|
On February 07 2010 00:09 Manit0u wrote:Well, they really should introduce denomination. It happened in Poland too and it was a welcome change. This turned into this We sold you that coin technology. : )
|
infact, i thought it was only state income tax, not federal?
|
On February 07 2010 03:23 StarsPride wrote: but yes please keep in mind, for any confusion. the state enforces the income tax. The feds wont come after you. the state will. The state is also alot weaker then the fed. so i imagine doing something about it wouldn't be that difficult if you could convince enough people
uh
wat
|
why not change my thread instead of creating a new and close mine before anything happened.. :/
am i too bad to frontpage a serious thread ?
i feel bad about my thread close; on the other side this thread does alot more answering and respond i ever thought of. so no matter i take this personally in the good way.
|
|
On February 07 2010 06:23 Mindcrime wrote:Show nested quote +On February 07 2010 03:23 StarsPride wrote: but yes please keep in mind, for any confusion. the state enforces the income tax. The feds wont come after you. the state will. The state is also alot weaker then the fed. so i imagine doing something about it wouldn't be that difficult if you could convince enough people uh wat the last two lines are about vetoing the income tax in states. the first 3 are about who enforces it. I normally dont need to explain my self. but for trolls like you. np
|
On June 23 2008 02:15 kemoryan wrote:So I've been watching some very interesting documentaries which prove that there is no federal law in the US that forces a citizen to pay a tax for its wages (labour). I wanted to know what you think about it (and specially americans). Did you know that people are illegally sent to jail for not paying income tax? And that the tax that you pay is not actually used to redistribute wealth or any kind of public service, but they give it to the Federal Reserve (PRIVATE financial entity) to pay the debt. Why isn't this on your (or any other countries') mass media? It's so spine-chilling, I mean US is supposed to represent freedom... so where's the freedom in that... and worst of all, why are there so few people who complain about it? This is one of the documentaries: http://www.documentarywire.com/america-from-freedom-to-fascism/ illegally send to jail for not paying income tax:
justice consists of humans, humans make mistakes if they don't have enough information.
why isnt that on mass media... hm, if you are a professor, would you even think of something that costs your whole representation, that is your job, to disappear; you will no longer be able to pay anything for your family.
complaining is showing you are weak, humans do that last. most have not the guts to complain, or just leave before they do.
|
On February 07 2010 09:49 StarsPride wrote:Show nested quote +On February 07 2010 06:23 Mindcrime wrote:On February 07 2010 03:23 StarsPride wrote: but yes please keep in mind, for any confusion. the state enforces the income tax. The feds wont come after you. the state will. The state is also alot weaker then the fed. so i imagine doing something about it wouldn't be that difficult if you could convince enough people uh wat the last two lines are about vetoing the income tax in states. the first 3 are about who enforces it. I normally dont need to explain my self. but for trolls like you. np

The IRS enforces the federal government's tax laws. The federal government definitely will come after you if you fail to pay your federal taxes. Ask Wesley Snipes.
|
On February 08 2010 08:23 Mindcrime wrote:Show nested quote +On February 07 2010 09:49 StarsPride wrote:On February 07 2010 06:23 Mindcrime wrote:On February 07 2010 03:23 StarsPride wrote: but yes please keep in mind, for any confusion. the state enforces the income tax. The feds wont come after you. the state will. The state is also alot weaker then the fed. so i imagine doing something about it wouldn't be that difficult if you could convince enough people uh wat the last two lines are about vetoing the income tax in states. the first 3 are about who enforces it. I normally dont need to explain my self. but for trolls like you. np  The IRS enforces the federal government's tax laws. The federal government definitely will come after you if you fail to pay your federal taxes. Ask Wesley Snipes. you would be right if the federal government's tax laws exists. !! research the op, better.
|
On February 08 2010 08:43 VabuDeltaKaiser wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2010 08:23 Mindcrime wrote:On February 07 2010 09:49 StarsPride wrote:On February 07 2010 06:23 Mindcrime wrote:On February 07 2010 03:23 StarsPride wrote: but yes please keep in mind, for any confusion. the state enforces the income tax. The feds wont come after you. the state will. The state is also alot weaker then the fed. so i imagine doing something about it wouldn't be that difficult if you could convince enough people uh wat the last two lines are about vetoing the income tax in states. the first 3 are about who enforces it. I normally dont need to explain my self. but for trolls like you. np  The IRS enforces the federal government's tax laws. The federal government definitely will come after you if you fail to pay your federal taxes. Ask Wesley Snipes. you would be right if the federal government's tax laws exists. !! research the op, better.
you are dumb
|
On February 08 2010 08:44 Mindcrime wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2010 08:43 VabuDeltaKaiser wrote:On February 08 2010 08:23 Mindcrime wrote:On February 07 2010 09:49 StarsPride wrote:On February 07 2010 06:23 Mindcrime wrote:On February 07 2010 03:23 StarsPride wrote: but yes please keep in mind, for any confusion. the state enforces the income tax. The feds wont come after you. the state will. The state is also alot weaker then the fed. so i imagine doing something about it wouldn't be that difficult if you could convince enough people uh wat the last two lines are about vetoing the income tax in states. the first 3 are about who enforces it. I normally dont need to explain my self. but for trolls like you. np  The IRS enforces the federal government's tax laws. The federal government definitely will come after you if you fail to pay your federal taxes. Ask Wesley Snipes. you would be right if the federal government's tax laws exists. !! research the op, better. you are dumb excuse me, i had been emotional.
research.
and get banned pls.
|
|
|
so you are completely ignoring the op, ignoring me, and ignoring the question for just showing the law that forces you to pay income taxes. just the law, basic data where, when and how that happened. should be easy.
did you read `? so if you did can you answere?
|
.............................................................................
|
Have you ever tried Google? I don't know if you've heard of this website, but if you want to know about some information, you can just type in the topic, and it brings up a bunch of links! It's totally amazing!!
The Constitution was amended in 1913, allowing Congress to impose an income tax. The Treasury Department website has a history of taxes in the United States. http://www.ustreas.gov/education/fact-sheets/taxes/ustax.shtml
The titles specifying penalties for not paying your taxes are easily found on the IRS Website. http://www.irs.gov/compliance/enforcement/article/0,,id=106790,00.html
So YES there are laws governing taxes and the enforcement of said taxes. Whether or not they are fair is a completely different story, but it is now a Constitutional right of Congress to impose an income tax.
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_Revenue_Code
"The Internal Revenue Code (or IRC; more formally, the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended) is the main body of domestic statutory tax law of the United States organized topically, including laws covering the income tax (see Income tax in the United States), payroll taxes, gift taxes, estate taxes and statutory excise taxes. The Internal Revenue Code is published as Title 26 of the United States Code (USC), and is also known as the internal revenue title. Its governing authority is the Internal Revenue Service."
United States Code:
"The United States Code is the codification by subject matter of the general and permanent laws of the United States based on what is printed in the Statutes at Large. It is divided by broad subjects into 50 titles and published by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the U.S. House of Representatives."
Legality of IRS
"The Internal Revenue Service is a bureau of the Department of the Treasury under the immediate direction of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. The Commissioner has general superintendence of the assessment and collection of all taxes imposed by any law providing internal revenue. The Internal Revenue Service is the agency by which these functions are performed."
26 C.F.R., Title 26, Volume 20, Section 601.101 (a).
Federal income tax is legal. The IRS is legal. And even if it weren't, it's not going away any time soon.
|
so far wikipedia is the basic of "common" knowledge. after all this is not common, so, get something new... :
*The Sixteenth Amendment was not ratified *Ordinary people haven't seen the income tax law *Former IRS employees say you don't have to pay taxes *The IRS refuses to show people the law *"Tax experts" say you don't have to pay income taxes *The Sixteenth Amendment conferred no new power to tax *"Income" includes only corporate gains; "income" does not include wages; "income" is not defined. *The Commissioner doesn't know the law! *Occasionally tax protestors win cases
text information: http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/jsiegel/Personal/taxes/F2F.htm
randomly googled this case, maybe americans with experience in legal coincidences backup!
video information: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1656880303867390173#
so far, i know, americans are fooled by tax, and it's a threat to freedom of life, capitalism and justice. edit: btw most quotes are from a anti site, although in their arguement completely ignoring russos points. so you have to work
|
|
You would be on firmer ground arguing that the Constitution is not legal because the Philadelphia Convention exceeded its mandate.
|
|
|
|