From the republican side, Mitt Romney and John McCain both seem likeable to me, but not as much as the 3 democrats. I'll admit Mitt Romney is probably more likeable than Clinton, but he really seems phony to me. If I were a republican, I would really be dumbfounded as to who to support. They all seem so shitty.
2008 US Presidential Election - Page 3
Forum Index > Closed |
stk01001
United States786 Posts
From the republican side, Mitt Romney and John McCain both seem likeable to me, but not as much as the 3 democrats. I'll admit Mitt Romney is probably more likeable than Clinton, but he really seems phony to me. If I were a republican, I would really be dumbfounded as to who to support. They all seem so shitty. | ||
fusionsdf
Canada15390 Posts
obama is goint to lose -.- | ||
a-game
Canada5085 Posts
| ||
Rev0lution
United States1805 Posts
On January 20 2008 06:06 a-game wrote: clinton wins nevada, and the nomination imo we're not really sure of that yet, but I think we can conclude that John Edwards is out ( he got 5%) | ||
a-game
Canada5085 Posts
| ||
QuanticHawk
United States32026 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
And fucking Edwards needs to drop out and endorse Obama already, douche bag. | ||
a-game
Canada5085 Posts
kerry endorsed obama way too late, but i guess you can't blame him seeing as the N.H. polls made it look like he didn't need help, when in fact a kerry endorsement before N.H. might of averted disaster. anyways F U obama you got my hopes up, then you fumble it on the last day with those stupid reagan comments :/ edit: clinton has leads in all of the super tuesday polls, so i really do think the nomination is hers. obama needed to pull a nevada win to gain some momentum, without it he's out of reach. edit2: paul is still putting up a fight for 2nd place in nevada, currently tied at 13% with mccain. i don't really like paul but it's an interesting sidestory anyways. | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
dybydx
Canada1764 Posts
Now if the republican somehow wins this election, the UN should really consider sending in an army under the name of "Operation World Peace" to "liberate" the americans and protect the rest of the world from "Operation [your nationality] Freedom". ^^ | ||
Servolisk
United States5241 Posts
On January 20 2008 06:06 a-game wrote: clinton wins nevada, and the nomination imo Obama winning South Carolina is almost a given, so I don't agree that it is over. It looks like a close win, so Obama and Clinton will be tied in total delegates. Because it is close, it doesn't signal any change in momentum. Especially when there are about 10,000 democratic voters there. | ||
a-game
Canada5085 Posts
| ||
Servolisk
United States5241 Posts
| ||
Silverflame
United States428 Posts
Just a month ago, Obama was behind in Nevada by like 25 points. Even the days up to the caucuses, Hillary led in all the polls by roughly the same margin she won today. The reason no one made a big deal of the polls is because of the New Hampshire debacle as well as the unpredictability of a Nevada caucus that was never significant until now. Plus, the Clinton campaign machine is amazing, they were able to turn the Culinary Worker's Union endorsement of Obama into a supposed "suppression of voters," making it seem like the Union leaders were trying to force everyone to vote Obama. Their strategy worked, a majority of Union members went for Hillary, defying the voter intimidation and speaking out for themselves. At least, that's what the Clinton machines claim anyway. I can hear her victory speech now, "despite the unfairness, the voter suppression, the intimidation..." | ||
a-game
Canada5085 Posts
but we'll see edit: paul and mccain still neck and neck with 97% precincts reporting in nevada Paul 5,628 13% McCain 5,514 13% | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
And as for Edwards, he cost Obama NH, had he dropped or cast his support to Obama earlier, he might have secured NH. But being the child that Edwards seems to hang on like, he wouldn't dare. I'd be surprised if Edwards dropped his bid before Super Tuesday. | ||
dybydx
Canada1764 Posts
On January 20 2008 08:24 a-game wrote: i just don't see how obama can beat clinton's three monsters NJ, NY, and CA somekind of "Florida style" election recount? lol i doubted Obama from the start. i was impressed how far he had gone on the polls, but the reality is hes black and as the news channels say "is america ready for a black president"... he didnt stand a real chance. hillary is stunningly inept for what i would expect from a lawyer and a previous FL. | ||
zdd
1463 Posts
Democrats Precincts Reporting: 1619 Of 1797 90% Winner Candidate Votes Vote % X Hillary Clinton 5,313 51% Barack Obama 4,721 45% John Edwards 393 4% Uncommitted 31 0% Dennis Kucinich 5 0% Mike Gravel 0 0% Chris Dodd 0 0% Joseph Biden 0 0% Bill Richardson 0 0% Republicans Precincts Reporting: 1719 Of 1797 95% Winner Candidate Votes Vote % X Mitt Romney 21,730 51% Ron Paul 5,628 13% John McCain 5,514 13% Mike Huckabee 3,436 8% Fred Thompson 3,326 8% Rudy Giuliani 1,873 4% Duncan Hunter 861 2% Sources: http://media.myfoxdc.com/YouDecide/race4.htm http://media.myfoxdc.com/YouDecide/race5.htm | ||
Rev0lution
United States1805 Posts
On January 20 2008 02:01 a-game wrote: man obama was doing so well until yesterdays reagan comments. now his market value at intrade has plummeted.. it's starting to look like a Clinton ticket for the democrats. which isn't so bad i guess except i was pretty excited about obama. i have my suspicions about clinton, she's visited the bilderberg group [1] and the other day bill was talking about making a "more perfect union, not only here but across the world" which makes me think they are apart of the NWO :/ you still believing in conspiracy theories like the New world order? lmao. | ||
CaucasianAsian
Korea (South)11568 Posts
Paul 5,742 13% McCain 5,558 13% Ron Paul took 2nd! That's really awesome for him. | ||
| ||