• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:02
CEST 01:02
KST 08:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202552RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams7Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 675 users

US Politics Mega-Blog - Page 114

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 112 113 114 115 116 171 Next
GoTuNk!
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
Chile4591 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-12-22 19:00:12
December 22 2018 18:59 GMT
#2261
On December 22 2018 20:23 iamthedave wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2018 19:29 Nouar wrote:
On December 22 2018 18:15 iamthedave wrote:
I thought that trying to prevent the massive unending refugee crisis was also a part of the considerations. I doubt that'll stop now that we've left.


These refugees don't go to the us, do you think Trump would care?


That is a fair point.


Should he? Shouldn't a european coalition take care of it? Or at least pay the bills?

Edit: I'm not arguing either way, just leaving up the questions for further discussion.
iamthedave
Profile Joined February 2011
England2814 Posts
December 22 2018 19:36 GMT
#2262
On December 23 2018 03:59 GoTuNk! wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2018 20:23 iamthedave wrote:
On December 22 2018 19:29 Nouar wrote:
On December 22 2018 18:15 iamthedave wrote:
I thought that trying to prevent the massive unending refugee crisis was also a part of the considerations. I doubt that'll stop now that we've left.


These refugees don't go to the us, do you think Trump would care?


That is a fair point.


Should he? Shouldn't a european coalition take care of it? Or at least pay the bills?

Edit: I'm not arguing either way, just leaving up the questions for further discussion.


Depends on whether you give a shit about Europe. Trump doesn't, so yeah, we'll have to. And are. That's kind of what NATO's for.

But hey. It's not like a destabilised Europe could affect the US in any way. That's never been a problem in the past.
I'm not bad at Starcraft; I just think winning's rude.
Nouar
Profile Joined May 2009
France3270 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-12-22 20:42:12
December 22 2018 20:39 GMT
#2263
On December 23 2018 04:36 iamthedave wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 23 2018 03:59 GoTuNk! wrote:
On December 22 2018 20:23 iamthedave wrote:
On December 22 2018 19:29 Nouar wrote:
On December 22 2018 18:15 iamthedave wrote:
I thought that trying to prevent the massive unending refugee crisis was also a part of the considerations. I doubt that'll stop now that we've left.


These refugees don't go to the us, do you think Trump would care?


That is a fair point.


Should he? Shouldn't a european coalition take care of it? Or at least pay the bills?

Edit: I'm not arguing either way, just leaving up the questions for further discussion.


Depends on whether you give a shit about Europe. Trump doesn't, so yeah, we'll have to. And are. That's kind of what NATO's for.

But hey. It's not like a destabilised Europe could affect the US in any way. That's never been a problem in the past.

Yes, just start a bunch of conflicts and stoke flames in a region, involve your "allies" (that helped establish your country and have been allies for centuries) through NATO or alliances, change president, remove all troops and disengage while it's still a hellhole, let them deal with all the setbacks, and require that they pay. No big deal, they'll love it, won't even hold grudges or be reluctant to help the next time. Aren't the other countries lackeys after all, supposed to get the trash out so we keep hegemony ?

What, nobody loves us and the US is hated ? Terrorism ? Why ? I don't understand ! Diplomacy 101 was boring, it took more than 2 minutes, so I slept through the lesson, sorry.
NoiR
iamthedave
Profile Joined February 2011
England2814 Posts
December 23 2018 08:27 GMT
#2264
On December 23 2018 05:39 Nouar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 23 2018 04:36 iamthedave wrote:
On December 23 2018 03:59 GoTuNk! wrote:
On December 22 2018 20:23 iamthedave wrote:
On December 22 2018 19:29 Nouar wrote:
On December 22 2018 18:15 iamthedave wrote:
I thought that trying to prevent the massive unending refugee crisis was also a part of the considerations. I doubt that'll stop now that we've left.


These refugees don't go to the us, do you think Trump would care?


That is a fair point.


Should he? Shouldn't a european coalition take care of it? Or at least pay the bills?

Edit: I'm not arguing either way, just leaving up the questions for further discussion.


Depends on whether you give a shit about Europe. Trump doesn't, so yeah, we'll have to. And are. That's kind of what NATO's for.

But hey. It's not like a destabilised Europe could affect the US in any way. That's never been a problem in the past.

Yes, just start a bunch of conflicts and stoke flames in a region, involve your "allies" (that helped establish your country and have been allies for centuries) through NATO or alliances, change president, remove all troops and disengage while it's still a hellhole, let them deal with all the setbacks, and require that they pay. No big deal, they'll love it, won't even hold grudges or be reluctant to help the next time. Aren't the other countries lackeys after all, supposed to get the trash out so we keep hegemony ?

What, nobody loves us and the US is hated ? Terrorism ? Why ? I don't understand ! Diplomacy 101 was boring, it took more than 2 minutes, so I slept through the lesson, sorry.


Unless my memory has failed me, I think the US is innocent in Syria. Didn't that start as a straight up normal rebellion until ISIS got involved?
I'm not bad at Starcraft; I just think winning's rude.
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13924 Posts
December 23 2018 16:23 GMT
#2265
On December 23 2018 17:27 iamthedave wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 23 2018 05:39 Nouar wrote:
On December 23 2018 04:36 iamthedave wrote:
On December 23 2018 03:59 GoTuNk! wrote:
On December 22 2018 20:23 iamthedave wrote:
On December 22 2018 19:29 Nouar wrote:
On December 22 2018 18:15 iamthedave wrote:
I thought that trying to prevent the massive unending refugee crisis was also a part of the considerations. I doubt that'll stop now that we've left.


These refugees don't go to the us, do you think Trump would care?


That is a fair point.


Should he? Shouldn't a european coalition take care of it? Or at least pay the bills?

Edit: I'm not arguing either way, just leaving up the questions for further discussion.


Depends on whether you give a shit about Europe. Trump doesn't, so yeah, we'll have to. And are. That's kind of what NATO's for.

But hey. It's not like a destabilised Europe could affect the US in any way. That's never been a problem in the past.

Yes, just start a bunch of conflicts and stoke flames in a region, involve your "allies" (that helped establish your country and have been allies for centuries) through NATO or alliances, change president, remove all troops and disengage while it's still a hellhole, let them deal with all the setbacks, and require that they pay. No big deal, they'll love it, won't even hold grudges or be reluctant to help the next time. Aren't the other countries lackeys after all, supposed to get the trash out so we keep hegemony ?

What, nobody loves us and the US is hated ? Terrorism ? Why ? I don't understand ! Diplomacy 101 was boring, it took more than 2 minutes, so I slept through the lesson, sorry.


Unless my memory has failed me, I think the US is innocent in Syria. Didn't that start as a straight up normal rebellion until ISIS got involved?

It was way more complicated then a "normal rebellion" when it started to divide the population up between religious and ethnic lines. The arab spring finaly spread to a country that wasn't all on board with a new government.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23221 Posts
December 23 2018 17:02 GMT
#2266
What if Trump just refuses to sign something funding government unless he gets his wall. Even after Dems take the house. What would a veto proof funding bill even look like?

"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
December 23 2018 17:56 GMT
#2267
I really think Trump will take something like $3.5 bil and declare victory. Yuuuge compared to $1.8 bil. If Dems think it’s going south politically (and some signs suggest it’s the case), they’ll take the $5.1 bil and add on some junk for their pet causes.

I have no clue what a veto-proof majority bill lacking funding for a wall would look like. It would have to include enough pork to pick off GOP Senators, likely to the tune of twenty times what it would cost to fund the entire wall.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3188 Posts
December 23 2018 20:56 GMT
#2268
I would be very curious what looks like it would force Democrats to cave here. The wall on its own is unpopular, let alone shutting down the government to fund it, and there's little doubt in anyone's mind that's what Trump is doing. Why not just keep passing clean CR's and let him veto them? Or offer reduced wall funding for DACA or something?
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
GoTuNk!
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
Chile4591 Posts
December 23 2018 22:20 GMT
#2269
On December 24 2018 05:56 ChristianS wrote:
I would be very curious what looks like it would force Democrats to cave here. The wall on its own is unpopular, let alone shutting down the government to fund it, and there's little doubt in anyone's mind that's what Trump is doing. Why not just keep passing clean CR's and let him veto them? Or offer reduced wall funding for DACA or something?


The Wall is not unpopular.
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13924 Posts
December 24 2018 01:37 GMT
#2270
The wall is the issue dems can use as a bat to keep their left flanks secure. Its much more valuable as an immediate vehicle against trump then the non-value backing down at this point would get them.

Not to mention they have to know that they merely have to wait for the muller investigation to come down in the next month or two before evaluating their position. Trump has given them all the cover they need for a couple months and their prospects are looking great.

On the flipside trump can't back down on wall funding. I'd take a 6 month ban bet that the shutdown lasts till the muller report drops.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3188 Posts
December 24 2018 06:17 GMT
#2271
On December 24 2018 07:20 GoTuNk! wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 24 2018 05:56 ChristianS wrote:
I would be very curious what looks like it would force Democrats to cave here. The wall on its own is unpopular, let alone shutting down the government to fund it, and there's little doubt in anyone's mind that's what Trump is doing. Why not just keep passing clean CR's and let him veto them? Or offer reduced wall funding for DACA or something?


The Wall is not unpopular.

I mean, what game are we playing here? I think I just read 59% oppose it somewhere. I can try to chase down the poll if you want, but something tells me you're operating from "polls are biased/fabricated" territory, in which case our only way of knowing public opinion is, what? Gut feeling?
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
iamthedave
Profile Joined February 2011
England2814 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-12-24 09:30:30
December 24 2018 09:24 GMT
#2272
On December 24 2018 15:17 ChristianS wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 24 2018 07:20 GoTuNk! wrote:
On December 24 2018 05:56 ChristianS wrote:
I would be very curious what looks like it would force Democrats to cave here. The wall on its own is unpopular, let alone shutting down the government to fund it, and there's little doubt in anyone's mind that's what Trump is doing. Why not just keep passing clean CR's and let him veto them? Or offer reduced wall funding for DACA or something?


The Wall is not unpopular.

I mean, what game are we playing here? I think I just read 59% oppose it somewhere. I can try to chase down the poll if you want, but something tells me you're operating from "polls are biased/fabricated" territory, in which case our only way of knowing public opinion is, what? Gut feeling?


I think the mindset is Border Security is an issue both sides value, and Border Security = wall in their minds. It's clearly not something they're saying just to screw with you since three different posters seem to believe that digging his heels in on the wall specifically is a winning issue for him.

Democrats could be spectacularly incompetent... but looking at the situation objectively they have no reason to give anything. Time's on their side, the GOP doesn't even like the wall that much (don't they still have a majority in both houses until January? If they were in lockstep they should be able to force it), and Democrat voters are going to give them shit if they fold to Trump now, just after pretending to have a spine. Oh, and Trump publically and aggressively went out in front and took responsibility for the shutdown.

Every reason not to.

Personally I support the idea, provided they follow it up by building a moat all around the US, and then insist on oldee-style portcullis and drawbridges at all the crossings. If we're going retro, let's go all the way!
I'm not bad at Starcraft; I just think winning's rude.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23221 Posts
December 24 2018 18:24 GMT
#2273
Do Democrats see this as the obvious propaganda that it is or do they accept the framing uncritically?

"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Mercy13
Profile Joined January 2011
United States718 Posts
December 24 2018 19:17 GMT
#2274
On December 25 2018 03:24 GreenHorizons wrote:
Do Democrats see this as the obvious propaganda that it is or do they accept the framing uncritically?

https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1076913303526486017


Meh it seems like a clickbaity article trying to stir up drama.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23221 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-12-24 19:34:54
December 24 2018 19:34 GMT
#2275
On December 25 2018 04:17 Mercy13 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 25 2018 03:24 GreenHorizons wrote:
Do Democrats see this as the obvious propaganda that it is or do they accept the framing uncritically?

https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1076913303526486017


Meh it seems like a clickbaity article trying to stir up drama.


"clickbaity" is pretty generous considering it's fallacious nature.

It's astonishing how bad "news" media can get without being held accountable. The rhetoric is ridiculous.

"Forces loyal to" and calling examining his record a "war" is some Trumpian level bullshit.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Mercy13
Profile Joined January 2011
United States718 Posts
December 24 2018 20:08 GMT
#2276
On December 25 2018 04:34 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 25 2018 04:17 Mercy13 wrote:
On December 25 2018 03:24 GreenHorizons wrote:
Do Democrats see this as the obvious propaganda that it is or do they accept the framing uncritically?

https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1076913303526486017


Meh it seems like a clickbaity article trying to stir up drama.


"clickbaity" is pretty generous considering it's fallacious nature.

It's astonishing how bad "news" media can get without being held accountable. The rhetoric is ridiculous.

"Forces loyal to" and calling examining his record a "war" is some Trumpian level bullshit.


It's a bad article and NBC should feel bad. This line they bury in the middle undermines their whole framing:

Sanders' is an unusually decentralized political world, with a loose collection of activists and operatives who often take actions without direction or approval from any central authority.


Still, I'm not sure what can be done about articles like this besides not reading them... modern media companies need clicks to survive so they put out clickbaty bs.

I don't buy the narrative that this is part of a "MSM" anti-Sanders conspiracy if that's what you're getting at.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23221 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-12-24 21:01:09
December 24 2018 20:27 GMT
#2277
On December 25 2018 05:08 Mercy13 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 25 2018 04:34 GreenHorizons wrote:
On December 25 2018 04:17 Mercy13 wrote:
On December 25 2018 03:24 GreenHorizons wrote:
Do Democrats see this as the obvious propaganda that it is or do they accept the framing uncritically?

https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1076913303526486017


Meh it seems like a clickbaity article trying to stir up drama.


"clickbaity" is pretty generous considering it's fallacious nature.

It's astonishing how bad "news" media can get without being held accountable. The rhetoric is ridiculous.

"Forces loyal to" and calling examining his record a "war" is some Trumpian level bullshit.


It's a bad article and NBC should feel bad. This line they bury in the middle undermines their whole framing:

Show nested quote +
Sanders' is an unusually decentralized political world, with a loose collection of activists and operatives who often take actions without direction or approval from any central authority.


Still, I'm not sure what can be done about articles like this besides not reading them... modern media companies need clicks to survive so they put out clickbaty bs.

I don't buy the narrative that this is part of a "MSM" anti-Sanders conspiracy if that's what you're getting at.


It's quite obviously almost wholly uncritical anti-Sanders propaganda. Whether it's a cabal or merely multifaceted self-interested misinformation pushed by those with aligned class interests is somewhat tangential.

fwiw I tend toward the latter, but it's clear our system leaves itself plenty vulnerable to the former as well.

We can say for sure it's not meant to inform but to persuade people to take on their framing which has little to do with reality so must be created to manipulate.

It would then seem impossible to deny that these articles/takes from the CAP wing of the party are basically what they are accusing people of for looking at Beto's record.

There's a class of punditry and media that is going to spend the next 6 months trying to convince people that we should focus on the wrapper around the policies rather than the policies themselves. They will also take huge differences and try to paper over them as minor variations. It's going to take a concerted effort to maintain the suspension of disbelief I think it takes to still not see an obvious agenda from corporate media that goes beyond a primitive hunger for ratings.

EDIT: We'll see this with Kamala's history of incarceration, Castro's work at HUD, Biden's long history of fuckery, and anyone else they think can push Bernie out of winning the primary. They'll also tell us we should ignore their record and focus on their campaign rhetoric. This will be in strict contrast to the hyper critical reporting we'll see on anything Bernie.

Most obviously captured by the article and tweet from the leading liberal TV/web news media which has already characterized basic scrutiny by people all over the political spectrum (many not even fans of Bernie) of Beto's record as "forces loyal to Sanders are waging... war"

Also he's not a favorite of activists, but of donors.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
GoTuNk!
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
Chile4591 Posts
December 24 2018 22:56 GMT
#2278
On December 25 2018 04:34 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 25 2018 04:17 Mercy13 wrote:
On December 25 2018 03:24 GreenHorizons wrote:
Do Democrats see this as the obvious propaganda that it is or do they accept the framing uncritically?

https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1076913303526486017


Meh it seems like a clickbaity article trying to stir up drama.


"clickbaity" is pretty generous considering it's fallacious nature.

It's astonishing how bad "news" media can get without being held accountable. The rhetoric is ridiculous.

"Forces loyal to" and calling examining his record a "war" is some Trumpian level bullshit.


One of the few bipartisan things left in the U.S is distrust and flat out dislike for the press in general; and with good reason.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12172 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-12-24 23:33:17
December 24 2018 23:26 GMT
#2279
On December 25 2018 07:56 GoTuNk! wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 25 2018 04:34 GreenHorizons wrote:
On December 25 2018 04:17 Mercy13 wrote:
On December 25 2018 03:24 GreenHorizons wrote:
Do Democrats see this as the obvious propaganda that it is or do they accept the framing uncritically?

https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1076913303526486017


Meh it seems like a clickbaity article trying to stir up drama.


"clickbaity" is pretty generous considering it's fallacious nature.

It's astonishing how bad "news" media can get without being held accountable. The rhetoric is ridiculous.

"Forces loyal to" and calling examining his record a "war" is some Trumpian level bullshit.


One of the few bipartisan things left in the U.S is distrust and flat out dislike for the press in general; and with good reason.


That's not really true. Liberals tend to be okay with the press there (and that's not really surprising given how the press' bias work). You're just running into a few progressives/socialists here and yeah we have a few issues.

I also dislike the notion that because we have some criticism of the press that I believe is fair and accurate, that is somehow equivalent to the right's war against facts.
No will to live, no wish to die
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
December 25 2018 01:19 GMT
#2280
I also dislike the notion that because we have some criticism of the press that I believe is fair and accurate, that is somehow equivalent to the left's war against facts.

That’s politics folks. Oh, and Merry Christmas.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Prev 1 112 113 114 115 116 171 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 11h 58m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 211
Nina 145
StarCraft: Brood War
Sexy 15
ivOry 7
Dota 2
monkeys_forever889
League of Legends
Dendi1030
syndereN170
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1659
Stewie2K1102
Super Smash Bros
Liquid`Ken47
AZ_Axe1
Other Games
summit1g10656
tarik_tv4856
ViBE196
C9.Mang0147
ToD78
PPMD49
Day[9].tv18
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 88
• davetesta41
• musti20045 35
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 56
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21315
League of Legends
• TFBlade529
Other Games
• imaqtpie1647
• Shiphtur418
• Day9tv18
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
11h 58m
Serral vs Cure
Solar vs Classic
OSC
14h 58m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 10h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 14h
CSO Cup
1d 16h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 18h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.