• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:32
CEST 22:32
KST 05:32
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202560RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings What tournaments are world championships? #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time The StarCraft 2 GOAT - An in-depth analysis Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Dewalt's Show Matches in China
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 764 users

LAPD shoots man, cleared of wrongdoing - Page 14

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 12 13 14 15 Next All
Reedjr
Profile Joined April 2011
United States228 Posts
February 16 2013 23:09 GMT
#261
On February 17 2013 08:06 Chilling5pr33 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 17 2013 08:00 hinnolinn wrote:
On February 17 2013 07:58 dcemuser wrote:
On February 17 2013 07:48 Chilling5pr33 wrote:
What do the two friends of the shot guy claimed, where are theire statements i would love to see them.


Based on the statement of his friends, it sounds like the first four shots were entirely justified, and the only ones in question were the two where he was bleeding and on the ground (but still had a gun within reach).


How you came to that conclusion based on the statements is beyond me.


I agree it seemes to me that he got asked just the right questions to let it still look as it could have been justified.

Then why didn't the other witness (Campos) get asked "just the right questions?"
FallDownMarigold
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States3710 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-16 23:15:49
February 16 2013 23:11 GMT
#262
On February 17 2013 08:06 Chilling5pr33 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 17 2013 08:00 hinnolinn wrote:
On February 17 2013 07:58 dcemuser wrote:
On February 17 2013 07:48 Chilling5pr33 wrote:
What do the two friends of the shot guy claimed, where are theire statements i would love to see them.


Based on the statement of his friends, it sounds like the first four shots were entirely justified, and the only ones in question were the two where he was bleeding and on the ground (but still had a gun within reach).


How you came to that conclusion based on the statements is beyond me.


I agree it seemes to me that he got asked just the right questions to let it still look as it could have been justified.

Show nested quote +
On February 17 2013 08:05 dcemuser wrote:
On February 17 2013 08:00 hinnolinn wrote:
On February 17 2013 07:58 dcemuser wrote:
On February 17 2013 07:48 Chilling5pr33 wrote:
What do the two friends of the shot guy claimed, where are theire statements i would love to see them.


Based on the statement of his friends, it sounds like the first four shots were entirely justified, and the only ones in question were the two where he was bleeding and on the ground (but still had a gun within reach).


How you came to that conclusion based on the statements is beyond me.


Okay, easy - guy is running with a loaded gun, so you take 2 shots at him when he keeps running (because he could easily turn and kill you). The guy goes down, and then says (quoted from the friend) "Alright, alright, I got a gun, I got a gun", which is the dumbest thing you could say since that implies intent, and the cop shoots him once more since he was moving and could have been reaching for it while saying that.

The questionable shots are the ones where he 'looks at them and then shoots again'.


I thought its theoretical legal to carry a loaded gun?
So its legal but you always can get shot anytime by any police man?
That makes no sence for me


No, it is not legal to carry a loaded gun in CA without a permit.
http://www.shouselaw.com/12031.html

"California Penal Code 12031 PC punishes carrying a loaded firearm in a vehicle or public place."
When something appears to make absolutely no sense whatsoever, it's usually a good indication that you should seek more information in order to verify whether the thing in question is truly nonsensical or if it's that you need to be more informed.
Chilling5pr33
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Germany518 Posts
February 16 2013 23:13 GMT
#263
On February 17 2013 08:09 Reedjr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 17 2013 08:06 Chilling5pr33 wrote:
On February 17 2013 08:00 hinnolinn wrote:
On February 17 2013 07:58 dcemuser wrote:
On February 17 2013 07:48 Chilling5pr33 wrote:
What do the two friends of the shot guy claimed, where are theire statements i would love to see them.


Based on the statement of his friends, it sounds like the first four shots were entirely justified, and the only ones in question were the two where he was bleeding and on the ground (but still had a gun within reach).


How you came to that conclusion based on the statements is beyond me.


I agree it seemes to me that he got asked just the right questions to let it still look as it could have been justified.

Then why didn't the other witness (Campos) get asked "just the right questions?"


Let me see some good questions:

What did the officer said to the killed person?
Did the suspect ever turned towards the police man?
Did the Suspect ever reached for his gun?
I guess there are even better ones.
F-
Aerisky
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
United States12129 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-16 23:37:16
February 16 2013 23:15 GMT
#264
Ugh the testimonies vary a lot...this is why eyewitness stories aren't that great to go on etc. They don't vary that much, but they do so enough that the liability of the officer might be drawn into question. At the same time, they don't vary so much that they surpass the potential effects of constructive memory and just misremembrance. It's possible that the officer was in fight/flight mode, thought his life was threatened, and really thought the victim was about to pull a gun on him after the victim had run a distance, but it's also possible that the officer shot him without good cause. I would, however, be inclined to think the latter if only because I think the testimonies seem to suggest it and because one would tend to extend sympathy toward the victim and outrage toward the shooter.

These situations are just depressing
Jim while Johnny had had had had had had had; had had had had the better effect on the teacher.
FallDownMarigold
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States3710 Posts
February 16 2013 23:17 GMT
#265
On February 17 2013 08:15 Aerisky wrote:
Ugh the testimonies vary a lot...this is why eyewitness stories aren't that great to go on etc. They don't vary that much, but they do so enough that the liability of the officer might be drawn into question. YET so much that they surpass the potential effects of constructive memory and just misremembrance. It's possible that the officer was in fight/flight mode, thought his life was threatened, and really thought the guy was about to pull a gun on the victim after the victim had run a distance, but it's also possible that the officer shot him without good cause. I would, however, be inclined to think the latter if only because I think the testimonies seem to suggest it and because one would tend to extend sympathy toward the victim and outrage toward the shooter.

These situations are just depressing

Very nice post!
Warlock40
Profile Joined September 2011
601 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-16 23:31:28
February 16 2013 23:24 GMT
#266
On February 17 2013 07:47 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 17 2013 07:40 Warlock40 wrote:
How is it that Deputy Jove's statement is automatically included as part of the "factual analysis"?

Witness statements are evidence. It doesn't mean that statements are assumed factually correct.


I know the witness statements are not assumed to be factually correct. I'm asking why Deputy Jove's statement is.

From the report:

Deputy Jove provided a voluntary statement which was considered as part of this analysis.


First of all, what does "voluntary statement" mean? I was under the impression that whenever anyone gets killed or even seriously hurt, there is a lot of paperwork involved. Does this mean that Jove did not even need to provide a statement to the people reviewing the case?

But the main point is about Jove's statement being considered fact. I understand that the testimony of sworn officers of the law has greater weight than the testimony of the average joe, but to just consider it fact doesn't seem very impartial.

Also, could an admin change the title to accurately reflect the department involved (Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department)?
NoGasfOu
Profile Joined April 2012
United States1117 Posts
February 16 2013 23:28 GMT
#267
Bullets are pretty cheap these days, especially in Stockton, California where I live.
Tassadar/TheBest/Jjakji/Rain(terran)/Heart
Djagulingu
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Germany3605 Posts
February 16 2013 23:28 GMT
#268
Los Angeles Police Dictatorship
"windows bash is a steaming heap of shit" tofucake
Stratos_speAr
Profile Joined May 2009
United States6959 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-16 23:35:59
February 16 2013 23:29 GMT
#269
There is absolutely no defense for what this cop did. The guy was running away and was no threat to him. Just another example of what a joke law enforcement is here in the States (especially the LAPD, probably being some of the worst of the lot).
A sound mind in a sound body, is a short, but full description of a happy state in this World: he that has these two, has little more to wish for; and he that wants either of them, will be little the better for anything else.
jinorazi
Profile Joined October 2004
Korea (South)4948 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-16 23:31:39
February 16 2013 23:30 GMT
#270
Julio Jove, nothing in the news archive :/

i really doubt ANY media station will pick out the two truck shootings and past events such as this one, question LAPD, create awareness. thats what sucks
age: 84 | location: california | sex: 잘함
Millitron
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States2611 Posts
February 16 2013 23:33 GMT
#271
On February 17 2013 08:24 Warlock40 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 17 2013 07:47 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On February 17 2013 07:40 Warlock40 wrote:
How is it that Deputy Jove's statement is automatically included as part of the "factual analysis"?

Witness statements are evidence. It doesn't mean that statements are assumed factually correct.


I know the witness statements are not assumed to be factually correct. I'm asking why Deputy Jove's statement is.

From the report:

Show nested quote +
Deputy Jove provided a voluntary statement which was considered as part of this analysis.


First of all, what does "voluntary statement" mean? I was under the impression that whenever anyone gets killed or even seriously hurt, there is a lot of paperwork involved. Does this mean that Jove did not even need to provide a statement to the people reviewing the case?

But the main point is about Jove's statement being considered fact. I understand that the testimony of sworn officers of the law has greater weight than the testimony of the average joe, but to just consider it fact doesn't seem very impartial.

Also, could an admin change the title to accurately reflect the department involved (Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department)?

Voluntary statement is when he waived his fifth amendment rights and spoke without a lawyer.

You do not have to answer any questions without your lawyer present if you do not want to. You can, but you don't have to.
Who called in the fleet?
Stratos_speAr
Profile Joined May 2009
United States6959 Posts
February 16 2013 23:35 GMT
#272
On February 17 2013 07:38 dcemuser wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 17 2013 01:11 Silvanel wrote:
The saddest thing is that some people are already brainwashed enough to justify this. In most countries that cop would get life in prison (or 20-25 years minimum).


The funniest thing is that everyone in this thread thinks that the world is brainwashed into thinking this is a good thing, yet almost nobody has rushed to this officer's defense. How does it even make sense to claim people are brainwashed when the vast majority is agreeing with you?

Who's brainwashed? If anything, it is you. The media's selective reporting of the 0.01% of cop incidents that go badly or involve cops that should be fired or imprisoned makes the entire country look down upon its own police force, when in reality, most of the cops are honest people.

Yes, I understand the reasons (capitalism). People don't like stories about cops risking their own life or dying to save people; stories about cops breaking the law are probably the best selling concept besides celebrity affairs.

The truth is that there are hundreds of thousands of cops in this country, and only one of them has to fuck up or be fucked up and the entire country will shit all over cops everywhere. It's stupid and people who buy into it are even stupider.


It sounds like you're living in a privileged bubble where you don't talk to many "average" individuals. The vast majority of this country practically reveres police officers/military veterans. It's definitely worthy of respect, but our cultural fascination with respecting these professions, combined with our irrational obsession with "security" (leading to an obnoxiously massive military and far, far too much leniency for law enforcement/military personnel) has led us to turn a blind eye to the crimes of officers/military personnel.
A sound mind in a sound body, is a short, but full description of a happy state in this World: he that has these two, has little more to wish for; and he that wants either of them, will be little the better for anything else.
Dontkillme
Profile Joined November 2011
Korea (South)806 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-16 23:50:56
February 16 2013 23:50 GMT
#273
It seems like the guy was running away. If the suspect had a gun why did he run away?
Bomber & Jaedong & FlaSh & SNSD <3
PanzerKing
Profile Joined May 2010
United States483 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-17 00:00:34
February 16 2013 23:58 GMT
#274
On February 17 2013 08:50 Dontkillme wrote:
It seems like the guy was running away. If the suspect had a gun why did he run away?


Why would he not run away? Possessing an unlicensed, loaded firearm in public is a serious felony in most, if not all jurisdictions.

Kids on the street are smart these days. In my jurisdiction, they know that possessing a loaded firearm is a felony, and unloaded firearm is a misdemeanor. So what do they do? They try to toss the mag and eject the cartridge in the chamber before they're caught, so they can plead to a misdemeanor, get mandatory youthful offender, and walk away with no criminal record and probation at worst. And that willingness to fiddle with the gun while you're running away from the cop just increases the chance that the officer will feel threatened and discharge his weapon. At any kind of distance and in an unlit part of the street, he can't tell whether you're about to turn around and kill him or whether you're trying to toss the ammo. All he can see is your hands pulling out a gun and fiddling with it.
http://tkrmx.blogspot.com/
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
February 17 2013 00:03 GMT
#275
On February 17 2013 07:59 m4inbrain wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 17 2013 07:50 Ldawg wrote:
Actions like this explain why people like Dorner go on his rampage and why a growing number of people view police as legalized gangs. In my state, I can shoot someone and claim self-defense if they break into my house, but not if they are on my property or even if they are damaging my property. I don't understand why anyone can claim self-defense and be found not-guilty if the victim did not possess a weapon of any kind and was running away.

I would state I hope the victim's family sues but even in that case if they are successful that means the California taxpayers are the ones being punished.


It's actually the biggest point in the whole case.

That guy was fleeing, not attacking. There's a slight difference, like 180°. He did not dive into cover. He ran full steam ahead, turning his back on the cop - completely exposed. That's not a threat.

I agree, as a cop, i would not chase him, because he might pull a gun on me. But killing him in that case is not justified, just because there could be danger if i chase him.

In other countries, as a cop, you need to protect your life. If my life is in danger when i chase someone, i just don't chase him alone. There's no need to kill a maybe innocent or "small criminal" just because he "might do something if i do something stupid, like chasing someone who i think could have a gun".

In every other country than the US, that guy would go to jail. And that would be justified.

Well according to the cop he shot when the suspect turned.

Jove yelled to Cuevas, “Let me see your hands! Let me see your handsl” Cuevas quickly turned
his upper body toward Jove. Fearing that Cuevas was about to shoot him, Jove fired one round
from his service Weapon.

We can see ex post from the video that Cuevas did not fully turn to shoot. But ex ante the cop doesn't know that and waiting even a fraction of a second too long could have been a fatal mistake.
PanzerKing
Profile Joined May 2010
United States483 Posts
February 17 2013 00:07 GMT
#276
On February 17 2013 09:03 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 17 2013 07:59 m4inbrain wrote:
On February 17 2013 07:50 Ldawg wrote:
Actions like this explain why people like Dorner go on his rampage and why a growing number of people view police as legalized gangs. In my state, I can shoot someone and claim self-defense if they break into my house, but not if they are on my property or even if they are damaging my property. I don't understand why anyone can claim self-defense and be found not-guilty if the victim did not possess a weapon of any kind and was running away.

I would state I hope the victim's family sues but even in that case if they are successful that means the California taxpayers are the ones being punished.


It's actually the biggest point in the whole case.

That guy was fleeing, not attacking. There's a slight difference, like 180°. He did not dive into cover. He ran full steam ahead, turning his back on the cop - completely exposed. That's not a threat.

I agree, as a cop, i would not chase him, because he might pull a gun on me. But killing him in that case is not justified, just because there could be danger if i chase him.

In other countries, as a cop, you need to protect your life. If my life is in danger when i chase someone, i just don't chase him alone. There's no need to kill a maybe innocent or "small criminal" just because he "might do something if i do something stupid, like chasing someone who i think could have a gun".

In every other country than the US, that guy would go to jail. And that would be justified.

Well according to the cop he shot when the suspect turned.

Show nested quote +
Jove yelled to Cuevas, “Let me see your hands! Let me see your handsl” Cuevas quickly turned
his upper body toward Jove. Fearing that Cuevas was about to shoot him, Jove fired one round
from his service Weapon.

We can see ex post from the video that Cuevas did not fully turn to shoot. But ex ante the cop doesn't know that and waiting even a fraction of a second too long could have been a fatal mistake.


Let's also not forget that the video is, quality-wise, on par with an Atari 2600 game. Nobody can tell with any degree of accuracy how much of his body was turned towards the cop or how quickly he was turning it. I mean, a person can turn their upper body around in a fraction of a second. At that resolution, it's impossible to say definitively what was happening.
http://tkrmx.blogspot.com/
Reedjr
Profile Joined April 2011
United States228 Posts
February 17 2013 00:08 GMT
#277
On February 17 2013 08:35 Stratos_speAr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 17 2013 07:38 dcemuser wrote:
On February 17 2013 01:11 Silvanel wrote:
The saddest thing is that some people are already brainwashed enough to justify this. In most countries that cop would get life in prison (or 20-25 years minimum).


The funniest thing is that everyone in this thread thinks that the world is brainwashed into thinking this is a good thing, yet almost nobody has rushed to this officer's defense. How does it even make sense to claim people are brainwashed when the vast majority is agreeing with you?

Who's brainwashed? If anything, it is you. The media's selective reporting of the 0.01% of cop incidents that go badly or involve cops that should be fired or imprisoned makes the entire country look down upon its own police force, when in reality, most of the cops are honest people.

Yes, I understand the reasons (capitalism). People don't like stories about cops risking their own life or dying to save people; stories about cops breaking the law are probably the best selling concept besides celebrity affairs.

The truth is that there are hundreds of thousands of cops in this country, and only one of them has to fuck up or be fucked up and the entire country will shit all over cops everywhere. It's stupid and people who buy into it are even stupider.


It sounds like you're living in a privileged bubble where you don't talk to many "average" individuals. The vast majority of this country practically reveres police officers/military veterans. It's definitely worthy of respect, but our cultural fascination with respecting these professions, combined with our irrational obsession with "security" (leading to an obnoxiously massive military and far, far too much leniency for law enforcement/military personnel) has led us to turn a blind eye to the crimes of officers/military personnel.


Firstly, the context of the people dcemuser is referring to is clearly the posters in this thread. While, as you say, "average individuals" may have a reverence for police officers, the majority here seems to be decidedly of the "fuck tha police" variety.

Secondly, why bring up the military at all? It is completely separate from the police. What does the size of the military or the actions of personnel overseas have anything to do with this thread?
Areon
Profile Joined November 2010
United States273 Posts
February 17 2013 00:15 GMT
#278
Sigh. Posting stupid bullshit articles like these aren't going to lessen the hate and bitching any more. But for what it's worth, LAPD has royally screwed up, and they deserve all the negative attention they can get for this crap.
HunterX11
Profile Joined March 2009
United States1048 Posts
February 17 2013 00:19 GMT
#279
On February 17 2013 09:15 Areon wrote:
Sigh. Posting stupid bullshit articles like these aren't going to lessen the hate and bitching any more. But for what it's worth, LAPD has royally screwed up, and they deserve all the negative attention they can get for this crap.


The thread title is wrong and this isn't even the LAPD at all
Try using both Irradiate and Defensive Matrix on an Overlord. It looks pretty neat.
Robinsa
Profile Joined May 2009
Japan1333 Posts
February 17 2013 00:20 GMT
#280
He shouldnt have run from the cops in the first place. If he had a reason to run Im glad the police put him down.
4649!!
Prev 1 12 13 14 15 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 13h 28m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
JuggernautJason169
Nathanias 143
BRAT_OK 58
StarCraft: Brood War
Larva 570
TY 142
Aegong 30
JulyZerg 7
Dota 2
capcasts239
League of Legends
Grubby3446
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K635
oskar187
flusha56
taco 17
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu588
Other Games
tarik_tv5326
FrodaN2799
summit1g1957
Hui .281
Trikslyr60
Sick39
PPMD37
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 22 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 28
• poizon28 25
• tFFMrPink 20
• Hupsaiya 19
• LUISG 12
• Adnapsc2 8
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 18
• HerbMon 14
• FirePhoenix6
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22452
League of Legends
• Doublelift3644
Other Games
• imaqtpie1187
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
13h 28m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
17h 28m
CSO Cup
19h 28m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
21h 28m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 12h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 17h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 21h
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.