• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 23:12
CET 05:12
KST 13:12
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT25Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book18Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
Weekly Cups (Feb 16-22): MaxPax doubles0Weekly Cups (Feb 9-15): herO doubles up2ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/0241LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16)46Weekly Cups (Feb 2-8): Classic, Solar, MaxPax win2
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Feb 16-22): MaxPax doubles How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game? Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT Liquipedia WCS Portal Launched
Tourneys
PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) How do the "codes" work in GSL? LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ? [A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 514 Ulnar New Year The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 513 Attrition Warfare Mutation # 512 Overclocked
Brood War
General
CasterMuse Youtube A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone A new season just kicks off Recent recommended BW games BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 1 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [LIVE] [S:21] ASL Season Open Day 1 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Zealot bombing is no longer popular? Fighting Spirit mining rates Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Beyond All Reason Nintendo Switch Thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread New broswer game : STG-World Diablo 2 thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Mexico's Drug War Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Ask and answer stupid questions here!
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Inside the Communication of …
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1709 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 8777

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8775 8776 8777 8778 8779 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-19 20:31:12
September 19 2017 20:28 GMT
#175521
that analogy seems quite inaccurate clutz.
and i'd disagree on the latter being bigger news than the former; since if the former had been otherwise it would be incredible news.
presidential candidates making absurd false accusation should be countered. sadly alot of fools still bought into it and voted to destroy the country.
it's simply not true that trump was wiretapped, period.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Karis Vas Ryaar
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States4396 Posts
September 19 2017 20:31 GMT
#175522
"I'm not agreeing with a lot of Virus's decisions but they are working" Tasteless. Ipl4 Losers Bracket Virus 2-1 Maru
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States45294 Posts
September 19 2017 20:33 GMT
#175523
Is that illegal, unethical, or just unorthodox? ^^^
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands22103 Posts
September 19 2017 20:33 GMT
#175524
On September 20 2017 05:28 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2017 05:09 Mohdoo wrote:
I think it's that LegalLord sees so many trillions of reasons for Clinton to walk away from this humiliated and defeated that hearing people talk about things that make it less her fault drives him insane. Talking about things outside her control, when so many things were totally within her control and would have won her the election, feels silly. Which I can somewhat understand. But it is important to look at both. Maybe I'm wrong, but that's how it looks from here.

It's not so much about walking away defeated, it's more about moving on and about letting the country move on. One of the few bright spots of a Trump win is that we as a country get to shed the choking influence of the Clinton cancer on our country. But the longer she plays the game of the sore loser who doesn't want to understand that about three-fourths of the country is saying "just fuck off, Hillary" the harder it is to clean house and move on.

If you want to move on from Hillary then stop posting about her.
I haven't counted but it certainly feels like the vast majority of posts that start another Hillary discussion come from you nowadays.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15737 Posts
September 19 2017 20:35 GMT
#175525
On September 20 2017 05:33 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
Is that illegal, unethical, or just unorthodox? ^^^


Could certainly argue defending the head of the party is a hell of a lot more important than a billboard in Kansas.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
September 19 2017 20:38 GMT
#175526
On September 20 2017 05:33 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2017 05:28 LegalLord wrote:
On September 20 2017 05:09 Mohdoo wrote:
I think it's that LegalLord sees so many trillions of reasons for Clinton to walk away from this humiliated and defeated that hearing people talk about things that make it less her fault drives him insane. Talking about things outside her control, when so many things were totally within her control and would have won her the election, feels silly. Which I can somewhat understand. But it is important to look at both. Maybe I'm wrong, but that's how it looks from here.

It's not so much about walking away defeated, it's more about moving on and about letting the country move on. One of the few bright spots of a Trump win is that we as a country get to shed the choking influence of the Clinton cancer on our country. But the longer she plays the game of the sore loser who doesn't want to understand that about three-fourths of the country is saying "just fuck off, Hillary" the harder it is to clean house and move on.

If you want to move on from Hillary then stop posting about her.
I haven't counted but it certainly feels like the vast majority of posts that start another Hillary discussion come from you nowadays.

it's been true for quit esome time actually; not just nowadays, but for mooooonths, really ever since after the election.
and of course he still can't help spewing factually false nonsense, as well as highly doubtful claims, about it constantly.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23659 Posts
September 19 2017 20:51 GMT
#175527
On September 20 2017 01:59 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2017 01:55 Mohdoo wrote:
On September 20 2017 01:50 Stratos_speAr wrote:
On September 20 2017 01:41 LegalLord wrote:
A lot of genuinely interesting and productive stuff that we have developed only saw light first as military developments. The military has never been shy about creating new and useful technologies when necessary. They still do, so at least that money does have something to show for the effort.


Unfortunately, it still seems wasteful when incredible sums of money are spent inefficiently on things that are completely unnecessary or erroneously paid for in the military. Furthermore, the service members rarely see this money. It sure as hell isn't in our wages, It rarely turns into new benefits (I can't tell you how many times I've been told, "sorry, that benefit was cut recently, you can't get it anymore"), living conditions are routinely poor (I could tell you quite a few stories about the barracks that I just came from and the galleys I had to eat in), and the gear is substandard (during my recent training, my flak jacket didn't fit and my rifle couldn't fire more than a single round without jamming).


Is this really avoidable, though? As entity gets bigger --> waste gets bigger. Kind of like how big companies lose millions of dollars a year to accounting errors. Is there some nation that we know has an outstandingly efficient military while also being huge? I imagine not. I am sure a lot of work has been done to study "how do huge things not be wasteful?", but it does not seem to have been particularly successful yet.

The point is that $80b in additional spending does not necessarily lead to anything like $80b in benefits.


It would be a lot closer if it went to providing everyone college, but you know Democrats prefer feeding the MIC.

But this is just a snack, $80b is a rounding error in our military.

The Defense Department’s Inspector General, in a June report, said the Army made $2.8 trillion in wrongful adjustments to accounting entries in one quarter alone in 2015, and $6.5 trillion for the year. Yet the Army lacked receipts and invoices to support those numbers or simply made them up.


Source

Can we not say the problem with tuition-free college is that it would be too expensive for the tax payer ever again please?
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
September 19 2017 21:03 GMT
#175528
I would think that there is ample evidence out there now that throwing more money at higher level education is a bad idea. All it will do is continue to drive up the cost of tuition.
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
September 19 2017 21:17 GMT
#175529
On September 20 2017 05:28 zlefin wrote:
that analogy seems quite inaccurate clutz.
and i'd disagree on the latter being bigger news than the former; since if the former had been otherwise it would be incredible news.
presidential candidates making absurd false accusation should be countered. sadly alot of fools still bought into it and voted to destroy the country.
it's simply not true that trump was wiretapped, period.


If Trump was wiretapped, that is huge bombshell news. Him not being wiretapped (despite his tweets) is "meh" news. Trump having phone calls intercepted is big news.

Overall, I think there has been a retcon over the last half year of what "wiretap" means when you say it in casual conversation. In January of 2017 there was the legal definition of wiretap, and the colloquial term which is broad and spanned everything from a direct wiretap to intercepting 1 or 2 emails. People would, for instance, think that on The Wire the Wallace, Bodie, and anyone else who used the payphone were "tapped". In the Sopranos if Tony's house is tapped and Joe schmoe calls he was "subject to" a tap. In 24 all the shady electronic intercepts were "taps".
Freeeeeeedom
IyMoon
Profile Joined April 2016
United States1249 Posts
September 19 2017 21:24 GMT
#175530
On September 20 2017 06:03 xDaunt wrote:
I would think that there is ample evidence out there now that throwing more money at higher level education is a bad idea. All it will do is continue to drive up the cost of tuition.


Do you feel there is ample evidence that throwing money at the military is a bad idea?
Something witty
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-19 21:28:26
September 19 2017 21:25 GMT
#175531
I don't think trump having a few phone calls intercepted is that big news; and moreover, that his claim was false remains entirely correct; and hence it is fine to report it that way. There's no need to use golden mean fallacy to make trump's claims seem less unjustified than they were. it's also bad policy to support liars lying, or to cover for them. trump should not be rewarded for lying; he should be in prison for it; or at least not where he is.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23659 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-19 21:35:03
September 19 2017 21:28 GMT
#175532
On September 20 2017 06:03 xDaunt wrote:
I would think that there is ample evidence out there now that throwing more money at higher level education is a bad idea. All it will do is continue to drive up the cost of tuition.


I'd first echo this question;

On September 20 2017 06:24 IyMoon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2017 06:03 xDaunt wrote:
I would think that there is ample evidence out there now that throwing more money at higher level education is a bad idea. All it will do is continue to drive up the cost of tuition.


Do you feel there is ample evidence that throwing money at the military is a bad idea?


Then, I'd say I'm okay with having politicians argue about how to drive down tuition costs, once tuition isn't a barrier to any student.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
September 19 2017 21:43 GMT
#175533
On September 20 2017 06:24 IyMoon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2017 06:03 xDaunt wrote:
I would think that there is ample evidence out there now that throwing more money at higher level education is a bad idea. All it will do is continue to drive up the cost of tuition.


Do you feel there is ample evidence that throwing money at the military is a bad idea?

Not really. I'd spend less on the military than we spend now, but the effects of flooding the military sector with funds are a little a different than with academia.
IyMoon
Profile Joined April 2016
United States1249 Posts
September 19 2017 21:49 GMT
#175534
On September 20 2017 06:43 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2017 06:24 IyMoon wrote:
On September 20 2017 06:03 xDaunt wrote:
I would think that there is ample evidence out there now that throwing more money at higher level education is a bad idea. All it will do is continue to drive up the cost of tuition.


Do you feel there is ample evidence that throwing money at the military is a bad idea?

Not really. I'd spend less on the military than we spend now, but the effects of flooding the military sector with funds are a little a different than with academia.


In what way? They both spend money on R&D, they both create jobs..... I mean the difference comes at low level but at high level I am not sure what the difference between how they spend their money really is.

Payroll,
Buildings,
R&D,
Advertising.

Both do these things... I might be missing the difference at a high level so if you could explain I would be grateful
Something witty
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
9025 Posts
September 19 2017 21:56 GMT
#175535
On September 20 2017 06:03 xDaunt wrote:
I would think that there is ample evidence out there now that throwing more money at higher level education is a bad idea. All it will do is continue to drive up the cost of tuition.

An informed populace is the bad idea. Can you imagine the impoverished kids who are barred from higher ed because they're poor but are really gifted mathematicians? Or the mother or father who had to forgo higher ed because they needed to support a family?

Take away the money barrier and suddenly a lot of people become start becoming equal. You increase demand and you increase supply. Colleges still take in fees from families and can charge for masters+ degrees.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-19 21:58:58
September 19 2017 21:58 GMT
#175536
More money spent on the military puts more money into the hands of the people who work on important advanced research projects - which includes those who work from the hallowed halls of academia.

More money into education generally leads to construction of endless university infrastructure projects, real estate of little worth, dorms for exorbitant prices, and so on. There is not a lack of money being spent on education, just a lack of proportionate results.

Healthcare is similar.

Infrastructure lol.

Two of the above three problems could adequately be solved with communism.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
September 19 2017 22:00 GMT
#175537
On September 20 2017 06:17 cLutZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2017 05:28 zlefin wrote:
that analogy seems quite inaccurate clutz.
and i'd disagree on the latter being bigger news than the former; since if the former had been otherwise it would be incredible news.
presidential candidates making absurd false accusation should be countered. sadly alot of fools still bought into it and voted to destroy the country.
it's simply not true that trump was wiretapped, period.


If Trump was wiretapped, that is huge bombshell news. Him not being wiretapped (despite his tweets) is "meh" news. Trump having phone calls intercepted is big news.

Overall, I think there has been a retcon over the last half year of what "wiretap" means when you say it in casual conversation. In January of 2017 there was the legal definition of wiretap, and the colloquial term which is broad and spanned everything from a direct wiretap to intercepting 1 or 2 emails. People would, for instance, think that on The Wire the Wallace, Bodie, and anyone else who used the payphone were "tapped". In the Sopranos if Tony's house is tapped and Joe schmoe calls he was "subject to" a tap. In 24 all the shady electronic intercepts were "taps".

Currently sitting President accusing the previous President of ordering a wiretap on himself while campaigning. This is big news, true or not.

Now, it was entirely false, and was reported as such. No ifs, and or buts, Obama did not order a wiretap on Trump Tower to monitor Trump's calls.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
kollin
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United Kingdom8380 Posts
September 19 2017 22:00 GMT
#175538
Is it not possible to somehow do both.
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
September 19 2017 22:06 GMT
#175539
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands22103 Posts
September 19 2017 22:08 GMT
#175540
On September 20 2017 06:58 LegalLord wrote:
More money spent on the military puts more money into the hands of the people who work on important advanced research projects - which includes those who work from the hallowed halls of academia.

More money into education generally leads to construction of endless university infrastructure projects, real estate of little worth, dorms for exorbitant prices, and so on. There is not a lack of money being spent on education, just a lack of proportionate results.

Healthcare is similar.

Infrastructure lol.

Two of the above three problems could adequately be solved with communism.

I disagree with how you look at where the money goes in education. If you give schools an extra X dollars your entirely correct but when your removing tuition fees to lower the barrier of entry for education your not adding more money, your replacing one source with another.
And the government has better control over the cost then currently where schools can just keep raising tuition fees to feed off government aid since the school will not longer get to set the rate.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Prev 1 8775 8776 8777 8778 8779 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
00:00
OSC Elite Rising Star #17.5
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft387
RuFF_SC2 248
mcanning 72
NeuroSwarm 29
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 9356
GuemChi 1715
Snow 201
Icarus 13
Dota 2
monkeys_forever213
LuMiX2
League of Legends
JimRising 701
Counter-Strike
Coldzera 1738
C9.Mang0393
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox950
Other Games
summit1g13493
WinterStarcraft373
Day[9].tv363
Maynarde129
Trikslyr65
ZombieGrub51
minikerr2
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick862
Counter-Strike
PGL638
Other Games
BasetradeTV55
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Light_VIP 41
• intothetv
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21010
League of Legends
• Scarra2226
• Lourlo864
• Stunt162
Other Games
• Day9tv363
• Shiphtur259
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Winter Champion…
7h 48m
Replay Cast
1d 4h
WardiTV Winter Champion…
1d 7h
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
SC Evo Complete
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-02-22
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Acropolis #4 - TS5
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
Spring Cup 2026
WardiTV Winter 2026
PiG Sty Festival 7.0
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025

Upcoming

[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 2nd Round
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 2nd Round Qualifier
Acropolis #4 - TS6
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
FISSURE Playground #3
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.