• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:03
CEST 22:03
KST 05:03
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10
Community News
Rollback Netcode in Brood War645.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 202621Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)0SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup10StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026)78
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 2026 [Old] StarCraft 3 Reportedly in Development StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026) How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)
Tourneys
RSL 2026 Offline Finals LCQ Sign-Ups $3,500 WardiTV Not-Summer Championship ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts
Brood War
General
Sagi.gg Launcher Released Mineral Boosting (2 workers/patch) ChatGPT cheats at StarSkirmish SCAI tournament BW General Discussion Rollback Netcode in Brood War
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Semifinal A [ASL22] Semifinal B [ASL22] Ro8 Day 4
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Total Annihilation Zero
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Link Between Gaming and …
TrAiDoS
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 11141 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 8777

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8775 8776 8777 8778 8779 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-19 20:31:12
September 19 2017 20:28 GMT
#175521
that analogy seems quite inaccurate clutz.
and i'd disagree on the latter being bigger news than the former; since if the former had been otherwise it would be incredible news.
presidential candidates making absurd false accusation should be countered. sadly alot of fools still bought into it and voted to destroy the country.
it's simply not true that trump was wiretapped, period.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Karis Vas Ryaar
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States4396 Posts
September 19 2017 20:31 GMT
#175522
"I'm not agreeing with a lot of Virus's decisions but they are working" Tasteless. Ipl4 Losers Bracket Virus 2-1 Maru
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States46514 Posts
September 19 2017 20:33 GMT
#175523
Is that illegal, unethical, or just unorthodox? ^^^
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands22662 Posts
September 19 2017 20:33 GMT
#175524
On September 20 2017 05:28 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2017 05:09 Mohdoo wrote:
I think it's that LegalLord sees so many trillions of reasons for Clinton to walk away from this humiliated and defeated that hearing people talk about things that make it less her fault drives him insane. Talking about things outside her control, when so many things were totally within her control and would have won her the election, feels silly. Which I can somewhat understand. But it is important to look at both. Maybe I'm wrong, but that's how it looks from here.

It's not so much about walking away defeated, it's more about moving on and about letting the country move on. One of the few bright spots of a Trump win is that we as a country get to shed the choking influence of the Clinton cancer on our country. But the longer she plays the game of the sore loser who doesn't want to understand that about three-fourths of the country is saying "just fuck off, Hillary" the harder it is to clean house and move on.

If you want to move on from Hillary then stop posting about her.
I haven't counted but it certainly feels like the vast majority of posts that start another Hillary discussion come from you nowadays.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15743 Posts
September 19 2017 20:35 GMT
#175525
On September 20 2017 05:33 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
Is that illegal, unethical, or just unorthodox? ^^^


Could certainly argue defending the head of the party is a hell of a lot more important than a billboard in Kansas.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
September 19 2017 20:38 GMT
#175526
On September 20 2017 05:33 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2017 05:28 LegalLord wrote:
On September 20 2017 05:09 Mohdoo wrote:
I think it's that LegalLord sees so many trillions of reasons for Clinton to walk away from this humiliated and defeated that hearing people talk about things that make it less her fault drives him insane. Talking about things outside her control, when so many things were totally within her control and would have won her the election, feels silly. Which I can somewhat understand. But it is important to look at both. Maybe I'm wrong, but that's how it looks from here.

It's not so much about walking away defeated, it's more about moving on and about letting the country move on. One of the few bright spots of a Trump win is that we as a country get to shed the choking influence of the Clinton cancer on our country. But the longer she plays the game of the sore loser who doesn't want to understand that about three-fourths of the country is saying "just fuck off, Hillary" the harder it is to clean house and move on.

If you want to move on from Hillary then stop posting about her.
I haven't counted but it certainly feels like the vast majority of posts that start another Hillary discussion come from you nowadays.

it's been true for quit esome time actually; not just nowadays, but for mooooonths, really ever since after the election.
and of course he still can't help spewing factually false nonsense, as well as highly doubtful claims, about it constantly.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24387 Posts
September 19 2017 20:51 GMT
#175527
On September 20 2017 01:59 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2017 01:55 Mohdoo wrote:
On September 20 2017 01:50 Stratos_speAr wrote:
On September 20 2017 01:41 LegalLord wrote:
A lot of genuinely interesting and productive stuff that we have developed only saw light first as military developments. The military has never been shy about creating new and useful technologies when necessary. They still do, so at least that money does have something to show for the effort.


Unfortunately, it still seems wasteful when incredible sums of money are spent inefficiently on things that are completely unnecessary or erroneously paid for in the military. Furthermore, the service members rarely see this money. It sure as hell isn't in our wages, It rarely turns into new benefits (I can't tell you how many times I've been told, "sorry, that benefit was cut recently, you can't get it anymore"), living conditions are routinely poor (I could tell you quite a few stories about the barracks that I just came from and the galleys I had to eat in), and the gear is substandard (during my recent training, my flak jacket didn't fit and my rifle couldn't fire more than a single round without jamming).


Is this really avoidable, though? As entity gets bigger --> waste gets bigger. Kind of like how big companies lose millions of dollars a year to accounting errors. Is there some nation that we know has an outstandingly efficient military while also being huge? I imagine not. I am sure a lot of work has been done to study "how do huge things not be wasteful?", but it does not seem to have been particularly successful yet.

The point is that $80b in additional spending does not necessarily lead to anything like $80b in benefits.


It would be a lot closer if it went to providing everyone college, but you know Democrats prefer feeding the MIC.

But this is just a snack, $80b is a rounding error in our military.

The Defense Department’s Inspector General, in a June report, said the Army made $2.8 trillion in wrongful adjustments to accounting entries in one quarter alone in 2015, and $6.5 trillion for the year. Yet the Army lacked receipts and invoices to support those numbers or simply made them up.


Source

Can we not say the problem with tuition-free college is that it would be too expensive for the tax payer ever again please?
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
September 19 2017 21:03 GMT
#175528
I would think that there is ample evidence out there now that throwing more money at higher level education is a bad idea. All it will do is continue to drive up the cost of tuition.
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
September 19 2017 21:17 GMT
#175529
On September 20 2017 05:28 zlefin wrote:
that analogy seems quite inaccurate clutz.
and i'd disagree on the latter being bigger news than the former; since if the former had been otherwise it would be incredible news.
presidential candidates making absurd false accusation should be countered. sadly alot of fools still bought into it and voted to destroy the country.
it's simply not true that trump was wiretapped, period.


If Trump was wiretapped, that is huge bombshell news. Him not being wiretapped (despite his tweets) is "meh" news. Trump having phone calls intercepted is big news.

Overall, I think there has been a retcon over the last half year of what "wiretap" means when you say it in casual conversation. In January of 2017 there was the legal definition of wiretap, and the colloquial term which is broad and spanned everything from a direct wiretap to intercepting 1 or 2 emails. People would, for instance, think that on The Wire the Wallace, Bodie, and anyone else who used the payphone were "tapped". In the Sopranos if Tony's house is tapped and Joe schmoe calls he was "subject to" a tap. In 24 all the shady electronic intercepts were "taps".
Freeeeeeedom
IyMoon
Profile Joined April 2016
United States1249 Posts
September 19 2017 21:24 GMT
#175530
On September 20 2017 06:03 xDaunt wrote:
I would think that there is ample evidence out there now that throwing more money at higher level education is a bad idea. All it will do is continue to drive up the cost of tuition.


Do you feel there is ample evidence that throwing money at the military is a bad idea?
Something witty
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-19 21:28:26
September 19 2017 21:25 GMT
#175531
I don't think trump having a few phone calls intercepted is that big news; and moreover, that his claim was false remains entirely correct; and hence it is fine to report it that way. There's no need to use golden mean fallacy to make trump's claims seem less unjustified than they were. it's also bad policy to support liars lying, or to cover for them. trump should not be rewarded for lying; he should be in prison for it; or at least not where he is.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24387 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-19 21:35:03
September 19 2017 21:28 GMT
#175532
On September 20 2017 06:03 xDaunt wrote:
I would think that there is ample evidence out there now that throwing more money at higher level education is a bad idea. All it will do is continue to drive up the cost of tuition.


I'd first echo this question;

On September 20 2017 06:24 IyMoon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2017 06:03 xDaunt wrote:
I would think that there is ample evidence out there now that throwing more money at higher level education is a bad idea. All it will do is continue to drive up the cost of tuition.


Do you feel there is ample evidence that throwing money at the military is a bad idea?


Then, I'd say I'm okay with having politicians argue about how to drive down tuition costs, once tuition isn't a barrier to any student.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
September 19 2017 21:43 GMT
#175533
On September 20 2017 06:24 IyMoon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2017 06:03 xDaunt wrote:
I would think that there is ample evidence out there now that throwing more money at higher level education is a bad idea. All it will do is continue to drive up the cost of tuition.


Do you feel there is ample evidence that throwing money at the military is a bad idea?

Not really. I'd spend less on the military than we spend now, but the effects of flooding the military sector with funds are a little a different than with academia.
IyMoon
Profile Joined April 2016
United States1249 Posts
September 19 2017 21:49 GMT
#175534
On September 20 2017 06:43 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2017 06:24 IyMoon wrote:
On September 20 2017 06:03 xDaunt wrote:
I would think that there is ample evidence out there now that throwing more money at higher level education is a bad idea. All it will do is continue to drive up the cost of tuition.


Do you feel there is ample evidence that throwing money at the military is a bad idea?

Not really. I'd spend less on the military than we spend now, but the effects of flooding the military sector with funds are a little a different than with academia.


In what way? They both spend money on R&D, they both create jobs..... I mean the difference comes at low level but at high level I am not sure what the difference between how they spend their money really is.

Payroll,
Buildings,
R&D,
Advertising.

Both do these things... I might be missing the difference at a high level so if you could explain I would be grateful
Something witty
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
9069 Posts
September 19 2017 21:56 GMT
#175535
On September 20 2017 06:03 xDaunt wrote:
I would think that there is ample evidence out there now that throwing more money at higher level education is a bad idea. All it will do is continue to drive up the cost of tuition.

An informed populace is the bad idea. Can you imagine the impoverished kids who are barred from higher ed because they're poor but are really gifted mathematicians? Or the mother or father who had to forgo higher ed because they needed to support a family?

Take away the money barrier and suddenly a lot of people become start becoming equal. You increase demand and you increase supply. Colleges still take in fees from families and can charge for masters+ degrees.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-19 21:58:58
September 19 2017 21:58 GMT
#175536
More money spent on the military puts more money into the hands of the people who work on important advanced research projects - which includes those who work from the hallowed halls of academia.

More money into education generally leads to construction of endless university infrastructure projects, real estate of little worth, dorms for exorbitant prices, and so on. There is not a lack of money being spent on education, just a lack of proportionate results.

Healthcare is similar.

Infrastructure lol.

Two of the above three problems could adequately be solved with communism.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
September 19 2017 22:00 GMT
#175537
On September 20 2017 06:17 cLutZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2017 05:28 zlefin wrote:
that analogy seems quite inaccurate clutz.
and i'd disagree on the latter being bigger news than the former; since if the former had been otherwise it would be incredible news.
presidential candidates making absurd false accusation should be countered. sadly alot of fools still bought into it and voted to destroy the country.
it's simply not true that trump was wiretapped, period.


If Trump was wiretapped, that is huge bombshell news. Him not being wiretapped (despite his tweets) is "meh" news. Trump having phone calls intercepted is big news.

Overall, I think there has been a retcon over the last half year of what "wiretap" means when you say it in casual conversation. In January of 2017 there was the legal definition of wiretap, and the colloquial term which is broad and spanned everything from a direct wiretap to intercepting 1 or 2 emails. People would, for instance, think that on The Wire the Wallace, Bodie, and anyone else who used the payphone were "tapped". In the Sopranos if Tony's house is tapped and Joe schmoe calls he was "subject to" a tap. In 24 all the shady electronic intercepts were "taps".

Currently sitting President accusing the previous President of ordering a wiretap on himself while campaigning. This is big news, true or not.

Now, it was entirely false, and was reported as such. No ifs, and or buts, Obama did not order a wiretap on Trump Tower to monitor Trump's calls.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
kollin
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United Kingdom8380 Posts
September 19 2017 22:00 GMT
#175538
Is it not possible to somehow do both.
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
September 19 2017 22:06 GMT
#175539
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands22662 Posts
September 19 2017 22:08 GMT
#175540
On September 20 2017 06:58 LegalLord wrote:
More money spent on the military puts more money into the hands of the people who work on important advanced research projects - which includes those who work from the hallowed halls of academia.

More money into education generally leads to construction of endless university infrastructure projects, real estate of little worth, dorms for exorbitant prices, and so on. There is not a lack of money being spent on education, just a lack of proportionate results.

Healthcare is similar.

Infrastructure lol.

Two of the above three problems could adequately be solved with communism.

I disagree with how you look at where the money goes in education. If you give schools an extra X dollars your entirely correct but when your removing tuition fees to lower the barrier of entry for education your not adding more money, your replacing one source with another.
And the government has better control over the cost then currently where schools can just keep raising tuition fees to feed off government aid since the school will not longer get to set the rate.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Prev 1 8775 8776 8777 8778 8779 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL Open Qualifier
04:00
Jungsu & Hasu #3
LiquipediaDiscussion
BSL Open Qualifier
04:00
PRO & GOSU #3
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
TKL 444
IndyStarCraft 301
EmSc Tv 12
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 22024
Calm 2233
Shuttle 338
Mini 163
White-Ra 163
ZZZero.O 129
firebathero 73
scan(afreeca) 21
soO 12
Sacsri 6
Dota 2
Gorgc6136
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps1503
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby4481
Liquid`Hasu586
Other Games
summit1g6794
Liquid`RaSZi2302
FrodaN1522
fl0m1483
RotterdaM879
olofmeister855
B2W.Neo750
Beastyqt353
crisheroes295
Livibee229
Pyrionflax135
Mew2King57
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick932
BasetradeTV206
StarCraft 2
angryscii 19
EmSc Tv 12
EmSc2Tv 12
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 17
• niya90s 1
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki46
• blackmanpl 20
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• imaqtpie1491
• Shiphtur699
• WagamamaTV349
Upcoming Events
OSC
2h 57m
Replay Cast
2h 57m
OSC
15h 57m
WardiTV Weekly
1d 14h
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Online Event
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Rush vs Soulkey
[ Show More ]
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
BSL Open Qualifier
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
BSL Open Qualifier
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Copium Cup

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Acropolis #5
HCC Season 3

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.