It's ok, we get it, you're offended that so many other men would defend something "absolutely horrible," but it's not that scary, you'll be ok.
I also advise that you try thinking longer than a second, it works well I find.
Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
farvacola
United States18819 Posts
September 07 2017 13:45 GMT
#173461
It's ok, we get it, you're offended that so many other men would defend something "absolutely horrible," but it's not that scary, you'll be ok. I also advise that you try thinking longer than a second, it works well I find. | ||
farvacola
United States18819 Posts
September 07 2017 13:46 GMT
#173462
On September 07 2017 22:44 Jockmcplop wrote: Can someone define for me exactly what 'toxic masculinity' is? Whenever I've seen it used its been as a way of making someone feel better about their lack of masculinity. Read the thread, we already went over its definition and Spanish correlate. Honestly, if English had a better word for machismo, this whole thing would be far easier to work through. | ||
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
September 07 2017 13:47 GMT
#173463
On September 07 2017 22:45 farvacola wrote: You already played your hand when you named the straw man through stating "Arguments like this are why people who think for even a second find modern feminism absolutely horrible." It's ok, we get it, you're offended that so many other men would defend something "absolutely horrible," but it's not that scary, you'll be ok. I also advise that you try thinking longer than a second, it works well I find. Played what hand? Please have some respect when communicating over a matter as pivotal as this as well, I am not treating you like a petulant child no matter how much I disagree with your statement. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
September 07 2017 13:48 GMT
#173464
On September 07 2017 22:44 Jockmcplop wrote: Can someone define for me exactly what 'toxic masculinity' is? Whenever I've seen it used its been as a way of making someone feel better about their lack of masculinity. Its like toxic cake. Some cake is toxic and filled with poison, but not all cakes are bad. But now think that all of human history was defined by toxic cake. Also, this falls metaphor falls apart real quick. You can just read the last couple pages and it pretty much spells it out. Its not that complex. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
September 07 2017 13:49 GMT
#173465
On September 07 2017 22:44 bo1b wrote: Show nested quote + On September 07 2017 22:41 Plansix wrote: An hour ago I said: On September 07 2017 20:31 Plansix wrote: Feminism addresses many of the problems facing men through the concept of toxic masculinity. Which is as harmful to men as it is to women. But it is often mischaracterized as an attack on men. And it continues to hold true, even after being explained over and over. A blanket catch all statement does not prevent an argument from being ridiculous. I honestly think you're attacking women far more then men. They have agency too, you know. No one said they didn’t have agency. You are arguing against points that people did not make. Its almost like you are arguing with some fictional feminist in your mind. | ||
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
September 07 2017 13:50 GMT
#173466
On September 07 2017 22:41 bo1b wrote: Show nested quote + On September 07 2017 22:38 Plansix wrote: On September 07 2017 22:28 bo1b wrote: Amazing. Out of interest, if underlying sexual selection in men has subliminally encouraged that behaviour in women, is it not possible that "manning up" hasn't been encouraged in a similar way from women? Or is this a one way street? If you asking if women have any responsibility or fault in this, the answer is: yes, but only in ways that reinforce toxic masculinity. Women tearing down other women or attempting to enforce harmful gender norms to empower themselves is a way that women add to the problem. There were women who opposed the suffrage movement for their own gain, for instance. Women who said that marital rape wasn’t real. Toxic masculinity harms everyone. Arguments like this are why people who think for even a second find modern feminism absolutely horrible. Have you seriously considered the statement of what you just said, and just how low you place women in the world compared to men? It's a fairly horrible loop when the problems women cause are a result of toxic masculinity. Your posts have a total lack of supporting reasoning for what you're saying (e.g. "the problems women cause"), which I do not find surprising. | ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9351 Posts
September 07 2017 13:50 GMT
#173467
On September 07 2017 22:46 farvacola wrote: Show nested quote + On September 07 2017 22:44 Jockmcplop wrote: Can someone define for me exactly what 'toxic masculinity' is? Whenever I've seen it used its been as a way of making someone feel better about their lack of masculinity. Read the thread, we already went over its definition and Spanish correlate. Honestly, if English had a better word for machismo, this whole thing would be far easier to work through. Well the way I see there's a place for it, as long as it isn't ubiquitous. I mean, that machismo means that certain people learn to develop certain skills that would otherwise not get learned. That it leads to men being generally expected to behave in a certain way isn't ideal, but it has clearly been biologically evolved (hence hormonal differences between men and women that feed into it) for a reason. There's a fine line between asking society not to expect negative, destructive behaviour from men and using definitions like 'toxic masculinity' as a way to denigrate men. The reason this term leads people to hate feminism is because some idiots on both sides can't really see that line | ||
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
September 07 2017 13:52 GMT
#173468
On September 07 2017 22:49 Plansix wrote: Show nested quote + On September 07 2017 22:44 bo1b wrote: On September 07 2017 22:41 Plansix wrote: An hour ago I said: On September 07 2017 20:31 Plansix wrote: Feminism addresses many of the problems facing men through the concept of toxic masculinity. Which is as harmful to men as it is to women. But it is often mischaracterized as an attack on men. And it continues to hold true, even after being explained over and over. A blanket catch all statement does not prevent an argument from being ridiculous. I honestly think you're attacking women far more then men. They have agency too, you know. No one said they didn’t have agency. You are arguing against points that people did not make. Its almost like you are arguing with some fictional feminist in your mind. I tend to think if you make a statement reducing problems women have created as having a root cause in toxic masculinity, then you have by definition removed agency from women. Short of saying that toxic masculinty isn't a male problem there is no escape from the loop that all problems women face are in some way a result of men. | ||
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
September 07 2017 13:54 GMT
#173469
On September 07 2017 22:50 Doodsmack wrote: Show nested quote + On September 07 2017 22:41 bo1b wrote: On September 07 2017 22:38 Plansix wrote: On September 07 2017 22:28 bo1b wrote: Amazing. Out of interest, if underlying sexual selection in men has subliminally encouraged that behaviour in women, is it not possible that "manning up" hasn't been encouraged in a similar way from women? Or is this a one way street? If you asking if women have any responsibility or fault in this, the answer is: yes, but only in ways that reinforce toxic masculinity. Women tearing down other women or attempting to enforce harmful gender norms to empower themselves is a way that women add to the problem. There were women who opposed the suffrage movement for their own gain, for instance. Women who said that marital rape wasn’t real. Toxic masculinity harms everyone. Arguments like this are why people who think for even a second find modern feminism absolutely horrible. Have you seriously considered the statement of what you just said, and just how low you place women in the world compared to men? It's a fairly horrible loop when the problems women cause are a result of toxic masculinity. Your posts have a total lack of supporting reasoning for what you're saying (e.g. "the problems women cause"), which I do not find surprising. I was told not too long ago that women starving them selves was a result of men. I can't think of a much more obvious problem then not eating, so I'm not entirely sure how to respond to you. | ||
kollin
United Kingdom8380 Posts
September 07 2017 13:55 GMT
#173470
| ||
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
September 07 2017 13:56 GMT
#173471
On September 07 2017 22:54 bo1b wrote: Show nested quote + On September 07 2017 22:50 Doodsmack wrote: On September 07 2017 22:41 bo1b wrote: On September 07 2017 22:38 Plansix wrote: On September 07 2017 22:28 bo1b wrote: Amazing. Out of interest, if underlying sexual selection in men has subliminally encouraged that behaviour in women, is it not possible that "manning up" hasn't been encouraged in a similar way from women? Or is this a one way street? If you asking if women have any responsibility or fault in this, the answer is: yes, but only in ways that reinforce toxic masculinity. Women tearing down other women or attempting to enforce harmful gender norms to empower themselves is a way that women add to the problem. There were women who opposed the suffrage movement for their own gain, for instance. Women who said that marital rape wasn’t real. Toxic masculinity harms everyone. Arguments like this are why people who think for even a second find modern feminism absolutely horrible. Have you seriously considered the statement of what you just said, and just how low you place women in the world compared to men? It's a fairly horrible loop when the problems women cause are a result of toxic masculinity. Your posts have a total lack of supporting reasoning for what you're saying (e.g. "the problems women cause"), which I do not find surprising. I was told not too long ago that women starving them selves was a result of men. I can't think of a much more obvious problem then not eating, so I'm not entirely sure how to respond to you. I'll help you out - why would a woman not eat? | ||
kollin
United Kingdom8380 Posts
September 07 2017 13:57 GMT
#173472
On September 07 2017 22:52 bo1b wrote: Show nested quote + On September 07 2017 22:49 Plansix wrote: On September 07 2017 22:44 bo1b wrote: On September 07 2017 22:41 Plansix wrote: An hour ago I said: On September 07 2017 20:31 Plansix wrote: Feminism addresses many of the problems facing men through the concept of toxic masculinity. Which is as harmful to men as it is to women. But it is often mischaracterized as an attack on men. And it continues to hold true, even after being explained over and over. A blanket catch all statement does not prevent an argument from being ridiculous. I honestly think you're attacking women far more then men. They have agency too, you know. No one said they didn’t have agency. You are arguing against points that people did not make. Its almost like you are arguing with some fictional feminist in your mind. I tend to think if you make a statement reducing problems women have created as having a root cause in toxic masculinity, then you have by definition removed agency from women. Short of saying that toxic masculinty isn't a male problem there is no escape from the loop that all problems women face are in some way a result of men. He's reduced the problems faced by women that are caused by toxic masculinity to being the result of societal structures that enforce this. This is not saying all problems that women face are in some way a result of men. You seem to be taking this as a personal attack, and not really thinking what you're reading through. | ||
farvacola
United States18819 Posts
September 07 2017 13:59 GMT
#173473
On September 07 2017 22:50 Jockmcplop wrote: Show nested quote + On September 07 2017 22:46 farvacola wrote: On September 07 2017 22:44 Jockmcplop wrote: Can someone define for me exactly what 'toxic masculinity' is? Whenever I've seen it used its been as a way of making someone feel better about their lack of masculinity. Read the thread, we already went over its definition and Spanish correlate. Honestly, if English had a better word for machismo, this whole thing would be far easier to work through. Well the way I see there's a place for it, as long as it isn't ubiquitous. I mean, that machismo means that certain people learn to develop certain skills that would otherwise not get learned. That it leads to men being generally expected to behave in a certain way isn't ideal, but it has clearly been biologically evolved (hence hormonal differences between men and women that feed into it) for a reason. There's a fine line between asking society not to expect negative, destructive behaviour from men and using definitions like 'toxic masculinity' as a way to denigrate men. The reason this term leads people to hate feminism is because some idiots on both sides can't really see that line The problem is that it is pervasive, which is why all these "but not all men!" arguments are missing the forest for the trees. Naturally, the circumstances are different here in the US, but in Mexico, the equivalence between machismo and toxic masculinity is pretty clear. Machismo has long been widespread in Mexican society. Male entitlement — reflected in telenovelas, movies, work settings, families and romantic relationships — has been tolerated, even celebrated. But times are changing for the Mexican macho man, or “machista.” Soaring crime rates against women in recent years, and a strengthening women’s rights movement, have forced Mexicans to begin addressing machismo and the harm it does through sexism, misogyny and violence. The effort got a boost on International Women’s Day last month, when President Enrique Peña Nieto called on Mexico “to launch a frontal assault against all expressions of machismo.” He urged the eradication of “a deeply rooted machista culture,” one that “ultimately and truly generates violence against women.” While women’s rights advocates view the public acknowledgment of the problem — as well as some political and legislative gains for women — as a good start, they are skeptical about societal change. They say that can happen only by confronting the entrenched ideas fueling machismo. Gendes, a research and advocacy group in Mexico City that seeks to improve male behavior through counseling, education and public awareness campaigns, is trying to do just that. Jorge, a university professor in Mexico City who asked that his last name not be used to protect his family’s privacy, came across a pamphlet advertising group therapy and decided to give it a try. His relationship with his wife had suffered after a violent episode. One night, his wife arrived 30 minutes late to meet him for a movie, and he felt she did not seem sufficiently remorseful. Their argument migrated from the sidewalk to their apartment, where, in a rage, Jorge threw her to the ground and punched her in the face, bloodying her nose. He said it was the first time in the relationship that his anger had turned physical, and he feared that his wife would leave him. “I had to do something,” Jorge said in an interview. “I felt curious to know if it was something I could actually change and if I could learn new ways of relating to people, particularly women.” Ruben Guzmán, a Gendes counselor, said the goal was “letting go of the person you were taught to be.”... ...Gloria Careaga, a professor in gender studies at the National Autonomous University of Mexico, said that as gender roles had begun to shift, men had not learned how to find new ways of relating to women. “Men here have not been taught any alternative ways of being a man in this country,” Ms. Careaga said. That tension, she said, has driven many men to violence. The National Citizens Femicide Observatory, a coalition of human rights and women’s groups in Mexico that studies violence against women, reported that annual female homicide numbers more than doubled between 2007 and 2015, from 1,086 to 2,555. Last year, Mexicans in dozens of cities took to the streets in the first nationally coordinated demonstration against machismo and violence against women. Major Mexican companies are weighing in as well. Tecate, a popular beer brand, started a television advertising campaign last summer featuring a woman covered in bruises. “A man is defined by how he treats a woman,” the voice-over said. “If you don’t respect women, Tecate is not for you. We don’t want you to buy beer from us.” But old habits die hard. “It is very convenient and comfortable to be a man in Mexico; it comes with great benefits,” said Mr. Vargas, the Gendes founder. “It is not easy to renounce privilege.” The men in the Gendes group therapy sessions know this all too well, as they have struggled to acknowledge, understand and change their behavior. During a recent session, the men stared at the floor. The conversation was punctuated by deep sighs. A man named Alejandro said his girlfriend had discovered that he had sent sexually charged WhatsApp messages to a neighbor. The counselors pushed him to examine his behavior. “I tried to control her by flirting with our neighbor behind her back,” he confessed. “It is emotional and sexual violence.” Where Machismo Is Entrenched, Focus Moves to the Trenches | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
September 07 2017 14:01 GMT
#173474
We had this exact same discussion with privilege. The core issue was that people didn’t like the concept of that they had privilege, even though it was explained over and over that it wasn’t something that made them bad. Now we come to toxic masculinity and people are uncomfortable because they perceive it as an attack on men and maleness. The issues isn’t about the problems created by privilege or toxic masculinity, but the peoples discomfort talking about those things. It makes them feel bad, so they would like a term that would make them feel better. | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42008 Posts
September 07 2017 14:01 GMT
#173475
| ||
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
September 07 2017 14:01 GMT
#173476
On September 07 2017 22:55 kollin wrote: The problem's mainly semantic I think, because some people read 'toxic masculinity' and presume that it means all masculinity is toxic, whereas others read it and think it just means to highlight the parts of masculinity that are toxic. The problem exists that overly stereotypical masculine behaviour clearly is a result of sexual selection over how ever many generations, along with the lesson most people learn in school about people who are competitive and people who are not. Fair enough it results in stupid situations like the "man up" problem. On the other hand what should be obviously the same thing but reflected in women, which to me has the same genesis has been flipped to be a result of men. Sex sells so women starve them selves therefor its a result of toxic masculinity is a flawed argument in a lot of ways and transfers responsibilty from women to an invisible oppressor in much the same way that a male equivalent should realistically be transferred to what ultimately probably comes down to what they think will impress women in the long run. Instead it's the patriarchy. | ||
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
September 07 2017 14:03 GMT
#173477
On September 07 2017 22:57 kollin wrote: Show nested quote + On September 07 2017 22:52 bo1b wrote: On September 07 2017 22:49 Plansix wrote: On September 07 2017 22:44 bo1b wrote: On September 07 2017 22:41 Plansix wrote: An hour ago I said: On September 07 2017 20:31 Plansix wrote: Feminism addresses many of the problems facing men through the concept of toxic masculinity. Which is as harmful to men as it is to women. But it is often mischaracterized as an attack on men. And it continues to hold true, even after being explained over and over. A blanket catch all statement does not prevent an argument from being ridiculous. I honestly think you're attacking women far more then men. They have agency too, you know. No one said they didn’t have agency. You are arguing against points that people did not make. Its almost like you are arguing with some fictional feminist in your mind. I tend to think if you make a statement reducing problems women have created as having a root cause in toxic masculinity, then you have by definition removed agency from women. Short of saying that toxic masculinty isn't a male problem there is no escape from the loop that all problems women face are in some way a result of men. He's reduced the problems faced by women that are caused by toxic masculinity to being the result of societal structures that enforce this. This is not saying all problems that women face are in some way a result of men. You seem to be taking this as a personal attack, and not really thinking what you're reading through. Can you not see the endless loop? Look at doosmack doing his best socrates impersonation above for a hint. It's not a personal attack, I'm not taking it as one. It is a double standard though. | ||
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
September 07 2017 14:05 GMT
#173478
On September 07 2017 22:56 Doodsmack wrote: Show nested quote + On September 07 2017 22:54 bo1b wrote: On September 07 2017 22:50 Doodsmack wrote: On September 07 2017 22:41 bo1b wrote: On September 07 2017 22:38 Plansix wrote: On September 07 2017 22:28 bo1b wrote: Amazing. Out of interest, if underlying sexual selection in men has subliminally encouraged that behaviour in women, is it not possible that "manning up" hasn't been encouraged in a similar way from women? Or is this a one way street? If you asking if women have any responsibility or fault in this, the answer is: yes, but only in ways that reinforce toxic masculinity. Women tearing down other women or attempting to enforce harmful gender norms to empower themselves is a way that women add to the problem. There were women who opposed the suffrage movement for their own gain, for instance. Women who said that marital rape wasn’t real. Toxic masculinity harms everyone. Arguments like this are why people who think for even a second find modern feminism absolutely horrible. Have you seriously considered the statement of what you just said, and just how low you place women in the world compared to men? It's a fairly horrible loop when the problems women cause are a result of toxic masculinity. Your posts have a total lack of supporting reasoning for what you're saying (e.g. "the problems women cause"), which I do not find surprising. I was told not too long ago that women starving them selves was a result of men. I can't think of a much more obvious problem then not eating, so I'm not entirely sure how to respond to you. I'll help you out - why would a woman not eat? Can you explain to me why some men would display such egregious displays of toxic masculinity? | ||
![]()
Liquid`Drone
Norway28561 Posts
September 07 2017 14:05 GMT
#173479
| ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42008 Posts
September 07 2017 14:06 GMT
#173480
On September 07 2017 21:23 Velr wrote: There are pre-employment drugtests? WTF? Is this normal? Welcome to America. If it's not explicitly written down in the constitution then it's not a real right. | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Calm Dota 2![]() Rain ![]() Horang2 ![]() Sea ![]() Hyuk ![]() Pusan ![]() actioN ![]() BeSt ![]() Larva ![]() Harstem ![]() [ Show more ] League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations Dota 2 Other Games StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • StrangeGG StarCraft: Brood War![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s League of Legends |
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
PiGosaur Monday
Code For Giants Cup
HupCup
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
SOOP
Dark vs MaxPax
PiG Sty Festival
Serral vs MaxPax
ByuN vs Clem
PiG Sty Festival
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs SHIN
[ Show More ] [BSL 2025] Weekly
PiG Sty Festival
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|