• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:15
CEST 12:15
KST 19:15
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy18ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research8Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool51Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
Is Adaferin Gel Effective for Pimples Find Out Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2)
Tourneys
https://www.facebook.com/LiverComplexNetherlands.O RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 520 Moving Fees Mutation # 519 Inner Power Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone
Brood War
General
ASL21 General Discussion so ive been playing broodwar for a week straight. Pros React To: JaeDong vs Queen BSL 22 Map Contest — Submissions OPEN to March 10 Klaucher discontinued / in-game color settings
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group E [ASL21] Ro24 Group F Azhi's Colosseum - Foreign KCM
Strategy
What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Chess Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread NASA and the Private Sector Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
China Uses Video Games to Sh…
TrAiDoS
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Electronics
mantequilla
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 16875 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 8202

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8200 8201 8202 8203 8204 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
July 26 2017 19:29 GMT
#164021
On July 27 2017 03:12 Reaps wrote:
What a absolutely terrifying tweet.

Just fan service for his evangelical base. The absolute worse response is getting your panties up in a bunch over it. He isn't Jerry Falwell. The embodied sentiment is a fairly mainstream conservative position.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
July 26 2017 19:30 GMT
#164022
On July 27 2017 04:29 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 27 2017 03:12 Reaps wrote:
What a absolutely terrifying tweet.

Just fan service for his evangelical base. The absolute worse response is getting your panties up in a bunch over it. He isn't Jerry Falwell. The embodied sentiment is a fairly mainstream conservative position.

I don't see any panties bunching.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
July 26 2017 19:33 GMT
#164023
I don't know the specifics but I'm curious if someone knows more. Could someone who is currently diagnosed with gender dysphoria even enter into service? I know several things preclude you from joining the military, such as being on antidepressants or ADHD medications, having certain chronic illnesses like asthma or sleep apnea. If you are already in the military and diagnosed afterwards then tricare treats for these things I believe.

It is all a bit confusing. If the military can preclude people based on chronic illnesses with the idea being that people with these chronic issues can't be deployed until their issues are resolved, and since they are chronic they wont be. Can they preclude people who are deemed to need costly gender reassignment procedures? I'm assuming that would be a denial as well. If someone is going to need hormone therapy and the like how is that different from other chronic things. Of course this doesn't even apply to all trans persons so a blanket ban doesnt make sense there either. And in any case announcing sweeping DoD policy changes through twitter is just stupid.
TheTenthDoc
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States9561 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-07-26 19:44:21
July 26 2017 19:33 GMT
#164024
On July 27 2017 04:24 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Show nested quote +
After a week sparring with his attorney general and steaming over the Russia investigation consuming his agenda, President Donald Trump was closing in on an important win.

House Republicans were planning to pass a spending bill stacked with his campaign promises, including money to build his border wall with Mexico.

But an internal House Republican fight over transgender troops was threatening to blow up the bill. And House GOP insiders feared they might not have the votes to pass the legislation because defense hawks wanted a ban on Pentagon-funded sex reassignment operations — something GOP leaders wouldn’t give them.

They turned to Trump, who didn’t hesitate. In the flash of a tweet, he announced that transgender troops would be banned altogether.

Trump’s sudden decision was, in part, a last-ditch attempt to save a House proposal full of his campaign promises that was on the verge of defeat, numerous congressional and White House sources said.

The president had always planned to scale back President Barack Obama-era policies welcoming such individuals in combat and greenlighting the military to pay for their medical treatment plans. But a behind-the-scenes GOP brawl threatening to tank a Pentagon funding increase and wall construction hastened Trump’s decision.

Numerous House conservatives and defense hawks this week had threatened to derail their own legislation if it did not include a prohibition on Pentagon funding for gender reassignment surgeries, which they deem a waste of taxpayer money. But GOP leaders were caught in a pinch between those demands and moderate Republicans who felt the proposal was blatantly discriminatory.

“There are several members of the conference who feel this really needs to be addressed,” said senior House Appropriations Committee member Robert Aderholt (R-Ala.) on Tuesday. “This isn’t about the transgender issue; it’s about the taxpayer dollars going to pay for the surgery out of the defense budget."

That’s why House lawmakers took the matter to the Trump administration. And when Defense Secretary James Mattis refused to immediately upend the policy, they went straight to the White House. Trump — never one for political correctness — was all too happy to oblige.

“[P]lease be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military,” Trump tweeted Wednesday morning. "Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail.”

The president’s directive, of course, took the House issue a step beyond paying for gender reassignment surgery and other medical treatment. House Republicans were never debating expelling all transgender troops from the military.

"This is like someone told the White House to light a candle on the table and the WH set the whole table on fire,” said one senior House Republican aide. The source said that while GOP leaders asked the White House for help, they weren't expecting — and got no heads up on — Trump's far-reaching directive.

While Democrats and centrist Republicans are already blasting the move, one White House official said the decision would be "seen as common-sense" by millions — though likely vociferously protested by others.

"It's not the worst thing in the world to have this fight," the administration official said.

The announcement, multiple sources said, did not sit well with Mattis, who appeared to be trying to avoid the matter in recent weeks. Congressional sources say Rep. Vicky Hartzler (R-Mo.), the original author of the House’s transgender proposal, tried numerous times to phone Mattis to discuss the transgender issue.


Source


So Trump took a far more substantive position and turned it into a caricature of itself because of his complete lack of understanding of an issue, potentially destroying the reasonable position? Shocking.

On July 27 2017 04:33 Kickstart wrote:
I don't know the specifics but I'm curious if someone knows more. Could someone who is currently diagnosed with gender dysphoria even enter into service? I know several things preclude you from joining the military, such as being on antidepressants or ADHD medications, having certain chronic illnesses like asthma or sleep apnea. If you are already in the military and diagnosed afterwards then tricare treats for these things I believe.

It is all a bit confusing. If the military can preclude people based on chronic illnesses with the idea being that people with these chronic issues can't be deployed until their issues are resolved, and since they are chronic they wont be. Can they preclude people who are deemed to need costly gender reassignment procedures? I'm assuming that would be a denial as well. If someone is going to need hormone therapy and the like how is that different from other chronic things. Of course this doesn't even apply to all trans persons so a blanket ban doesnt make sense there either. And in any case announcing sweeping DoD policy changes through twitter is just stupid.


Yes, there were specific Obama-era protections and protocols in place for individuals both in and out of combat to enlist. I suspect in part because they realized trying to screen out body dysphoria was basically impossible (kind of like deciding if people are Muslims at airports) and there was no evidence of a systematic problem of people enlisting purely to reassign (of course, evidence doesn't matter to the GOP). And the original GOP agenda was focused totally on surgery costs. But if we believe this non-DOD tweet it now doesn't matter if you're post-assignment or never intend to have reassignment, you're fired and can't be hired.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
July 26 2017 19:39 GMT
#164025
Questions have once again been raised over US President Donald Trump’s grasp on foreign policy after he appeared to misunderstand the role played by Lebanese militant organisation Hezbollah in the Middle East’s complex geopolitics.

During a news conference with Lebanese President Saad al-Hariri in the White House’s Rose Garden on Tuesday, Mr Trump was asked about his position on the Shia group.

“The prime minister and I have just concluded an extensive conversation about the challenges and opportunities facing Lebanon and its neighbours,” Trump said.

Hezbollah was a “menace” from within to the Lebanese people and the region, Mr Trump added.

“Lebanon is on the front lines in the fight against Isis, al-Qaeda and Hezbollah. The Lebanese people, of all faiths, are working together to keep - and you know this, and we've been discussing this at great length - their country safe and prosperous.”

While the US has condemned Hezbollah as a terrorist group, and Congress is considering stepping up sanctions, its political wing is the most powerful entity in Lebanon’s deeply divided coalition government.


www.yahoo.com
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
July 26 2017 19:43 GMT
#164026
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
July 26 2017 19:47 GMT
#164027
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
IyMoon
Profile Joined April 2016
United States1249 Posts
July 26 2017 19:51 GMT
#164028
On July 27 2017 04:47 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/890295376611344385


My favorite part about this is how he goes "We worked on this for 27 hours"

I work on projects for work 100+ easily, and that shits not healthcare for americans.
Something witty
TheTenthDoc
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States9561 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-07-26 20:05:33
July 26 2017 20:05 GMT
#164029
Well, repeal and delay is dead in the Senate (5 no votes from R's). All that seems to be left is "skinny repeal" which is policy gibberish that's nearly Trumpian, so it will probably pass.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
July 26 2017 20:07 GMT
#164030
I can't say I understand the strategy behind this Vote-A-Rama. It's just a string of failures, all of which are making headlines lol.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
July 26 2017 20:10 GMT
#164031
On July 27 2017 05:05 TheTenthDoc wrote:
Well, repeal and delay is dead in the Senate (5 no votes from R's). All that seems to be left is "skinny repeal" which is policy gibberish that's nearly Trumpian, so it will probably pass.

People are saying the skinny repeal might make it through, but it might just die too. I think McCain might be a hard no on all of these bills and he moved for debate because he knew he could kill them all.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
9037 Posts
July 26 2017 20:10 GMT
#164032
On July 27 2017 05:07 Doodsmack wrote:
I can't say I understand the strategy behind this Vote-A-Rama. It's just a string of failures, all of which are making headlines lol.

It's just to show constituents that they are working on it but some aren't onboard with anything they are trying to do.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
July 26 2017 20:19 GMT
#164033
Manafort is involved in plenty of New York real estate deals. So are Russian money launderers he associates with.

zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
July 26 2017 20:30 GMT
#164034
On July 27 2017 05:07 Doodsmack wrote:
I can't say I understand the strategy behind this Vote-A-Rama. It's just a string of failures, all of which are making headlines lol.

I'd imagine it's one of those between a rock and a hard place scenarios; if they don't have a vote, they'll get hammered on it, after all they've been talking about it forever. It's better for them really to make a vote, have it fail, then be blamed for failing, but they can try to pass the buck and blame the republicans who voted no, without being liable for the actual consequences of a successful yes vote.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
On_Slaught
Profile Joined August 2008
United States12190 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-07-26 20:33:43
July 26 2017 20:31 GMT
#164035
Trumps just taking his party back to their roots. Nothing to see here. Though ofc this is going to play horribly politically and that is why many Republicans didn't want this. But since when has Trump cared about what his party mates wanted?
Toadesstern
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
Germany16350 Posts
July 26 2017 20:32 GMT
#164036
maybe they're hoping that after X failed vote attempts they can get just those 1 or 2 votes they need from the R's that refused after all?
Wear them out until they just don't care anymore and vote for whatever
<Elem> >toad in charge of judging lewdness <Elem> how bad can it be <Elem> also wew, that is actually p lewd.
Wulfey_LA
Profile Joined April 2017
932 Posts
July 26 2017 20:36 GMT
#164037
The trans ban was 100% gaslighting. There was no effort to turn it into policy. Mueller must be getting close to something good.

IyMoon
Profile Joined April 2016
United States1249 Posts
July 26 2017 20:54 GMT
#164038
On July 27 2017 05:36 Wulfey_LA wrote:
The trans ban was 100% gaslighting. There was no effort to turn it into policy. Mueller must be getting close to something good.

https://twitter.com/DefenseBaron/status/890281836034838529


Well there are the reports that he did this so he could get funding for his wall from hawk Rs
Something witty
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
July 26 2017 21:00 GMT
#164039
On July 27 2017 05:32 Toadesstern wrote:
maybe they're hoping that after X failed vote attempts they can get just those 1 or 2 votes they need from the R's that refused after all?
Wear them out until they just don't care anymore and vote for whatever

They can only lose three.

Collins is a no on all three bills from all reports.
Heller is a no on all three bills from all reports.
McCain could be a no vote on all three bills.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
jcarlsoniv
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States27922 Posts
July 26 2017 21:05 GMT
#164040
On July 27 2017 06:00 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 27 2017 05:32 Toadesstern wrote:
maybe they're hoping that after X failed vote attempts they can get just those 1 or 2 votes they need from the R's that refused after all?
Wear them out until they just don't care anymore and vote for whatever

They can only lose three.

Collins is a no on all three bills from all reports.
Heller is a no on all three bills from all reports.
McCain could be a no vote on all three bills.


At this point, I'm not putting any eggs into the McCain basket.
Soniv ||| Soniv#1962 ||| @jcarlsoniv ||| The Big Golem ||| Join the Glorious Evolution. What's your favorite aminal, a bear? ||| Joe "Don't call me Daniel" "Soniv" "Daniel" Carlsberg LXIX ||| Paging Dr. John Shadow
Prev 1 8200 8201 8202 8203 8204 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Afreeca Starleague
10:00
Ro16 Group Selection
Afreeca ASL 11495
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SortOf 164
Lowko117
ProTech63
Codebar 20
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 2338
BeSt 1301
Hyuk 558
Larva 272
Zeus 254
Killer 233
ggaemo 128
ToSsGirL 80
Pusan 52
Mind 50
[ Show more ]
Aegong 40
Shinee 36
NaDa 27
Hm[arnc] 23
yabsab 22
ajuk12(nOOB) 14
Bale 11
Noble 8
Terrorterran 8
GoRush 7
Dota 2
XcaliburYe647
League of Legends
JimRising 429
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss1018
olofmeister963
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor174
Other Games
summit1g10083
singsing649
crisheroes201
Happy130
Sick75
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL7989
Other Games
BasetradeTV224
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 215
lovetv 3
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 51
• Adnapsc2 15
• StrangeGG 6
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt494
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
45m
Replay Cast
13h 45m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
23h 45m
PiGosaur Cup
1d 13h
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
BSL
5 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
BSL
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Elite League 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W2
IPSL Spring 2026
Escore Tournament S2: W3
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
RSL Revival: Season 5
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.