|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On July 23 2017 05:15 ChristianS wrote: Assuming he's guilty, how is perjury not a big deal? I seem to recall Republicans feeling very, very strongly about the importance if perjury not too long ago.
If he's not guilty that's another matter, but if you're saying "sure he lied under oath, but nbd," ...isn't that a felony?
I don't know if anyone is saying that.
|
On July 23 2017 05:17 Introvert wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2017 05:15 ChristianS wrote: Assuming he's guilty, how is perjury not a big deal? I seem to recall Republicans feeling very, very strongly about the importance if perjury not too long ago.
If he's not guilty that's another matter, but if you're saying "sure he lied under oath, but nbd," ...isn't that a felony? I don't know if anyone is saying that. LL just did like two posts above that dude
|
On July 23 2017 04:15 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2017 04:03 Wulfey_LA wrote:On July 23 2017 02:48 LegalLord wrote: I'll be honest, I don't see what's so bad about this Sessions story given only what is known right now. Flynn was pretty bad; he actively undermined a sitting president with illegal diplomacy. But being a liar and talking to a Russian ambassador about vaguely described topics? I just don't see the same pressure there. How many times does the Attorney General of the United States have to get caught lying under oath before you lose faith in his fitness for office? That first time? How about the second time with Franken? How about this third time where it comes out he had a pretty long talk with Kislyak at the Mayflower hotel? What about the next time after his next lying session before a senate committee? Ballpark with me here, how many times does an Attorney General need to get caught lying under oath before it is bad? EDIT: for transparency, I would say the second time is final. The first time .. yeah there was Alberto Gonzales and his ass certainly got nailed a first time and got to stay on. But this second time should be done for Sessions. Wells Fargo was lying to, committing identity theft of, and defrauding millions of customers. Millions of Americans wake up and deposit money into their accounts every month. Think about that. A bank got caught red handed stealing it's customers money (after the financial sector nearly imploded the economy) and people keep giving them MORE of their money. If you think a couple convoluted lies are enough I don't think you are familiar with the people who still think this isn't problematic. EDIT: If Wells Fargo was your best friend/brother you probably would disown him, but if they are your bank, ~80%+ of people think "nah, I'll forgive them, just an honest mistake" Comparing what Wells Fargo was doing (which was wrong) to what a typical street identity theft is silly.
When Wells Fargo opened an account without the customer's approval, it just sat at zero balance in pretty much all cases. There were occasionally fees associated with the fake accounts. Of the 85,000 fees accounts that incurred fees, the fees totaled $2M. That's an average of $23.53 per account that incurred, or about a dollar or two per each of the fake account total (i.e. including fee and non-fee accounts). It probably affected some credit scores as well.
It's been established (for a bunch of reasons) that the intent was not to steal customer money, but the fake accounts were the result of overly high sales targets for bankers from a sales-first culture and some willful ignorance on the part of middle management, and maybe upper management. I'm not sure if you're aware, but an extra $2M in revenue is probably a rounding error for Wells Fargo.
Most of their customers were unaffected, and Wells Fargo paid $110M to consumers who had fake accounts opened. The cost of the reputational damage to Wells Fargo almost certainly exceeds the $110M.
If this was an attempt to steal money by Wells Fargo's upper management, it was the least rational attempt to do so that I've ever heard of.
If you're a remotely rational consumer, you can see why Wells Fargo is still a perfectly fine place to bank at even after the scandal.
On July 23 2017 04:56 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2017 04:24 mozoku wrote:On July 23 2017 03:41 Doodsmack wrote:On November 04 2012 Danglars wrote: Actually 4 years in the copilot seat (if, by any stretch of the imagination, the VP occupies this) would be a fitting end to his Presidency. I would be shocked if he accepted that role if it was offered. Maybe Romney would have to stipulate 33 rounds of golf and Mrs. Obama as Special Envoy on Nutrition representing both the Dept. of Education and Dept. of Health and Human Services. The more I think about it, it might even end up being more preferable to me than Romney/Biden, a sort of penance for relishing the spotlight, and a reminder to Romney for all the things he was voted in to NOT be. On October 16 2012 xDaunt wrote: I expected Romney to do well and beat Obama, but I did not expect Obama to be as bad as he was. He better put down the golf clubs. Michael Moore and Democrats complained about Bush's vacations. Republicans complained about Obama on the golf course. Democrats/the Left are complaining about Trump's golf/vacation. Can we just acknowledge that every president takes time off? Probably more than the average worker too, because the presidency is undoubtedly pretty close to a 24/7 job when you're not on vacation. He's taken off work nearly a quarter of the days he's been in office, and he can't be that busy if every day he's on Twitter and we consistently hear about how he can't be bothered to read reports or go to meetings. President of the United States is an important job and should be taken seriously. He's not taking it seriously, which is why nothing's getting done. Obama and Bush took it seriously. Yeah, he's a bad president. But it's not because he takes vacations. So let's move on to criticizing the hundreds of real issues there are with his presidency.
|
On July 23 2017 05:20 Tachion wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2017 05:17 Introvert wrote:On July 23 2017 05:15 ChristianS wrote: Assuming he's guilty, how is perjury not a big deal? I seem to recall Republicans feeling very, very strongly about the importance if perjury not too long ago.
If he's not guilty that's another matter, but if you're saying "sure he lied under oath, but nbd," ...isn't that a felony? I don't know if anyone is saying that. LL just did like two posts above that dude
I didn't read his posts that way, but perhaps.
|
On July 23 2017 04:15 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2017 04:03 Wulfey_LA wrote:On July 23 2017 02:48 LegalLord wrote: I'll be honest, I don't see what's so bad about this Sessions story given only what is known right now. Flynn was pretty bad; he actively undermined a sitting president with illegal diplomacy. But being a liar and talking to a Russian ambassador about vaguely described topics? I just don't see the same pressure there. How many times does the Attorney General of the United States have to get caught lying under oath before you lose faith in his fitness for office? That first time? How about the second time with Franken? How about this third time where it comes out he had a pretty long talk with Kislyak at the Mayflower hotel? What about the next time after his next lying session before a senate committee? Ballpark with me here, how many times does an Attorney General need to get caught lying under oath before it is bad? EDIT: for transparency, I would say the second time is final. The first time .. yeah there was Alberto Gonzales and his ass certainly got nailed a first time and got to stay on. But this second time should be done for Sessions. Wells Fargo was lying to, committing identity theft of, and defrauding millions of customers. Millions of Americans wake up and deposit money into their accounts every month. Think about that. A bank got caught red handed stealing it's customers money (after the financial sector nearly imploded the economy) and people keep giving them MORE of their money. If you think a couple convoluted lies are enough I don't think you are familiar with the people who still think this isn't problematic. EDIT: If Wells Fargo was your best friend/brother you probably would disown him, but if they are your bank, ~80%+ of people think "nah, I'll forgive them, just an honest mistake" Comparing what Wells Fargo was doing (which was wrong) to what a typical street identity theft is silly.
When Wells Fargo opened an account without the customer's approval, it just sat at zero balance in pretty much all cases. There were occasionally fees associated with the fake accounts. Of the 85,000 fees accounts that incurred fees, the fees totaled $2M. That's an average of $23.53 per account that incurred, or about a dollar or two per each of the fake account total (i.e. including fee and non-fee accounts). It probably affected some credit scores as well.
It's been established (for a bunch of reasons) that the intent was not to steal customer money, but the fake accounts were the result of overly high sales targets for bankers from a sales-first culture, some willful ignorance on the part of middle management, and arguably upper management. I'm not sure if you're aware, but an extra $2M in revenue is probably a rounding error for Wells Fargo.
Most of their customers were unaffected, and Wells Fargo paid $110M to consumers who had fake accounts opened. The cost of the reputational damage to Wells Fargo almost certainly exceeds the $110M, so the total cost is easily $200M+.
If this was an attempt to steal money by Wells Fargo's upper management, it was the worst theft attempt I've ever heard of.
If you're a remotely rational consumer, you can see why Wells Fargo is still a perfectly fine place to bank at even after the scandal.
On July 23 2017 04:56 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2017 04:24 mozoku wrote:On July 23 2017 03:41 Doodsmack wrote:https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/888820846952886274On November 04 2012 Danglars wrote: Actually 4 years in the copilot seat (if, by any stretch of the imagination, the VP occupies this) would be a fitting end to his Presidency. I would be shocked if he accepted that role if it was offered. Maybe Romney would have to stipulate 33 rounds of golf and Mrs. Obama as Special Envoy on Nutrition representing both the Dept. of Education and Dept. of Health and Human Services. The more I think about it, it might even end up being more preferable to me than Romney/Biden, a sort of penance for relishing the spotlight, and a reminder to Romney for all the things he was voted in to NOT be. On October 16 2012 xDaunt wrote: I expected Romney to do well and beat Obama, but I did not expect Obama to be as bad as he was. He better put down the golf clubs. Michael Moore and Democrats complained about Bush's vacations. Republicans complained about Obama on the golf course. Democrats/the Left are complaining about Trump's golf/vacation. Can we just acknowledge that every president takes time off? Probably more than the average worker too, because the presidency is undoubtedly pretty close to a 24/7 job when you're not on vacation. He's taken off work nearly a quarter of the days he's been in office, and he can't be that busy if every day he's on Twitter and we consistently hear about how he can't be bothered to read reports or go to meetings. President of the United States is an important job and should be taken seriously. He's not taking it seriously, which is why nothing's getting done. Obama and Bush took it seriously. Yeah, he's a bad president. But it's not because he takes vacations. So let's move on to criticizing the hundreds of real issues there are with his presidency.
On July 23 2017 05:10 zlefin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2017 04:24 mozoku wrote:On July 23 2017 03:41 Doodsmack wrote:https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/888820846952886274On November 04 2012 Danglars wrote: Actually 4 years in the copilot seat (if, by any stretch of the imagination, the VP occupies this) would be a fitting end to his Presidency. I would be shocked if he accepted that role if it was offered. Maybe Romney would have to stipulate 33 rounds of golf and Mrs. Obama as Special Envoy on Nutrition representing both the Dept. of Education and Dept. of Health and Human Services. The more I think about it, it might even end up being more preferable to me than Romney/Biden, a sort of penance for relishing the spotlight, and a reminder to Romney for all the things he was voted in to NOT be. On October 16 2012 xDaunt wrote: I expected Romney to do well and beat Obama, but I did not expect Obama to be as bad as he was. He better put down the golf clubs. Michael Moore and Democrats complained about Bush's vacations. Republicans complained about Obama on the golf course. Democrats/the Left are complaining about Trump's golf/vacation. Can we just acknowledge that every president takes time off? Probably more than the average worker too, because the presidency is undoubtedly pretty close to a 24/7 job when you're not on vacation. I don't mind them taking lots of time off; I just dislike the hypocrisy when people complain about one side doing it but not the other (or themselves), and similar such hypocrisies. it seems reasonable to point out hypocrisies in how people deal with things. not that I'm sure that applies to the specific quotes in here; just on the general principle of the golf issue. Fair, but the way to get beyond dumb criticism isn't to keep doing it "because the other side did!" It's to just stop with dumb criticisms all together.
Breitbart and Fox News cultists are just as bad, but if you want to take the moral high ground against them then you can't be just as hypocritical as they are.
|
|
On July 23 2017 05:20 mozoku wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2017 04:15 GreenHorizons wrote:On July 23 2017 04:03 Wulfey_LA wrote:On July 23 2017 02:48 LegalLord wrote: I'll be honest, I don't see what's so bad about this Sessions story given only what is known right now. Flynn was pretty bad; he actively undermined a sitting president with illegal diplomacy. But being a liar and talking to a Russian ambassador about vaguely described topics? I just don't see the same pressure there. How many times does the Attorney General of the United States have to get caught lying under oath before you lose faith in his fitness for office? That first time? How about the second time with Franken? How about this third time where it comes out he had a pretty long talk with Kislyak at the Mayflower hotel? What about the next time after his next lying session before a senate committee? Ballpark with me here, how many times does an Attorney General need to get caught lying under oath before it is bad? EDIT: for transparency, I would say the second time is final. The first time .. yeah there was Alberto Gonzales and his ass certainly got nailed a first time and got to stay on. But this second time should be done for Sessions. Wells Fargo was lying to, committing identity theft of, and defrauding millions of customers. Millions of Americans wake up and deposit money into their accounts every month. Think about that. A bank got caught red handed stealing it's customers money (after the financial sector nearly imploded the economy) and people keep giving them MORE of their money. If you think a couple convoluted lies are enough I don't think you are familiar with the people who still think this isn't problematic. EDIT: If Wells Fargo was your best friend/brother you probably would disown him, but if they are your bank, ~80%+ of people think "nah, I'll forgive them, just an honest mistake" Comparing what Wells Fargo was doing (which was wrong) to what a typical street identity theft is silly. When Wells Fargo opened an account without the customer's approval, it just sat at zero balance in pretty much all cases. There were occasionally fees associated with the fake accounts. Of the 85,000 fees accounts that incurred fees, the fees totaled $2M. That's an average of $23.53 per account that incurred, or about a dollar or two per each of the fake account total (i.e. including fee and non-fee accounts). It probably affected some credit scores as well. It's been established (for a bunch of reasons) that the intent was not to steal customer money, but the fake accounts were the result of overly high sales targets for bankers from a sales-first culture and some willful ignorance on the part of middle management, and maybe upper management. I'm not sure if you're aware, but an extra $2M in revenue is probably a rounding error for Wells Fargo. Most of their customers were unaffected, and Wells Fargo paid $110M to consumers who had fake accounts opened. The cost of the reputational damage to Wells Fargo almost certainly exceeds the $110M. If this was an attempt to steal money by Wells Fargo's upper management, it was the least rational attempt to do so that I've ever heard of. If you're a remotely rational consumer, you can see why Wells Fargo is still a perfectly fine place to bank at even after the scandal. Show nested quote +On July 23 2017 04:56 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On July 23 2017 04:24 mozoku wrote:On July 23 2017 03:41 Doodsmack wrote:https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/888820846952886274On November 04 2012 Danglars wrote: Actually 4 years in the copilot seat (if, by any stretch of the imagination, the VP occupies this) would be a fitting end to his Presidency. I would be shocked if he accepted that role if it was offered. Maybe Romney would have to stipulate 33 rounds of golf and Mrs. Obama as Special Envoy on Nutrition representing both the Dept. of Education and Dept. of Health and Human Services. The more I think about it, it might even end up being more preferable to me than Romney/Biden, a sort of penance for relishing the spotlight, and a reminder to Romney for all the things he was voted in to NOT be. On October 16 2012 xDaunt wrote: I expected Romney to do well and beat Obama, but I did not expect Obama to be as bad as he was. He better put down the golf clubs. Michael Moore and Democrats complained about Bush's vacations. Republicans complained about Obama on the golf course. Democrats/the Left are complaining about Trump's golf/vacation. Can we just acknowledge that every president takes time off? Probably more than the average worker too, because the presidency is undoubtedly pretty close to a 24/7 job when you're not on vacation. He's taken off work nearly a quarter of the days he's been in office, and he can't be that busy if every day he's on Twitter and we consistently hear about how he can't be bothered to read reports or go to meetings. President of the United States is an important job and should be taken seriously. He's not taking it seriously, which is why nothing's getting done. Obama and Bush took it seriously. Yeah, he's a bad president. But it's not because he takes vacations. So let's move on to criticizing the hundreds of real issues there are with his presidency. People criticize his vacation/golf time so much because of the lies and hypocrisy Trump has exhibited about it from past statements. He personally criticized Obama A LOT for his golf games, and has said he wouldn't take vacations as president. Then he turns out to be so much worse.
|
On July 23 2017 05:28 Tachion wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2017 05:20 mozoku wrote:On July 23 2017 04:15 GreenHorizons wrote:On July 23 2017 04:03 Wulfey_LA wrote:On July 23 2017 02:48 LegalLord wrote: I'll be honest, I don't see what's so bad about this Sessions story given only what is known right now. Flynn was pretty bad; he actively undermined a sitting president with illegal diplomacy. But being a liar and talking to a Russian ambassador about vaguely described topics? I just don't see the same pressure there. How many times does the Attorney General of the United States have to get caught lying under oath before you lose faith in his fitness for office? That first time? How about the second time with Franken? How about this third time where it comes out he had a pretty long talk with Kislyak at the Mayflower hotel? What about the next time after his next lying session before a senate committee? Ballpark with me here, how many times does an Attorney General need to get caught lying under oath before it is bad? EDIT: for transparency, I would say the second time is final. The first time .. yeah there was Alberto Gonzales and his ass certainly got nailed a first time and got to stay on. But this second time should be done for Sessions. Wells Fargo was lying to, committing identity theft of, and defrauding millions of customers. Millions of Americans wake up and deposit money into their accounts every month. Think about that. A bank got caught red handed stealing it's customers money (after the financial sector nearly imploded the economy) and people keep giving them MORE of their money. If you think a couple convoluted lies are enough I don't think you are familiar with the people who still think this isn't problematic. EDIT: If Wells Fargo was your best friend/brother you probably would disown him, but if they are your bank, ~80%+ of people think "nah, I'll forgive them, just an honest mistake" Comparing what Wells Fargo was doing (which was wrong) to what a typical street identity theft is silly. When Wells Fargo opened an account without the customer's approval, it just sat at zero balance in pretty much all cases. There were occasionally fees associated with the fake accounts. Of the 85,000 fees accounts that incurred fees, the fees totaled $2M. That's an average of $23.53 per account that incurred, or about a dollar or two per each of the fake account total (i.e. including fee and non-fee accounts). It probably affected some credit scores as well. It's been established (for a bunch of reasons) that the intent was not to steal customer money, but the fake accounts were the result of overly high sales targets for bankers from a sales-first culture and some willful ignorance on the part of middle management, and maybe upper management. I'm not sure if you're aware, but an extra $2M in revenue is probably a rounding error for Wells Fargo. Most of their customers were unaffected, and Wells Fargo paid $110M to consumers who had fake accounts opened. The cost of the reputational damage to Wells Fargo almost certainly exceeds the $110M. If this was an attempt to steal money by Wells Fargo's upper management, it was the least rational attempt to do so that I've ever heard of. If you're a remotely rational consumer, you can see why Wells Fargo is still a perfectly fine place to bank at even after the scandal. On July 23 2017 04:56 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On July 23 2017 04:24 mozoku wrote:On July 23 2017 03:41 Doodsmack wrote:https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/888820846952886274On November 04 2012 Danglars wrote: Actually 4 years in the copilot seat (if, by any stretch of the imagination, the VP occupies this) would be a fitting end to his Presidency. I would be shocked if he accepted that role if it was offered. Maybe Romney would have to stipulate 33 rounds of golf and Mrs. Obama as Special Envoy on Nutrition representing both the Dept. of Education and Dept. of Health and Human Services. The more I think about it, it might even end up being more preferable to me than Romney/Biden, a sort of penance for relishing the spotlight, and a reminder to Romney for all the things he was voted in to NOT be. On October 16 2012 xDaunt wrote: I expected Romney to do well and beat Obama, but I did not expect Obama to be as bad as he was. He better put down the golf clubs. Michael Moore and Democrats complained about Bush's vacations. Republicans complained about Obama on the golf course. Democrats/the Left are complaining about Trump's golf/vacation. Can we just acknowledge that every president takes time off? Probably more than the average worker too, because the presidency is undoubtedly pretty close to a 24/7 job when you're not on vacation. He's taken off work nearly a quarter of the days he's been in office, and he can't be that busy if every day he's on Twitter and we consistently hear about how he can't be bothered to read reports or go to meetings. President of the United States is an important job and should be taken seriously. He's not taking it seriously, which is why nothing's getting done. Obama and Bush took it seriously. Yeah, he's a bad president. But it's not because he takes vacations. So let's move on to criticizing the hundreds of real issues there are with his presidency. People criticize his vacation/golf time so much because of the lies and hypocrisy Trump has exhibited about it from past statements. He personally criticized Obama A LOT for his golf games, and has said he wouldn't take vacations as president. Then he turns out to be so much worse.
plus all the money being spent on his security when the budget wants to cut those agencies funding.
|
It's just foreign to me that someone could think that Trump's "unpresidented" amount of time on a golf course has nothing to do with the rampant incompetence of his administration. It's been 41 days so far. Well over 1 full month. Barely 6 months in. When he's been dragging his ass filling hundreds of positions across several government agencies, and what he has attempted to do has all failed spectacularly, I don't see what merits so much vacation time. If you're trying to pretend it was the same with Bush and Obama, I have a bridge to sell you.
It's a very simple idea. The man leads my country, I want him to be doing his job from time to time.
|
mozoku -> it's not a dumb criticism, (least not the versions I've been using; some other versions may be dumb). and we've already criticized trump for the more serious matters, there's no shortage of serious criticisms of trump. it's just so tiring that we like to also use some of the funnier criticisms to lighten things up.
|
Don't forget the cost of Trumps vacations. Protecting the President when he is at a country club is an expensive affair, both in Secret Service cost and in damage done to the regional economy through no-fly zones and coastal exclusion zones.
Companies in Florida and the state itself I believe were already seeking to recoup damages from the WH.
|
On July 23 2017 05:38 NewSunshine wrote: It's just foreign to me that someone could think that Trump's "unpresidented" amount of time on a golf course has nothing to do with the rampant incompetence of his administration. It's been 41 days so far. Well over 1 full month. Barely 6 months in. When he's been dragging his ass filling hundreds of positions across several government agencies, and what he has attempted to do has all failed spectacularly, I don't see what merits so much vacation time. If you're trying to pretend it was the same with Bush and Obama, I have a bridge to sell you.
It's a very simple idea. The man leads my country, I want him to be doing his job from time to time. In terms of vacation time, Trump's vacations are not unprecedented (assuming you extrapolate what he's done so far). They're closer to the middle, though above average. They are more costly, but that's not the argument you've been making.
Source
|
As usual, truly subtle way to convey his message.
Also I have trouble understanding how something can be both an illegal leak and a lie...
|
Trump is up to 43 days of ~180 as President on a Trump branded golf course. Those aren't vacations, they are weekend. The real problem is the self dealing. He is using the power of the Presidency along with its security and transportation budgets to promote his golf courses. The idea that the President can devote public dollars into a business that feeds into his pocket should be making people concerned with Corruption nauseous. Again, Corruption whiners are strangely silent as Trump actually turns public dollars into his own dollars.
|
On July 23 2017 05:48 mozoku wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2017 05:38 NewSunshine wrote: It's just foreign to me that someone could think that Trump's "unpresidented" amount of time on a golf course has nothing to do with the rampant incompetence of his administration. It's been 41 days so far. Well over 1 full month. Barely 6 months in. When he's been dragging his ass filling hundreds of positions across several government agencies, and what he has attempted to do has all failed spectacularly, I don't see what merits so much vacation time. If you're trying to pretend it was the same with Bush and Obama, I have a bridge to sell you.
It's a very simple idea. The man leads my country, I want him to be doing his job from time to time. In terms of vacation time, Trump's vacations are not unprecedented (assuming you extrapolate what he's done so far). They're closer to the middle, though above average. They are more costly, but that's not the argument you've been making. Source
Out of curiosity, which presidents have vacationed more than him (on average via extrapolation)? If his vacation time is "closer to the middle", then who spent more time away? Surely there must be quite a few presidents?
|
On July 23 2017 05:38 NewSunshine wrote: It's just foreign to me that someone could think that Trump's "unpresidented" amount of time on a golf course has nothing to do with the rampant incompetence of his administration. It's been 41 days so far. Well over 1 full month. Barely 6 months in. When he's been dragging his ass filling hundreds of positions across several government agencies, and what he has attempted to do has all failed spectacularly, I don't see what merits so much vacation time.
Trump's appointing people faster than the Senate confirms them. If you want to point a finger at regarding the unfilled positions, point it at the Senate.
|
On July 23 2017 05:48 mozoku wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2017 05:38 NewSunshine wrote: It's just foreign to me that someone could think that Trump's "unpresidented" amount of time on a golf course has nothing to do with the rampant incompetence of his administration. It's been 41 days so far. Well over 1 full month. Barely 6 months in. When he's been dragging his ass filling hundreds of positions across several government agencies, and what he has attempted to do has all failed spectacularly, I don't see what merits so much vacation time. If you're trying to pretend it was the same with Bush and Obama, I have a bridge to sell you.
It's a very simple idea. The man leads my country, I want him to be doing his job from time to time. In terms of vacation time, Trump's vacations are not unprecedented (assuming you extrapolate what he's done so far). They're closer to the middle, though above average. They are more costly, but that's not the argument you've been making. Source
That wiki page only lists vacations for four presidents and vacation days for 10. So I hope you aren't suggesting it shows anything?
I'd be more interested to see vacation days in the first 180 days, anyway, which as far as I know isn't reported anywhere.
On July 23 2017 06:05 Buckyman wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2017 05:38 NewSunshine wrote: It's just foreign to me that someone could think that Trump's "unpresidented" amount of time on a golf course has nothing to do with the rampant incompetence of his administration. It's been 41 days so far. Well over 1 full month. Barely 6 months in. When he's been dragging his ass filling hundreds of positions across several government agencies, and what he has attempted to do has all failed spectacularly, I don't see what merits so much vacation time. Trump's appointing people faster than the Senate confirms them. If you want to point a finger at regarding the unfilled positions, point it at the Senate.
A lot of the vacancy issues are for unappointed positions, I think, that the Trump White House has exerted basically no pressure to have filled.
|
On July 23 2017 06:05 TheTenthDoc wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2017 05:48 mozoku wrote:On July 23 2017 05:38 NewSunshine wrote: It's just foreign to me that someone could think that Trump's "unpresidented" amount of time on a golf course has nothing to do with the rampant incompetence of his administration. It's been 41 days so far. Well over 1 full month. Barely 6 months in. When he's been dragging his ass filling hundreds of positions across several government agencies, and what he has attempted to do has all failed spectacularly, I don't see what merits so much vacation time. If you're trying to pretend it was the same with Bush and Obama, I have a bridge to sell you.
It's a very simple idea. The man leads my country, I want him to be doing his job from time to time. In terms of vacation time, Trump's vacations are not unprecedented (assuming you extrapolate what he's done so far). They're closer to the middle, though above average. They are more costly, but that's not the argument you've been making. Source That wiki page only lists vacations for four presidents and vacation days for 10. So I hope you aren't suggesting it shows anything? I'd be more interested to see vacation days in the first 180 days, anyway, which as far as I know isn't reported anywhere. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/can-a-president-really-take-a-vacation/
Since taking office, President Obama has made 11 visits to Camp David, spanning all or part of 27 days. They're mostly weekends and cannot fairly be counted as vacations.
His immediate predecessor was more inclined to take a break from the confines of the White House. Our CBS News tally shows President George W. Bush made 9 visits to his Texas ranch, spending all or part of 69 days there during his first year in office. Mr. Bush also made 25 visits to Camp David in 2001 totaling 78 days. And he spent a four-day weekend at his folks' place in Kennebunkport, Maine that year.
During Ronald Reagan's fist year in office, he made seven trips west to his California ranch, spending all or part of 42 days there. He also spent 57 days at Camp David in 1989, having made 19 visits to the presidential retreat in Maryland's Catoctin Mountains, most of them weekend respites. The Reagans also spent three or four days every year in Palm Springs, Calif., as New Year's guests at the estate of friend and philanthropist Walter Annenberg.
Jimmy Carter spent 19 days on "vacation" during his first year as president – most of the time at his home in Plains, Ga.
W. Bush is smoking everybody out of the water.
|
Donald Trump's plan to bring back coal appeared to take a hit when a Texan power plant revealed it was making around 70 workers redundant because the fossil fuel not making money.
The US President said he had "ended the war on coal" last month as he vowed to dismantle "job-killing" Environmental Protection Agency regulations and put miners back to work.
He has outlined plans to shift the US away from renewable energy through proposed budget cuts after controversially withdrawing from the landmark Paris agreement on climate change on 1 June.
But the price of coal remains so high that the Texas Municipal Power Agency (TMPA) said it will have to lay off around 70 workers from a coal-fired electrical plant at Gibbons Creek, Anderson, during the winter months.
The agency claimed it was not economical to keep the facility running all year round and said it would only keep it fully operational between June and September, according to KBTX-TV.
Around 20 people will reportedly stay to maintain safety standards throughout the rest of the year.
The TMPA has been trying to sell the power plant for more than a year and will have to decide whether to shut it down completely if a buyer is not found by September 2018.
The news will come as a blow for Mr Trump, who declared that “the golden era of American energy is now underway” at an event called Unleashing American Energy last month.
The President told energy executives and labour union leaders: “You've gone through eight years of hell.
“We are putting the coal miners back to work just like I promised.
“We are ending the intrusive [Environmental Protection Agency] regulations that raise the price of energy so substantially.”
A global oversupply of oil has actually kept prices of the commodity down in recent years, and the Trump administration’s push for gas exports is likely to continue facing a market glut.
He has already approved the sale of more American natural gas to South Korea as well as the construction of a new petroleum pipeline to Mexico.
“That'll go right under the wall,” Mr Trump joked, referring to the 74-mile long wall he hopes to build along the US-Mexico border.
Mr Trump also intends to approve two applications to export natural gas from the Lake Charles liquefied natural gas terminal in Louisiana and open up a new offshore oil and gas leasing programme.
He said: “We have so much more [energy] than we ever thought possible...We don't want to let other countries take away our sovereignty and tell us what to do...We will be dominant. We will export American energy all around the globe...Job-killing regulations are being removed...like you've never seen before.”
Mr Trump said the Paris Accord had hurt the coal industry and claimed it would prove “too costly” for the country to stick to the agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Thirteen states and more than two hundred city mayors have pledged to abide by the Paris goals, despite the President's decision to withdraw from the agreement.
New money in renewable energy outpaced new investments in fossil fuels for the first time in 2015 to the tune of $350bn.
Source
|
That wiki page only lists vacations for four presidents and vacation days for 10. So I hope you aren't suggesting it shows anything?
I'd be more interested to see vacation days in the first 180 days, anyway, which as far as I know isn't reported anywhere. I'm not sure how you think 10 of the last 15 (including 6 of the last 7) presidents is worthless data? I'm not sure I'd even want to use pre-Depression data if it was available. The claim was that Trump's vacations are "unprecedented" anyway, which is clearly false.
On July 23 2017 05:40 zlefin wrote: mozoku -> it's not a dumb criticism, (least not the versions I've been using; some other versions may be dumb). and we've already criticized trump for the more serious matters, there's no shortage of serious criticisms of trump. it's just so tiring that we like to also use some of the funnier criticisms to lighten things up. I think it's dumb criticism because I don't see any value in micromanaging the president.
Furthermore, I've never been POTUS and neither have any of you; I don't claim to know how much vacation time is appropriate for the world's most stressful job. Nor do I claim to know how much free time you actually have as POTUS. It's going to vary person to person, and time period to time period anyway. So any attempt at micromanaging is going to be badly misguided.
I would gladly have Trump spend his whole presidency on vacation if it meant the country would be better off. I think he's a bad president because his administration is a mess, I disagree with his policies, he appears to be a Russian plant, his legislative agenda is failing, etc.
And I doubt any of that is because he's taken 1 out every 6 days off to golf.
|
|
|
|