| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
brian
United States9642 Posts
On June 08 2017 00:03 Sermokala wrote: How about instead of posting the shitty response tweet to a response tweet you post the link that has the actual content on it? he says insultingly, forgetting to provide not only the content in question but also any content at all. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Edit: Better vid. | ||
|
ZerOCoolSC2
9062 Posts
| ||
|
Sermokala
United States14155 Posts
On June 08 2017 00:12 brian wrote: he says insultingly, forgetting to provide not only the content in question but also any content at all. He responds to a post suggesting a that a frequent tweet poster post a link with the real content while providing content and warning to people that they have to click twice before reaching anything relevant. Also he says misunderstanding the basis of the word content and should probably refrain from third person battles in the future. | ||
ZeromuS
Canada13410 Posts
On June 08 2017 00:17 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: https://twitter.com/BuzzFeedNews/status/872469528386699264 Edit: Better vid. https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/872473379747631104 Yeah that doesn't really strike me as confident | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Anyways... | ||
|
brian
United States9642 Posts
On June 08 2017 00:22 Sermokala wrote: He responds to a post suggesting a that a frequent tweet poster post a link with the real content while providing content and warning to people that they have to click twice before reaching anything relevant. Also he says misunderstanding the basis of the word content and should probably refrain from third person battles in the future. what content did you provide? what battle? and lastly who are you that you think you're going to tell other people to butt out of a thread lol. calling out a garbage post garners a garbage response. i shouldn't have been surprised. | ||
|
ZeromuS
Canada13410 Posts
A surcharge for grocery stores that accept food stamps. That seems like a really terrible policy idea for me. Forcing small stores to not take stamps because they probably can't afford it, force people to go to larger chains, force people to potentially get less food because of higher food costs or force poor people to commute further to grocery stores that actually take the food stamps. | ||
|
ZerOCoolSC2
9062 Posts
| ||
KwarK
United States44189 Posts
On June 08 2017 00:35 ZeromuS wrote: http://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/07/trump-wants-to-start-charging-stores-to-accept-food-stamps.html A surcharge for grocery stores that accept food stamps. That seems like a really terrible policy idea for me. Forcing small stores to not take stamps because they probably can't afford it, force people to go to larger chains, force people to potentially get less food because of higher food costs or force poor people to commute further to grocery stores that actually take the food stamps. It doesn't even make sense. Trying to increase government revenue by increasing the prices of food for food stamps so that people who use food stamps can't buy as much food. Why not just cut food stamps and give out less money in the first place. The entire idea is about as smart as stealing from your own wallet. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
ZeromuS
Canada13410 Posts
| ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On June 08 2017 00:45 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Seriously everyone should be watching this hearing. This has gotten very ugly but historical in nature. I'd love to if I didn't have work to do. Certainly wish I could watch though, this definitely looks eventful. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Mike Rogers looks ready to punch somebody. | ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
Edit: I think it might get Trump upset enough to do something stupid, though, so there's that. | ||
|
Grumbels
Netherlands7032 Posts
| ||
|
biology]major
United States2253 Posts
coats: "I don't have a legal basis, i think it's inappropriate to discuss conversations w/ president in public setting" senator: "in few hours we will have another closed private hearing, will you commit to answer my questions unequivocally then" coats: very fidgety, and after delays saying some bs, says he has to speak to general counsel before committing to answer. Lol wtf | ||
|
Nebuchad
Switzerland12475 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games |
|
RSL Revival
Solar vs Rogue
Maru vs NightMare
Sparkling Tuna Cup
IPSL
Bonyth vs Hawk
GSL
Replay Cast
WardiTV Weekly
The PondCast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
