• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:45
CEST 14:45
KST 21:45
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy1uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event12Serral wins EWC 202549Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple5SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 195Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up6LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments5[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10
StarCraft 2
General
Rogue Talks: "Koreans could dominate again" Lambo Talks: The Future of SC2 and more... RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event
Tourneys
SEL Masters #5 - Korea vs Russia (SC Evo) Enki Epic Series #5 - TaeJa vs Classic (SC Evo) ByuN vs TaeJa Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Global Tourney for College Students in September RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather
Brood War
General
ASL20 Pre-season Tier List ranking! ASL Season 20 Ro24 Groups BW General Discussion BSL Polish World Championship 2025 20-21 September StarCon Philadelphia
Tourneys
KCM 2025 Season 3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Gaming After Dark: Poor Slee…
TrAiDoS
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 637 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 7567

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7565 7566 7567 7568 7569 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42738 Posts
May 17 2017 22:43 GMT
#151321
Danglars is also glossing over the question of whether or not the leaks are leaking things that should be leaked due to national interest by framing it all as partisan politics. That's somewhat missing the point. There's nothing partisan about the question of whether a foreign agent should be serving on the national security council. You don't leak that because you have a vendetta against Trump and his anti-establishment approach, you leak that because you're a goddamn patriot.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
riotjune
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United States3393 Posts
May 17 2017 22:44 GMT
#151322
What's the focus of the investigation? To see if Trump colluded with Russians to get them to hack the voting machines? Nothing's gonna happen to Trump lol
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-05-17 22:46:16
May 17 2017 22:44 GMT
#151323

The family of Seth Rich, the Democratic National Committee staffer who was fatally shot last July, is demanding retractions from Fox News and WTTG-TV on Wednesday for their inaccurate reports on the unsolved murder, a spokesman for the family told CNN Wednesday.
"The family is officially asking for a retraction and an apology from Fox News and from the Fox 5 DC affiliate for inaccurate reporting and damaging the legacy of their son," spokesman Brad Bauman said.
This week, both Fox News and WTTG-TV published and aired reports, sourced to private investigator Rod Wheeler, that said evidence showed Rich had been in contact with Wikileaks before his death. Wheeler later told CNN he had no such evidence and that he had, in fact, only heard of some information attributed to him from a Fox News reporter with whom he spoke.
A FoxNews.com story on the case also cited a "federal source" who said the FBI had conducted a forensic analysis of Rich's computer and discovered thousands of emails with Wikileaks. But a law enforcement official told CNN that the FBI never had possession of Rich's laptop and did not conduct a forensic analysis of its contents.
Neither Fox News nor WTTG-TV have issued corrections to their reports. Multiple requests for comment made to both outlets were not returned.
Bauman said that if Fox News and WTTG-TV do not take action, the family will.
"They need to retract the story or issue an apology or the family will consider other options, including legal, to clear their son's name and get Fox to do what's right," he told CNN.
Washington's Metropolitan Police Department, which continues to investigate the murder, says there is evidence to suggest Rich was the victim of a botched robbery.
But for months, right-wing media outlets have floated unproven theories that Rich was the person who provided Wikileaks thousands of internal DNC emails, and that his death might have been connected with the supposed leak. No real evidence has been provided to support such claims.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/17/media/seth-rich-family-apology-retraction-fox-news-wttg/index.html

edit : Also, some may find this useful though it's already known
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42738 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-05-17 22:50:04
May 17 2017 22:47 GMT
#151324
On May 18 2017 07:44 riotjune wrote:
What's the focus of the investigation? To see if Trump colluded with Russians to get them to hack the voting machines? Nothing's gonna happen to Trump lol

? What's with the voting machines? That's not what the Russian interference was, the interference was pushing fake stories in social media and cyber attacks on the Democratic Party. And it's already established that the Russians interfered in the election and tipped it to Trump. The question is whether they did so as part of a quid pro quo or just because they thought it'd be funny.

We already know that Putin tipped the election from a narrow Clinton victory to a narrow Trump victory. That much has already been shown to be true. What we lack is a smoking gun from Trump offering Putin policy concessions in exchange for the election. So far the government line has been that Trump offered the policy concessions (Crimean recognition, end of sanctions, pulling NATO out of Eastern Europe, Ukrainian annexation) with no expectation of anything in return and that Putin likewise tipped the election without an agreement in place.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
biology]major
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2253 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-05-17 22:55:55
May 17 2017 22:52 GMT
#151325
This is a huge problem for Trump. Now the media got ammo for another year at least because these things take time. Secondly, this bad hombre is not going to give any fucks and will interview trump either under oath or privately. Trump has to be careful with his word. Thirdly, Comey lurks in the background, and his presence is still in the FBI through his memos. Fourthly, a new FBI director will be appointed who will also be working with Mueller most likely. Atleast now if this goes to no collusion, we can be sure, there was no collusion. Either way bad news for trump.
Question.?
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-05-17 22:58:54
May 17 2017 22:55 GMT
#151326
completely not politics related, just hijacking a popular thread
is anyone else unable to access google.com / gmail.com ?

edit: thanks. very odd. guess ill have to reset router later.
riotjune
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United States3393 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-05-17 23:09:16
May 17 2017 22:57 GMT
#151327
^Probably just you, it's fine on my side.

Well if you guys say so, maybe something will come out of this. He might even get impeached?
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
May 17 2017 23:03 GMT
#151328
On May 18 2017 07:38 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2017 07:33 Danglars wrote:
On May 18 2017 07:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On May 18 2017 07:19 Danglars wrote:
On May 18 2017 06:53 Mohdoo wrote:
On May 18 2017 06:48 Danglars wrote:
On May 18 2017 06:34 Nevuk wrote:
Former Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) is among the candidates President Trump is considering for FBI director, the White House said Wednesday.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer said Trump is meeting in the afternoon with the ex-Connecticut senator and three other possible replacements for ousted FBI Director James Comey at the White House.

Unlike past FBI directors, Lieberman has no experience as an FBI agent or as a federal judge or prosecutor. The Democrat-turned-Independent was Connecticut attorney general before being elected to the Senate in 1988.

Lieberman endorsed Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential campaign.

Trump is also meeting with acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe, former Oklahoma Gov. Frank Keating (R) and former FBI official Richard McFeely.

Keating worked as an FBI special agent before entering politics. He also served as a U.S. attorney and top Justice Department official during the Reagan administration.

The administration has been interviewing candidates in recent days to replace Comey amid continued fallout over the FBI chief's firing early last week.
thehill.com

I don't think Lieberman is the right guy to tamp down on the leaks and restore some credibility in the department.


I think the perspective that leaks are something that can be prevented through force or orders or anything of that nature, is very, very misguided.

The only way to stop leaks is to remove people's motivation to leak.

Nonsense. The motivation is political opposition, always has been. The administrative state is politicized and the incentive structure is perverse. Lawbreaking in this case has to actually be investigated and punished, otherwise it's a tacit admission that though you lose the White House, Democrats will never lose the fourth branch of government.

It's becoming too much to expect civil servants to do their jobs in a Republican administration.


You are saying this entire Russia ordeal is a partisan attack orchestrated by what you define as a left-leaning intelligence community?

Read it again. The leak campaign is partisan politics. Americans sent Trump to shake things up and the federal bureaucracy is intent on never letting that happen, so they selectively leak to undermine the administration. It's a wonder to behold. Yet some people think ... oh just take away the motivation and like good children they'll start behaving again. Pathetic.


So you're saying there are democrat-sympathetic people in the intelligence community (FBI, CIA etc) who are leaking stuff to work against Trump for political reasons? And you are saying an FBI director can prevent this from happening? How?


remember when giuliani had a direct line to the ny fbi office during the series of clinton fishing expeditions and republicans were totally cool with it?
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
May 17 2017 23:11 GMT
#151329
When President Donald Trump casually shared highly classified intel with top Russian diplomats last week, National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, who was in the room, did not immediately realize the significance of what Trump divulged, according to an NBC News report out Wednesday.

Citing an unnamed U.S. official with direct knowledge of the matter, NBC reported that McMaster “is not steeped in counterterrorism” and thus was not immediately aware of the importance of the information Trump gave to Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

The Washington Post first reported on Monday that Trump had shared with the top diplomats information regarding an Islamic State threat, which had been provided by an ally who did not authorize the United States to disclose it. White House counterterrorism adviser Tom Bossert contacted officials at the CIA and NSA after the meeting to try to prevent further damage, according to the report.

NBC News reported that Bossert wasn’t even in the meeting, and only learned of Trump’s remarks from notes that he read immediately after it concluded.

McMaster told reporters on Monday evening that the Washington Post story “as reported” was “false,” but Trump blew up that spin Tuesday in a pair of early-morning tweets admitting that he shared “facts” with Russian officials.

Speaking from the White House briefing room later Tuesday, McMaster did not deny that Trump shared classified information and confirmed that the CIA and NSA were indeed contacted out of an “overabundance of caution” following the meeting.

“If there was nothing the President shared that he shouldn’t have shared, why did they contact the NSA and CIA?” a reporter asked.

“I would say an overabundance of caution but I’m not sure,” McMaster replied. “I’ve not talked to him about that. About why he reached out.”


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
pmh
Profile Joined March 2016
1352 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-05-17 23:20:22
May 17 2017 23:12 GMT
#151330
On May 18 2017 07:47 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2017 07:44 riotjune wrote:
What's the focus of the investigation? To see if Trump colluded with Russians to get them to hack the voting machines? Nothing's gonna happen to Trump lol

? What's with the voting machines? That's not what the Russian interference was, the interference was pushing fake stories in social media and cyber attacks on the Democratic Party. And it's already established that the Russians interfered in the election and tipped it to Trump. The question is whether they did so as part of a quid pro quo or just because they thought it'd be funny.

We already know that Putin tipped the election from a narrow Clinton victory to a narrow Trump victory. That much has already been shown to be true. What we lack is a smoking gun from Trump offering Putin policy concessions in exchange for the election. So far the government line has been that Trump offered the policy concessions (Crimean recognition, end of sanctions, pulling NATO out of Eastern Europe, Ukrainian annexation) with no expectation of anything in return and that Putin likewise tipped the election without an agreement in place.




We already know that Putin tipped the election from a narrow Clinton victory to a narrow Trump victory. That much has already been shown to be true

I must have missed this,do you have a link for this?

Anyway,i guess trump is done now. It seems impossible that he will survive this right? Its hard to keep track what story will bring him down,there are so many. There is the leaking of intelligence during the meeting with the rusian ambasador and then there is comey thing,and that is just this week alone. If anything it will be the firing of comey in combination with trump asking him to drop the flyn investigation. Pence will be such a revelation to deal with for the democrats after trump is gone,they probably can not wait. I think trump will survive this week and these storys, only to run into the next big story the next week. But I have to admit this seems far from certain right now.
Wulfey_LA
Profile Joined April 2017
932 Posts
May 17 2017 23:13 GMT
#151331
On May 18 2017 07:33 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2017 07:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On May 18 2017 07:19 Danglars wrote:
On May 18 2017 06:53 Mohdoo wrote:
On May 18 2017 06:48 Danglars wrote:
On May 18 2017 06:34 Nevuk wrote:
Former Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) is among the candidates President Trump is considering for FBI director, the White House said Wednesday.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer said Trump is meeting in the afternoon with the ex-Connecticut senator and three other possible replacements for ousted FBI Director James Comey at the White House.

Unlike past FBI directors, Lieberman has no experience as an FBI agent or as a federal judge or prosecutor. The Democrat-turned-Independent was Connecticut attorney general before being elected to the Senate in 1988.

Lieberman endorsed Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential campaign.

Trump is also meeting with acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe, former Oklahoma Gov. Frank Keating (R) and former FBI official Richard McFeely.

Keating worked as an FBI special agent before entering politics. He also served as a U.S. attorney and top Justice Department official during the Reagan administration.

The administration has been interviewing candidates in recent days to replace Comey amid continued fallout over the FBI chief's firing early last week.
thehill.com

I don't think Lieberman is the right guy to tamp down on the leaks and restore some credibility in the department.


I think the perspective that leaks are something that can be prevented through force or orders or anything of that nature, is very, very misguided.

The only way to stop leaks is to remove people's motivation to leak.

Nonsense. The motivation is political opposition, always has been. The administrative state is politicized and the incentive structure is perverse. Lawbreaking in this case has to actually be investigated and punished, otherwise it's a tacit admission that though you lose the White House, Democrats will never lose the fourth branch of government.

It's becoming too much to expect civil servants to do their jobs in a Republican administration.


You are saying this entire Russia ordeal is a partisan attack orchestrated by what you define as a left-leaning intelligence community?

Read it again. The leak campaign is partisan politics. Americans sent Trump to shake things up and the federal bureaucracy is intent on never letting that happen, so they selectively leak to undermine the administration. It's a wonder to behold. Yet some people think ... oh just take away the motivation and like good children they'll start behaving again. Pathetic.


Where are the best leaks coming from? Within the Whitehouse (Israel blab, reports of Trump's rank incompetence) and from people Trump fired (Comey and Yates, but these arguably aren't even leaks).
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
May 17 2017 23:14 GMT
#151332
On May 18 2017 07:38 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2017 07:33 Danglars wrote:
On May 18 2017 07:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On May 18 2017 07:19 Danglars wrote:
On May 18 2017 06:53 Mohdoo wrote:
On May 18 2017 06:48 Danglars wrote:
On May 18 2017 06:34 Nevuk wrote:
Former Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) is among the candidates President Trump is considering for FBI director, the White House said Wednesday.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer said Trump is meeting in the afternoon with the ex-Connecticut senator and three other possible replacements for ousted FBI Director James Comey at the White House.

Unlike past FBI directors, Lieberman has no experience as an FBI agent or as a federal judge or prosecutor. The Democrat-turned-Independent was Connecticut attorney general before being elected to the Senate in 1988.

Lieberman endorsed Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential campaign.

Trump is also meeting with acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe, former Oklahoma Gov. Frank Keating (R) and former FBI official Richard McFeely.

Keating worked as an FBI special agent before entering politics. He also served as a U.S. attorney and top Justice Department official during the Reagan administration.

The administration has been interviewing candidates in recent days to replace Comey amid continued fallout over the FBI chief's firing early last week.
thehill.com

I don't think Lieberman is the right guy to tamp down on the leaks and restore some credibility in the department.


I think the perspective that leaks are something that can be prevented through force or orders or anything of that nature, is very, very misguided.

The only way to stop leaks is to remove people's motivation to leak.

Nonsense. The motivation is political opposition, always has been. The administrative state is politicized and the incentive structure is perverse. Lawbreaking in this case has to actually be investigated and punished, otherwise it's a tacit admission that though you lose the White House, Democrats will never lose the fourth branch of government.

It's becoming too much to expect civil servants to do their jobs in a Republican administration.


You are saying this entire Russia ordeal is a partisan attack orchestrated by what you define as a left-leaning intelligence community?

Read it again. The leak campaign is partisan politics. Americans sent Trump to shake things up and the federal bureaucracy is intent on never letting that happen, so they selectively leak to undermine the administration. It's a wonder to behold. Yet some people think ... oh just take away the motivation and like good children they'll start behaving again. Pathetic.


So you're saying there are democrat-sympathetic people in the intelligence community (FBI, CIA etc) who are leaking stuff to work against Trump for political reasons? And you are saying an FBI director can prevent this from happening? How?

The start is laying out the policy and promising outside investigations if agents and supervisors and managers don't shape up. This does nothing but hurt the executive's ability to carry out its job and undermine American's faith in their institutions. Aka they are doing Putin's job much better than if he were actually paying them.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
May 17 2017 23:15 GMT
#151333
Remember when I was talking about McConnell and Ryan...

"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
May 17 2017 23:16 GMT
#151334
On May 18 2017 08:13 Wulfey_LA wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2017 07:33 Danglars wrote:
On May 18 2017 07:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On May 18 2017 07:19 Danglars wrote:
On May 18 2017 06:53 Mohdoo wrote:
On May 18 2017 06:48 Danglars wrote:
On May 18 2017 06:34 Nevuk wrote:
Former Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) is among the candidates President Trump is considering for FBI director, the White House said Wednesday.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer said Trump is meeting in the afternoon with the ex-Connecticut senator and three other possible replacements for ousted FBI Director James Comey at the White House.

Unlike past FBI directors, Lieberman has no experience as an FBI agent or as a federal judge or prosecutor. The Democrat-turned-Independent was Connecticut attorney general before being elected to the Senate in 1988.

Lieberman endorsed Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential campaign.

Trump is also meeting with acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe, former Oklahoma Gov. Frank Keating (R) and former FBI official Richard McFeely.

Keating worked as an FBI special agent before entering politics. He also served as a U.S. attorney and top Justice Department official during the Reagan administration.

The administration has been interviewing candidates in recent days to replace Comey amid continued fallout over the FBI chief's firing early last week.
thehill.com

I don't think Lieberman is the right guy to tamp down on the leaks and restore some credibility in the department.


I think the perspective that leaks are something that can be prevented through force or orders or anything of that nature, is very, very misguided.

The only way to stop leaks is to remove people's motivation to leak.

Nonsense. The motivation is political opposition, always has been. The administrative state is politicized and the incentive structure is perverse. Lawbreaking in this case has to actually be investigated and punished, otherwise it's a tacit admission that though you lose the White House, Democrats will never lose the fourth branch of government.

It's becoming too much to expect civil servants to do their jobs in a Republican administration.


You are saying this entire Russia ordeal is a partisan attack orchestrated by what you define as a left-leaning intelligence community?

Read it again. The leak campaign is partisan politics. Americans sent Trump to shake things up and the federal bureaucracy is intent on never letting that happen, so they selectively leak to undermine the administration. It's a wonder to behold. Yet some people think ... oh just take away the motivation and like good children they'll start behaving again. Pathetic.


Where are the best leaks coming from? Within the Whitehouse (Israel blab, reports of Trump's rank incompetence) and from people Trump fired (Comey and Yates, but these arguably aren't even leaks).

The worst thus far have been classified information out of the FBI and intelligence agencies.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
May 17 2017 23:20 GMT
#151335
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-05-17 23:26:35
May 17 2017 23:24 GMT
#151336
Based on reporting I've read, it's probably inevitable that Trump's own White House will leak against him, and his campaign probably did too, because they're forced to use that avenue to influence/convince him. Trump is highly media driven, and that will probably be his downfall.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42738 Posts
May 17 2017 23:28 GMT
#151337
On May 18 2017 08:12 pmh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2017 07:47 KwarK wrote:
On May 18 2017 07:44 riotjune wrote:
What's the focus of the investigation? To see if Trump colluded with Russians to get them to hack the voting machines? Nothing's gonna happen to Trump lol

? What's with the voting machines? That's not what the Russian interference was, the interference was pushing fake stories in social media and cyber attacks on the Democratic Party. And it's already established that the Russians interfered in the election and tipped it to Trump. The question is whether they did so as part of a quid pro quo or just because they thought it'd be funny.

We already know that Putin tipped the election from a narrow Clinton victory to a narrow Trump victory. That much has already been shown to be true. What we lack is a smoking gun from Trump offering Putin policy concessions in exchange for the election. So far the government line has been that Trump offered the policy concessions (Crimean recognition, end of sanctions, pulling NATO out of Eastern Europe, Ukrainian annexation) with no expectation of anything in return and that Putin likewise tipped the election without an agreement in place.




We already know that Putin tipped the election from a narrow Clinton victory to a narrow Trump victory. That much has already been shown to be true

I must have missed this,do you have a link for this?

If you want a news article you can start here.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/10/cia-concludes-russia-interfered-to-help-trump-win-election-report

But we're talking about a margin of just 10,000 voters in key states like Michigan which pushed the election in Trump's favour. It's really hard to convey just how close the election was. Literally any factor can be argued to have changed the election result. Had Hillary won by the same margin you would not be wrong to say that Billy Bush had changed the election result through interference.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
May 17 2017 23:32 GMT
#151338
On May 18 2017 08:20 Nevuk wrote:
https://twitter.com/AlexNBCNews/status/864973840857935873


So he cleared the room for a knee slapper of a joke.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
May 17 2017 23:38 GMT
#151339
On May 18 2017 08:32 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2017 08:20 Nevuk wrote:
https://twitter.com/AlexNBCNews/status/864973840857935873


So he cleared the room for a knee slapper of a joke.

The article is false(runs from reporters at high speed).
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-05-17 23:40:45
May 17 2017 23:40 GMT
#151340
Called it.

+ Show Spoiler +
KIEV, Ukraine — A month before Donald Trump clinched the Republican nomination, one of his closest allies in Congress — House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy — made a politically explosive assertion in a private conversation on Capitol Hill with his fellow GOP leaders: that Trump could be the beneficiary of payments from Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“There’s two people I think Putin pays: Rohrabacher and Trump,” McCarthy (R-Calif.) said, according to a recording of the June 15, 2016 exchange, which was listened to and verified by The Washington Post. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher is a Californian Republican known in Congress as a fervent defender of Putin and Russia.

House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) immediately interjected, stopping the conversation from further exploring McCarthy’s assertion, and swore the Republicans present to secrecy.

Before the conversation, McCarthy and Ryan had emerged from separate talks at the U.S. Capitol with Ukrainian Prime Minister Volodymyr Groysman, who had described a Kremlin tactic of financing populist politicians to undercut Eastern European democratic institutions.

News had just broken the day before in The Washington Post that Russian government hackers had penetrated the computer network of the Democratic National Committee, prompting McCarthy to shift the conversation from Russian meddling in Europe to events closer to home.

Some of the lawmakers laughed at McCarthy’s comment. Then McCarthy quickly added: “Swear to God.”

Ryan instructed his Republican lieutenants to keep the conversation private, saying: “No leaks...This is how we know we’re a real family here.”

The remarks remained secret for nearly a year.

The conversation provides a glimpse at the internal views of GOP leaders who now find themselves under mounting pressure over the conduct of President Trump. The exchange shows that the Republican leadership in the House privately discussed Russia’s involvement in the 2016 election and Trump’s relationship to Putin, but wanted to keep their concerns secret. It is difficult to tell from the recording the extent to which the remarks were meant to be taken literally.

The House leadership has so far stood by the White House as it has lurched from one crisis to another, much of the turmoil fueled by contacts between Trump or his associates with Russia.

House Republican leaders have so far resisted calls for the appointment of an independent commission or a special prosecutor to investigate Russian interference, though pressure has been mounting on them to do so after Trump’s firing of FBI director James B. Comey and the disclosure that the president shared intelligence with Russian diplomats.

Evan McMullin, who in his role as policy director to the House Republican Conference participated in the June 15 conversation, said: “It’s true that Majority Leader McCarthy said that he thought candidate Trump was on the Kremlin’s payroll. Speaker Ryan was concerned about that leaking.”

McMullin ran for president last year as an independent and has been a vocal critic of Trump.

When initially asked to comment on the exchange, Brendan Buck, a spokesman for Ryan, said: “That never happened,” and Matt Sparks, a spokesman for McCarthy, said: “The idea that McCarthy would assert this is absurd and false.”

After being told that The Post would cite a recording of the exchange, Buck, speaking for the GOP House leadership, said: “This entire year-old exchange was clearly an attempt at humor. No one believed the majority leader was seriously asserting that Donald Trump or any of our members were being paid by the Russians. What’s more, the speaker and leadership team have repeatedly spoken out against Russia’s interference in our election, and the House continues to investigate that activity.”

“This was a failed attempt at humor,” Sparks said.

Ken Grubbs, a spokesman for Rohrabacher, said the congressman has been a consistent advocate of “working closer with the Russians to combat radical Islamism. The congressman doesn’t need to be paid to come to such a necessary conclusion.”

When McCarthy voiced his assessment of whom Putin supports, suspicions were only beginning to swirl around Trump’s alleged Russia ties.

At the time, U.S. intelligence agencies knew that the Russians had hacked the DNC and other institutions, but Moscow had yet to start publicly releasing damaging emails through WikiLeaks to undermine Trump’s Democratic challenger, Hillary Clinton. An FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the presidential election would open the following month, in late July, Comey has said in testimony to Congress.

Trump has sought to play down contacts between his campaign and the Russians, dismissing as a “witch hunt” the FBI and congressional investigations into Russian efforts to aid Trump and any possible coordination between the Kremlin and his associates. Trump denies any coordination with Moscow took place.

Presidential candidate Trump’s embrace of Putin and calls for closer cooperation with Moscow put him at odds with the House Republican caucus, whose members have long advocated a harder line on Russia, with the exception of Rohrabacher and a few others.

Among GOP leaders in the House, McCarthy stood out as a Putin critic who in 2015 called for the imposition of “more severe” sanctions for its actions in eastern Ukraine and the annexation of Crimea.

In May 2016, McCarthy signed up to serve as a Trump delegate at the Republican National Convention, breaking ranks with Ryan who said he still wasn’t ready to endorse the candidate. McCarthy’s relationship with Trump became so close that the president would sometimes refer to him as “my Kevin.”

Trump was by then the lone Republican remaining in the contest for the nomination. Though Ryan continued to hold out, Trump picked up endorsements from the remaining GOP leaders in the House, including Rep. Steve Scalise, the Majority Whip from Louisiana, and Republican Conference Chairman Cathy McMorris Rodgers (Wash.) — both of whom took part in the June 15 conversation.

Ryan announced on June 2 that he would vote for Trump to help “unite the party so we can win in the fall” but continued to clash with the candidate, including over Putin. While Trump sought to cast Putin as a better leader than then-President Obama, Ryan dubbed him an “aggressor” who didn’t share U.S. interests.

On the same day as Ryan’s endorsement, Clinton stepped up her attacks on Trump over his public statements praising Putin. “If Donald gets his way, they’ll be celebrating in the Kremlin,” she said.

Ukrainian officials were unnerved by Trump’s statements in support of Putin. Republicans, they had believed, were supposed to be tougher on Russia.

When Trump named Paul Manafort as his campaign manager in April 2016, alarm bells in Kiev started ringing even louder. Manafort was already well known in Ukraine because of his influential role as a political consultant to Viktor Yanukovych, the country’s former Kremlin-friendly ruler until a popular uprising forced him to flee to Russia. Manafort had also consulted for a powerful Russian businessman with close ties to the Kremlin.

“Ukraine was, in a sense, a testing ground for Manafort,” said Ukrainian political scientist Taras Berezovets, who became a grudging admirer of Manafort’s skills in the so-called “dark arts” of political stagecraft while Berezovets was working for one of Yanukovych’s political rivals.

At the urging of Manafort, Yanukovych campaigned with populist slogans labeling NATO a “menace” and casting “elites” in the Ukrainian capital as out of touch, Berezovets said. Trump struck similar themes during the 2016 campaign.

The FBI is now investigating whether Manafort, who stepped down as Trump’s campaign manager in August, received off-the-books payments from Yanukovych’s party, U.S. officials said. As part of that investigation, FBI agents recently took possession of a newly-discovered document which allegedly details payments totaling $750,000. Ukrainian lawmaker Sergii Leshchenko, who first disclosed the new document, declined to comment on his contacts with the FBI.

A spokesperson for Manafort has said that Trump’s former campaign manager has not been contacted by the FBI. Manafort has also disputed the authenticity of the newly-discovered document.

Groysman, on an official visit to Washington, met separately with Ryan and McCarthy on June 15 at the Capitol.

He told them how the Russians meddled in European politics and called for “unity” in addressing the threat, according to U.S. and Ukrainian officials. Ryan issued a statement after the meeting saying, “the United States stands with Ukraine as it works to rebuild its economy and confront Russian aggression.”

Later, Ryan spoke privately with McCarthy, Rodgers, Scalise and Rep. Patrick McHenry, the deputy whip, among others.

Ryan mentioned his meeting with Groysman, prompting Rodgers to ask: “How are things going in Ukraine?” according to the recording.

The situation was difficult, Ryan said. Groysman, he said, had told him that Russian-backed forces were firing 30-40 shells into Ukrainian territory every day. And the prime minister described Russian tactics that include “financing our populists, financing people in our governments to undo our governments.”

Ryan said Russia’s goal was to “turn Ukraine against itself.” Groysman underlined Russia’s intentions, saying “They’re just going to roll right through us and go to the Baltics and everyone else,” according to Ryan’s summary of the prime minister’s remarks in the recording.

“Yes,” Rodgers said in agreement, noting that the Russians were funding non-government organizations across Europe as part of a wider “propaganda war.”

“Maniacal,” Ryan said. “And guess, guess who’s the only one taking a strong stand up against it? We are.”

Rodgers disagreed. “We’re not…we’re not…but, we’re not,” she said.

That’s when McCarthy brought the conversation about Russian meddling around to the DNC hack, Trump and Rohrabacher.

“I’ll guarantee you that’s what it is...The Russians hacked the DNC and got the opp [opposition] research that they had on Trump,” McCarthy said with a laugh.

Ryan asked who the Russians “delivered” the opposition research to.

“There’s... there’s two people, I think, Putin pays: Rohrabacher and Trump,” McCarthy said, drawing some laughter. “Swear to God,” McCarthy added.

“This is an off the record,” Ryan said.

Some lawmakers laughed at that.

“No leaks, alright?,” Ryan said, adding: “This is how we know we’re a real family here.”

“That’s how you know that we’re tight,” Scalise said.

“What’s said in the family stays in the family,” Ryan added.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Prev 1 7565 7566 7567 7568 7569 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Summer Champion…
11:00
Group Stage 1 - Group A
WardiTV682
IndyStarCraft 133
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko341
Harstem 248
IndyStarCraft 133
ForJumy 11
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 55440
Sea 7274
Calm 4154
Rain 3547
Horang2 1912
Bisu 1309
Jaedong 1133
Mini 727
ggaemo 668
Flash 500
[ Show more ]
BeSt 364
EffOrt 358
actioN 310
Mong 308
Soma 210
Snow 159
hero 151
Barracks 148
Hyun 107
ToSsGirL 87
Mind 69
Hyuk 68
Soulkey 67
Rush 61
sorry 51
Backho 43
Aegong 37
Sacsri 32
sSak 30
Movie 29
Yoon 29
Shine 27
TY 25
[sc1f]eonzerg 24
soO 21
Sharp 21
Icarus 20
HiyA 20
Sexy 16
sas.Sziky 12
SilentControl 11
Bale 8
Terrorterran 5
Dota 2
qojqva1634
Cr1tdota696
XcaliburYe247
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1751
x6flipin640
markeloff98
flusha94
edward24
kRYSTAL_4
Super Smash Bros
Westballz23
Other Games
FrodaN4268
singsing2556
B2W.Neo1188
DeMusliM516
crisheroes475
hiko467
RotterdaM283
XaKoH 203
Hui .189
Fuzer 127
SortOf85
Mew2King71
rGuardiaN46
ArmadaUGS33
QueenE23
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 8
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 51
• davetesta19
• iHatsuTV 5
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki8
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1594
• WagamamaTV610
League of Legends
• Jankos983
• Stunt661
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
4h 15m
PiGosaur Monday
11h 15m
WardiTV Summer Champion…
22h 15m
The PondCast
1d 21h
WardiTV Summer Champion…
1d 22h
Replay Cast
2 days
LiuLi Cup
2 days
Online Event
3 days
SC Evo League
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
[ Show More ]
CSO Contender
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
4 days
SC Evo League
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Sharp vs Ample
Larva vs Stork
Wardi Open
5 days
RotterdaM Event
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
JyJ vs TY
Bisu vs Speed
WardiTV Summer Champion…
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

StarCon 2025 Philadelphia
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20
CSLAN 3
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.