US Politics Mega-thread - Page 7567
Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42738 Posts
| ||
riotjune
United States3393 Posts
| ||
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
The family of Seth Rich, the Democratic National Committee staffer who was fatally shot last July, is demanding retractions from Fox News and WTTG-TV on Wednesday for their inaccurate reports on the unsolved murder, a spokesman for the family told CNN Wednesday. "The family is officially asking for a retraction and an apology from Fox News and from the Fox 5 DC affiliate for inaccurate reporting and damaging the legacy of their son," spokesman Brad Bauman said. This week, both Fox News and WTTG-TV published and aired reports, sourced to private investigator Rod Wheeler, that said evidence showed Rich had been in contact with Wikileaks before his death. Wheeler later told CNN he had no such evidence and that he had, in fact, only heard of some information attributed to him from a Fox News reporter with whom he spoke. A FoxNews.com story on the case also cited a "federal source" who said the FBI had conducted a forensic analysis of Rich's computer and discovered thousands of emails with Wikileaks. But a law enforcement official told CNN that the FBI never had possession of Rich's laptop and did not conduct a forensic analysis of its contents. Neither Fox News nor WTTG-TV have issued corrections to their reports. Multiple requests for comment made to both outlets were not returned. Bauman said that if Fox News and WTTG-TV do not take action, the family will. "They need to retract the story or issue an apology or the family will consider other options, including legal, to clear their son's name and get Fox to do what's right," he told CNN. Washington's Metropolitan Police Department, which continues to investigate the murder, says there is evidence to suggest Rich was the victim of a botched robbery. But for months, right-wing media outlets have floated unproven theories that Rich was the person who provided Wikileaks thousands of internal DNC emails, and that his death might have been connected with the supposed leak. No real evidence has been provided to support such claims. http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/17/media/seth-rich-family-apology-retraction-fox-news-wttg/index.html edit : Also, some may find this useful though it's already known | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42738 Posts
On May 18 2017 07:44 riotjune wrote: What's the focus of the investigation? To see if Trump colluded with Russians to get them to hack the voting machines? Nothing's gonna happen to Trump lol ? What's with the voting machines? That's not what the Russian interference was, the interference was pushing fake stories in social media and cyber attacks on the Democratic Party. And it's already established that the Russians interfered in the election and tipped it to Trump. The question is whether they did so as part of a quid pro quo or just because they thought it'd be funny. We already know that Putin tipped the election from a narrow Clinton victory to a narrow Trump victory. That much has already been shown to be true. What we lack is a smoking gun from Trump offering Putin policy concessions in exchange for the election. So far the government line has been that Trump offered the policy concessions (Crimean recognition, end of sanctions, pulling NATO out of Eastern Europe, Ukrainian annexation) with no expectation of anything in return and that Putin likewise tipped the election without an agreement in place. | ||
biology]major
United States2253 Posts
| ||
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
is anyone else unable to access google.com / gmail.com ? edit: thanks. very odd. guess ill have to reset router later. | ||
riotjune
United States3393 Posts
Well if you guys say so, maybe something will come out of this. He might even get impeached? | ||
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On May 18 2017 07:38 Mohdoo wrote: So you're saying there are democrat-sympathetic people in the intelligence community (FBI, CIA etc) who are leaking stuff to work against Trump for political reasons? And you are saying an FBI director can prevent this from happening? How? remember when giuliani had a direct line to the ny fbi office during the series of clinton fishing expeditions and republicans were totally cool with it? | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
When President Donald Trump casually shared highly classified intel with top Russian diplomats last week, National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, who was in the room, did not immediately realize the significance of what Trump divulged, according to an NBC News report out Wednesday. Citing an unnamed U.S. official with direct knowledge of the matter, NBC reported that McMaster “is not steeped in counterterrorism” and thus was not immediately aware of the importance of the information Trump gave to Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. The Washington Post first reported on Monday that Trump had shared with the top diplomats information regarding an Islamic State threat, which had been provided by an ally who did not authorize the United States to disclose it. White House counterterrorism adviser Tom Bossert contacted officials at the CIA and NSA after the meeting to try to prevent further damage, according to the report. NBC News reported that Bossert wasn’t even in the meeting, and only learned of Trump’s remarks from notes that he read immediately after it concluded. McMaster told reporters on Monday evening that the Washington Post story “as reported” was “false,” but Trump blew up that spin Tuesday in a pair of early-morning tweets admitting that he shared “facts” with Russian officials. Speaking from the White House briefing room later Tuesday, McMaster did not deny that Trump shared classified information and confirmed that the CIA and NSA were indeed contacted out of an “overabundance of caution” following the meeting. “If there was nothing the President shared that he shouldn’t have shared, why did they contact the NSA and CIA?” a reporter asked. “I would say an overabundance of caution but I’m not sure,” McMaster replied. “I’ve not talked to him about that. About why he reached out.” Source | ||
pmh
1352 Posts
On May 18 2017 07:47 KwarK wrote: ? What's with the voting machines? That's not what the Russian interference was, the interference was pushing fake stories in social media and cyber attacks on the Democratic Party. And it's already established that the Russians interfered in the election and tipped it to Trump. The question is whether they did so as part of a quid pro quo or just because they thought it'd be funny. We already know that Putin tipped the election from a narrow Clinton victory to a narrow Trump victory. That much has already been shown to be true. What we lack is a smoking gun from Trump offering Putin policy concessions in exchange for the election. So far the government line has been that Trump offered the policy concessions (Crimean recognition, end of sanctions, pulling NATO out of Eastern Europe, Ukrainian annexation) with no expectation of anything in return and that Putin likewise tipped the election without an agreement in place. We already know that Putin tipped the election from a narrow Clinton victory to a narrow Trump victory. That much has already been shown to be true I must have missed this,do you have a link for this? Anyway,i guess trump is done now. It seems impossible that he will survive this right? Its hard to keep track what story will bring him down,there are so many. There is the leaking of intelligence during the meeting with the rusian ambasador and then there is comey thing,and that is just this week alone. If anything it will be the firing of comey in combination with trump asking him to drop the flyn investigation. Pence will be such a revelation to deal with for the democrats after trump is gone,they probably can not wait. I think trump will survive this week and these storys, only to run into the next big story the next week. But I have to admit this seems far from certain right now. | ||
Wulfey_LA
932 Posts
On May 18 2017 07:33 Danglars wrote: Read it again. The leak campaign is partisan politics. Americans sent Trump to shake things up and the federal bureaucracy is intent on never letting that happen, so they selectively leak to undermine the administration. It's a wonder to behold. Yet some people think ... oh just take away the motivation and like good children they'll start behaving again. Pathetic. Where are the best leaks coming from? Within the Whitehouse (Israel blab, reports of Trump's rank incompetence) and from people Trump fired (Comey and Yates, but these arguably aren't even leaks). | ||
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On May 18 2017 07:38 Mohdoo wrote: So you're saying there are democrat-sympathetic people in the intelligence community (FBI, CIA etc) who are leaking stuff to work against Trump for political reasons? And you are saying an FBI director can prevent this from happening? How? The start is laying out the policy and promising outside investigations if agents and supervisors and managers don't shape up. This does nothing but hurt the executive's ability to carry out its job and undermine American's faith in their institutions. Aka they are doing Putin's job much better than if he were actually paying them. | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On May 18 2017 08:13 Wulfey_LA wrote: Where are the best leaks coming from? Within the Whitehouse (Israel blab, reports of Trump's rank incompetence) and from people Trump fired (Comey and Yates, but these arguably aren't even leaks). The worst thus far have been classified information out of the FBI and intelligence agencies. | ||
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
| ||
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
| ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42738 Posts
On May 18 2017 08:12 pmh wrote: We already know that Putin tipped the election from a narrow Clinton victory to a narrow Trump victory. That much has already been shown to be true I must have missed this,do you have a link for this? If you want a news article you can start here. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/10/cia-concludes-russia-interfered-to-help-trump-win-election-report But we're talking about a margin of just 10,000 voters in key states like Michigan which pushed the election in Trump's favour. It's really hard to convey just how close the election was. Literally any factor can be argued to have changed the election result. Had Hillary won by the same margin you would not be wrong to say that Billy Bush had changed the election result through interference. | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
On May 18 2017 08:20 Nevuk wrote: https://twitter.com/AlexNBCNews/status/864973840857935873 So he cleared the room for a knee slapper of a joke. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On May 18 2017 08:32 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: So he cleared the room for a knee slapper of a joke. The article is false(runs from reporters at high speed). | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + KIEV, Ukraine — A month before Donald Trump clinched the Republican nomination, one of his closest allies in Congress — House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy — made a politically explosive assertion in a private conversation on Capitol Hill with his fellow GOP leaders: that Trump could be the beneficiary of payments from Russian President Vladimir Putin. “There’s two people I think Putin pays: Rohrabacher and Trump,” McCarthy (R-Calif.) said, according to a recording of the June 15, 2016 exchange, which was listened to and verified by The Washington Post. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher is a Californian Republican known in Congress as a fervent defender of Putin and Russia. House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) immediately interjected, stopping the conversation from further exploring McCarthy’s assertion, and swore the Republicans present to secrecy. Before the conversation, McCarthy and Ryan had emerged from separate talks at the U.S. Capitol with Ukrainian Prime Minister Volodymyr Groysman, who had described a Kremlin tactic of financing populist politicians to undercut Eastern European democratic institutions. News had just broken the day before in The Washington Post that Russian government hackers had penetrated the computer network of the Democratic National Committee, prompting McCarthy to shift the conversation from Russian meddling in Europe to events closer to home. Some of the lawmakers laughed at McCarthy’s comment. Then McCarthy quickly added: “Swear to God.” Ryan instructed his Republican lieutenants to keep the conversation private, saying: “No leaks...This is how we know we’re a real family here.” The remarks remained secret for nearly a year. The conversation provides a glimpse at the internal views of GOP leaders who now find themselves under mounting pressure over the conduct of President Trump. The exchange shows that the Republican leadership in the House privately discussed Russia’s involvement in the 2016 election and Trump’s relationship to Putin, but wanted to keep their concerns secret. It is difficult to tell from the recording the extent to which the remarks were meant to be taken literally. The House leadership has so far stood by the White House as it has lurched from one crisis to another, much of the turmoil fueled by contacts between Trump or his associates with Russia. House Republican leaders have so far resisted calls for the appointment of an independent commission or a special prosecutor to investigate Russian interference, though pressure has been mounting on them to do so after Trump’s firing of FBI director James B. Comey and the disclosure that the president shared intelligence with Russian diplomats. Evan McMullin, who in his role as policy director to the House Republican Conference participated in the June 15 conversation, said: “It’s true that Majority Leader McCarthy said that he thought candidate Trump was on the Kremlin’s payroll. Speaker Ryan was concerned about that leaking.” McMullin ran for president last year as an independent and has been a vocal critic of Trump. When initially asked to comment on the exchange, Brendan Buck, a spokesman for Ryan, said: “That never happened,” and Matt Sparks, a spokesman for McCarthy, said: “The idea that McCarthy would assert this is absurd and false.” After being told that The Post would cite a recording of the exchange, Buck, speaking for the GOP House leadership, said: “This entire year-old exchange was clearly an attempt at humor. No one believed the majority leader was seriously asserting that Donald Trump or any of our members were being paid by the Russians. What’s more, the speaker and leadership team have repeatedly spoken out against Russia’s interference in our election, and the House continues to investigate that activity.” “This was a failed attempt at humor,” Sparks said. Ken Grubbs, a spokesman for Rohrabacher, said the congressman has been a consistent advocate of “working closer with the Russians to combat radical Islamism. The congressman doesn’t need to be paid to come to such a necessary conclusion.” When McCarthy voiced his assessment of whom Putin supports, suspicions were only beginning to swirl around Trump’s alleged Russia ties. At the time, U.S. intelligence agencies knew that the Russians had hacked the DNC and other institutions, but Moscow had yet to start publicly releasing damaging emails through WikiLeaks to undermine Trump’s Democratic challenger, Hillary Clinton. An FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the presidential election would open the following month, in late July, Comey has said in testimony to Congress. Trump has sought to play down contacts between his campaign and the Russians, dismissing as a “witch hunt” the FBI and congressional investigations into Russian efforts to aid Trump and any possible coordination between the Kremlin and his associates. Trump denies any coordination with Moscow took place. Presidential candidate Trump’s embrace of Putin and calls for closer cooperation with Moscow put him at odds with the House Republican caucus, whose members have long advocated a harder line on Russia, with the exception of Rohrabacher and a few others. Among GOP leaders in the House, McCarthy stood out as a Putin critic who in 2015 called for the imposition of “more severe” sanctions for its actions in eastern Ukraine and the annexation of Crimea. In May 2016, McCarthy signed up to serve as a Trump delegate at the Republican National Convention, breaking ranks with Ryan who said he still wasn’t ready to endorse the candidate. McCarthy’s relationship with Trump became so close that the president would sometimes refer to him as “my Kevin.” Trump was by then the lone Republican remaining in the contest for the nomination. Though Ryan continued to hold out, Trump picked up endorsements from the remaining GOP leaders in the House, including Rep. Steve Scalise, the Majority Whip from Louisiana, and Republican Conference Chairman Cathy McMorris Rodgers (Wash.) — both of whom took part in the June 15 conversation. Ryan announced on June 2 that he would vote for Trump to help “unite the party so we can win in the fall” but continued to clash with the candidate, including over Putin. While Trump sought to cast Putin as a better leader than then-President Obama, Ryan dubbed him an “aggressor” who didn’t share U.S. interests. On the same day as Ryan’s endorsement, Clinton stepped up her attacks on Trump over his public statements praising Putin. “If Donald gets his way, they’ll be celebrating in the Kremlin,” she said. Ukrainian officials were unnerved by Trump’s statements in support of Putin. Republicans, they had believed, were supposed to be tougher on Russia. When Trump named Paul Manafort as his campaign manager in April 2016, alarm bells in Kiev started ringing even louder. Manafort was already well known in Ukraine because of his influential role as a political consultant to Viktor Yanukovych, the country’s former Kremlin-friendly ruler until a popular uprising forced him to flee to Russia. Manafort had also consulted for a powerful Russian businessman with close ties to the Kremlin. “Ukraine was, in a sense, a testing ground for Manafort,” said Ukrainian political scientist Taras Berezovets, who became a grudging admirer of Manafort’s skills in the so-called “dark arts” of political stagecraft while Berezovets was working for one of Yanukovych’s political rivals. At the urging of Manafort, Yanukovych campaigned with populist slogans labeling NATO a “menace” and casting “elites” in the Ukrainian capital as out of touch, Berezovets said. Trump struck similar themes during the 2016 campaign. The FBI is now investigating whether Manafort, who stepped down as Trump’s campaign manager in August, received off-the-books payments from Yanukovych’s party, U.S. officials said. As part of that investigation, FBI agents recently took possession of a newly-discovered document which allegedly details payments totaling $750,000. Ukrainian lawmaker Sergii Leshchenko, who first disclosed the new document, declined to comment on his contacts with the FBI. A spokesperson for Manafort has said that Trump’s former campaign manager has not been contacted by the FBI. Manafort has also disputed the authenticity of the newly-discovered document. Groysman, on an official visit to Washington, met separately with Ryan and McCarthy on June 15 at the Capitol. He told them how the Russians meddled in European politics and called for “unity” in addressing the threat, according to U.S. and Ukrainian officials. Ryan issued a statement after the meeting saying, “the United States stands with Ukraine as it works to rebuild its economy and confront Russian aggression.” Later, Ryan spoke privately with McCarthy, Rodgers, Scalise and Rep. Patrick McHenry, the deputy whip, among others. Ryan mentioned his meeting with Groysman, prompting Rodgers to ask: “How are things going in Ukraine?” according to the recording. The situation was difficult, Ryan said. Groysman, he said, had told him that Russian-backed forces were firing 30-40 shells into Ukrainian territory every day. And the prime minister described Russian tactics that include “financing our populists, financing people in our governments to undo our governments.” Ryan said Russia’s goal was to “turn Ukraine against itself.” Groysman underlined Russia’s intentions, saying “They’re just going to roll right through us and go to the Baltics and everyone else,” according to Ryan’s summary of the prime minister’s remarks in the recording. “Yes,” Rodgers said in agreement, noting that the Russians were funding non-government organizations across Europe as part of a wider “propaganda war.” “Maniacal,” Ryan said. “And guess, guess who’s the only one taking a strong stand up against it? We are.” Rodgers disagreed. “We’re not…we’re not…but, we’re not,” she said. That’s when McCarthy brought the conversation about Russian meddling around to the DNC hack, Trump and Rohrabacher. “I’ll guarantee you that’s what it is...The Russians hacked the DNC and got the opp [opposition] research that they had on Trump,” McCarthy said with a laugh. Ryan asked who the Russians “delivered” the opposition research to. “There’s... there’s two people, I think, Putin pays: Rohrabacher and Trump,” McCarthy said, drawing some laughter. “Swear to God,” McCarthy added. “This is an off the record,” Ryan said. Some lawmakers laughed at that. “No leaks, alright?,” Ryan said, adding: “This is how we know we’re a real family here.” “That’s how you know that we’re tight,” Scalise said. “What’s said in the family stays in the family,” Ryan added. Source | ||
| ||