US Politics Mega-thread - Page 7484
Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
biology]major
United States2253 Posts
| ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On May 10 2017 10:17 xDaunt wrote: 1) Trump fired Comey either for a) legitimate reasons, or b) to cover up the investigation (an illegitimate reason). There's also possibility c) Trump fired Comey for illegitimate reasons that are unrelated to the Russia investigation. I'm also skeptical of the assumption that Trump firing Comey means Trump is guilty, but that doesn't mean I'm automatically assuming that Trump's reason for firing Comey is therefore legitimate. It seems more likely to me that Trump is firing Comey for some dumb reason and just happens to be oblivious of how bad the timing of this makes him look. | ||
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On May 10 2017 11:37 TheYango wrote: There's also possibility c) Trump fired Comey for illegitimate reasons that are unrelated to the Russia investigation. I'm also skeptical of the assumption that Trump firing Comey means Trump is guilty, but that doesn't mean I'm automatically assuming that Trump's reason for firing Comey is therefore legitimate. It seems more likely to me that Trump is firing Comey for some dumb reason and just happens to be oblivious of how bad the timing of this makes him look. Yeah, there could be other, unknown illicit reasons for why Trump canned Comey, but the running narrative around here is that it must have something to do with the Russia investigation, so that's the one that I singled out for scrutiny. | ||
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
| ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42904 Posts
On May 10 2017 11:37 biology]major wrote: What if the next fbi appointment turns down the job lol. That would be hilarious On the one hand the White House would have to be incredibly incompetent to not ask the candidate if he wants it in private before announcing to avoid that kind of public humiliation. On the other hand, that's exactly what happened when they announced their candidate to replace Flynn. | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42904 Posts
On May 10 2017 11:45 LegalLord wrote: I'd personally sidestep the Russia issue Least shocking post here. | ||
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
You want to be a troll or you got something useful to add here? | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
This is a good sign. Nothing weird here. | ||
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
On May 10 2017 11:53 LegalLord wrote: You want to be a troll or you got something useful to add here? No one is side stepping anything, shit is about to go down. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On May 10 2017 11:53 LegalLord wrote: You want to be a troll or you got something useful to add here? Translation: You are a Russian shill. User was warned for this post | ||
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
On May 10 2017 12:00 ShoCkeyy wrote: No one is side stepping anything, shit is about to go down. Let me word it a little differently: whether it's about Russia or not this is quite clearly a political firing. | ||
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
On May 10 2017 10:55 eviltomahawk wrote: The question is, what are those legitimate reasons? It's stated in the letters that the primary reason for the firing is due to the Clinton email investigation. While they can cite that investigation as a legitimate reason, it did occur last year, so what could have changed between inauguration and now regarding that investigation that would've prompted the firing? The timing seems awfully fishy because of that, which could be indicative of some other, unstated reasons for the firing that we can only speculate on. The main problem for Trump and Sessions is all the video of them contradicting the reasoning in the letters. At best this move is complete buffoonery, but we definitely need a special prosecutor. | ||
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
| ||
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
Meanwhile, the AHCA still has things going on : | ||
Zambrah
United States7333 Posts
| ||
m4ini
4215 Posts
On May 10 2017 11:41 xDaunt wrote: Yeah, there could be other, unknown illicit reasons for why Trump canned Comey, but the running narrative around here is that it must have something to do with the Russia investigation, so that's the one that I singled out for scrutiny. Weren't you the one who said "trump isn't stupid"? You just acknowledged that regardless of reasoning (and i can't wait to hear it, since everything "official" currently is pure bullshit), this was stupid. Or do you think "the running narrative" is only popular here, nowhere else? It's so obvious that this would happen. So either, he wanted that shitstorm to hide/push something, or he's an idiot. The sad part is, you actually can't tell because both are rather possible. Not to mention, it seems quite awkward to accept that there's quite the possibility for other unknown illicit reasons, but russia? That is absolutely impossible. And shame on anyone who immediately makes the connection, since it's so incredibly far-fetched. Fake news! Sad! | ||
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
The more James Comey showed up on television discussing the FBI’s investigation into possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, the more the White House bristled, according to aides to President Donald Trump. Frustration was growing among top associates of the president that Mr. Comey, in a series of appearances before a Senate panel, wouldn’t publicly tamp down questions about possible collusion with Russian interference in the 2016 presidential race. A person with knowledge of recent conversations said they wanted Mr. Comey to “say those three little words: ‘There’s no ties.’” In the months before his decision to dismiss Mr. Comey as head of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Mr. Trump grew unhappy that the media spotlight kept shining on the director. He viewed Mr. Comey as eager to step in front of TV cameras and questioned whether his expanding media profile was warping his view of the Russia investigation, the officials said. www.wsj.com | ||
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
| ||
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
| ||
ChristianS
United States3188 Posts
On May 10 2017 10:17 xDaunt wrote: No, you pretty much have it backwards. There's a critical difference between presuming that someone is above a certain threshold of stupidity and then presuming that someone is smart. The logic is basically this: 1) Trump fired Comey either for a) legitimate reasons, or b) to cover up the investigation (an illegitimate reason). 2) Trump would only have reason to fire Comey to cover up the investigation if there was something to that investigation. 3) However, if there is something to the investigation, then firing Comey won't stop the investigation. 4) Only someone who is really stupid wouldn't understand Point 3 and would try to fire Comey to stop the investigation. 5) I find it highly unlikely that Trump is stupid enough to not understand Point 3. 6) For this reason, I think that it is more likely that than not that Trump fired Comey for legitimate reasons. Just wanted to make sure we weren't going full "this looks super incriminating, which is why he's OBVIOUSLY not guilty." Okay, so followup question. Nixon was happy to fire people investigating him to try to impede the investigation. Was Nixon too dumb to understand point 3? | ||
| ||