• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:53
CEST 11:53
KST 18:53
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202558RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 What tournaments are world championships? RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Post Pic of your Favorite Food! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 784 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 6407

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6405 6406 6407 6408 6409 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
December 12 2016 03:50 GMT
#128121
On December 12 2016 12:30 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
I definitely agree with you that Tim Kaine was a pretty bad pick

You know, here's the odd thing: pretty much everyone agrees after the election agrees that Kaine wasn't a good choice. Throughout the election, though, it didn't really even see much mention. I definitely expressed my disapproval of the man more than once, but few people were really willing to agree that he was a bad choice.

I guess the issue here is that no one really expected Clinton to lose and so it was sort of a moot point who it was, and an afterthought.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44300 Posts
December 12 2016 03:53 GMT
#128122
On December 12 2016 12:44 kwizach wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2016 12:26 Nevuk wrote:
On December 12 2016 11:46 kwizach wrote:
On December 12 2016 11:33 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On December 12 2016 11:23 LegalLord wrote:
The world got punked when people decided they couldn't risk having a racist sexist xenophobe in office and had to pick the most electable possible opponent just to make sure they couldn't possibly lose. The progressives would just have to get a few scraps and be glad they got something in return for getting behind said hyper-electable leader.


I get the satire, but I don't necessarily agree with the idea that Hillary was the worst that the Democrats could have fielded. Bernie may have done better and Biden probably would have won if he had run, but Hillary beat everyone in the primary and she even won the popular vote. It's not like she got rolled over in some sort of landslide.

Not only that, but the idea that HRC won the primary first and foremost because she was seen as more electable than Sanders is simply false and something I already debunked earlier in the thread.

It may not have been the primary reason anyone gave for voting for her, but it was by far the primary defense used by her supporters when Sanders was brought up. The defense was used to such an incredible extent that I feel that significant mockery of that argument is deserved when she lost to literally the least electable candidate of all time besides herself. On paper (aside from her scandals) she was very electable. In reality, she was flat out boring, which is a massive crime in the US political system.

As DarkPlasmaBall said, this wasn't my experience at all. Spontaneous arguments from the Clinton camp focused on her experience, her pragmatism, her policy knowledge, her ability to get things done, etc. It is the Sanders campaign, and in fact Sanders himself, who tried to persuade voters and superdelegates to vote for him instead of HRC because of polls showing him with bigger leads over Donald Trump. That was indeed one of the arguments put forward by individuals and outlets supporting Sanders, and I saw Clinton supporters reply to that argument more so than initiate electability claims.

In any case, I was addressing the claim that people voted for her because she was more electable, and it was clearly not one of the primary reasons.


I think that's a really good point. I have nothing against Bernie supporters making that argument, but they were definitely the ones who more frequently made that argument rather than Hillary supporters. (Both camps made plenty of other arguments too, of course.)
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
December 12 2016 03:55 GMT
#128123
In all fairness, back then we didn't know that DNC leaks would happen and that the emails would end quite badly. It was still a bad bet but not as bad as it would have been in July.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44300 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-12 04:40:42
December 12 2016 03:58 GMT
#128124
On December 12 2016 12:50 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2016 12:30 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
I definitely agree with you that Tim Kaine was a pretty bad pick

You know, here's the odd thing: pretty much everyone agrees after the election agrees that Kaine wasn't a good choice. Throughout the election, though, it didn't really even see much mention. I definitely expressed my disapproval of the man more than once, but few people were really willing to agree that he was a bad choice.

I guess the issue here is that no one really expected Clinton to lose and so it was sort of a moot point who it was, and an afterthought.


I had definitely voiced my concern about Tim Kaine as a pick as well; I have nothing against the guy, but pairing up the not-cool-mom-who-wants-to-be-the-cool-mom with the dad-who-is-the-king-of-dad-jokes was a pretty sad and unenthusiastic pairing. It seemed clear to me that Kaine was picked because he was the kind of guy who wouldn't get in the way or steal the limelight from Clinton. I was hoping for a liberal/ not-super-establishment firebrand runningmate like Bernie or Liz Warren to help unify the anti-establishment liberals and draw crowds. I think those would have been smarter and more strategic picks.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-12 04:01:20
December 12 2016 04:00 GMT
#128125
On December 12 2016 12:36 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2016 12:26 Nevuk wrote:
On December 12 2016 11:46 kwizach wrote:
On December 12 2016 11:33 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On December 12 2016 11:23 LegalLord wrote:
The world got punked when people decided they couldn't risk having a racist sexist xenophobe in office and had to pick the most electable possible opponent just to make sure they couldn't possibly lose. The progressives would just have to get a few scraps and be glad they got something in return for getting behind said hyper-electable leader.


I get the satire, but I don't necessarily agree with the idea that Hillary was the worst that the Democrats could have fielded. Bernie may have done better and Biden probably would have won if he had run, but Hillary beat everyone in the primary and she even won the popular vote. It's not like she got rolled over in some sort of landslide.

Not only that, but the idea that HRC won the primary first and foremost because she was seen as more electable than Sanders is simply false and something I already debunked earlier in the thread.

It may not have been the primary reason anyone gave for voting for her, but it was by far the primary defense used by her supporters when Sanders was brought up. The defense was used to such an incredible extent that I feel that significant mockery of that argument is deserved when she lost to literally the least electable candidate of all time besides herself. On paper (aside from her scandals) she was very electable. In reality, she was flat out boring, which is a massive crime in the US political system.


Wait, what? Are you saying that during the primary, it was commonplace for Clinton supporters to make the argument to Bernie supporters that Bernie supporters shouldn't vote for him during the primary- and that they should instead vote for Hillary during the primary- because Bernie couldn't possibly win the general election? That's news to me; all my experiences with Hillary supporters during the primary made arguments based on substantive policy and experience/ qualifications when trying to convince me to vote for her over Bernie. They didn't convince me in the primary, but they were sensible enough arguments that made me happy to vote for her in the general election. But yeah, she's obviously a lot more boring than Bernie fwiw.

Yeah, that exact argument. It was a very common experience for me to read in the wild. It was so absurd of an argument as to be surreal, to be honest. (It wasn't on this site, more on reddit and other places where moderation is less frequent).
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-12 04:16:20
December 12 2016 04:01 GMT
#128126
On December 12 2016 12:30 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
I don't really see a reason to buy into that conspiracy, sorry :/

Why not? Given that only two democrats one democrat plus Bernie ran against Hillary and that the DNC showed favoritism for Hillary, you really think that it's just a conspiracy theory?
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23221 Posts
December 12 2016 04:03 GMT
#128127
Is everyone forgetting Hillary made the "I'm more electable" argument herself at the Flint debate (pretty big stage)?

That prompted a lot of her supporters to make the same argument. Also, it's not so much the "electable" argument as EVERYONE dismissing Bernie having a chance in the first place.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
a_flayer
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Netherlands2826 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-12 04:19:40
December 12 2016 04:18 GMT
#128128
On December 12 2016 13:03 GreenHorizons wrote:
Is everyone forgetting Hillary made the "I'm more electable" argument herself at the Flint debate (pretty big stage)?

That prompted a lot of her supporters to make the same argument. Also, it's not so much the "electable" argument as EVERYONE dismissing Bernie having a chance in the first place.


I got that same feeling whenever I did hear Bernie mentioned on the MSM. People were just being so abrasively dismissive. Just as they did with Trump. Hell, it reminded me of some (BBC? I think British at any rate) documentary I saw on the political opposition in Russia. They were complaining about being cast aside, underfunded, not getting any airtime in the media or being dismissed when they did... All the same complaints as Bernie. At least they're not getting murdered anymore, I guess.
When you came along so righteous with a new national hate, so convincing is the ardor of war and of men, it's harder to breathe than to believe you're a friend. The wars at home, the wars abroad, all soaked in blood and lies and fraud.
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-12 04:20:44
December 12 2016 04:19 GMT
#128129
On December 12 2016 13:03 GreenHorizons wrote:
Is everyone forgetting Hillary made the "I'm more electable" argument herself at the Flint debate (pretty big stage)?

That prompted a lot of her supporters to make the same argument. Also, it's not so much the "electable" argument as EVERYONE dismissing Bernie having a chance in the first place.

Sanders was already making the argument much earlier than the debate in Flint, but we seem to be remembering the debate differently since it's actually Sanders who said the following:

SANDERS: I’ll tell you something, this is my right arm. I’m prepared to give — no, I shouldn’t say that. I would love to run against Donald Trump, and I’ll tell you why. For a start, but almost — not all, but almost every poll has shown that Sanders versus Trump does a lot better than Clinton versus Trump. Right here in Michigan there was a poll done, I think yesterday, or today, had me beating Trump in Michigan by 22 points.
SANDERS: Secretary Clinton beat him as well, but not by so much. And, that’s true nationally, and in many other states.

Clinton's argument when answering Cooper's question was about having received more votes thus far than Trump and any other presidential candidate, and about building a large coalition.

Anyway, the initial point was that people did not primarily vote for HRC because she was seen as more electable. I don't have anything else to add on that topic.
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44300 Posts
December 12 2016 04:22 GMT
#128130
On December 12 2016 13:01 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2016 12:30 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
I don't really see a reason to buy into that conspiracy, sorry :/

Why not? Given that only two democrats one democrat plus Bernie ran against Hillary and that the DNC showed favoritism for Hillary, you really think that it's just a conspiracy theory?


I believe Joe Biden's reason for not running (the death of his son), and there were 6 Democratic candidates who ran: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2016#Candidates

I think that unless you have more evidence besides "Biden's speech was really good though", I'm not going to be able to buy into the idea you're proposing.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-12 04:25:01
December 12 2016 04:24 GMT
#128131
Bernie Sanders is a Democrat in all but name. He wasn't part of "the Democratic establishment" but he was absolutely definitely a Democrat by voting record, ideology, and political alignment in general. The Vermont Democrats gave him their nomination for Senate but he declined it. I think it disingenuous to say he isn't a Democrat unless you think being part of the DNC is what it means to "be a Democrat."
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
December 12 2016 04:29 GMT
#128132
On December 12 2016 13:22 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2016 13:01 xDaunt wrote:
On December 12 2016 12:30 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
I don't really see a reason to buy into that conspiracy, sorry :/

Why not? Given that only two democrats one democrat plus Bernie ran against Hillary and that the DNC showed favoritism for Hillary, you really think that it's just a conspiracy theory?


I believe Joe Biden's reason for not running (the death of his son), and there were 6 Democratic candidates who ran: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2016#Candidates

I think that unless you have more evidence besides "Biden's speech was really good though", I'm not going to be able to buy into the idea you're proposing.

Ah yes, I forgot about them. They were like the equivalent of a bunch of Ben Carsons running.
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-12 04:32:46
December 12 2016 04:32 GMT
#128133
I think people were and are generally overstating how big the ideological difference between Clinton and Sanders is. The narrative of authentic left-winger vs neocon is very exciting and all but Clinton always was one of the most liberal Democrats around and Sanders would probably not have brought about single payer healthcare and free colleges if he would have ended up in office against a Republican congress, so the actual room for left-wing politics was limited anyway.

This whole story that was created I think really has hurt the Democrats. All Republicans turned out for Trump in the end, from Libertarian to crazy Evangelical to Conservative although Trump is non of those things. The Liberal-Left really needs to consolidate.
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44300 Posts
December 12 2016 04:34 GMT
#128134
On December 12 2016 13:29 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2016 13:22 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On December 12 2016 13:01 xDaunt wrote:
On December 12 2016 12:30 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
I don't really see a reason to buy into that conspiracy, sorry :/

Why not? Given that only two democrats one democrat plus Bernie ran against Hillary and that the DNC showed favoritism for Hillary, you really think that it's just a conspiracy theory?


I believe Joe Biden's reason for not running (the death of his son), and there were 6 Democratic candidates who ran: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2016#Candidates

I think that unless you have more evidence besides "Biden's speech was really good though", I'm not going to be able to buy into the idea you're proposing.

Ah yes, I forgot about them. They were like the equivalent of a bunch of Ben Carsons running.


Even less important imo (iirc, Carson had decent support early on in the primary before everyone realized he was just sleepwalking); these other no-name Democrats were more like whoever was on the JV Republican debate stage with <1% support. But I'm not surprised at all that the establishment DNC supported the best known and most qualified establishment candidate.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15686 Posts
December 12 2016 04:36 GMT
#128135
On December 12 2016 12:50 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2016 12:30 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
I definitely agree with you that Tim Kaine was a pretty bad pick

You know, here's the odd thing: pretty much everyone agrees after the election agrees that Kaine wasn't a good choice. Throughout the election, though, it didn't really even see much mention. I definitely expressed my disapproval of the man more than once, but few people were really willing to agree that he was a bad choice.

I guess the issue here is that no one really expected Clinton to lose and so it was sort of a moot point who it was, and an afterthought.

Hey now. I went bananas when she picked Kaine. It should have been Sanders. He would have taken it and he would have been able to deliver Wisconsin. Clinton's message with Kaine wasn't capable of taking back the voters she lost to sanders in Wisconsin.
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44300 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-12 04:39:43
December 12 2016 04:38 GMT
#128136
On December 12 2016 13:32 Nyxisto wrote:
I think people were and are generally overstating how big the ideological difference between Clinton and Sanders is.


I agree. Both Clinton and Sanders said on many occasions- even on the debate stage- that they agree on far more than they disagree on. From time to time, Bernie and some advisors would even throw out high percentages (not that they were expected to quantify this) on just how much he agreed with certain plans and policies. One example:

"But his side downplayed the prospect for major clashes in Philadelphia, calling the platform a victory that reflects Sanders' influence on the party. "We got 80% of what we wanted in this platform," top Sanders policy adviser Warren Gunnels told CNN." ~ http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/10/politics/democratic-platform-bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton/
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
December 12 2016 04:40 GMT
#128137
The big differences between Sanders and Clinton happened to be on issues I kind of cared about most, including trade and general FP direction. That was pretty significant, IMO.

Social issues, let's just say other people care about those more than I do. I'd support them but it's not what makes or breaks my support of candidates.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
December 12 2016 07:06 GMT
#128138
On December 12 2016 13:32 Nyxisto wrote:
I think people were and are generally overstating how big the ideological difference between Clinton and Sanders is. The narrative of authentic left-winger vs neocon is very exciting and all but Clinton always was one of the most liberal Democrats around and Sanders would probably not have brought about single payer healthcare and free colleges if he would have ended up in office against a Republican congress, so the actual room for left-wing politics was limited anyway.

This whole story that was created I think really has hurt the Democrats. All Republicans turned out for Trump in the end, from Libertarian to crazy Evangelical to Conservative although Trump is non of those things. The Liberal-Left really needs to consolidate.

Some days I hear that Clinton was one of the most moderate candidates they could've nominated. Today I hear from you she's one of the most liberal Democrats around. She obviously can't be both. They're both to the left of my conservatism, that's for sure. But I kind of want to wait and see if any of the Clinton-is-the-biggest-moderate voices resurface to say it. I remember that Podesta email about throwing a bone to the Bernie bros along the lines of 'we'll support minimum wage but that stops after election unity isn't necessary'. This is less for me about what she sold herself as--I saw both sides and it's a politician standard--and more about what kind of policies she'd really put her heart and soul (and corruption?) into.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
December 12 2016 07:41 GMT
#128139
By the way, has Trump said anything recently about his position on H1-B visas? He has spoken out quite strongly against them in some debate in March and it broadly fits with both his anti-immigration program and his pick of Sessions. But it just doesn't seem to come up often.

I hope he does kill it; I'd really like to see the program end.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12172 Posts
December 12 2016 08:42 GMT
#128140
On December 12 2016 13:32 Nyxisto wrote:
I think people were and are generally overstating how big the ideological difference between Clinton and Sanders is. The narrative of authentic left-winger vs neocon is very exciting and all but Clinton always was one of the most liberal Democrats around and Sanders would probably not have brought about single payer healthcare and free colleges if he would have ended up in office against a Republican congress, so the actual room for left-wing politics was limited anyway.

This whole story that was created I think really has hurt the Democrats. All Republicans turned out for Trump in the end, from Libertarian to crazy Evangelical to Conservative although Trump is non of those things. The Liberal-Left really needs to consolidate.


I was under the impression that Schumer had openly acknowledged that the establishment democrat strategy was a shift to the right. Strategically, to make it so that Republicans cover an even smaller amount of the voting population, and taking the left for granted because they can't really vote for anyone else anyway.

Either my information is incorrect (that very well may be the case, I'm going to look for it again later when I have time) or we can't really overstate the difference between a social democrat and the picture the democratic party had in mind.
No will to live, no wish to die
Prev 1 6405 6406 6407 6408 6409 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 7m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech101
StarCraft: Brood War
Nal_rA 5358
Shuttle 1516
Larva 516
BeSt 480
actioN 219
ToSsGirL 182
ZerO 113
ggaemo 112
TY 107
JulyZerg 96
[ Show more ]
Dewaltoss 86
EffOrt 68
Backho 63
sorry 61
Sharp 44
Soma 33
Snow 15
ajuk12(nOOB) 13
Dota 2
XaKoH 547
XcaliburYe263
Counter-Strike
allub142
Other Games
summit1g6232
singsing1459
ceh9652
Beastyqt442
Fuzer 198
ZerO(Twitch)5
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 62
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV193
League of Legends
• Stunt752
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
1h 7m
Serral vs Cure
Solar vs Classic
OSC
4h 7m
CranKy Ducklings
1d
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 4h
CSO Cup
1d 6h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 8h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 23h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.