• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:13
CEST 18:13
KST 01:13
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3
Community News
Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)10BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13
StarCraft 2
General
Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2) feardragon: Blizzards biggest blunder with SC was… TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation How herO can make history in the Code S S2 finals
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group A [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group B SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 3
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 25862 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 6266

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6264 6265 6266 6267 6268 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
hunts
Profile Joined September 2010
United States2113 Posts
November 18 2016 21:49 GMT
#125301
On November 19 2016 06:47 biology]major wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 06:45 hunts wrote:
On November 19 2016 06:41 biology]major wrote:
On November 19 2016 06:26 Stratos_speAr wrote:
On November 19 2016 06:24 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 06:16 Nyxisto wrote:
Milo also thinks that lesbians don't exist, why the fuck are we taking his personal experiences seriously again?

Do you have something substantive to say about the charge that Bannon is a white-supremacist, anti-semite?


I think that the main charges stem from the fact that he ran Breitbart, which is an explicit vessel for the racist/sexist/xenophobic beliefs of the Alt-Right.


So you don't think there is differnce between that and him personally having those beliefs?


Would he run a website dedicated to sexism, racism, xenophobia, and anti-semitism if he did not hold those beliefs? Do you think he doesn't believe any of that but just wanted to run a website that posted fake articles and blogs that were sexist, racist, xenophobic, and antisemitic just for fun while not believing any of it?


Yes it's a niche market to make money using shock value. It's entirely possible, you're the one making assumptions.


Making assumptions on a very long history of hateful things said by him and those he employs? At some point you are no longer making assumptions but stating reality. Unless you have some concrete proof beyond "well he hired some people that aren't white." then we must believe what we can actually see, and that is the racism, sexism, xenophobia, homophobia, antisemitism and just plain bigotry that he stands for as the leader of breitbart.
twitch.tv/huntstv 7x legend streamer
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
November 18 2016 21:50 GMT
#125302
On November 19 2016 06:47 Nyxisto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 06:45 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 06:26 Stratos_speAr wrote:
On November 19 2016 06:24 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 06:16 Nyxisto wrote:
Milo also thinks that lesbians don't exist, why the fuck are we taking his personal experiences seriously again?

Do you have something substantive to say about the charge that Bannon is a white-supremacist, anti-semite?


I think that the main charges stem from the fact that he ran Breitbart, which is an explicit vessel for the racist/sexist/xenophobic beliefs of the Alt-Right.

That you think that Breitbart is an Alt-Right website shows how little you know about what Breitbart actually is and what they publish. Quit taking sensationalist garbage about your political opponents at face value and actually read what they have to say before deciding who they are. This really isn't hard.


Are you actually going to respond to my post and can tell me if you agree whether this kind of journalism is white supremacism or are you just going to dodge given that you explicitly asked me? You do this all the time when you get called out.

I already did. The answer is categorically no: it's not white supremacism, and that you think it is reeks of SJWism.
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-18 21:55:54
November 18 2016 21:50 GMT
#125303
On November 19 2016 06:47 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 06:26 Nyxisto wrote:
On November 19 2016 06:24 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 06:16 Nyxisto wrote:
Milo also thinks that lesbians don't exist, why the fuck are we taking his personal experiences seriously again?

Do you have something substantive to say about the charge that Bannon is a white-supremacist, anti-semite?


Well he constantly says white supremacist things, I don't care how many Jews he hires. You can be an anti-semite and Jewish.

How about stuff like this? http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/01/hoist-it-high-and-proud-the-confederate-flag-proclaims-a-glorious-heritage/

"While your supporters are trashing the monuments and reputations of the forefathers of so many Americans, Barack, you might just want to remind us again which state of the Union, north or south, your ancestors resided in during the traumatic years 1861- 1865? Or did Kenya not have a dog in that fight?"

Completely normal journalism, right?

Let's bring back a post that I made a few pages ago about the poisonous effect of the SJW's:

Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 03:04 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 02:53 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 02:51 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 02:47 Nebuchad wrote:
The extremely few people I've heard identify themselves as SJWs were generally quite rational, much more than you would expect given the rep they get. I have no doubt that you can dig up a few stories where some of them do something irrational but most of the stories I've seen regarding universities are wilfully amplified to create a controversy. The notable exception is refusing right-wing speakers, that is actually fairly bad.

You need look no further than the arguments that there have been with the SJW posters in this thread to see how toxic their perspective is.


I don't really see who would be a SJW in this thread, who am I missing? I would have said I'm one of the closest.

You are correct on the history zlefin.

Plansix is the most notorious and consistent. But the real problem is that the SJW's rhetoric poisons political discourse overall by seeping into the arguments of the left, even if those the various persons on the left making those argument wouldn't consider themselves to be SJWs. We just saw a classic example of this a few posts ago:

On November 19 2016 02:26 Doodsmack wrote:
On November 19 2016 01:53 xDaunt wrote:
My biggest hope is that he fixes our immigration system


The key to Trump's support. Trump's main support comes in the form of the immigration vote. It's always the first thing they mention. Deep down, these people want less Mexicans and Muslims around. Let's not beat around the bush with abstract cultural decline arguments.


None of the conservative posters around here are remotely surprised at Doodsmack's inability to accept or recognize that people who want to stop "fix immigration" -- or even stop illegal immigration -- have reasons for doing so that are unrelated to race. So instead of having a discussion on the merits of proper policy for the country, the discussion has devolved to crass identity politics. This is why I rail against SJWs and the regressive left.


The liberal argument regarding the propriety of flying the Confederate falls right in line with what I am saying.


What's the argument, Social justice warriors are mean so you have to rehabilitate a racist symbol as a kind of counter-measure?

Obama deported more people than bush, if this is not race related, why do you actually think that 'liberals' do not want to 'fix' immigration? I can answer, because they don't do it while ranting about Mexicans and Muslims.
Blisse
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Canada3710 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-18 22:49:28
November 18 2016 21:51 GMT
#125304
In the same vein that Breitbart hiring Jews isn't necessarily an end-all discussion counterexample to Bannon's anti-Semitism, that fact he headed an organization that regularly published discriminatory material doesn't necessarily immediately make him racist. He could for example, have a strong moral conviction that the right to free speech implies the continued existence of discriminatory platforms. Look for more supporting evidence.

Personally I think he is all the -ists he's been called. The way he uses the word Jew in his quotes seem much more hate fueled. I don't think this alone, out of context, 20 years ago, is discrediting, but in a better world I would prefer people who were more tolerant. However, I do find it oddly sickening that so many "nationalist" movement heads like Bannon.

Also personal bone to pick, people keep bringing up Hillary's KKK connection with Byrd. Byrd has repeatedly apologized for his past in the KKK and shown an explicit and consistent change in behavior from his racist past. Bannon has not disavowed the support of all these -ist supporters, and has not consistently acted in a way that suggests he's not (or trying not to be) -ist.
There is no one like you in the universe.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
November 18 2016 21:56 GMT
#125305
On November 19 2016 06:50 Nyxisto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 06:47 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 06:26 Nyxisto wrote:
On November 19 2016 06:24 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 06:16 Nyxisto wrote:
Milo also thinks that lesbians don't exist, why the fuck are we taking his personal experiences seriously again?

Do you have something substantive to say about the charge that Bannon is a white-supremacist, anti-semite?


Well he constantly says white supremacist things, I don't care how many Jews he hires. You can be an anti-semite and Jewish.

How about stuff like this? http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/01/hoist-it-high-and-proud-the-confederate-flag-proclaims-a-glorious-heritage/

"While your supporters are trashing the monuments and reputations of the forefathers of so many Americans, Barack, you might just want to remind us again which state of the Union, north or south, your ancestors resided in during the traumatic years 1861- 1865? Or did Kenya not have a dog in that fight?"

Completely normal journalism, right?

Let's bring back a post that I made a few pages ago about the poisonous effect of the SJW's:

On November 19 2016 03:04 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 02:53 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 02:51 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 02:47 Nebuchad wrote:
The extremely few people I've heard identify themselves as SJWs were generally quite rational, much more than you would expect given the rep they get. I have no doubt that you can dig up a few stories where some of them do something irrational but most of the stories I've seen regarding universities are wilfully amplified to create a controversy. The notable exception is refusing right-wing speakers, that is actually fairly bad.

You need look no further than the arguments that there have been with the SJW posters in this thread to see how toxic their perspective is.


I don't really see who would be a SJW in this thread, who am I missing? I would have said I'm one of the closest.

You are correct on the history zlefin.

Plansix is the most notorious and consistent. But the real problem is that the SJW's rhetoric poisons political discourse overall by seeping into the arguments of the left, even if those the various persons on the left making those argument wouldn't consider themselves to be SJWs. We just saw a classic example of this a few posts ago:

On November 19 2016 02:26 Doodsmack wrote:
On November 19 2016 01:53 xDaunt wrote:
My biggest hope is that he fixes our immigration system


The key to Trump's support. Trump's main support comes in the form of the immigration vote. It's always the first thing they mention. Deep down, these people want less Mexicans and Muslims around. Let's not beat around the bush with abstract cultural decline arguments.


None of the conservative posters around here are remotely surprised at Doodsmack's inability to accept or recognize that people who want to stop "fix immigration" -- or even stop illegal immigration -- have reasons for doing so that are unrelated to race. So instead of having a discussion on the merits of proper policy for the country, the discussion has devolved to crass identity politics. This is why I rail against SJWs and the regressive left.


The liberal argument regarding the propriety of flying the Confederate falls right in line with what I am saying.


What's the argument, Social justice warriors are mean so you have to rehabilitate a racist symbol as a kind of counter-measure?

Obama deported more people than bush, if this is not race related, why do you actually think that 'liberals' do not want to 'fix' immigration? I can answer, because they don't do it while ranting about Mexicans and Muslims.

It's the typical SJW argument on everything: our opponents are a bunch of racists, so we have the moral high ground, so we win automatically.
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
November 18 2016 21:58 GMT
#125306
But please answer the question, Obama has deported more people than any other president before, as far as I know his strategy was to foremost deport criminals. So given this fact, why are people somehow convinced that Obama is lax on illegal immigration or does not value American border security?
TheYango
Profile Joined September 2008
United States47024 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-18 22:12:21
November 18 2016 22:03 GMT
#125307
On November 19 2016 06:41 biology]major wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 06:26 Stratos_speAr wrote:
On November 19 2016 06:24 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 06:16 Nyxisto wrote:
Milo also thinks that lesbians don't exist, why the fuck are we taking his personal experiences seriously again?

Do you have something substantive to say about the charge that Bannon is a white-supremacist, anti-semite?


I think that the main charges stem from the fact that he ran Breitbart, which is an explicit vessel for the racist/sexist/xenophobic beliefs of the Alt-Right.


So you don't think there is differnce between that and him personally having those beliefs?

Personally, I acknowledge that there's a difference between actually being racist/anti-Semitic and simply playing host to them because it appeals to the crowd on your website. However, it's not a difference I care about, because playing host to actually racist/anti-Semitic writers solely for the sake of shock factor and page views is a generally shitty thing to do also. The distinction between "Bannon is a racist/anti-Semite" and "Bannon is not a racist/anti-Semite, he just puts up with them writing shit for his website" is not one that really improves my opinion of him very much. The discussion of whether Bannon is/isn't a racist is a semantic one that serves no purpose other than to distract from the more general discussion of people finding him to be a distasteful person to have associated with the US President or with any position of real influence.

We had a similar discussion about Jill Stein during the election as well. The difference between "Jill Stein is anti-science" and "Jill Stein is not anti-science but simply panders to anti-science people to get their vote" is pointless. Same deal here.
Moderator
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-18 22:07:54
November 18 2016 22:04 GMT
#125308
On November 19 2016 06:58 Nyxisto wrote:
But please answer the question, Obama has deported more people than any other president before, as far as I know his strategy was to foremost deport criminals. So given this fact, why are people somehow convinced that Obama is lax on illegal immigration or does not value American border security?

Which question? You keep moving around. And you still haven't posted anything remotely resembling compelling evidence that Bannon is a white-supremacist or anti-semite. And guess what? You're not going to be able to, because the allegation is simply untrue, no matter how hard you poor leftists wish it wasn't. The evil racist Bannon is a figment of your imagination. But hey, keep lecturing us on the right about how we're untethered from reality and the "facts."

As for your question about Obama being lax on illegal immigration, we need look no further than the tolerance and promotion of sanctuary cities, derision of wall building, and all of the executive orders that he wrote trying to pass amnesty by fiat. And don't even get me started on the constant derision that Obama and the democrats throw at the right for daring to suggest that we secure our borders. Yeah, Obama isn't even in Trump's league when it comes to border security.
TanGeng
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Sanya12364 Posts
November 18 2016 22:05 GMT
#125309
On November 19 2016 06:58 Nyxisto wrote:
But please answer the question, Obama has deported more people than any other president before, as far as I know his strategy was to foremost deport criminals. So given this fact, why are people somehow convinced that Obama is lax on illegal immigration or does not value American border security?


As with all statistics, if you aren't looking into methodology, the numbers are meaningless.
Moderator我们是个踏实的赞助商模式俱乐部
Antyee
Profile Joined May 2011
Hungary1011 Posts
November 18 2016 22:10 GMT
#125310
On November 19 2016 06:58 Nyxisto wrote:
But please answer the question, Obama has deported more people than any other president before, as far as I know his strategy was to foremost deport criminals. So given this fact, why are people somehow convinced that Obama is lax on illegal immigration or does not value American border security?

They changed the way deportation numbers are counted. It was about counting people who were turned away at the border while they weren't counted beforehand or something like that.
"My spoon is too big."
Blisse
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Canada3710 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-18 22:23:06
November 18 2016 22:10 GMT
#125311
On November 19 2016 07:05 TanGeng wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 06:58 Nyxisto wrote:
But please answer the question, Obama has deported more people than any other president before, as far as I know his strategy was to foremost deport criminals. So given this fact, why are people somehow convinced that Obama is lax on illegal immigration or does not value American border security?


As with all statistics, if you aren't looking into methodology, the numbers are meaningless.



From 2012.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/aug/10/american-principles-action/has-barack-obama-deported-more-people-any-other-pr/

According to current figures from Immigration and Customs Enforcement -- the federal agency responsible for deportations -- Obama has removed 1.4 million people during his 42 months in office so far. Technically, that's fewer than under George W. Bush, whose cumulative total was 2 million. But Bush’s number covers eight full years, which doesn’t allow an apples-to-apples comparison.

If you instead compare the two presidents’ monthly averages, it works out to 32,886 for Obama and 20,964 for Bush, putting Obama clearly in the lead. Bill Clinton is far behind with 869,676 total and 9,059 per month. All previous occupants of the White House going back to 1892 fell well short of the level of the three most recent presidents.

We wondered whether there might have been a surge of undocumented immigrants that explained the increase, but there wasn’t. During the first two years of Obama’s tenure, the Pew Hispanic Center estimated the illegal immigrant population nationwide at 11.2 million, compared to an average during Bush’s eight-year tenure of 10.6 million. And illegal immigration actually peaked late in Bush’s second term, at which point the recession hit and the numbers declined under Obama. Such patterns do not explain the 57 percent bump in monthly deportations that we found under Obama.



From 2016.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/obamas-deportation-policy-numbers/story?id=41715661

Between 2009 and 2015 his [Obama's] administration has removed more than 2.5 million people through immigration orders, which doesn’t include the number of people who "self-deported" or were turned away and/or returned to their home country at the border by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

According to governmental data, the Obama administration has deported more people than any other president's administration in history.

...

In fact, they have deported more than the sum of all the presidents of the 20th century.

President George W. Bush's administration deported just over two million during his time in office; and Obama’s numbers don’t reflect his last year in office, for which data is not yet available.

...

President Obama directed U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to focus on criminals, not families, during his November 2014 executive action on immigration.

According to their website, "ICE has continued to increase its focus on identifying, arresting, and removing convicted criminals in prisons and jails, and also at-large arrests in the interior."

In fiscal year 2015, 91 percent of people removed from inside the U.S. were previously convicted of a crime.

The administration made the first priority "threats to national security, border security, and public safety." That includes gang members, convicted felons or charged with "aggravated felony" and anyone apprehended at the border trying to enter the country illegally.

In 2015, 81 percent, or 113,385, of the removals were the priority one removals.

Priority two includes "misdemeanants and new immigration violators."

That includes "aliens convicted of three or more misdemeanor offenses, other than minor traffic" violations, as well as those convicted of domestic violence, sexual abuse, burglary, DUIs or drug trafficking.



http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-obama-deportations-20140402-story.html

On the other side of the ledger, the number of people deported at or near the border has gone up — primarily as a result of changing who gets counted in the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency's deportation statistics.

The vast majority of those border crossers would not have been treated as formal deportations under most previous administrations. If all removals were tallied, the total sent back to Mexico each year would have been far higher under those previous administrations than it is now.

...

Until recent years, most people caught illegally crossing the southern border were simply bused back into Mexico in what officials called "voluntary returns," but which critics derisively termed "catch and release." Those removals, which during the 1990s reached more 1 million a year, were not counted in Immigration and Customs Enforcement's deportation statistics.

Now, the vast majority of border crossers who are apprehended get fingerprinted and formally deported. The change began during the George W. Bush administration and accelerated under Obama. The policy stemmed in part from a desire to ensure that people who had crossed into the country illegally would have formal charges on their records.



I'm not sure who to believe right now, but I don't see anything necessarily good or bad about having higher or lower figures. Need more context. I agree with Obama's immigration/deportation changes. I have no clue what Trump wants to do because he has outlined basically jack shit on policy.
There is no one like you in the universe.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-18 22:18:33
November 18 2016 22:17 GMT
#125312
No need to worry guys it's all a hoax remember that...

Political people in the United States are watching the chaos in Washington in the moment. But some people in the science community are watching the chaos somewhere else — the Arctic.

It’s polar night there now — the sun isn’t rising in much of the Arctic. That’s when the Arctic is supposed to get super-cold, when the sea ice that covers the vast Arctic Ocean is supposed to grow and thicken.

But in fall of 2016 — which has been a zany year for the region, with multiple records set for low levels of monthly sea ice — something is totally off. The Arctic is super-hot, even as a vast area of cold polar air has been displaced over Siberia.

At the same time, one of the key indicators of the state of the Arctic — the extent of sea ice covering the polar ocean — is at a record low. The ice is freezing up again, as it always does this time of year after reaching its September low, but it isn’t doing so as rapidly as usual.

In fact, the ice’s area is even lower than it was during the record-low 2012:

[image loading]


Twitter’s expert Arctic watchers also are stunned. Zack Labe, a PhD student at the University of California at Irvine who studies the Arctic, tweeted out an image on Wednesday from the Danish Meteorological Institute showing Arctic temperatures about 20 degrees Celsius higher than normal above 80 degrees North Latitude.

“Today’s latest #Arctic mean temperature continues to move the wrong direction . . . up. Quite an anomalous spike!,” Labe wrote. Here’s the figure:

[image loading]

“Despite onset of #PolarNight, temperatures near #NorthPole increasing. Extraordinary situation right now in #Arctic, w/record low #seaice,” added Daniel Swain, a climate scientist at UCLA.

This is the second year in a row that temperatures near the North Pole have risen to freakishly warm levels. During 2015’s final days, the temperature near the Pole spiked to the melting point thanks to a massive storm that pumped warm air into the region.

So what’s going on here?

“It’s about 20C [36 degrees Fahrenheit] warmer than normal over most of the Arctic Ocean, along with cold anomalies of about the same magnitude over north-central Asia,” Jennifer Francis, an Arctic specialist at Rutgers University, said by email Wednesday.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12089 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-18 22:29:35
November 18 2016 22:28 GMT
#125313
Well xDaunt, it should strike you that while you are accusing people of dismissing claims using terms like "racism" to avoid answering, you are effectively dismissing claims using terms like "SJWs" to avoid answering.

I've never read Breitbart, I don't know what it's about. A lot of people in the media (my echo chamber) have told me that it can be qualified in certain ways. Clearly you have some other sources (your echo chamber?) that tell you that it's something else. Perhaps it's your experience reading Breitbart? I don't know if you read it or not.

One of these two claims is correct, the other is not. So far, it seems logical to assume that you are the one who is incorrect, simply because of Occam's razor: the alt-right seems to believe that, the media in general seems to believe that, most people seem to believe that. It's easier for you to be wrong than them, logically.

But if they're all wrong, then that's an interesting case to make. I would be interested in reading about that case. Much more interested than I would be in learning about how I'm to be dismissed because I'm a SJW and I have echo chambers.
No will to live, no wish to die
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-18 22:31:38
November 18 2016 22:30 GMT
#125314
On November 19 2016 07:04 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 06:58 Nyxisto wrote:
But please answer the question, Obama has deported more people than any other president before, as far as I know his strategy was to foremost deport criminals. So given this fact, why are people somehow convinced that Obama is lax on illegal immigration or does not value American border security?

Which question? You keep moving around. And you still haven't posted anything remotely resembling compelling evidence that Bannon is a white-supremacist or anti-semite. And guess what? You're not going to be able to, because the allegation is simply untrue, no matter how hard you poor leftists wish it wasn't. The evil racist Bannon is a figment of your imagination. But hey, keep lecturing us on the right about how we're untethered from reality and the "facts."

As for your question about Obama being lax on illegal immigration, we need look no further than the tolerance and promotion of sanctuary cities, derision of wall building, and all of the executive orders that he wrote trying to pass amnesty by fiat. And don't even get me started on the constant derision that Obama and the democrats throw at the right for daring to suggest that we secure our borders. Yeah, Obama isn't even in Trump's league when it comes to border security.


I consider celebrating the confederate flag white supremacism, you don't. If that's not extreme enough for you there's nothing that will convince you that he is indeed a white supremacist.

And that Obama didn't try to build a wall is good. Most illegal immigration is visa overstays, it's not his business to strongarm cities either. Just like with terrorism the difference between Obama and Trump is that Obama has never politicised the justice system or war.

The Obama administration has gone to pretty great lengths to take a considerable amount of terrorists out, but he has never divided the population in the US or has turned it into a circus. Trump has not served in a public office for even a day and apparently he is tougher than Obama?
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
November 18 2016 22:36 GMT
#125315
On November 19 2016 07:28 Nebuchad wrote:
Well xDaunt, it should strike you that while you are accusing people of dismissing claims using terms like "racism" to avoid answering, you are effectively dismissing claims using terms like "SJWs" to avoid answering.

I've answered everything, so I have no idea what you're talking about.
TheTenthDoc
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States9561 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-18 22:46:20
November 18 2016 22:46 GMT
#125316
I mean, Trump said at the debates he's a big fan of Obama's immigration policy and that he was doing a great job. Trump just wants a wall on the whole border...for some reason.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
November 18 2016 22:52 GMT
#125317
On November 19 2016 07:46 TheTenthDoc wrote:
I mean, Trump said at the debates he's a big fan of Obama's immigration policy and that he was doing a great job. Trump just wants a wall on the whole border...for some reason.


I'm not sure you should be questioning Trump on immigration, he got Sheriff Joe's endorsement.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12089 Posts
November 18 2016 22:53 GMT
#125318
On November 19 2016 07:36 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 07:28 Nebuchad wrote:
Well xDaunt, it should strike you that while you are accusing people of dismissing claims using terms like "racism" to avoid answering, you are effectively dismissing claims using terms like "SJWs" to avoid answering.

I've answered everything, so I have no idea what you're talking about.


And I described your answers as similar to someone saying that their opposition can be dismissed because it's racist. In the six to seven answers you've given, you've mentioned brainwashing, echo chambers, SJWisms, and SJWs (twice). We get the point. We should educate ourselves until we find out that you're right. We were just hoping that you would be the teacher.
No will to live, no wish to die
Blisse
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Canada3710 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-18 22:54:43
November 18 2016 22:53 GMT
#125319
Does this boil down to whether Bannon turning Breitbart into an alt-right newsground mean that Bannon is a white nationalist/supremist? How do you distinguish between the alt-right and white nationalism/supremism?
There is no one like you in the universe.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
November 18 2016 23:00 GMT
#125320
On November 19 2016 07:53 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 07:36 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 07:28 Nebuchad wrote:
Well xDaunt, it should strike you that while you are accusing people of dismissing claims using terms like "racism" to avoid answering, you are effectively dismissing claims using terms like "SJWs" to avoid answering.

I've answered everything, so I have no idea what you're talking about.


And I described your answers as similar to someone saying that their opposition can be dismissed because it's racist. In the six to seven answers you've given, you've mentioned brainwashing, echo chambers, SJWisms, and SJWs (twice). We get the point. We should educate ourselves until we find out that you're right. We were just hoping that you would be the teacher.

What do you want education on specifically? You folks are the ones who are asserting that Bannon is an anti-semite and white-supremacist, to which I responded show me the proof. I have yet to see it.
Prev 1 6264 6265 6266 6267 6268 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
13:00
King of the Hill Weekly #213
CranKy Ducklings292
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
BRAT_OK 58
EnDerr 37
MindelVK 23
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 37089
Calm 4467
firebathero 632
Mini 624
Shuttle 522
Stork 413
Hyuk 308
hero 101
Rush 81
Yoon 75
[ Show more ]
ToSsGirL 44
Nal_rA 26
sSak 24
scan(afreeca) 18
ajuk12(nOOB) 11
Noble 9
IntoTheRainbow 8
Dota 2
Gorgc6854
qojqva2373
boxi98156
Counter-Strike
fl0m5188
olofmeister2197
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0607
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu113
Other Games
tarik_tv30807
gofns17056
FrodaN1206
hiko745
Beastyqt406
crisheroes402
Lowko187
elazer111
XaKoH 77
Trikslyr63
QueenE42
FunKaTv 14
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream6215
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• 3DClanTV 29
• Adnapsc2 9
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 32
• Rasowy 9
• Michael_bg 5
• FirePhoenix4
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2434
League of Legends
• Nemesis12850
• TFBlade941
Other Games
• WagamamaTV137
• Shiphtur71
Upcoming Events
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
2h 47m
Korean StarCraft League
10h 47m
SOOP
16h 47m
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
17h 47m
WardiTV Invitational
18h 47m
ByuN vs MaNa
MaxPax vs Solar
Reynor vs Creator
Gerald vs Spirit
Cheesadelphia
22h 47m
CSO Cup
1d
BSL: ProLeague
1d 1h
Hawk vs UltrA
Sziky vs spx
TerrOr vs JDConan
GSL Code S
1d 15h
Rogue vs herO
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 17h
[ Show More ]
BSL: ProLeague
2 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
Cross vs Doodle
MadiNho vs Dragon
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
4 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.