• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:00
CEST 11:00
KST 18:00
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202550RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series BW General Discussion ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [Update] ShieldBattery: 1v1 Fastest Support!
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 702 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 5086

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5084 5085 5086 5087 5088 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
CobaltBlu
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States919 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-21 23:50:58
September 21 2016 23:50 GMT
#101701
On September 22 2016 08:47 Doodsmack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 08:28 Dan HH wrote:
TRUMP OPPOSES PRESIDENT OBAMA’S PLAN TO SURRENDER AMERICAN INTERNET CONTROL TO FOREIGN POWERS

"Donald J. Trump is committed to preserving Internet freedom for the American people and citizens all over the world. The U.S. should not turn control of the Internet over to the United Nations and the international community. President Obama intends to do so on his own authority – just 10 days from now, on October 1st, unless Congress acts quickly to stop him. The Republicans in Congress are admirably leading a fight to save the Internet this week, and need all the help the American people can give them to be successful. Hillary Clinton’s Democrats are refusing to protect the American people by not protecting the Internet.


The U.S. created, developed and expanded the Internet across the globe. U.S. oversight has kept the Internet free and open without government censorship – a fundamental American value rooted in our Constitution’s Free Speech clause. Internet freedom is now at risk with the President’s intent to cede control to international interests, including countries like China and Russia, which have a long track record of trying to impose online censorship. Congress needs to act, or Internet freedom will be lost for good, since there will be no way to make it great again once it is lost." - Stephen Miller, National Policy Director


https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trump-opposes-president-obama-plan-to-surrender-american-internet

Is Cruz now Donald's tech advisor? ICANN has nothing to do with censorship or muh freedom


It really takes a simpleton to want to repeatedly claim Obama is serving foreign interests.


Trump isn't interested in understanding stuff like this. He is just trying to distort reality as much as possible in a way that benefits him by repeating lies. It is the same thing he is trying to do with the lies he constantly tells about Clinton's gun and immigration policies.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23221 Posts
September 21 2016 23:53 GMT
#101702
On September 22 2016 08:43 FiWiFaKi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 08:30 GreenHorizons wrote:
On September 22 2016 08:27 FiWiFaKi wrote:
On September 22 2016 08:26 GreenHorizons wrote:
Judging by the responses none of you even know what I'm talking about?

I'm not talking about the twin towers at all. I'm talking about WTC-7. Sounds like you guys are like me and just wrote it off as Alex Jones stuff without looking much deeper.

If anyone knows anything about WTC-7 I'd be interested in hearing from them.


Actually I do:





A large chunk of the building was burning, so you should take it easy, and not call people out without some thought first.


Those are just typical office fires, if those made buildings like that prone to near 0-resistance collapse, no one would go in them.

+ Show Spoiler +


I presume you've read the NIST report as well?


Most things are designed to withstand any one bad thing happening to it at once, so a fire for example, sure. It's tough to anticipate a large combination of things at once, and usually this results in the negative effects amplifying themselves many times.

I remember watching a documentary years and years back that said something about bad fireproofing standards on the steel, then you have a massive shock to the foundation when other things are collapsing, that's the building going through an earthquake. You have debris hitting the building from the other stuff happening. Combine that with the fire going on for hours on end.

And now when quickly skimming wikipedia, I see some stuff about a sprinkler system needing manual initiation, low water pressure to deal with the flow rate of water needed, and who knows, maybe some minor construction faults as well.

Point is, a reasonable number of buildings would have fallen in these circumstances... Would all? Unlikely, but it's completely feasible for it to happen, say the average skyscraper would have a 30-50% chance of falling in this situation. When you girlfriend told you she finished eating the food you made she didn't like and there was a 50% chance she ate it and a 50% chance she threw it out, is your reaction to go check the garbage can?

It's a completely realistic thing to happen, and I don't know why people keep trying to hang onto these things so tight.


I'm feeling like that's a no to reading the NIST report. The official report discounts any "large combination of things" they say it was the fire changing the loads alone that caused a near zero-resistance collapse.

Also the odds are nowhere near 30-50% by any measure. There have been lots of fires in tall buildings, some that were clearly worse, the only time they've ever collapsed like that, in all the time they've existed, happened on that day.

But as Nec pointed out this just acts as a distraction. The bottom line is that I do own what I'm voting for.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-21 23:55:42
September 21 2016 23:54 GMT
#101703
On September 22 2016 08:43 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 08:30 Plansix wrote:
Great, now we just need a doctor to talk about vaccines and the cycle will be complete. Then we can send Jill back to her very expensive house in Lexington.


I think I'm going to call you out on this one and see what happens. GH was bringing up a very reasonable point against you two pages ago. Notice how you completely ignored it and just came back now that the truther talk is happening so that you get to look reasonable again even though you have discontinued the other conversation?

What is this reasonable point? I have previously stated that I do not fully trust Clinton and I am not 100% happy with my choice. I have said this several times. I also do not prescribe to GHs view on the center left in any way. I fully support Warren and her push to regulate the banks and move from criminal charges against Wells Fargo and others. I believe that criminal penalties is the only way to prevent CEOs and the higher ups from allowing this to happen. I talked about that long before this election started, in this thread. It is not my problem that GH does not approve of this or the way I walk about Clinton, that I am not negative enough for tastes.

Clinton is the only path to what I want. I do not hold as negative a view of her as others, but I do believe she will compromise with the republicans in an attempt to stabilize the government. That is what I want. I do not want to cram far left platform down county's throat just to lose the senate in a mid term election. I did that once already.

I want many of the things GH wants. But unlike him, I accept that a lot of the country does not agree with me and gets to vote. So I have opted for the most likely path to get there and to vote for the people I think will convince the US that its a good plan. So vote for Warren, Obama and Clinton when given the chance. GH talks about voting for Jill Stein out of protest.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
September 21 2016 23:56 GMT
#101704
On September 22 2016 08:53 GreenHorizons wrote:
But as Nec pointed out this just acts as a distraction. The bottom line is that I do own what I'm voting for.

No, this was all very relevant to the discussion of why no one wants to try having intellectual honest discussions with you anymore.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-21 23:59:44
September 21 2016 23:57 GMT
#101705
On September 22 2016 08:46 IgnE wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 08:16 zlefin wrote:
Oh, and back on the PTO stuff; I remembered and looked up what the old stuff was about; a trademark was issued that is facially invalid under the law, but was never challenged; some scum trademarked "tower defense" for games. *eyeroll*

and that is clearly a result of gross failure by low level staff to do their job.


trademark people have to process between 6 and 10 applications a day. how long do you want them scouring gaming forums for obscure gaming genres? if they had more time to search they might catch it, but theyd also probably be excoriated for being lazy scumbags the rest of the time when the applications take a fraction of the time.

tower defense isn't exactly an obscure genre. and a few simple google searches would've shown it was invalid.
I expect them to have people knowledgeable in an area reviewing things, and not to make obvious and basic mistakes which are symptomatic of a failure to have decent oversight systems in place.
that you make the unsound claim of tower defense being obscure reduces the strength of your point substantially.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
September 21 2016 23:57 GMT
#101706
Yes, if you want what GH wants there's literally only one vote to maximize the chance of that happening and it's voting for the democratic candidate. Every other vote increases the chance of Trump winning. It's as simple as that.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23221 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-22 00:03:19
September 21 2016 23:57 GMT
#101707
I want many of the things GH wants. But unlike him, I accept that a lot of the country does not agree with me and gets to vote. So I have opted for the most likely path to get there and to vote for the people I think will convince the US that its a good plan. So vote for Warren, Obama and Clinton when given the chance.


What we disagree on is whether he'll actually get closer to what he wants or if he'll just get sold that whatever watered down version Republicans pass is acceptable progress and that we should focus elsewhere now.

And whether this was foreseeable and preventable.

This recent Trump stop and frisk thing is a great example.

I'm supposed to be worried about Trump because he would try to implement a policy like that, problem is that stop and frisk isn't a creation of the right, it's of the center left.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12172 Posts
September 21 2016 23:59 GMT
#101708
On September 22 2016 08:57 Nyxisto wrote:
Yes, if you want what GH wants there's literally only one vote to maximize the chance of that happening and it's voting for the democratic candidate. Every other vote increases the chance of Trump winning. It's as simple as that.


On September 22 2016 07:55 GreenHorizons wrote:
And I actually understand people who came to Clinton after she won the primary, people who supported her during the primary got here under very different circumstances.

No will to live, no wish to die
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
September 22 2016 00:00 GMT
#101709
On September 22 2016 08:59 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 08:57 Nyxisto wrote:
Yes, if you want what GH wants there's literally only one vote to maximize the chance of that happening and it's voting for the democratic candidate. Every other vote increases the chance of Trump winning. It's as simple as that.


Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 07:55 GreenHorizons wrote:
And I actually understand people who came to Clinton after she won the primary, people who supported her during the primary got here under very different circumstances.



Don't understand the relevance. Laws don't care how you got there. The election is not some spiritual trip, what matters if you're a liberal person is electing people who do liberal things.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
September 22 2016 00:02 GMT
#101710
On September 22 2016 08:59 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 08:57 Nyxisto wrote:
Yes, if you want what GH wants there's literally only one vote to maximize the chance of that happening and it's voting for the democratic candidate. Every other vote increases the chance of Trump winning. It's as simple as that.


Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 07:55 GreenHorizons wrote:
And I actually understand people who came to Clinton after she won the primary, people who supported her during the primary got here under very different circumstances.



Those who supported Clinton in the primary are either corporate sell-outs (not liberal enough) or naive (low information)?
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12172 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-22 00:03:56
September 22 2016 00:03 GMT
#101711
On September 22 2016 09:00 Nyxisto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 08:59 Nebuchad wrote:
On September 22 2016 08:57 Nyxisto wrote:
Yes, if you want what GH wants there's literally only one vote to maximize the chance of that happening and it's voting for the democratic candidate. Every other vote increases the chance of Trump winning. It's as simple as that.


On September 22 2016 07:55 GreenHorizons wrote:
And I actually understand people who came to Clinton after she won the primary, people who supported her during the primary got here under very different circumstances.



Don't understand the relevance. Laws don't care how you got there. The election is not some spiritual trip, what matters if you're a liberal person is electing people who do liberal things.


The relevance is pretty obvious. If you say you want the same thing GH wants and you're voting for Clinton against Trump, it's different from saying you want the same thing GH wants and you're voting for Clinton against Sanders... And everyone here, including GH as I quoted above, recognizes that.
No will to live, no wish to die
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 22 2016 00:03 GMT
#101712
To be very clear, I do not believe Bernie Sanders could have accomplish the things I want. I reviewed his track record in congress and how willing he is to compromise and found it lacking. By the time the primary got to my state, Clinton was my own option.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23221 Posts
September 22 2016 00:06 GMT
#101713
On September 22 2016 09:03 Plansix wrote:
To be very clear, I do not believe Bernie Sanders could have accomplish the things I want. I reviewed his track record in congress and how willing he is to compromise and found it lacking. By the time the primary got to my state, Clinton was my own option.


I feel like I've asked this before, but what specifically do you think she will accomplish that Bernie wouldn't have?
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
September 22 2016 00:07 GMT
#101714
On September 22 2016 08:57 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 08:46 IgnE wrote:
On September 22 2016 08:16 zlefin wrote:
Oh, and back on the PTO stuff; I remembered and looked up what the old stuff was about; a trademark was issued that is facially invalid under the law, but was never challenged; some scum trademarked "tower defense" for games. *eyeroll*

and that is clearly a result of gross failure by low level staff to do their job.


trademark people have to process between 6 and 10 applications a day. how long do you want them scouring gaming forums for obscure gaming genres? if they had more time to search they might catch it, but theyd also probably be excoriated for being lazy scumbags the rest of the time when the applications take a fraction of the time.

tower defense isn't exactly an obscure genre. and a few simple google searches would've shown it was invalid.
I expect them to have people knowledgeable in an area reviewing things, and not to make obvious and basic mistakes which are symptomatic of a failure to have decent oversight systems in place.
that you make the unsound claim of tower defense being obscure reduces the strength of your point substantially.


ok im not defending it. im saying that its understandable how a bad trademark gets issued. imagine some middle aged woman getting the application. it's not that hard to see how any combination of two words that is not already in the trademark database in the computer games market would be prima facie valid. i don't really view it as the main problem affecting the IP system; in fact i don't really view it as that big of a problem at all. trademarks are pretty worthless without tangible evidence in litigation, and a trademark on tower defense is obviously a flimsy legal document.

there are a number of bad patents issued every year too. just google ip blogs making fun of idiotic patents that were issued. but in any organization with 10,000+ examiners issuing millions of intellectual property rights you are going to have some things fall through the cracks. i don't think the tower defense anecdote amounts to much.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
Liquid`Jinro
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
Sweden33719 Posts
September 22 2016 00:10 GMT
#101715
On September 22 2016 08:50 CobaltBlu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 08:47 Doodsmack wrote:
On September 22 2016 08:28 Dan HH wrote:
TRUMP OPPOSES PRESIDENT OBAMA’S PLAN TO SURRENDER AMERICAN INTERNET CONTROL TO FOREIGN POWERS

"Donald J. Trump is committed to preserving Internet freedom for the American people and citizens all over the world. The U.S. should not turn control of the Internet over to the United Nations and the international community. President Obama intends to do so on his own authority – just 10 days from now, on October 1st, unless Congress acts quickly to stop him. The Republicans in Congress are admirably leading a fight to save the Internet this week, and need all the help the American people can give them to be successful. Hillary Clinton’s Democrats are refusing to protect the American people by not protecting the Internet.


The U.S. created, developed and expanded the Internet across the globe. U.S. oversight has kept the Internet free and open without government censorship – a fundamental American value rooted in our Constitution’s Free Speech clause. Internet freedom is now at risk with the President’s intent to cede control to international interests, including countries like China and Russia, which have a long track record of trying to impose online censorship. Congress needs to act, or Internet freedom will be lost for good, since there will be no way to make it great again once it is lost." - Stephen Miller, National Policy Director


https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trump-opposes-president-obama-plan-to-surrender-american-internet

Is Cruz now Donald's tech advisor? ICANN has nothing to do with censorship or muh freedom


It really takes a simpleton to want to repeatedly claim Obama is serving foreign interests.


Trump isn't interested in understanding stuff like this. He is just trying to distort reality as much as possible in a way that benefits him by repeating lies. It is the same thing he is trying to do with the lies he constantly tells about Clinton's gun and immigration policies.

This is a real press release? It's not the onion or something. ...???
Moderatortell the guy that interplanatar interaction is pivotal to terrans variety of optionitudals in the pre-midgame preperatories as well as the protosstinal deterriggation of elite zergling strikes - Stimey n | Formerly FrozenArbiter
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
September 22 2016 00:10 GMT
#101716
--- Nuked ---
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12172 Posts
September 22 2016 00:11 GMT
#101717
On September 22 2016 09:02 ticklishmusic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 08:59 Nebuchad wrote:
On September 22 2016 08:57 Nyxisto wrote:
Yes, if you want what GH wants there's literally only one vote to maximize the chance of that happening and it's voting for the democratic candidate. Every other vote increases the chance of Trump winning. It's as simple as that.


On September 22 2016 07:55 GreenHorizons wrote:
And I actually understand people who came to Clinton after she won the primary, people who supported her during the primary got here under very different circumstances.



Those who supported Clinton in the primary are either corporate sell-outs (not liberal enough) or naive (low information)?


I would argue that if you are a social democrat and you voted for Clinton over Sanders, you did something wrong, yeah. Of course you don't have to be a social democrat to be honest or informed, so I reject the negative connotation that you put on the other types of voters.
No will to live, no wish to die
GGTeMpLaR
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States7226 Posts
September 22 2016 00:13 GMT
#101718
On September 22 2016 09:10 Barrin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 08:57 Nyxisto wrote:
Yes, if you want what GH wants there's literally only one vote to maximize the chance of that happening and it's voting for the democratic candidate. Every other vote increases the chance of Trump winning. It's as simple as that.

Assuming either Hillary or Trump wins 100%, a vote for a third party is the same as not voting.*

*If a third party candidate gets 5% or more of the vote, that party gets federal funding for the next presidential election.


And by this logic voting is the same as not voting unless the election is won by one vote.
CobaltBlu
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States919 Posts
September 22 2016 00:13 GMT
#101719
On September 22 2016 09:10 Liquid`Jinro wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 08:50 CobaltBlu wrote:
On September 22 2016 08:47 Doodsmack wrote:
On September 22 2016 08:28 Dan HH wrote:
TRUMP OPPOSES PRESIDENT OBAMA’S PLAN TO SURRENDER AMERICAN INTERNET CONTROL TO FOREIGN POWERS

"Donald J. Trump is committed to preserving Internet freedom for the American people and citizens all over the world. The U.S. should not turn control of the Internet over to the United Nations and the international community. President Obama intends to do so on his own authority – just 10 days from now, on October 1st, unless Congress acts quickly to stop him. The Republicans in Congress are admirably leading a fight to save the Internet this week, and need all the help the American people can give them to be successful. Hillary Clinton’s Democrats are refusing to protect the American people by not protecting the Internet.


The U.S. created, developed and expanded the Internet across the globe. U.S. oversight has kept the Internet free and open without government censorship – a fundamental American value rooted in our Constitution’s Free Speech clause. Internet freedom is now at risk with the President’s intent to cede control to international interests, including countries like China and Russia, which have a long track record of trying to impose online censorship. Congress needs to act, or Internet freedom will be lost for good, since there will be no way to make it great again once it is lost." - Stephen Miller, National Policy Director


https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trump-opposes-president-obama-plan-to-surrender-american-internet

Is Cruz now Donald's tech advisor? ICANN has nothing to do with censorship or muh freedom


It really takes a simpleton to want to repeatedly claim Obama is serving foreign interests.


Trump isn't interested in understanding stuff like this. He is just trying to distort reality as much as possible in a way that benefits him by repeating lies. It is the same thing he is trying to do with the lies he constantly tells about Clinton's gun and immigration policies.

This is a real press release? It's not the onion or something. ...???


It is on his website unfortunately.
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-22 00:17:17
September 22 2016 00:16 GMT
#101720
On September 22 2016 09:13 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 09:10 Barrin wrote:
On September 22 2016 08:57 Nyxisto wrote:
Yes, if you want what GH wants there's literally only one vote to maximize the chance of that happening and it's voting for the democratic candidate. Every other vote increases the chance of Trump winning. It's as simple as that.

Assuming either Hillary or Trump wins 100%, a vote for a third party is the same as not voting.*

*If a third party candidate gets 5% or more of the vote, that party gets federal funding for the next presidential election.


And by this logic voting is the same as not voting unless the election is won by one vote.


The chance of third party candidates not mattering is significantly higher than the chance of the election being won by a vote. Voting for the third party in this election is counter productive if you're a liberal
Prev 1 5084 5085 5086 5087 5088 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
firebathero 1389
Hyuk 670
Leta 331
Bisu 164
BeSt 157
ToSsGirL 134
JulyZerg 128
Zeus 109
Dewaltoss 99
Jaedong 60
[ Show more ]
Hyun 51
sorry 46
soO 41
Sacsri 33
NaDa 28
ajuk12(nOOB) 23
Soma 22
yabsab 8
Sharp 4
ivOry 3
Britney 0
Dota 2
XcaliburYe260
BananaSlamJamma194
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss301
allub187
Other Games
ceh9591
Happy268
Fuzer 163
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1240
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH258
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 4
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt707
Other Games
• WagamamaTV177
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
1h
Reynor vs Zoun
Solar vs SHIN
Classic vs ShoWTimE
Cure vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 2h
OSC
1d 5h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Online Event
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.