• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:16
CET 20:16
KST 04:16
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy7ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book19Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool48Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win42026 KungFu Cup Announcement6BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled12
StarCraft 2
General
Potential Updates Coming to the SC2 CN Server What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw?
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open RSL Season 4 announced for March-April WardiTV Team League Season 10 KSL Week 87
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat Mutation # 516 Specter of Death
Brood War
General
How much money terran looses from gas steal? mca64Launcher - New Version with StarCraft: Remast RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site ASL21 General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro24 Group B [ASL21] Ro24 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2026 Changsha Offline Cup
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Cricket [SPORT] Formula 1 Discussion Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Laptop capable of using Photoshop Lightroom?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
Unintentional protectionism…
Uldridge
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1680 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4948

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4946 4947 4948 4949 4950 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
TheYango
Profile Joined September 2008
United States47024 Posts
September 10 2016 17:48 GMT
#98941
I'm self-aware enough to accept that I'm at least 3 of those things, but I hope people don't necessarily consider me deplorable.
Moderator
Rebs
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Pakistan10726 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-10 18:05:15
September 10 2016 18:01 GMT
#98942
On September 11 2016 02:41 oBlade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 11 2016 01:51 Rebs wrote:
On September 11 2016 01:12 TheYango wrote:
You don't have to be in the category being insulted to be turned off from a candidate by insulting statements. This isn't that hard to understand.


Is it really insulting though ? Shes talking about people who exhibit racist, xenophobic, hateful behavior. She would have been better of saying "some" instead of half.. but whatever the point is valid. I characterise people who exhibit these tendencies as deplorable. And if that ends up being, 10 20 30 40 50 60 or whatever percent of Trump supporters then thats how many there are.

She called 10% of America deplorable, irredeemable, racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic, Islamophobic, and not America. Since the alt-right speech (tackling the real issues), she's going to keep insulting the voters like this. Trump might insult every opponent of his in the political arena, but he's so far been smart enough not to come out and say, you know what the problem is? that the opponent's supporters are entitled victims that are too stupid to learn personal responsibility and be convinced to vote for me. Do you know what no person said after hearing Romney's 47% comment 4 years ago? "Woohoo, he can't have been talking about me so I must be in that 5-10% of independents that he's trying to win over, I'm so elated to have this privilege of being condescended to, let me cast a ballot today!" I hope Clinton keeps doing this.


lol what the fuck are you even talking about. Romneys comment was about literally half the country.

Clintons comment is on one subsection of a subsection. The people she is talking about will not vote for her and everyone knows who shes talking about.

If you are racist xenophobic islamophobic etc etc then you should be willing to hear it. OR stop fucking whining about PC culture.

Unless you disagree that these are not conditions for someone to be deplorable ?

Is it also not true that Trump has supporters who qualify under those categories ? I disagree with her making a blanket claim to say half. I think it would be safer to say some.

On September 11 2016 02:48 TheYango wrote:
I'm self-aware enough to accept that I'm at least 3 of those things, but I hope people don't necessarily consider me deplorable.


If you exhibit behavior that qualifies those things then I would consider you deplorable and probably stay away from you. But thats just my opinion, other people might be ok with it.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
September 10 2016 18:20 GMT
#98943
On September 11 2016 02:48 TheYango wrote:
I'm self-aware enough to accept that I'm at least 3 of those things, but I hope people don't necessarily consider me deplorable.

Many leftists seek to classify people who disagree with their policy into any of a certain number of groups which they believe can be safely dismissed as morons not worth listening to.

See also: the ever-expanding definition of what makes someone a "racist."
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23761 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-10 18:22:00
September 10 2016 18:21 GMT
#98944
On September 11 2016 03:01 Rebs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 11 2016 02:41 oBlade wrote:
On September 11 2016 01:51 Rebs wrote:
On September 11 2016 01:12 TheYango wrote:
You don't have to be in the category being insulted to be turned off from a candidate by insulting statements. This isn't that hard to understand.


Is it really insulting though ? Shes talking about people who exhibit racist, xenophobic, hateful behavior. She would have been better of saying "some" instead of half.. but whatever the point is valid. I characterise people who exhibit these tendencies as deplorable. And if that ends up being, 10 20 30 40 50 60 or whatever percent of Trump supporters then thats how many there are.

She called 10% of America deplorable, irredeemable, racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic, Islamophobic, and not America. Since the alt-right speech (tackling the real issues), she's going to keep insulting the voters like this. Trump might insult every opponent of his in the political arena, but he's so far been smart enough not to come out and say, you know what the problem is? that the opponent's supporters are entitled victims that are too stupid to learn personal responsibility and be convinced to vote for me. Do you know what no person said after hearing Romney's 47% comment 4 years ago? "Woohoo, he can't have been talking about me so I must be in that 5-10% of independents that he's trying to win over, I'm so elated to have this privilege of being condescended to, let me cast a ballot today!" I hope Clinton keeps doing this.


lol what the fuck are you even talking about. Romneys comment was about literally half the country.

Clintons comment is on one subsection of a subsection. The people she is talking about will not vote for her and everyone knows who shes talking about.

If you are racist xenophobic islamophobic etc etc then you should be willing to hear it. OR stop fucking whining about PC culture.

Unless you disagree that these are not conditions for someone to be deplorable ?

Is it also not true that Trump has supporters who qualify under those categories ? I disagree with her making a blanket claim to say half. I think it would be safer to say some.

Show nested quote +
On September 11 2016 02:48 TheYango wrote:
I'm self-aware enough to accept that I'm at least 3 of those things, but I hope people don't necessarily consider me deplorable.


If you exhibit behavior that qualifies those things then I would consider you deplorable and probably stay away from you. But thats just my opinion, other people might be ok with it.


I think we all have our ism's or whatever. Like privilege, it's not about pretending it doesn't exist/happen, it's about acknowledging it and working to correct it.

Someone who says they're not any of those things (or at least do things that could reasonably be called such) immediately loses all credibility on the subject in my eyes.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Yoav
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1874 Posts
September 10 2016 18:30 GMT
#98945
On September 11 2016 02:41 oBlade wrote:Trump might insult every opponent of his in the political arena, but he's so far been smart enough not to come out and say, you know what the problem is? that the opponent's supporters are entitled victims that are too stupid to learn personal responsibility


Isn't that basically what he said about black voters?
TheTenthDoc
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States9561 Posts
September 10 2016 18:37 GMT
#98946
I do hope that the Trump campaign does what they said Clinton should have done with the "I love war" quote and provides the full context of her statement, including the following bit about wanting to help and empathize with the other half of Trump supporters.
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
September 10 2016 18:38 GMT
#98947
On September 11 2016 03:30 Yoav wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 11 2016 02:41 oBlade wrote:Trump might insult every opponent of his in the political arena, but he's so far been smart enough not to come out and say, you know what the problem is? that the opponent's supporters are entitled victims that are too stupid to learn personal responsibility


Isn't that basically what he said about black voters?


It doesn't matter because they're black. It's become clear over and over again that you can basically say any outrageous thing as long as the group that you're targeting isn't white men. No matter if you're calling Mexicans rapists or Muslims terrorists, don't accuse anybody of being racist because that's some real discrimination
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
September 10 2016 18:39 GMT
#98948
On September 11 2016 03:37 TheTenthDoc wrote:
I do hope that the Trump campaign does what they said Clinton should have done with the "I love war" quote and provides the full context of her statement, including the following bit about wanting to help and empathize with the other half of Trump supporters. /s


ftfy
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
September 10 2016 18:47 GMT
#98949
On September 10 2016 09:40 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 10 2016 07:18 Danglars wrote:
I disliked Cruz's mild so-con tone and he did poorly focusing on one message and one topic in speeches and decided on laundry list of a million conservative positions with little time spent on each.

I feel like the Cruz campaign was constantly caught between trying to sell two different faces of itself. On the one hand he tried to sell himself to the voters as being the anti-establishment candidate who for years criticized the Republican elite for not sticking to true conservative values. But at the same time he was also trying to sell himself to said elite on being more of a proper Republican than Trump.

He might have had a better chance of honing his message if he wasn't caught between two sides of the party and trying to appease them both.

To the extent that when he was almost the last man standing, he did bill himself as the only way to stop Trump and talked about how the party didn't stand for what he stood for. Primary triangulation.

On September 11 2016 02:41 oBlade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 11 2016 01:51 Rebs wrote:
On September 11 2016 01:12 TheYango wrote:
You don't have to be in the category being insulted to be turned off from a candidate by insulting statements. This isn't that hard to understand.


Is it really insulting though ? Shes talking about people who exhibit racist, xenophobic, hateful behavior. She would have been better of saying "some" instead of half.. but whatever the point is valid. I characterise people who exhibit these tendencies as deplorable. And if that ends up being, 10 20 30 40 50 60 or whatever percent of Trump supporters then thats how many there are.

She called 10% of America deplorable, irredeemable, racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic, Islamophobic, and not America. Since the alt-right speech (tackling the real issues), she's going to keep insulting the voters like this. Trump might insult every opponent of his in the political arena, but he's so far been smart enough not to come out and say, you know what the problem is? that the opponent's supporters are entitled victims that are too stupid to learn personal responsibility and be convinced to vote for me. Do you know what no person said after hearing Romney's 47% comment 4 years ago? "Woohoo, he can't have been talking about me so I must be in that 5-10% of independents that he's trying to win over, I'm so elated to have this privilege of being condescended to, let me cast a ballot today!" I hope Clinton keeps doing this.

She's so full of herself, she might just do it. But she has good handlers.

On September 11 2016 03:20 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 11 2016 02:48 TheYango wrote:
I'm self-aware enough to accept that I'm at least 3 of those things, but I hope people don't necessarily consider me deplorable.

Many leftists seek to classify people who disagree with their policy into any of a certain number of groups which they believe can be safely dismissed as morons not worth listening to.

See also: the ever-expanding definition of what makes someone a "racist."

You want to know the meaning of Trump resiliency amongst supporters? They've figured out in the soundbites from "cling to guns and religion" and "racist/sexist/xenophobic/homophobic/islamophobic," it's them that's being referred to. All for holding the wrong positions. There's the right policy, then there's the sexist policy and on down the line. And you're the scum of the earth for supporting them. I wager the left's blazing success on social issues has emboldened them to banish noble opposition in thought and word.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-10 19:04:27
September 10 2016 19:03 GMT
#98950
On September 11 2016 03:47 Danglars wrote:
You want to know the meaning of Trump resiliency amongst supporters? They've figured out in the soundbites from "cling to guns and religion" and "racist/sexist/xenophobic/homophobic/islamophobic," it's them that's being referred to. All for holding the wrong positions. There's the right policy, then there's the sexist policy and on down the line. And you're the scum of the earth for supporting them. I wager the left's blazing success on social issues has emboldened them to banish noble opposition in thought and word.


Isn't it a little ironic that apparent 'Conservatives' of all people have essentially adopted some kind of post modern 'anything goes' narrative? Are we supposed to tolerate racism in the discourse to celebrate diversity? Actual conservatives ought to denounce Trump as much as any leftist. You don't need to be a liberal to hate bigots

oBlade
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States5958 Posts
September 10 2016 19:07 GMT
#98951
On September 11 2016 03:01 Rebs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 11 2016 02:41 oBlade wrote:
On September 11 2016 01:51 Rebs wrote:
On September 11 2016 01:12 TheYango wrote:
You don't have to be in the category being insulted to be turned off from a candidate by insulting statements. This isn't that hard to understand.


Is it really insulting though ? Shes talking about people who exhibit racist, xenophobic, hateful behavior. She would have been better of saying "some" instead of half.. but whatever the point is valid. I characterise people who exhibit these tendencies as deplorable. And if that ends up being, 10 20 30 40 50 60 or whatever percent of Trump supporters then thats how many there are.

She called 10% of America deplorable, irredeemable, racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic, Islamophobic, and not America. Since the alt-right speech (tackling the real issues), she's going to keep insulting the voters like this. Trump might insult every opponent of his in the political arena, but he's so far been smart enough not to come out and say, you know what the problem is? that the opponent's supporters are entitled victims that are too stupid to learn personal responsibility and be convinced to vote for me. Do you know what no person said after hearing Romney's 47% comment 4 years ago? "Woohoo, he can't have been talking about me so I must be in that 5-10% of independents that he's trying to win over, I'm so elated to have this privilege of being condescended to, let me cast a ballot today!" I hope Clinton keeps doing this.


lol what the fuck are you even talking about. Romneys comment was about literally half the country.

Clintons comment is on one subsection of a subsection. The people she is talking about will not vote for her and everyone knows who shes talking about.

Yes, we've been over that, Romney was talking about 47% of the country at most (though to the extent he was talking about people who don't vote for him but also don't vote for anybody, who cares? so then it'd be more like 20%) and Clinton "only" 10%.

The people who do not know what HRC is on about are not going to be impressed with a candidate associating them with undesirables. Just like I just explained, nobody heard Romney's comments and thought they were lucky that they must be in the group of independents he wanted to rescue from entitled victimhood. + Show Spoiler +
I don't know if I'm being too esoteric for people who don't remember Romney's full comments:

On September 11 2016 03:01 Rebs wrote:
Is it also not true that Trump has supporters who qualify under those categories ? I disagree with her making a blanket claim to say half. I think it would be safer to say some.

Is there no bigot who votes Democrat?

On September 11 2016 03:30 Yoav wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 11 2016 02:41 oBlade wrote:Trump might insult every opponent of his in the political arena, but he's so far been smart enough not to come out and say, you know what the problem is? that the opponent's supporters are entitled victims that are too stupid to learn personal responsibility


Isn't that basically what he said about black voters?

He said blacks are poorer and worse off (and to please vote for him to fix it) which any adherent to the concept of "privilege" should admit is true. He said he'd get 95% of the black vote in 2020. Not oh, poor blacks, I'm not even going to bother since they're hopeless. I promise I'll be here if that kind of tape comes out.
"I read it. You know how to read, you ignorant fuck?" - Andy Dufresne
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
September 10 2016 19:26 GMT
#98952
On September 11 2016 04:07 oBlade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 11 2016 03:01 Rebs wrote:
On September 11 2016 02:41 oBlade wrote:
On September 11 2016 01:51 Rebs wrote:
On September 11 2016 01:12 TheYango wrote:
You don't have to be in the category being insulted to be turned off from a candidate by insulting statements. This isn't that hard to understand.


Is it really insulting though ? Shes talking about people who exhibit racist, xenophobic, hateful behavior. She would have been better of saying "some" instead of half.. but whatever the point is valid. I characterise people who exhibit these tendencies as deplorable. And if that ends up being, 10 20 30 40 50 60 or whatever percent of Trump supporters then thats how many there are.

She called 10% of America deplorable, irredeemable, racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic, Islamophobic, and not America. Since the alt-right speech (tackling the real issues), she's going to keep insulting the voters like this. Trump might insult every opponent of his in the political arena, but he's so far been smart enough not to come out and say, you know what the problem is? that the opponent's supporters are entitled victims that are too stupid to learn personal responsibility and be convinced to vote for me. Do you know what no person said after hearing Romney's 47% comment 4 years ago? "Woohoo, he can't have been talking about me so I must be in that 5-10% of independents that he's trying to win over, I'm so elated to have this privilege of being condescended to, let me cast a ballot today!" I hope Clinton keeps doing this.


lol what the fuck are you even talking about. Romneys comment was about literally half the country.

Clintons comment is on one subsection of a subsection. The people she is talking about will not vote for her and everyone knows who shes talking about.

Yes, we've been over that, Romney was talking about 47% of the country at most (though to the extent he was talking about people who don't vote for him but also don't vote for anybody, who cares? so then it'd be more like 20%) and Clinton "only" 10%.

The people who do not know what HRC is on about are not going to be impressed with a candidate associating them with undesirables. Just like I just explained, nobody heard Romney's comments and thought they were lucky that they must be in the group of independents he wanted to rescue from entitled victimhood. + Show Spoiler +
I don't know if I'm being too esoteric for people who don't remember Romney's full comments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2gvY2wqI7M

Show nested quote +
On September 11 2016 03:01 Rebs wrote:
Is it also not true that Trump has supporters who qualify under those categories ? I disagree with her making a blanket claim to say half. I think it would be safer to say some.

Is there no bigot who votes Democrat?

Show nested quote +
On September 11 2016 03:30 Yoav wrote:
On September 11 2016 02:41 oBlade wrote:Trump might insult every opponent of his in the political arena, but he's so far been smart enough not to come out and say, you know what the problem is? that the opponent's supporters are entitled victims that are too stupid to learn personal responsibility


Isn't that basically what he said about black voters?

He said blacks are poorer and worse off (and to please vote for him to fix it) which any adherent to the concept of "privilege" should admit is true. He said he'd get 95% of the black vote in 2020. Not oh, poor blacks, I'm not even going to bother since they're hopeless. I promise I'll be here if that kind of tape comes out.


According to Trump, Judge Curiel is biased against him because he's Mexican and Trump's building the wall. That's a generalization that insults Mexicans, no matter how much you want to say "but let's just be realistic people are tribalistic so Trump is right". Saying that because Khizr Khan's wife didn't talk, it must be because her husband didn't allow her to, is a generalization that insults Muslims. Saying Kaepernick should leave the country if it doesn't work for him, and not apologizing for spearheading the birther movement, show at the very least that he has a giant blind spot when it comes to black people.

And I could go on and on so you just can't credibly say Trump has not been insulting to groups of Americans.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-10 19:29:35
September 10 2016 19:28 GMT
#98953
Prisoners in more than 20 states went on a coordinated strike Friday, refusing to go to their assigned jobs and demanding an "end to prison slavery." The work stoppage, staged on the 45th anniversary of the Attica prison uprising of 1971, marks one of the largest attempted prison strikes in decades.

"Slavery is alive and well in the prison system, but by the end of this year, it won't be anymore," reads a statement by the Industrial Workers of the World's Incarcerated Workers Organizing Committee (IWOC), the group that put together and announced the strike. "This call goes directly to the slaves themselves."

It may be no surprised that America's 2 million-plus inmates mop floors or scrub toilets in their prisons and jails, but the country's prison population is also a source of cheap and, in states like Texas, even free labor.

As state budgets have shrunk in recent years, prisons have launched new work programs. Prisoners repair public plumbing, clean up roadkill, manage public spaces such as graveyards, and even do underwater welding.

"Think about how much it costs to incarcerate someone," Republican Senator John Ensign said in 2011, advocating for more of these programs. "Do we want them just sitting in prison, lifting weights, becoming violent and thinking about the next crime? Or do we want them having a little purpose in life and learning a skill?"

The true scope of prison labor goes beyond personal development and public works: It's good business. Prisoners scrub products for Wal-Mart, package coffee for Starbucks, sew clothes for Victoria's Secret, and man call centers for AT&T.

Corporations cut deals with both private and public prisons, which gives them access to a labor force that has no choice but to work for, say, 20 cents an hour. Businesses and governments in turn save big.

"At Holman prison, the industry we have there is the state tag plant, which produces license plates for the state, and also a sewing factory," said Robert Horton, public information manager for the Alabama Department of Corrections. Horton added that operations had not been interrupted by the strike.

Prisoners are not permitted to unionize, as labor law does not consider them employees. That's something the IWOC is looking to change by clandestinely recruiting prisoners to join up with a guild free of union dues.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
September 10 2016 20:05 GMT
#98954
Haha, I love "basket of deplorables." What a great, high-handed insult. I may steal that one for future use.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23761 Posts
September 10 2016 20:10 GMT
#98955
On September 11 2016 05:05 xDaunt wrote:
Haha, I love "basket of deplorables." What a great, high-handed insult. I may steal that one for future use.


Does sound like a classy way of saying "bag of dicks". I don't get why she's trying to make it sound like an accident though, it was in the prompter wasn't it? It's not like it would have been the first time she read it.

She doesn't regret saying it (and she probably shouldn't) she regrets how it played in the media.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
CorsairHero
Profile Joined December 2008
Canada9491 Posts
September 10 2016 20:12 GMT
#98956
Hillary Clinton on Saturday walked back comments she made about supporters of Donald Trump at an event in New York City.

Clinton said on Friday evening that you could put half of the Republican presidential nominee's supporters in a "basket of deplorables," which she said would include racists, xenophobes, and homophobes.

But, following a firestorm of backlash, Clinton released a statement saying her comments were "grossly generalistic," and that she regretted denigrating "half" of Trump's supporters.

While she offered remorse for her comments, Clinton also said it was "deplorable" that Trump has built his campaign "largely on prejudice and paranoia," and has "given a national platform to hateful views and voices."

"As I said, many of Trump's supporters are hard-working Americans who just don’t feel like the economy or our political system are working for them," she added.

Clinton resolved to try and "bring our country together" and "make our economy work for everyone."

Trump, along with his running mate Mike Pence, responded on Saturday by criticizing the comments Hillary made on Friday.

"Wow, Hillary Clinton was SO INSULTING to my supporters, millions of amazing, hard working people. I think it will cost her at the Polls!" Trump tweeted.

Pence piled on, saying at the Values Voter Summit that Clinton's "low opinion" of Trump's supporters should be "denounced in the strongest possible terms."

"Hillary, they are not a basket of anything," Pence said. "They are Americans and they deserve your respect."

Source
© Current year.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 10 2016 20:13 GMT
#98957
WASHINGTON ― The Obama administration has proposed a new rule that would prevent states from defunding Planned Parenthood or any other family planning provider for political reasons.

The new rule, which the Department of Health and Human Services proposed last week, says that states cannot withhold Title X federal family planning money from certain recipients for any reason other than the provider’s “ability to deliver services to program beneficiaries in an effective manner.” That means states can no longer vote to defund Planned Parenthood because some of its clinics offer abortion services.

“This will make a real difference in so many people’s lives,” said Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood. “Thanks to the Obama administration, women will still be able to access the birth control they need to plan their families, and the cancer screenings they need to stay healthy.”

The Title X program provides basic preventive health care and family planning services for 4 million low-income Americans. About 85 percent of patients who use Title X have incomes below $23,500. Planned Parenthood serves about a third of those patients, using the $70 million a year it receives in Title X grants to subsidize contraceptives and cancer and sexually transmitted infection screenings for people who can’t afford them. Title X does not allow any money to be used to pay for abortions for any reason.

Still, politicians in 11 states have voted to block public funds from Planned Parenthood because its services include abortion. Republicans in Congress are also on a mission to defund the family planning provider, citing a series of debunked undercover videos produced by anti-abortion activists that purport to show Planned Parenthood selling fetal body parts.

Rep. Diane Black (R-Tenn.), a member of the House select committee that’s investigating the video’s claims, called the Obama administration’s new rule to protect Planned Parenthood a “stunt.”

“We must use the full force of Congress and the grassroots strength of the national pro-life movement to defeat this absurd rule and prevent the Obama Administration from acting unilaterally to carry out political favors and prop up a scandal-ridden abortion provider,” she said in a statement.

The political problem for Republicans right now in their endeavor to demonize and defund Planned Parenthood is that family planning providers are on the front lines in the fight against Zika, the rapidly spreading virus that causes severe birth defects. The Centers for Disease Control said the “primary strategy” to reduce Zika-related pregnancy complications should be to help women avoid or delay pregnancy through family planning and birth control, and Planned Parenthood is already distributing Zika prevention kits and education in neighborhoods where the virus is spreading. But some of the most high-risk states for the mosquito-borne and sexually transmitted virus ― Florida, Louisiana and Texas ― have voted to block funds to Planned Parenthood. About 84 pregnant women in Florida are currently infected with Zika, officials have said.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
puerk
Profile Joined February 2015
Germany855 Posts
September 10 2016 20:18 GMT
#98958
4 more years!
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
September 10 2016 20:24 GMT
#98959
re: lastest Stealth article
I don't see how states would have any authority over who gets federal moneys anyways. I mean, if the money is given out by the federal gov't under Title X or whatever; why does this issue even come up?
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11450 Posts
September 10 2016 20:28 GMT
#98960
On September 11 2016 05:24 zlefin wrote:
re: lastest Stealth article
I don't see how states would have any authority over who gets federal moneys anyways. I mean, if the money is given out by the federal gov't under Title X or whatever; why does this issue even come up?

Is it perhaps block transfers where the State can choose how specifically to spend the money provided certain standards are met?
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
Prev 1 4946 4947 4948 4949 4950 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 44m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 274
elazer 223
OGKoka 187
UpATreeSC 159
TKL 138
ProTech121
JuggernautJason64
MindelVK 52
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 18200
Calm 3758
Mini 802
EffOrt 528
Shuttle 311
ggaemo 238
actioN 99
Mong 55
Mind 48
Aegong 33
[ Show more ]
Bale 10
IntoTheRainbow 10
Dota 2
Gorgc8032
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps2913
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu130
Other Games
Grubby3070
FrodaN1254
Beastyqt626
B2W.Neo334
KnowMe171
QueenE99
C9.Mang063
ZombieGrub20
Organizations
StarCraft 2
ComeBackTV 224
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream41
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Reevou 4
• intothetv
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 5
• FirePhoenix4
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV921
• lizZardDota262
League of Legends
• Nemesis2837
• TFBlade762
Other Games
• imaqtpie777
• Shiphtur163
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
4h 44m
KCM Race Survival
13h 44m
The PondCast
14h 44m
WardiTV Team League
16h 44m
OSC
16h 44m
Replay Cast
1d 4h
WardiTV Team League
1d 16h
Big Brain Bouts
1d 21h
Fjant vs SortOf
YoungYakov vs Krystianer
Reynor vs HeRoMaRinE
RSL Revival
2 days
Cure vs Zoun
herO vs Rogue
WardiTV Team League
2 days
[ Show More ]
Platinum Heroes Events
2 days
BSL
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
ByuN vs Maru
MaxPax vs TriGGeR
WardiTV Team League
3 days
BSL
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Light vs Calm
Royal vs Mind
Wardi Open
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
OSC
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Rush vs PianO
Flash vs Speed
Replay Cast
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
BeSt vs Leta
Queen vs Jaedong
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-03-24
WardiTV Winter 2026
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
NationLESS Cup
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

2026 Changsha Offline CUP
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.