| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24403 Posts
In conclusion, we can trust scientific consensus when they tell us GMOs are safe. The point you're missing is that "safety of GMO's" doesn't start and stop with consumption. Also it's clear you didn't see her answer the question about it from the town hall. | ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
On August 19 2016 00:08 Dan HH wrote: What the fuck is he talking about? This looks like the Twitter version of Tourette's | ||
|
TMagpie
265 Posts
On August 19 2016 00:04 GreenHorizons wrote: Not all of them, just enough to kill it. I don't remember any Democrats calling them out really either. Dems had a majority but still failed to pass ACA and kept gutting it and gutting it. Was it to appease conservatives? Slightly--it was mostly being gutted to appease fellow democrats who wouldn't stand in line. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
On August 19 2016 00:17 GreenHorizons wrote: The point you're missing is that "safety of GMO's" doesn't start and stop with consumption. Also it's clear you didn't see her answer the question about it from the town hall. Give me time stamps and I'll listen. Could not pay me to listen to that entire thing. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24403 Posts
On August 19 2016 00:23 Mohdoo wrote: Give me time stamps and I'll listen. Could not pay me to listen to that entire thing. If you want to continue to opine from a place of ignorance, that's on you. Is this your way of admitting you've been dodging the issue around GMO safety going beyond consumption on purpose? | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
On August 19 2016 00:29 GreenHorizons wrote: If you want to continue to opine from a place of ignorance, that's on you. Is this your way of admitting you've been dodging the issue around GMO safety going beyond consumption on purpose? I am not being presented with an argument. Present me with an argument and I'll address it. Telling someone to sit down and watch a 2 hour video or else admit ignorance is ridiculous. Addressing a 3rd candidate polling at less than 5% is already being generous. There are other things to discuss besides the green party's recent attempt. This isn't the first election with a green party candidate. It won't be the last. Politics in our country has continued as if the green party doesn't even exist for a long time. As I said, if you can tell me which part of this video is relevant, I'll gladly watch it and address it. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24403 Posts
On August 19 2016 00:33 Mohdoo wrote: I am not being presented with an argument. Present me with an argument and I'll address it. Telling someone to sit down and watch a 2 hour video or else admit ignorance is ridiculous. Addressing a 3rd candidate polling at less than 5% is already being generous. There are other things to discuss besides the green party's recent attempt. This isn't the first election with a green party candidate. It won't be the last. Politics in our country has continued as if the green party doesn't even exist for a long time. As I said, if you can tell me which part of this video is relevant, I'll gladly watch it and address it. I'll take that as a yes then. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
I would take that as a, you dont want to be succinct in providing your evidence, I mean if you've seen it and you know where its been addressed. For all the effort you put in a couple of time stamps couldn't hurt. He has a point. The burden of proof is not on him to sift through 2 hours of a video for evidence of a claim you are making. Unless all 2 hours are relevant which I believe to be a suspect thought at best. | ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
hmm, a pokemon with an "endorse" move, there's room there for some good comedy. | ||
|
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On August 19 2016 00:45 Rebs wrote: He has a point. The burden of proof is not on him to sift through 2 hours of a video for evidence of a claim you are making. Unless all 2 hours are relevant which I believe to be a suspect thought at best. I don't think he thinks all 2 hours are relevant, but that people should watch 2 hours of Jill Stein regardless. | ||
|
Adreme
United States5574 Posts
On August 19 2016 00:21 TMagpie wrote: Dems had a majority but still failed to pass ACA and kept gutting it and gutting it. Was it to appease conservatives? Slightly--it was mostly being gutted to appease fellow democrats who wouldn't stand in line. It was because they needed 100% of all democrats in the senate on board in order to pass it and thats a very tall order to get everyone in a party on board a single piece of legislation all because of the pointless and unneeded filibuster. | ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
| ||
|
TMagpie
265 Posts
On August 19 2016 00:53 TheYango wrote: I don't think he thinks all 2 hours are relevant, but that people should watch 2 hours of Jill Stein regardless. That's a different dialouge though right? GMO bad, it's mentioned somewhere in this long VOD is very different from "Jill be the shit yo, watch this sick track where she lays down some truth, boom!" | ||
|
TMagpie
265 Posts
On August 19 2016 00:54 Adreme wrote: It was because they needed 100% of all democrats in the senate on board in order to pass it and thats a very tall order to get everyone in a party on board a single piece of legislation all because of the pointless and unneeded filibuster. Not disagreeing with any given point. Just saying that the initial ACA was much grander and was gutted because Democrats have very little party loyalty. Just look at the GOP congressmen supporting trump 2-3 months ago. Death on their faces like someone was ramming an iron star up their asses, and yet we're still able to say that they supported Trump. Because they understand party unity is to stand together. Dems can't even agree on what a progressive law should be let alone ban together to push it. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
WolfintheSheep
Canada14127 Posts
On August 19 2016 01:03 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: https://twitter.com/dmedin11/status/766299013872250880 Congratulations on the first step back to a civilized society? | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
On August 19 2016 01:03 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: https://twitter.com/dmedin11/status/766299013872250880 Wow. This is absolutely amazing. I am stunned. How is this not some enormous deal? The financial incentive to imprison people is an enormous hole in our progress as a society. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
IntoTheTV X SOOP
PiGosaur Cup
The PondCast
Kung Fu Cup
IntoTheTV X SOOP
FEL
Patches Events
FEL
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
