EPTFound this kind of funny.
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4407
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
zeo
Serbia6336 Posts
Found this kind of funny. | ||
|
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
| ||
|
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
On July 23 2016 00:53 zeo wrote: Anyway, anyone following the DNC wikileaks dump? Based on their recent Turkey releases I am expecting 9000 spam emails On July 23 2016 01:00 Mohdoo wrote: I really think Clinton picking Kaine would be a big mistake. I am not seeing a single benefit. Agreed, but she would never pick one of the actually good options | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On July 23 2016 00:39 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: + Show Spoiler + https://twitter.com/AP/status/756511143686963201 he wont win, and hes a blip in louisiana political history compared to the likes of edwin edwards. On July 23 2016 00:53 KwarK wrote: Hitching your wagon to Trump is only justifiable if Trump wins. In 4 months there are going to be a lot of Republican politicians trying to explain why they were never actually a true believer and didn't mean all those things they said. paul ryan trying to trumpsplain is gonna be fun. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On July 23 2016 01:22 Doodsmack wrote: So how about Trump's cease and desist and implied legal threat sent to the Art of the Deal author? I'll bet the "return" of proceeds isn't even contemplated in their contract. What kind of person does it take to use lawyer attack dogs in the service of vendettas, over an entire career? A thin skinned baby who can’t deal with criticism and thinks the court system should always work in their favor. | ||
|
PassiveAce
United States18076 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/VTGQqF8.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/448WQbI.jpg) | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15736 Posts
On July 23 2016 01:24 Nevuk wrote: Based on their recent Turkey releases I am expecting 9000 spam emails Agreed, but she would never pick one of the actually good options I still think Bernie is her best option. This entire election will be determined by turnout, nothing more. Trump realizes it and Clinton realizes it. This election is a war more than a campaign. We need more soldiers and Bernie brings soldiers. Figure out everything else later, just win the election. I think democrats trying to have a perfectly Clinton campaign is a huge mistake and that any arrogance regarding Trump's chances will likely lose the election. Democrats need to run this campaign as "just win, no matter what" instead of trying to have the perfect little cabinet and the perfect little show. Turnout, turnout, turnout. That's all that matters. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On July 23 2016 01:30 Mohdoo wrote: I still think Bernie is her best option. This entire election will be determined by turnout, nothing more. Trump realizes it and Clinton realizes it. This election is a war more than a campaign. We need more soldiers and Bernie brings soldiers. Figure out everything else later, just win the election. I agree that Hillary needs to drive turnout, but I wonder whether Bernie would compromise her in other ways. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On July 23 2016 01:33 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Clinton will not pick anyone that is more popular or known than her. Thus Kaine is the safe bet. Her ego is what could lose her the election. I don't know if anyone can be more popular or known than the party's presidential nominee. But I do think that Hillary is well-aware of her comparative enthusiasm gap, and doesn't want to pick someone who is better at getting progressive panties wet than she is. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On July 22 2016 23:59 LegalLord wrote: From a few days ago, for those that have mentioned this issue before: Source Who was it posting articles about how he hadn't filed evidence yet and was just going to lie about it and never forgive the loans? Guess that settles that debate. Another +1 for Trump and -1 for sensationalist media | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15736 Posts
On July 23 2016 01:33 xDaunt wrote: I agree that Hillary needs to drive turnout, but I wonder whether Bernie would compromise her in other ways. On July 23 2016 01:33 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Clinton will not pick anyone that is more popular or known than her. Thus Kaine is the safe bet. Her ego is what could lose her the election. To address both of you, I hope/assume the cynicism regarding Clinton's tight grip on the DNC is somewhat exaggerated. I DO think the DNC did their best to push for what they thought was their best option, but I think the DNC has sway and some amount of control. I am hopeful that she will be pressured to do what is necessary to win. The DNC has the data, they know they could very well just throw Trump in the white house. I don't think anyone is as arrogant as they were 6 months ago. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
farvacola
United States18846 Posts
| ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
On July 23 2016 01:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote: Who was it posting articles about how he hadn't filed evidence yet and was just going to lie about it and never forgive the loans? Guess that settles that debate. Another +1 for Trump and -1 for sensationalist media I dunno, and I don't feel like looking that far back in the thread to find it. There was an understandable concern he might do that; and a desire to wait until it's actually done and verified. I'm glad now that it's been done. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45251 Posts
On July 23 2016 01:41 farvacola wrote: lol, gonna be funny when governors like Kasich start campaigning for Hillary. That would be amazing if Hillary takes Ohio thanks to Kasich. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15736 Posts
On July 23 2016 01:41 farvacola wrote: lol, gonna be funny when governors like Kasich start campaigning for Hillary. Do we think that is possible, or more likely that they will simply sit this one out? | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On July 23 2016 01:43 Mohdoo wrote: Do we think that is possible, or more likely that they will simply sit this one out? They'll sit it out. They don't want a repeat of Cruz's Wednesday night kamikaze. The calculation of the Establishment is as follows: Trump is likely to lose this November and be nothing but a bad memory afterwards, so let's just ride out the storm and live to fight another day. I think that there are problems with this line of thought, but I have no doubt that is what they're thinking. | ||
KwarK
United States43539 Posts
The gamble makes sense for the likes of Cruz, the odds are good Trump will lose but even if the odds weren't good being positioned as the sane conservative voice of reason in the event of a loss is much more useful than being slightly more in Trump's good graces but still on the outside in the event of a win. There's no real upside to endorsements but a few to failing to endorse. | ||
| ||
