US Politics Mega-thread - Page 3926
Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
SK.Testie
Canada11084 Posts
On June 03 2016 01:44 ticklishmusic wrote: Also Elizabeth Holmes is a fraud. I expect people will start suing her soon. http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/06/01/celebrated-unicorn-rider-elizabeth-holmes-now-net-worth-zero/ | ||
Mohdoo
United States15403 Posts
On June 03 2016 01:58 Plansix wrote: All the stories I hear about SV relate to them driving up all the prices in SF and making it unlivable for the natives of the city. And tech bros bitching about the fact that the Bart is past is lifespan and needs to be updated. And homeless people. Apparently if you make a lot of money, homeless people should go away. While this is not exactly the wording I would use, I would say that I am willing to pay a premium to live in an area that gets rid of homeless people. However, I have become very jaded regarding this issue after living in Portland for years. The amount of people I have encountered who have no desire to be remotely decent is too damn high. I'm completely drained of sympathy. I'll support every effort to prevent homelessness and mental illness. But there are many people who are, at this point, purely toxic, awful individuals. There's no saving them and letting them occupy affluent areas does no one any good. | ||
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
| ||
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
Edit: basic housing is a good way to deal with homeless problem. It is easier for them to get help if they want it if that have that basic level of structure in their lives. And it takes a lot of the burden off police and public services. | ||
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On June 03 2016 02:14 SK.Testie wrote: http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/06/01/celebrated-unicorn-rider-elizabeth-holmes-now-net-worth-zero/ She's probably paying herself a pretty solid salary with all sorts of cash components | ||
killa_robot
Canada1884 Posts
On June 03 2016 02:40 Plansix wrote: Yeah, having worked in probation, even the bad people that you talk about are normally mentally ill or have drug problems. There are almost zero cases of people being homeless just because they are lazy. Citation required. I've met someone who was willingly homeless just because they felt like it. They had friends who were also willingly homeless. Though their lifestyle caught the attention of police on occasion. That's not to say all homeless people want to be homeless, but to say almost none of them do is just ignorant. | ||
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
On June 02 2016 17:55 zeo wrote: Well there is a transcript, and the last few minutes are the run-of-the-mill catchphrases, buzzwords, false causes and strawmans you would expect. Googleing the names of those people on the panel made my morning I laughed so hard. Thanks for this. Irony. Clinton about to give a foreign policy speech. Curious to see how much time she spends pointing out the danger of Trumps "policies." Juxtaposition on the issue she is most comfortable with, and the one Trump seems to struggle the most with, makes good strategic sense. Moreso given FP is one of the primary jobs of the President. | ||
Introvert
United States4663 Posts
| ||
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
Of course this won't work on his supporters, who seem to rely more on emotion than logic in their support of him, but it is a good way to start chipping away at independents. Unsurprisingly his response is that all her arguments are lies. Little harder to maintain that attack when she is literally quoting him on every argument. | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
When Donald Trump comes to Cleveland this summer to claim the Republican nomination, he’ll do it an eight-minute drive away from the George V. Voinovich Bridge. He’ll be eight minutes in the other direction from Voinovich Atrium at the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, and just a few minutes farther from Voinovich Bicentennial Park. But as of now, Trump will be without the backing of George Voinovich himself, the former Ohio governor and senator —and one of the state’s favorite Republican sons — who has yet to throw his support behind the presumptive GOP nominee. Trump’s swing-state trouble isn’t limited to Voinovich. While national Republican leaders have largely gotten on board, a host of key establishment figures in Ohio and Florida — including current Ohio Gov. John Kasich, former Gov. Bob Taft, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, Florida Reps. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen and Carlos Curbelo and other influential Latino leaders in Florida — are still refusing to get behind the GOP nominee. “He has, over the campaign, talked about lots of things, and what he’s talked about in his solutions to these things have raised a lot of eyebrows,” said Voinovich, counting himself as one of what he described as many Ohioans who have serious concerns about Trump’s plans for everything from the debt to international alliances. “I mean, the point is, people are dismayed at some of the stuff.” He went on to add, “He’s got a lot of work to do between now and the election to reach out, not only to Republicans, but to independents who have serious questions about whether he’s able to get the job done.” A lack of establishment support didn’t slow Trump in the primary, as Trump got very few big-name endorsements but won handily anyway. But even if establishment figures sway only small numbers of voters, recent history demonstrates that small margins can make a big difference. When George W. Bush beat John Kerry in Ohio in 2004, the last time the state went Republican, he did it by just over 100,000 votes. And when Bush was declared Florida’s victor over Al Gore in 2000, the margin was so tight that some Democrats are still arguing over the result 16 years later. The challenge for Trump is starkly apparent in Ohio, where insufficient Republican turnout in 2012 (and robust Democratic turnout) helped President Barack Obama romp to victory over Mitt Romney, even though Romney won independents in the state. Source | ||
Mohdoo
United States15403 Posts
On June 03 2016 04:24 Introvert wrote: I must say, I'm surprised Ryan held out as long as he did. Their statisticians showed a 3rd party isn't viable. I think that's all it comes down to lol | ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21392 Posts
Since people talked about it without providing the story itself. | ||
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
puerk
Germany855 Posts
| ||
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
| ||
farvacola
United States18819 Posts
On June 03 2016 04:58 xDaunt wrote: I'm sure that Trump made Ryan a deal that he couldn't refuse. Nah, it's a relatively easy way for Ryan to share in Trump's spotlight while playing up the big man status of the speaker position. I bet the party had more to do with it ![]() | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On June 03 2016 04:59 puerk wrote: Has the House GOP announced a new agenda already? Because "do nothing but express repeatedly and staunchly to be against anything that can be vaguely associated with obama" for sure won't cut it as an agenda once a new president is voted in. The platforms for the parties are announced at the conventions. But you might see something similar, but you replace Obama with Clinton and keep talking about repealing the ACA. And tax cuts targeted at the rich, I mean Job Creators. | ||
Mohdoo
United States15403 Posts
| ||
| ||