• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:13
CEST 08:13
KST 15:13
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation12$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [G] Progamer Settings ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 580 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 3034

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 3032 3033 3034 3035 3036 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
February 25 2016 22:00 GMT
#60661
Apple’s lawyers believe forcing America’s largest company to help the government crack open one of its iPhones would violate the US constitution and be a misinterpretation of a 227-year-old law.

The 36-page legal brief is Apple’s formal rebuttal to a federal court order to write and sign software that would make it easier for investigators to open a phone used by the San Bernardino gunman.

Its attorneys argue that the government seeks “a dangerous power that Congress and the American people have withheld: the ability to force companies like Apple to undermine the basic security and privacy interests of hundreds of millions of individuals around the globe”.

Apple claims the court order violates American speech law under the first amendment, due process protections under the fifth amendment and leans too heavily on the so-called All Writs Act, a statute dating back to 1789 that gives courts broad authority to ensure orders are fulfilled.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
ErectedZenith
Profile Joined January 2016
325 Posts
February 25 2016 22:00 GMT
#60662
On February 26 2016 06:49 Plansix wrote:
I didn’t need Salon to tell me America’s are pretty dumb. Not much dumber than other countries, but we are not batting any higher. Trump being the front runner in the Republicans race is right in line with use electing Bush twice.


The Don is the front runner for GOP is the prove that average Americans are smart enough to realize that socialism won't solve society's problems after the failure that is affirmative action.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 25 2016 22:02 GMT
#60663
I always felt the drones where going to come back to haunt the US, especially when we established their operation HQ in the US. I get that it makes logistical sense and is safer, but perception of the program is so damaging. A nation reaching out across the globe to kill people with unmanned robots. Kids are quoted that the “fear the sky because the US owns it.” Just not the perception you want to be projecting world wide.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15664 Posts
February 25 2016 22:02 GMT
#60664
On February 26 2016 07:00 ErectedZenith wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 06:49 Plansix wrote:
I didn’t need Salon to tell me America’s are pretty dumb. Not much dumber than other countries, but we are not batting any higher. Trump being the front runner in the Republicans race is right in line with use electing Bush twice.


The Don is the front runner for GOP is the prove that average Americans are smart enough to realize that socialism won't solve society's problems after the failure that is affirmative action.


How exactly do affirmative action and socialism fit together?
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23173 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-25 22:04:57
February 25 2016 22:04 GMT
#60665
Just stop...


“What happened was, the people who still needed some assistance didn’t get it,” Mr. Clinton said. “We were able to restore virtually all the cuts to legal immigrants that the Republicans demanded, we kept the guarantee of nutrition and health care. But the law needs to be changed to help the poorest of the poor.”

He added, “There’s no question that it did far more good than harm, and there’s no question that subsequent events showed it needs some improvement.”

“I don’t think America ever stopped being great – we have to make America whole again,” Mr. Clinton told a couple of hundred supporters in Rock Hill, a modest-size city near the North Carolina border.

“How do we make America whole again? Well, we shouldn’t build a wall around this country. We should do what Hillary wants to do. We should tear down the barriers and build ladders to prosperity.”

While Mrs. Clinton has been decrying “systemic racism” in the criminal justice system ahead of the South Carolina primary, where more than half of Democratic voters are likely to be black, Mr. Clinton took a different tack here. He praised police officers generally and said that communities needed “neighborhood councils” and other groups that would build closer ties with beat cops and law enforcement officials.

“We need to put more police on the street that look like the communities they are policing,” Mr. Clinton said. “We all know that anytime people have a lot of guns, and there’s violence, and drugs are being sold, once in a while something’s going to happen that shouldn’t happen.”

He did not pass judgment on who was to blame in such incidents, but focused instead on the need for the police and community officials to work together.

“We need the police, we need the police, but we need a police that people trust are on their side,” Mr. Clinton said.

Throughout his speech, Mr. Clinton seemed to be reaching out to white voters at a time when Mrs. Clinton is explicitly courting African-Americans


Source
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 25 2016 22:04 GMT
#60666
On February 26 2016 07:02 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 07:00 ErectedZenith wrote:
On February 26 2016 06:49 Plansix wrote:
I didn’t need Salon to tell me America’s are pretty dumb. Not much dumber than other countries, but we are not batting any higher. Trump being the front runner in the Republicans race is right in line with use electing Bush twice.


The Don is the front runner for GOP is the prove that average Americans are smart enough to realize that socialism won't solve society's problems after the failure that is affirmative action.


How exactly do affirmative action and socialism fit together?

Why are you responding to the bait lord? He stumps for Trump, much like an old Sheep based user.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15664 Posts
February 25 2016 22:06 GMT
#60667
Fair enough.

Am I the only one starting to wonder if Kerry just blackmails the living hell out of world leaders until they agree to his requests?


UNITED NATIONS — The United States and China have agreed to stiffen international financial sanctions against North Korea in a major shift for Beijing, which has long been unwilling to further isolate its intransigent ally.


Source
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-25 22:09:58
February 25 2016 22:09 GMT
#60668
A bill that allows children of all ages to handle guns passed Iowa’s house of representatives on Tuesday.

Approved by a 62-36 vote, the bill permits children under the age of 14 to have “a pistol, revolver or the ammunition” while under parental supervision. The bill will now head to the state senate.

“It’s our impression that most, and probably all, states allow minors to possess firearms with parental supervision,” Allison Anderman, staff attorney for the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, said. “If there are age limitations on possession with parental supervision, they vary by state.”

State representative Kirsten Running-Marquardt, who opposes the bill, said it “allows for one-year-olds, two-year-olds, three-year-olds, four-year-olds to operate handguns”, according to CBS-affiliate KCCI. She added: “We do not need a militia of toddlers.”

Currently in Iowa, children can legally use long guns and shotguns under adult supervision but not handguns. This bill would change that, allowing the use of handguns as long as parents are 21 years old and maintain “visual and verbal contact at all times with the supervised person”. Children would still not be able to purchase firearms on their own.

State representative Jake Highfill told the Washington Post that the new law “gives the power back to parents”.

“Allowing people to learn at a young age the respect that a gun commands is one of the most important things you can do,” Highfill said.

The alternative, he added, is “turning 18 with no experience”.

But those opposing the bill were not convinced. State representative Mary Mascher argued that they “can’t legislate good parenting … but we can protect our children”. She cited seat belt, smoking and car seat laws.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
February 25 2016 22:12 GMT
#60669
On February 26 2016 07:09 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Show nested quote +
A bill that allows children of all ages to handle guns passed Iowa’s house of representatives on Tuesday.

Approved by a 62-36 vote, the bill permits children under the age of 14 to have “a pistol, revolver or the ammunition” while under parental supervision. The bill will now head to the state senate.

“It’s our impression that most, and probably all, states allow minors to possess firearms with parental supervision,” Allison Anderman, staff attorney for the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, said. “If there are age limitations on possession with parental supervision, they vary by state.”

State representative Kirsten Running-Marquardt, who opposes the bill, said it “allows for one-year-olds, two-year-olds, three-year-olds, four-year-olds to operate handguns”, according to CBS-affiliate KCCI. She added: “We do not need a militia of toddlers.”

Currently in Iowa, children can legally use long guns and shotguns under adult supervision but not handguns. This bill would change that, allowing the use of handguns as long as parents are 21 years old and maintain “visual and verbal contact at all times with the supervised person”. Children would still not be able to purchase firearms on their own.

State representative Jake Highfill told the Washington Post that the new law “gives the power back to parents”.

“Allowing people to learn at a young age the respect that a gun commands is one of the most important things you can do,” Highfill said.

The alternative, he added, is “turning 18 with no experience”.

But those opposing the bill were not convinced. State representative Mary Mascher argued that they “can’t legislate good parenting … but we can protect our children”. She cited seat belt, smoking and car seat laws.


Source

Good. This isn't something that needs to be criminalized.
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21647 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-25 22:15:35
February 25 2016 22:14 GMT
#60670
On February 26 2016 07:09 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Show nested quote +
A bill that allows children of all ages to handle guns passed Iowa’s house of representatives on Tuesday.

Approved by a 62-36 vote, the bill permits children under the age of 14 to have “a pistol, revolver or the ammunition” while under parental supervision. The bill will now head to the state senate.

“It’s our impression that most, and probably all, states allow minors to possess firearms with parental supervision,” Allison Anderman, staff attorney for the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, said. “If there are age limitations on possession with parental supervision, they vary by state.”

State representative Kirsten Running-Marquardt, who opposes the bill, said it “allows for one-year-olds, two-year-olds, three-year-olds, four-year-olds to operate handguns”, according to CBS-affiliate KCCI. She added: “We do not need a militia of toddlers.”

Currently in Iowa, children can legally use long guns and shotguns under adult supervision but not handguns. This bill would change that, allowing the use of handguns as long as parents are 21 years old and maintain “visual and verbal contact at all times with the supervised person”. Children would still not be able to purchase firearms on their own.

State representative Jake Highfill told the Washington Post that the new law “gives the power back to parents”.

“Allowing people to learn at a young age the respect that a gun commands is one of the most important things you can do,” Highfill said.

The alternative, he added, is “turning 18 with no experience”.

But those opposing the bill were not convinced. State representative Mary Mascher argued that they “can’t legislate good parenting … but we can protect our children”. She cited seat belt, smoking and car seat laws.


Source

I am reminded of the story of an 11 year old shooting an 8y old girl who did not let him play with her puppy.

On February 26 2016 07:12 xDaunt wrote:
Good. This isn't something that needs to be criminalized.

Why the fuck does a child need to use a lethal weapon?
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
jcarlsoniv
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States27922 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-25 22:15:38
February 25 2016 22:15 GMT
#60671
On February 26 2016 07:12 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 07:09 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
A bill that allows children of all ages to handle guns passed Iowa’s house of representatives on Tuesday.

Approved by a 62-36 vote, the bill permits children under the age of 14 to have “a pistol, revolver or the ammunition” while under parental supervision. The bill will now head to the state senate.

“It’s our impression that most, and probably all, states allow minors to possess firearms with parental supervision,” Allison Anderman, staff attorney for the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, said. “If there are age limitations on possession with parental supervision, they vary by state.”

State representative Kirsten Running-Marquardt, who opposes the bill, said it “allows for one-year-olds, two-year-olds, three-year-olds, four-year-olds to operate handguns”, according to CBS-affiliate KCCI. She added: “We do not need a militia of toddlers.”

Currently in Iowa, children can legally use long guns and shotguns under adult supervision but not handguns. This bill would change that, allowing the use of handguns as long as parents are 21 years old and maintain “visual and verbal contact at all times with the supervised person”. Children would still not be able to purchase firearms on their own.

State representative Jake Highfill told the Washington Post that the new law “gives the power back to parents”.

“Allowing people to learn at a young age the respect that a gun commands is one of the most important things you can do,” Highfill said.

The alternative, he added, is “turning 18 with no experience”.

But those opposing the bill were not convinced. State representative Mary Mascher argued that they “can’t legislate good parenting … but we can protect our children”. She cited seat belt, smoking and car seat laws.


Source

Good. This isn't something that needs to be criminalized.


Agreed. I find this to be a completely reasonable argument


The alternative, he added, is “turning 18 with no experience”.


If we're gonna continue having guns (which we are), experience is a good thing.

On February 26 2016 07:14 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 07:09 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
A bill that allows children of all ages to handle guns passed Iowa’s house of representatives on Tuesday.

Approved by a 62-36 vote, the bill permits children under the age of 14 to have “a pistol, revolver or the ammunition” while under parental supervision. The bill will now head to the state senate.

“It’s our impression that most, and probably all, states allow minors to possess firearms with parental supervision,” Allison Anderman, staff attorney for the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, said. “If there are age limitations on possession with parental supervision, they vary by state.”

State representative Kirsten Running-Marquardt, who opposes the bill, said it “allows for one-year-olds, two-year-olds, three-year-olds, four-year-olds to operate handguns”, according to CBS-affiliate KCCI. She added: “We do not need a militia of toddlers.”

Currently in Iowa, children can legally use long guns and shotguns under adult supervision but not handguns. This bill would change that, allowing the use of handguns as long as parents are 21 years old and maintain “visual and verbal contact at all times with the supervised person”. Children would still not be able to purchase firearms on their own.

State representative Jake Highfill told the Washington Post that the new law “gives the power back to parents”.

“Allowing people to learn at a young age the respect that a gun commands is one of the most important things you can do,” Highfill said.

The alternative, he added, is “turning 18 with no experience”.

But those opposing the bill were not convinced. State representative Mary Mascher argued that they “can’t legislate good parenting … but we can protect our children”. She cited seat belt, smoking and car seat laws.


Source

I am reminded of the story of an 11 year old shooting an 8y old girl who did not let him play with her puppy.


I'm gonna go ahead and assume that 11 year old wasn't under adult supervision.
Soniv ||| Soniv#1962 ||| @jcarlsoniv ||| The Big Golem ||| Join the Glorious Evolution. What's your favorite aminal, a bear? ||| Joe "Don't call me Daniel" "Soniv" "Daniel" Carlsberg LXIX ||| Paging Dr. John Shadow
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23173 Posts
February 25 2016 22:15 GMT
#60672
On February 26 2016 07:09 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Show nested quote +
A bill that allows children of all ages to handle guns passed Iowa’s house of representatives on Tuesday.

Approved by a 62-36 vote, the bill permits children under the age of 14 to have “a pistol, revolver or the ammunition” while under parental supervision. The bill will now head to the state senate.

“It’s our impression that most, and probably all, states allow minors to possess firearms with parental supervision,” Allison Anderman, staff attorney for the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, said. “If there are age limitations on possession with parental supervision, they vary by state.”

State representative Kirsten Running-Marquardt, who opposes the bill, said it “allows for one-year-olds, two-year-olds, three-year-olds, four-year-olds to operate handguns”, according to CBS-affiliate KCCI. She added: “We do not need a militia of toddlers.”

Currently in Iowa, children can legally use long guns and shotguns under adult supervision but not handguns. This bill would change that, allowing the use of handguns as long as parents are 21 years old and maintain “visual and verbal contact at all times with the supervised person”. Children would still not be able to purchase firearms on their own.

State representative Jake Highfill told the Washington Post that the new law “gives the power back to parents”.

“Allowing people to learn at a young age the respect that a gun commands is one of the most important things you can do,” Highfill said.

The alternative, he added, is “turning 18 with no experience”.

But those opposing the bill were not convinced. State representative Mary Mascher argued that they “can’t legislate good parenting … but we can protect our children”. She cited seat belt, smoking and car seat laws.


Source


I don't have a problem with having guns and kids under 14 using them. There should probably some restrictions though. I mean you can keep it under a .22, but the risk isn't anything but ominous rendering of "parental supervision".
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-25 22:18:30
February 25 2016 22:16 GMT
#60673
I am confused why anyone would teach their kid on a handgun over a long gun or shotgun, but I guess it was just a weird oversight in the law. I learned on a 22 at age 12, so I'm not really against it. I think its really dumb to hand a child anything that is semi-automatic, but there are negligence and civil laws to punish that type of stupidity.
On February 26 2016 07:14 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 07:09 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
A bill that allows children of all ages to handle guns passed Iowa’s house of representatives on Tuesday.

Approved by a 62-36 vote, the bill permits children under the age of 14 to have “a pistol, revolver or the ammunition” while under parental supervision. The bill will now head to the state senate.

“It’s our impression that most, and probably all, states allow minors to possess firearms with parental supervision,” Allison Anderman, staff attorney for the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, said. “If there are age limitations on possession with parental supervision, they vary by state.”

State representative Kirsten Running-Marquardt, who opposes the bill, said it “allows for one-year-olds, two-year-olds, three-year-olds, four-year-olds to operate handguns”, according to CBS-affiliate KCCI. She added: “We do not need a militia of toddlers.”

Currently in Iowa, children can legally use long guns and shotguns under adult supervision but not handguns. This bill would change that, allowing the use of handguns as long as parents are 21 years old and maintain “visual and verbal contact at all times with the supervised person”. Children would still not be able to purchase firearms on their own.

State representative Jake Highfill told the Washington Post that the new law “gives the power back to parents”.

“Allowing people to learn at a young age the respect that a gun commands is one of the most important things you can do,” Highfill said.

The alternative, he added, is “turning 18 with no experience”.

But those opposing the bill were not convinced. State representative Mary Mascher argued that they “can’t legislate good parenting … but we can protect our children”. She cited seat belt, smoking and car seat laws.


Source

I am reminded of the story of an 11 year old shooting an 8y old girl who did not let him play with her puppy.

Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 07:12 xDaunt wrote:
Good. This isn't something that needs to be criminalized.

Why the fuck does a child need to use a lethal weapon?

Because that is how people learn to use guns. This law only changed the rules for hand guns. You can still give a kid an AK47 and shoot with them under the previous law.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21647 Posts
February 25 2016 22:18 GMT
#60674
On February 26 2016 07:15 jcarlsoniv wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 07:12 xDaunt wrote:
On February 26 2016 07:09 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
A bill that allows children of all ages to handle guns passed Iowa’s house of representatives on Tuesday.

Approved by a 62-36 vote, the bill permits children under the age of 14 to have “a pistol, revolver or the ammunition” while under parental supervision. The bill will now head to the state senate.

“It’s our impression that most, and probably all, states allow minors to possess firearms with parental supervision,” Allison Anderman, staff attorney for the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, said. “If there are age limitations on possession with parental supervision, they vary by state.”

State representative Kirsten Running-Marquardt, who opposes the bill, said it “allows for one-year-olds, two-year-olds, three-year-olds, four-year-olds to operate handguns”, according to CBS-affiliate KCCI. She added: “We do not need a militia of toddlers.”

Currently in Iowa, children can legally use long guns and shotguns under adult supervision but not handguns. This bill would change that, allowing the use of handguns as long as parents are 21 years old and maintain “visual and verbal contact at all times with the supervised person”. Children would still not be able to purchase firearms on their own.

State representative Jake Highfill told the Washington Post that the new law “gives the power back to parents”.

“Allowing people to learn at a young age the respect that a gun commands is one of the most important things you can do,” Highfill said.

The alternative, he added, is “turning 18 with no experience”.

But those opposing the bill were not convinced. State representative Mary Mascher argued that they “can’t legislate good parenting … but we can protect our children”. She cited seat belt, smoking and car seat laws.


Source

Good. This isn't something that needs to be criminalized.


Agreed. I find this to be a completely reasonable argument

Show nested quote +

The alternative, he added, is “turning 18 with no experience”.


If we're gonna continue having guns (which we are), experience is a good thing.

Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 07:14 Gorsameth wrote:
On February 26 2016 07:09 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
A bill that allows children of all ages to handle guns passed Iowa’s house of representatives on Tuesday.

Approved by a 62-36 vote, the bill permits children under the age of 14 to have “a pistol, revolver or the ammunition” while under parental supervision. The bill will now head to the state senate.

“It’s our impression that most, and probably all, states allow minors to possess firearms with parental supervision,” Allison Anderman, staff attorney for the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, said. “If there are age limitations on possession with parental supervision, they vary by state.”

State representative Kirsten Running-Marquardt, who opposes the bill, said it “allows for one-year-olds, two-year-olds, three-year-olds, four-year-olds to operate handguns”, according to CBS-affiliate KCCI. She added: “We do not need a militia of toddlers.”

Currently in Iowa, children can legally use long guns and shotguns under adult supervision but not handguns. This bill would change that, allowing the use of handguns as long as parents are 21 years old and maintain “visual and verbal contact at all times with the supervised person”. Children would still not be able to purchase firearms on their own.

State representative Jake Highfill told the Washington Post that the new law “gives the power back to parents”.

“Allowing people to learn at a young age the respect that a gun commands is one of the most important things you can do,” Highfill said.

The alternative, he added, is “turning 18 with no experience”.

But those opposing the bill were not convinced. State representative Mary Mascher argued that they “can’t legislate good parenting … but we can protect our children”. She cited seat belt, smoking and car seat laws.


Source

I am reminded of the story of an 11 year old shooting an 8y old girl who did not let him play with her puppy.


I'm gonna go ahead and assume that 11 year old wasn't under adult supervision.

And an adult standing at a distance is going to be able to intervene if a kid points a gun at someone else and pulls the trigger?
And you assume the kid is not going to be able to get access to that gun while unsupervised.
I think we have enough proof from people shooting others with daddies gun that its a pipe dream.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 25 2016 22:19 GMT
#60675
On February 26 2016 07:18 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 07:15 jcarlsoniv wrote:
On February 26 2016 07:12 xDaunt wrote:
On February 26 2016 07:09 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
A bill that allows children of all ages to handle guns passed Iowa’s house of representatives on Tuesday.

Approved by a 62-36 vote, the bill permits children under the age of 14 to have “a pistol, revolver or the ammunition” while under parental supervision. The bill will now head to the state senate.

“It’s our impression that most, and probably all, states allow minors to possess firearms with parental supervision,” Allison Anderman, staff attorney for the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, said. “If there are age limitations on possession with parental supervision, they vary by state.”

State representative Kirsten Running-Marquardt, who opposes the bill, said it “allows for one-year-olds, two-year-olds, three-year-olds, four-year-olds to operate handguns”, according to CBS-affiliate KCCI. She added: “We do not need a militia of toddlers.”

Currently in Iowa, children can legally use long guns and shotguns under adult supervision but not handguns. This bill would change that, allowing the use of handguns as long as parents are 21 years old and maintain “visual and verbal contact at all times with the supervised person”. Children would still not be able to purchase firearms on their own.

State representative Jake Highfill told the Washington Post that the new law “gives the power back to parents”.

“Allowing people to learn at a young age the respect that a gun commands is one of the most important things you can do,” Highfill said.

The alternative, he added, is “turning 18 with no experience”.

But those opposing the bill were not convinced. State representative Mary Mascher argued that they “can’t legislate good parenting … but we can protect our children”. She cited seat belt, smoking and car seat laws.


Source

Good. This isn't something that needs to be criminalized.


Agreed. I find this to be a completely reasonable argument


The alternative, he added, is “turning 18 with no experience”.


If we're gonna continue having guns (which we are), experience is a good thing.

On February 26 2016 07:14 Gorsameth wrote:
On February 26 2016 07:09 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
A bill that allows children of all ages to handle guns passed Iowa’s house of representatives on Tuesday.

Approved by a 62-36 vote, the bill permits children under the age of 14 to have “a pistol, revolver or the ammunition” while under parental supervision. The bill will now head to the state senate.

“It’s our impression that most, and probably all, states allow minors to possess firearms with parental supervision,” Allison Anderman, staff attorney for the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, said. “If there are age limitations on possession with parental supervision, they vary by state.”

State representative Kirsten Running-Marquardt, who opposes the bill, said it “allows for one-year-olds, two-year-olds, three-year-olds, four-year-olds to operate handguns”, according to CBS-affiliate KCCI. She added: “We do not need a militia of toddlers.”

Currently in Iowa, children can legally use long guns and shotguns under adult supervision but not handguns. This bill would change that, allowing the use of handguns as long as parents are 21 years old and maintain “visual and verbal contact at all times with the supervised person”. Children would still not be able to purchase firearms on their own.

State representative Jake Highfill told the Washington Post that the new law “gives the power back to parents”.

“Allowing people to learn at a young age the respect that a gun commands is one of the most important things you can do,” Highfill said.

The alternative, he added, is “turning 18 with no experience”.

But those opposing the bill were not convinced. State representative Mary Mascher argued that they “can’t legislate good parenting … but we can protect our children”. She cited seat belt, smoking and car seat laws.


Source

I am reminded of the story of an 11 year old shooting an 8y old girl who did not let him play with her puppy.


I'm gonna go ahead and assume that 11 year old wasn't under adult supervision.

And an adult standing at a distance is going to be able to intervene if a kid points a gun at someone else and pulls the trigger?
And you assume the kid is not going to be able to get access to that gun while unsupervised.
I think we have enough proof from people shooting others with daddies gun that its a pipe dream.

I didn't kill anyone. My brother either. My parents either. We all made it. If we are going to get mad about gun laws, lets get mad about bad ones. This isn't the hill to die on.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
ErectedZenith
Profile Joined January 2016
325 Posts
February 25 2016 22:25 GMT
#60676
On February 26 2016 07:02 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 07:00 ErectedZenith wrote:
On February 26 2016 06:49 Plansix wrote:
I didn’t need Salon to tell me America’s are pretty dumb. Not much dumber than other countries, but we are not batting any higher. Trump being the front runner in the Republicans race is right in line with use electing Bush twice.


The Don is the front runner for GOP is the prove that average Americans are smart enough to realize that socialism won't solve society's problems after the failure that is affirmative action.


How exactly do affirmative action and socialism fit together?


The democratic party are actively vouching for socialism (see Sanders asking for more taxes for the job providers).

Socialism:
a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies.

Source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism

And affirmative action forces employers to artificially creates quotas adjudicated by governments.

Don't listen to that guy that calls people trolls because they've got a point and facts and he's got none.
CannonsNCarriers
Profile Joined April 2010
United States638 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-25 22:31:14
February 25 2016 22:31 GMT
#60677
On February 26 2016 07:25 ErectedZenith wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 07:02 Mohdoo wrote:
On February 26 2016 07:00 ErectedZenith wrote:
On February 26 2016 06:49 Plansix wrote:
I didn’t need Salon to tell me America’s are pretty dumb. Not much dumber than other countries, but we are not batting any higher. Trump being the front runner in the Republicans race is right in line with use electing Bush twice.


The Don is the front runner for GOP is the prove that average Americans are smart enough to realize that socialism won't solve society's problems after the failure that is affirmative action.


How exactly do affirmative action and socialism fit together?


The democratic party are actively vouching for socialism (see Sanders asking for more taxes for the job providers).

Socialism:
a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies.

Source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism

And affirmative action forces employers to artificially creates quotas adjudicated by governments.

Don't listen to that guy that calls people trolls because they've got a point and facts and he's got none.


I am that guy that harps on the definition of socialism and your post is legit triggering me. The USA has had taxes since the founding. We have had a tax system comparable to what we have now since the great 1986 tax reform act. Moving the rates around, say back up to what they were in the 90s before the Gingrich capital side tax cuts, would not make the USA socialist. Check the definition you quoted. Going up to 35% on capital gains or reforming the corporate profit tax so that the actual collected amount is closer to the listed 35% will not in any way result in "a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies."
Dun tuch my cheezbrgr
ErectedZenith
Profile Joined January 2016
325 Posts
February 25 2016 22:34 GMT
#60678
On February 26 2016 07:31 CannonsNCarriers wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 07:25 ErectedZenith wrote:
On February 26 2016 07:02 Mohdoo wrote:
On February 26 2016 07:00 ErectedZenith wrote:
On February 26 2016 06:49 Plansix wrote:
I didn’t need Salon to tell me America’s are pretty dumb. Not much dumber than other countries, but we are not batting any higher. Trump being the front runner in the Republicans race is right in line with use electing Bush twice.


The Don is the front runner for GOP is the prove that average Americans are smart enough to realize that socialism won't solve society's problems after the failure that is affirmative action.


How exactly do affirmative action and socialism fit together?


The democratic party are actively vouching for socialism (see Sanders asking for more taxes for the job providers).

Socialism:
a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies.

Source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism

And affirmative action forces employers to artificially creates quotas adjudicated by governments.

Don't listen to that guy that calls people trolls because they've got a point and facts and he's got none.


I am that guy that harps on the definition of socialism and your post is legit triggering me. The USA has had taxes since the founding. We have had a tax system comparable to what we have now since the great 1986 tax reform act. Moving the rates around, say back up to what they were in the 90s before the Gingrich capital side tax cuts, would not make the USA socialist. Check the definition you quoted. Going up to 35% on capital gains or reforming the corporate profit tax so that the actual collected amount is closer to the listed 35% will not in any way result in "a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies."


Nobody is saying that we should get rid of taxes but not raising it.

The point is that money is a company's blood. Raising taxes doesn't help anybody except for the government and who knows if the government will ACTUALLY put those money into good use. The trust in government is at all time low.

What you want the system to do is to cut away the social welfare system and introduce a better way of utilizing the current taxes by giving people money to start their own business or make it a loan to support them into going into STEM fields.
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21647 Posts
February 25 2016 22:38 GMT
#60679
On February 26 2016 07:34 ErectedZenith wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 07:31 CannonsNCarriers wrote:
On February 26 2016 07:25 ErectedZenith wrote:
On February 26 2016 07:02 Mohdoo wrote:
On February 26 2016 07:00 ErectedZenith wrote:
On February 26 2016 06:49 Plansix wrote:
I didn’t need Salon to tell me America’s are pretty dumb. Not much dumber than other countries, but we are not batting any higher. Trump being the front runner in the Republicans race is right in line with use electing Bush twice.


The Don is the front runner for GOP is the prove that average Americans are smart enough to realize that socialism won't solve society's problems after the failure that is affirmative action.


How exactly do affirmative action and socialism fit together?


The democratic party are actively vouching for socialism (see Sanders asking for more taxes for the job providers).

Socialism:
a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies.

Source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism

And affirmative action forces employers to artificially creates quotas adjudicated by governments.

Don't listen to that guy that calls people trolls because they've got a point and facts and he's got none.


I am that guy that harps on the definition of socialism and your post is legit triggering me. The USA has had taxes since the founding. We have had a tax system comparable to what we have now since the great 1986 tax reform act. Moving the rates around, say back up to what they were in the 90s before the Gingrich capital side tax cuts, would not make the USA socialist. Check the definition you quoted. Going up to 35% on capital gains or reforming the corporate profit tax so that the actual collected amount is closer to the listed 35% will not in any way result in "a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies."


Nobody is saying that we should get rid of taxes but not raising it.

The point is that money is a company's blood. Raising taxes doesn't help anybody except for the government and who knows if the government will ACTUALLY put those money into good use. The trust in government is at all time low.

What you want the system to do is to cut away the social welfare system and introduce a better way of utilizing the current taxes by giving people money to start their own business or make it a loan to support them into going into STEM fields.

The problem is that big businesses are making record profits while barely paying taxes (if they pay any at all).

As for your other idea. 100% employment is an impossible myth. Any system that relies on it is doomed to fail.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
ErectedZenith
Profile Joined January 2016
325 Posts
February 25 2016 22:46 GMT
#60680
On February 26 2016 07:38 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 07:34 ErectedZenith wrote:
On February 26 2016 07:31 CannonsNCarriers wrote:
On February 26 2016 07:25 ErectedZenith wrote:
On February 26 2016 07:02 Mohdoo wrote:
On February 26 2016 07:00 ErectedZenith wrote:
On February 26 2016 06:49 Plansix wrote:
I didn’t need Salon to tell me America’s are pretty dumb. Not much dumber than other countries, but we are not batting any higher. Trump being the front runner in the Republicans race is right in line with use electing Bush twice.


The Don is the front runner for GOP is the prove that average Americans are smart enough to realize that socialism won't solve society's problems after the failure that is affirmative action.


How exactly do affirmative action and socialism fit together?


The democratic party are actively vouching for socialism (see Sanders asking for more taxes for the job providers).

Socialism:
a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies.

Source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism

And affirmative action forces employers to artificially creates quotas adjudicated by governments.

Don't listen to that guy that calls people trolls because they've got a point and facts and he's got none.


I am that guy that harps on the definition of socialism and your post is legit triggering me. The USA has had taxes since the founding. We have had a tax system comparable to what we have now since the great 1986 tax reform act. Moving the rates around, say back up to what they were in the 90s before the Gingrich capital side tax cuts, would not make the USA socialist. Check the definition you quoted. Going up to 35% on capital gains or reforming the corporate profit tax so that the actual collected amount is closer to the listed 35% will not in any way result in "a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies."


Nobody is saying that we should get rid of taxes but not raising it.

The point is that money is a company's blood. Raising taxes doesn't help anybody except for the government and who knows if the government will ACTUALLY put those money into good use. The trust in government is at all time low.

What you want the system to do is to cut away the social welfare system and introduce a better way of utilizing the current taxes by giving people money to start their own business or make it a loan to support them into going into STEM fields.

The problem is that big businesses are making record profits while barely paying taxes (if they pay any at all).

As for your other idea. 100% employment is an impossible myth. Any system that relies on it is doomed to fail.


Then get rid of their mechanism to escape taxes.

ACTUALLY have white collar crimes to be charged for abusing the tax system by giving harsher punishment for fraud.

100% employment is ofc impossible, kids shouldn't be forced to work. Nobody is saying that here though (are you putting words in my mouth?).

But it is something that we should strive for, giving people the necessary tools to work productively in the society.

That's how trust between humans are built.
Prev 1 3032 3033 3034 3035 3036 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 47m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 205
StarCraft: Brood War
Noble 139
PianO 114
Leta 86
Bale 23
JulyZerg 12
Dota 2
ODPixel175
NeuroSwarm95
League of Legends
JimRising 828
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor113
Other Games
summit1g8706
Stewie2K1051
shahzam755
monkeys_forever480
SortOf54
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick38137
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH366
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• tankgirl 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1244
• Stunt513
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
3h 47m
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
6h 47m
Replay Cast
17h 47m
RSL Revival
1d 3h
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 9h
OSC
1d 13h
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
2 days
FEL
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.