• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 23:21
CET 05:21
KST 13:21
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !8Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced15
StarCraft 2
General
When will we find out if there are more tournament ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump
Tourneys
Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1: Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14! Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement Mutation # 501 Price of Progress
Brood War
General
How Rain Became ProGamer in Just 3 Months BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle screp: Command line app to parse SC rep files [BSL21] RO8 Bracket & Prediction Contest
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] WB SEMIFINALS - Saturday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO8 - Day 2 - Sunday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Mechabellum Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread PC Games Sales Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
The (Hidden) Drug Problem in…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1540 users

The Mortar

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
Penev
Profile Joined October 2012
28512 Posts
October 21 2012 21:06 GMT
#1
Greetings, fellow evil-doers (<3 Fenrax),

please allow me to propose a new unit for HotS: The Mortar. Yes, I know, yet another one but why not give it a chance; It's not that you've got anything better to do anyway, right?

The purpose of this unit is to combine and replace the units called Widow mine and Warhound with the latter already being removed by Blizzard as you all know. I must say that I dislike the Widow Mine even more than the Warhound because it feels more like a Zerg unit than a Terran one. The Mortar is supposed to be a support unit, not an attack unit like the Warhound, mostly defensive but with an anti siege line capability.

It will look something like a cross between this:

[image loading]

and this:

[image loading]

But a bit more modern of course.
A short fat barrel instead of a turret; Moveable from straight down between its tracks to lay mines
and up in an angle (like in the second picture), to shoot them. With the warhound, Terran had too many walkers I feel, and making it a more conventional vehicle it's less advanced looking to emphasise the difference in technology (level) between Protoss and Terran. It also makes for more consistent use of technology, if you will. Two vehicles with tracks instead of just the one. For the same reason I'd like it to be a (remote controlled) robot like the Raven, making it the second armed robot in the Terran arsenal.

The capabilities:

1. Lay mines. Let's say it can lay a maximum of three mines (think spider mine, not Widow; They're ugly and too big). It can pick them back up and relocate if nescesarry. If one of 'm explodes, a new one can be laid (purchased?).
Blizzard apparantly wants the Widow Mine to be able to hit air. I'm not sure why but if really nescesarry these mines could be made able to launch themselves into the air to do so. I'd rather see 'm behave largely like spider mines though; Mine draggin' time!

2. Shoot mines. Yep, not just put 'm in the ground but shoot the damn things into advancing armies and, of course, at siege lines. Besides doing direct damage they'll also trigger the tanks to shoot them, damaging themselves. If shot into nomansland the mine will act the same as if burried but above the ground (no detection needed to spot). It's shot in an arc and will bounce a bit, using realistic physics. Its range should be enough for the Mortar to stay out of reach of siege tanks altough maybe including the bounces after it hits the ground. You don't have to target an unit to launch and if an out of range area is selected it wil fire the mine in that direction at its maximum range. You can choose to shoot it at a shorter range though, even rolling it of a ramp or a cliff; Surprise!

3. Discharge. It hasn't got a normal attack but it has the ability (on cooldown) to give of an electric charge with minimal range (anti melee). It's also an armoured unit with the hp a tank like unit should have. This will make sure that if left alone and vulnerable , it can stall a bit for support. Other usage could be hold position on a ramp, denying zerglings entrance to your base.

Upgrades could be more mines for instance, or maybe the discharge ability.

So, there you go. Two “problems” solved with one unit, instead of two. Balancing can be done on all aspects of the Mortar and its weapons to make sure it isn't a massable unit. Needs a factory with tech lab to build, I think. So what do you think about the Mortar? Please let me know and if you don't like it I'd appreciate it if you explained why.

(I've got a lot more ideas btw, like for instance replacing the Thors' Strike Cannons with Flack Cannons giving it a non instant, air only, stormlike ability which, for instance, can force Broodlords
to relocate (they'll have to temporarly hold their attack) or cut of escape routes for mutalisks so you can stimm in with your marines and finnish them of. This will give the Terran some extra anti air so the mines aren't needed for that role? I'm really confused as to why they should in the first place but whatever. And I've got ideas for the other races as well).
I Protoss winner, could it be?
sona
Profile Joined September 2012
Canada52 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-21 21:20:44
October 21 2012 21:11 GMT
#2
Change is too drastic and shooting mines is a bit silly . I always thought adding a weak AtG and AtA unit that could lay mines would be best, but the current widow mine is doing fine.

My dreamcraft: Freyr (Norse God of fertility...lol)

[image loading]

Time to build mines internally: 30-60 seconds (moving factory)
Plant mine: 2-4 seconds (has an deployment animation)
Cost of each mine: 50/50 (suicidal - attack air/ground/invisible)

Can attack ground and air with small mounted mini gun - like the Goliath ground attack style for both ground and air. Its attack will be more like a tickle attack with its main purpose is to lay mines. It could also be used a buffer shield for tanks.
Antylamon
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1981 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-21 21:19:45
October 21 2012 21:16 GMT
#3
Aren't ideas for BNet?

List of closed threads for ideas:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=376569
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=376672
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=376524
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=367967
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=343821
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=305069
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=372647
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=372279
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=372054
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=372507
Penev
Profile Joined October 2012
28512 Posts
October 21 2012 21:16 GMT
#4
On October 22 2012 06:11 sona wrote:
Change is too drastic and shooting mines is a bit silly . I always thought adding a weak AtG and AtA unit that could lay mines would be best, but the current widow mine is doing fine.

Would you care to explain why shooting mines would be silly? Just curious. And I do not agree about the widow mine. It feels like a baneling and now it's a turret to. eh..
I Protoss winner, could it be?
Penev
Profile Joined October 2012
28512 Posts
October 21 2012 21:19 GMT
#5
On October 22 2012 06:16 Antylamon wrote:
Aren't ideas for BNet?

List of closed threads for ideas:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=376569
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=376672
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=376524
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=367967
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=343821
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=305069

Well, it potentially fixes some problems SC2 supposedly has..
I Protoss winner, could it be?
Thalandros
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
Netherlands1151 Posts
October 21 2012 21:19 GMT
#6
On October 22 2012 06:16 Penev wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 22 2012 06:11 sona wrote:
Change is too drastic and shooting mines is a bit silly . I always thought adding a weak AtG and AtA unit that could lay mines would be best, but the current widow mine is doing fine.

Would you care to explain why shooting mines would be silly? Just curious. And I do not agree about the widow mine. It feels like a baneling and now it's a turret to. eh..

Because mines are things you deploy, waiting for people to step on them. Mines also take a while to arm in general, so it wouldn't make sense. I think that's what he meant. ^^
|| ''I think we have all experienced passion that is not in any sense reasonable.'' ||
Antylamon
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1981 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-21 21:25:19
October 21 2012 21:21 GMT
#7
On October 22 2012 06:19 Penev wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 22 2012 06:16 Antylamon wrote:
Aren't ideas for BNet?

List of closed threads for ideas:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=376569
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=376672
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=376524
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=367967
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=343821
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=305069

Well, it potentially fixes some problems SC2 supposedly has..

That's not my point. Put it on BNet if you have HotS, or even if you don't have HotS. If someone on BNet with HotS likes the idea, they might repost the thread on the HotS forum of BNet.

TL is not the place for this, for multiple reasons. One, it would overflow the HotS forum of TL. Two, Blizz doesn't look here very often.
JayceeSC
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
73 Posts
October 21 2012 21:22 GMT
#8
I don't really like Widow Mine as a unit that much.. In my opinion, a unit that deploys mines would be much better (also making the mines auto detonate themselves).
Penev
Profile Joined October 2012
28512 Posts
October 21 2012 21:23 GMT
#9
On October 22 2012 06:19 Thalandros wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 22 2012 06:16 Penev wrote:
On October 22 2012 06:11 sona wrote:
Change is too drastic and shooting mines is a bit silly . I always thought adding a weak AtG and AtA unit that could lay mines would be best, but the current widow mine is doing fine.

Would you care to explain why shooting mines would be silly? Just curious. And I do not agree about the widow mine. It feels like a baneling and now it's a turret to. eh..

Because mines are things you deploy, waiting for people to step on them. Mines also take a while to arm in general, so it wouldn't make sense. I think that's what he meant. ^^

Ah, but it would make sense, that's how it potentially can brake a siege line; The tanks will fire on it, damaging themselves.
I Protoss winner, could it be?
Cloak
Profile Joined October 2009
United States816 Posts
October 21 2012 21:26 GMT
#10
Yes, and mines that shoot rockets and replenish themselves makes perfect sense.
The more you know, the less you understand.
Penev
Profile Joined October 2012
28512 Posts
October 21 2012 21:30 GMT
#11
On October 22 2012 06:11 sona wrote:
Change is too drastic and shooting mines is a bit silly . I always thought adding a weak AtG and AtA unit that could lay mines would be best, but the current widow mine is doing fine.

My dreamcraft: Freyr (Norse God of fertility...lol)

[image loading]

Time to build mines internally: 30-60 seconds (moving factory)
Plant mine: 2-4 seconds (has an deployment animation)
Cost of each mine: 50/50 (suicidal - attack air/ground/invisible)

Can attack ground and air with small mounted mini gun - like the Goliath ground attack style for both ground and air. Its attack will be more like a tickle attack with its main purpose is to lay mines. It could also be used a buffer shield for tanks.

But why a walker Sona? Btw, I didn't ad stats on purpose; A lot can be changed if necessary. For instance how much mines it can carry or shoot.
I Protoss winner, could it be?
sona
Profile Joined September 2012
Canada52 Posts
October 21 2012 21:35 GMT
#12
On October 22 2012 06:30 Penev wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 22 2012 06:11 sona wrote:
Change is too drastic and shooting mines is a bit silly . I always thought adding a weak AtG and AtA unit that could lay mines would be best, but the current widow mine is doing fine.

My dreamcraft: Freyr (Norse God of fertility...lol)

[image loading]

Time to build mines internally: 30-60 seconds (moving factory)
Plant mine: 2-4 seconds (has an deployment animation)
Cost of each mine: 50/50 (suicidal - attack air/ground/invisible)

Can attack ground and air with small mounted mini gun - like the Goliath ground attack style for both ground and air. Its attack will be more like a tickle attack with its main purpose is to lay mines. It could also be used a buffer shield for tanks.

But why a walker Sona? Btw, I didn't ad stats on purpose; A lot can be changed if necessary. For instance how much mines it can carry or shoot.


Rollers will overlap with the tanks. 4 Leg mech looks cool and unique, think how the army will look as a bunch. Beside, 4 walkers can walk in all kinds of terran, making them practical for laying mines in difficult positions. I provided a rough idea of what it should do, the exact specifications (HP/timings/costs) can be ironed out later.
Rassy
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands2308 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-21 21:37:25
October 21 2012 21:36 GMT
#13
Ha ha, mortar is nice idea and title made me think about the widow mine right away.
Can see the widow mine as a buried mortar wich autofires once every 40 sec, the effects seem to be quiet similar lol.
The unit in the picture looks awesome, isnt it more like a houwitzer though?
Penev
Profile Joined October 2012
28512 Posts
October 21 2012 21:42 GMT
#14
On October 22 2012 06:36 Rassy wrote:
Ha ha, mortar is nice idea and title made me think about the widow mine right away.
Can see the widow mine as a buried mortar wich autofires once every 40 sec, the effects seem to be quiet similar lol.
The unit in the picture looks awesome, isnt it more like a houwitzer though?

From wiki: US Army 13-inch mortar "Dictator" was a rail-mounted gun of the US Civil War.
I Protoss winner, could it be?
Penev
Profile Joined October 2012
28512 Posts
October 21 2012 21:52 GMT
#15
On October 22 2012 06:35 sona wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 22 2012 06:30 Penev wrote:
On October 22 2012 06:11 sona wrote:
Change is too drastic and shooting mines is a bit silly . I always thought adding a weak AtG and AtA unit that could lay mines would be best, but the current widow mine is doing fine.

My dreamcraft: Freyr (Norse God of fertility...lol)

[image loading]

Time to build mines internally: 30-60 seconds (moving factory)
Plant mine: 2-4 seconds (has an deployment animation)
Cost of each mine: 50/50 (suicidal - attack air/ground/invisible)

Can attack ground and air with small mounted mini gun - like the Goliath ground attack style for both ground and air. Its attack will be more like a tickle attack with its main purpose is to lay mines. It could also be used a buffer shield for tanks.

But why a walker Sona? Btw, I didn't ad stats on purpose; A lot can be changed if necessary. For instance how much mines it can carry or shoot.


Rollers will overlap with the tanks. 4 Leg mech looks cool and unique, think how the army will look as a bunch. Beside, 4 walkers can walk in all kinds of terran, making them practical for laying mines in difficult positions. I provided a rough idea of what it should do, the exact specifications (HP/timings/costs) can be ironed out later.

Yeah but it kinda raises the question of why the siege tanks have tracks and this one legs. The other walkers are more like your usual (transformer) robot. You see; I like my science fiction to make as much sense as possible. I don't dislike your idea though.
I Protoss winner, could it be?
Markwerf
Profile Joined March 2010
Netherlands3728 Posts
October 22 2012 00:21 GMT
#16
A bouncing shell / fire effect would be really interesting and open up so much map and design space.
The weapon would have to bounce on the ground but also be able to bounce off of walls and cliffs. If fired up a slope it would fire less far and off a slope further etc. It would make exact map layout and stuff like statues etc much more interesting and provide very cool interaction with other spells like forcefield. Exploding on first unit it contacts with etc, there could be a lot of micro in getting it to explode at the place you want.
It don't think it's likely such interaction between a weapon and the map is easily done with the engine though so a bounce weapon would probably not really work well. It would be quite ugly if it wasn't worked out well, ie moving through units and objects etc.
Inquisitor1323
Profile Joined March 2012
370 Posts
October 22 2012 01:06 GMT
#17
We already have a seige unit. Also, we dont need dedicated seige line destroyers. So much of the fun of TvT is seige lines and how they discourage deathballs and encourage drop play and multitasking. It gives TvT stability and prevents it from being a giant slugfest like PvP. Instead of making a new seige unit, Blizzard needs to buff or change the current one so it doesnt get ROFLstomped by Protoss and Zerg.
AndreiDaGiant
Profile Joined October 2010
United States394 Posts
October 22 2012 01:40 GMT
#18
i enjoy the current widow mine honestly because i feel it fills alot of the holes mech play had and although it may seem imbalanced to some people, if you see some one who is really good it just looks silly how easy it is to deal with them. in terms of the mortor idea, it seems somwhat redundant. instead of making another seige tank that can kill protoss why not just make it so the siege tank can kill protoss.... all in all i have to say i disagree alot with this post.
Terran Metal for the Win
targ
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Malaysia445 Posts
October 22 2012 01:57 GMT
#19
On October 22 2012 06:35 sona wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 22 2012 06:30 Penev wrote:
On October 22 2012 06:11 sona wrote:
Change is too drastic and shooting mines is a bit silly . I always thought adding a weak AtG and AtA unit that could lay mines would be best, but the current widow mine is doing fine.

My dreamcraft: Freyr (Norse God of fertility...lol)

[image loading]

Time to build mines internally: 30-60 seconds (moving factory)
Plant mine: 2-4 seconds (has an deployment animation)
Cost of each mine: 50/50 (suicidal - attack air/ground/invisible)

Can attack ground and air with small mounted mini gun - like the Goliath ground attack style for both ground and air. Its attack will be more like a tickle attack with its main purpose is to lay mines. It could also be used a buffer shield for tanks.

But why a walker Sona? Btw, I didn't ad stats on purpose; A lot can be changed if necessary. For instance how much mines it can carry or shoot.


Rollers will overlap with the tanks. 4 Leg mech looks cool and unique, think how the army will look as a bunch. Beside, 4 walkers can walk in all kinds of terran, making them practical for laying mines in difficult positions. I provided a rough idea of what it should do, the exact specifications (HP/timings/costs) can be ironed out later.


I think it should either be two-legged or go on wheels. Terran vehicles are all two-legged mech or go on wheels/tracks, four legs are for Protoss walkers.
http://billyfoong.blogspot.com/ my other opinions are here
MasterCynical
Profile Joined September 2012
505 Posts
October 22 2012 02:38 GMT
#20
So a terran reaver?

I like it.
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PiG Daily
21:00
Best Games of Starcraft
SHIN vs ByuN
Reynor vs Classic
TBD vs herO
Maru vs SHIN
TBD vs Classic
PiGStarcraft678
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft678
PiLiPiLi 43
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 585
Leta 307
ZergMaN 178
NaDa 61
Mong 23
Hm[arnc] 21
Icarus 6
Dota 2
monkeys_forever326
LuMiX1
League of Legends
JimRising 522
Counter-Strike
summit1g7837
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox212
Other Games
Coldzera 1015
WinterStarcraft250
ViBE138
C9.Mang0109
Trikslyr61
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1152
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 3
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki19
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22291
Other Games
• Scarra1793
• Shiphtur123
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
5h 40m
WardiTV 2025
6h 40m
Spirit vs Cure
Reynor vs MaxPax
SHIN vs TBD
Solar vs herO
Classic vs TBD
SC Evo League
8h 10m
Ladder Legends
14h 40m
BSL 21
15h 40m
Sziky vs Dewalt
eOnzErG vs Cross
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 5h
Ladder Legends
1d 12h
BSL 21
1d 15h
StRyKeR vs TBD
Bonyth vs TBD
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
[ Show More ]
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Classic
Cure vs herO
Reynor vs MaxPax
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS3
RSL Offline Finals
Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 1
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.