|
Please, immediately dismiss the thought that this is going to be even remotely relevant to Team Prime. Ok, now that I've clarified that, here's what's up.
+ Show Spoiler +Mvp only wins championships on his x#th final, given that x is a prime number, excluding 1.
Mvp won his second championship at his 2nd final. 2 is a prime number.
Mvp won his third championship at his 3rd final. 3 is a prime number.
Mvp lost his 4th final. 4 is not a prime number.
Mvp won his 4th championship at his 5th final. 5 is a prime number.
Mvp lost his 6th final. 6 is not a prime number.
Mvp will win his next final. 7 is a prime number.
Mvp will lose the next 3 finals, unfortunately. Then he will win 6 championships on his 11th final.
It only makes sense as Mvp started out his legacy by defeating MarineKingPRIME. MKP put a Prime curse on Mvp.
|
Cool Story Bro
User was warned for this post
|
Hehe was actually pretty interesting ^^
|
could mvp be the link between prime numbers?
|
Those numbers finally make a sense for me. Thanks!
|
On October 21 2012 22:00 GhostLink wrote:
Mvp will lose the next 4 finals, unfortunately. Then he will win 6 championships on his 11th final.
tall order for one man, even mvp
|
I like to think Mvp will eventually make 11 GSL finals, as unlikely as it is ;o
|
Ah, so this is what the abc conjecture was all about 
|
Mvp is the key to the deep connection between prime numbers, of course. Nestea might have created the universe, but Mvp's got a few tricks up his sleeve too.
|
On October 21 2012 22:00 GhostLink wrote:Please, immediately dismiss the thought that this is going to be even remotely relevant to Team Prime. Ok, now that I've clarified that, here's what's up. + Show Spoiler +Mvp only wins championships on his x#th final, given that x is a prime number, excluding 1.
Mvp won his second championship at his 2nd final. 2 is a prime number.
Mvp won his third championship at his 3rd final. 3 is a prime number.
Mvp lost his 4th final. 4 is not a prime number.
Mvp won his 4th championship at his 5th final. 5 is a prime number.
Mvp lost his 6th final. 6 is not a prime number.
Mvp will win his next final. 7 is a prime number.
Mvp will lose the next 4 finals, unfortunately. Then he will win 6 championships on his 11th final. It only makes sense as Mvp started out his legacy by defeating MarineKingPRIME. MKP put a Prime curse on Mvp.
You know, you just gave conclusive proof that 1 should be considered a prime number! The exclusion of 1 right now is somewhat arbitrary, but as Mvp's first championship was his first finals, 1 must be a prime number!
|
If he is a prime terran then what am I? a zero zerg? well shiet....
|
ahhh, but does it reset when HoTS comes out? or even disappear all together
|
Thats pretty big, if mvp keeps winning championships, we might finnaly learn if prime numbers are finite or infinte, groundbreaking!!
|
Funny coincidences, haha, I though it would be an announcement or something like that !
|
Dat math's.
Can't be wrong
|
Six tournaments as a sample size is virtually a non-factor. It sounds natural, but your divisive assertion leaves a lot of remainder for doubt.
You're Mersenne around with us, aren't you
|
On October 21 2012 22:25 Primal666 wrote:
Thats pretty big, if mvp keeps winning championships, we might finnaly learn if prime numbers are finite or infinte, groundbreaking!!
We already know that there are infinite prime numbers. Finding them is the problem 
Even more, there is the question, whether it is possible to define a prime number function. The OP suggests, that Mvp himself is this function.
|
This is really silly, you can't start out by excluding the number one. MVP had his first championship in his first finals. One is not a prime number, therefore your theory doesn't work.
|
The question is, was this a counter-curse from MarineKing? Will Mvp's prime curse be lifted when MarineKing rids himself of the Kong curse?
On October 21 2012 22:24 ImNightmare wrote:
If he is a prime terran then what am I? a zero zerg? well shiet....
I prefer to think of ourselves as Null Zergs. Sounds much cooler.
|
On October 21 2012 22:33 Grumbels wrote:
This is really silly, you can't start out by excluding the number one. MVP had his first championship in his first finals. One is not a prime number, therefore your theory doesn't work.
But neither do all of the current proposed theories to finding the solution the the prime number questions that have been puzzling mathematicians for centuries. Maybe it's time to take a fresh new approach, and Mvp has found a solution, by excluding the number 1 from the equation.
|
On October 21 2012 22:36 GhostLink wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2012 22:33 Grumbels wrote:
This is really silly, you can't start out by excluding the number one. MVP had his first championship in his first finals. One is not a prime number, therefore your theory doesn't work. But neither do all of the current proposed theories to finding the solution the the prime number questions that have been puzzling mathematicians for centuries. Maybe it's time to take a fresh new approach, and Mvp has found a solution, by excluding the number 1 from the equation.
All we know for sure is that he's not perfect
|
Pretty sure you have this wrong, prime numbers are MVP numbers.
|
On October 21 2012 22:38 eieio wrote:
Pretty sure you have this wrong, prime numbers are MVP numbers.
:D
That will be what they'll be called after Mvp revolutionizes and redefines them. 100 years from now, kids in school will be studying Mvp numbers.
|
wow, not a coincidence at all that theres a tonne of prime numbers from 1- 10.... wtf is this thread
|
I'm waiting for the day we get a Fibonacci Protoss
|
On October 21 2012 22:41 GhostLink wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2012 22:38 eieio wrote:
Pretty sure you have this wrong, prime numbers are MVP numbers. :D That will be what they'll be called after Mvp revolutionizes and redefines them. 100 years from now, kids in school will be studying Mvp numbers.
hahahaha, "these are the nestea numbers cause they're consistent, these are the MVP numbers cause they just keep increasing"
seriously though this thread cracked me up, nice post.
|
Haha thats a funny coincidence xD
|
now: prove that MVP will win infinitely many gsl titles!
|
On October 21 2012 22:30 wozzot wrote:
You're Mersenne around with us, aren't you
afFermative !
|
That's propably the best conspiracy theory I've read in a while
|
On October 21 2012 22:52 JustPassingBy wrote:
now: prove that MVP will win infinitely many gsl titles!
Corollary. MVP will win an infinite number of GSLs.
Proof. Suppose that GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr are all of the GSLs MVP will win. Let q = (2*3*5*7...*r)+1 and let p be a prime GSL number dividing q. Then GSLp cannot be any of GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr, as otherwise p would divide the difference q-(2*3*5*7...*r) = 1, which is impossible. Therefore, GSLp must be another GSL that MVP will win. Q.E.D.
|
On October 21 2012 23:02 Dayrlan wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2012 22:52 JustPassingBy wrote:
now: prove that MVP will win infinitely many gsl titles! Corollary. MVP will win an infinite number of GSLs.Proof. Suppose that GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr are all of the GSLs MVP will win. Let q = (2*3*5*7...*r)+1 and let p be a prime GSL number dividing q. Then GSLp cannot be any of GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr, as otherwise p would divide the difference q-(2*3*5*7...*r) = 1, which is impossible. Therefore, GSLp must be another GSL that MVP will win. Q.E.D.
....................................wut?
|
On October 21 2012 23:05 Clazziquai10 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2012 23:02 Dayrlan wrote:On October 21 2012 22:52 JustPassingBy wrote:
now: prove that MVP will win infinitely many gsl titles! Corollary. MVP will win an infinite number of GSLs.Proof. Suppose that GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr are all of the GSLs MVP will win. Let q = (2*3*5*7...*r)+1 and let p be a prime GSL number dividing q. Then GSLp cannot be any of GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr, as otherwise p would divide the difference q-(2*3*5*7...*r) = 1, which is impossible. Therefore, GSLp must be another GSL that MVP will win. Q.E.D. ....................................wut?
Day[9] would appreciate it. :>
|
your Country52798 Posts
On October 21 2012 23:02 Dayrlan wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2012 22:52 JustPassingBy wrote:
now: prove that MVP will win infinitely many gsl titles! Corollary. MVP will win an infinite number of GSLs.Proof. Suppose that GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr are all of the GSLs MVP will win. Let q = (2*3*5*7...*r)+1 and let p be a prime GSL number dividing q. Then GSLp cannot be any of GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr, as otherwise p would divide the difference q-(2*3*5*7...*r) = 1, which is impossible. Therefore, GSLp must be another GSL that MVP will win. Q.E.D.
I laughed pretty hard :D
But this also proves that SC2 will never die, it will last for an infinite amount of time :o
|
On October 21 2012 22:08 Alejandrisha wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2012 22:00 GhostLink wrote:
Mvp will lose the next 4 finals, unfortunately. Then he will win 6 championships on his 11th final. tall order for one man, even mvp
MVP is no man.
|
..finding prime numbers is a problem resolved like 2100 years ago; a bit precise formulation is how to find them in a polynomial time, which is at this time unknown.
|
On October 21 2012 23:02 Dayrlan wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2012 22:52 JustPassingBy wrote:
now: prove that MVP will win infinitely many gsl titles! Corollary. MVP will win an infinite number of GSLs.Proof. Suppose that GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr are all of the GSLs MVP will win. Let q = (2*3*5*7...*r)+1 and let p be a prime GSL number dividing q. Then GSLp cannot be any of GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr, as otherwise p would divide the difference q-(2*3*5*7...*r) = 1, which is impossible. Therefore, GSLp must be another GSL that MVP will win. Q.E.D.
Well, there we have it!
LOL btw :D thank you so much for this post
Can i include this in the OP?
|
If he loses the next four finals after winning the 7th one, wouldn't that include losing his 11th final?
|
On October 21 2012 23:37 bLo0d wrote:
If he loses the next four finals after winning the 7th one, wouldn't that include losing his 11th final?
.... Corrected, haha thanks.
|
You're wrong. Mvp isn't a prime player. Primes are mvp numbers.
|
Lol nice find. Next thing you know, you be asking MVP to divide by zero
|
On October 21 2012 23:02 Dayrlan wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2012 22:52 JustPassingBy wrote:
now: prove that MVP will win infinitely many gsl titles! Corollary. MVP will win an infinite number of GSLs.Proof. Suppose that GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr are all of the GSLs MVP will win. Let q = (2*3*5*7...*r)+1 and let p be a prime GSL number dividing q. Then GSLp cannot be any of GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr, as otherwise p would divide the difference q-(2*3*5*7...*r) = 1, which is impossible. Therefore, GSLp must be another GSL that MVP will win. Q.E.D.
Well done, Mr. Euklid
|
wouldn't surprise me if some superstitious people actually believed this ^^
|
always wondered why people dont consider 1 a prime. It is divisible only by itself and 1 to make a whole number, doesn't that qualify it as a prime?
|
On October 21 2012 23:47 emythrel wrote:
always wondered why people dont consider 1 a prime. It is divisible only by itself and 1 to make a whole number, doesn't that qualify it as a prime?
it's an exception
deal with it
|
On October 21 2012 23:02 Dayrlan wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2012 22:52 JustPassingBy wrote:
now: prove that MVP will win infinitely many gsl titles! Corollary. MVP will win an infinite number of GSLs.Proof. Suppose that GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr are all of the GSLs MVP will win. Let q = (2*3*5*7...*r)+1 and let p be a prime GSL number dividing q. Then GSLp cannot be any of GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr, as otherwise p would divide the difference q-(2*3*5*7...*r) = 1, which is impossible. Therefore, GSLp must be another GSL that MVP will win. Q.E.D.
That requires an additional assumption.
|
On October 21 2012 23:47 emythrel wrote:
always wondered why people dont consider 1 a prime. It is divisible only by itself and 1 to make a whole number, doesn't that qualify it as a prime?
It depends on the definition of prime numbers.
For example, you can define them by how you did, which would make 1 a prime number.
But you can also define them by: a number is a prime number if and only if it is divisible by exactly 2 numbers.
Then 1 isn't a prime number, because it is (the only number that is ) only divisible by one number, by 1.
The reason why math uses the second definition and not the one you have given, is that there are a few theorems about prime numbers which only work for prime numbers =/= 1, as the unity number one has various special properties which other numbers don't have.
|
HSHAHAHA i get it! MKP prime and prime number
hahahah!
that is an interesting correlation
|
|
|
Lol thats cool, I was gonna say did he leave LGIM for prime, that would be crazy.
|
|
|
On October 21 2012 23:33 GhostLink wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2012 23:02 Dayrlan wrote:On October 21 2012 22:52 JustPassingBy wrote:
now: prove that MVP will win infinitely many gsl titles! Corollary. MVP will win an infinite number of GSLs.Proof. Suppose that GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr are all of the GSLs MVP will win. Let q = (2*3*5*7...*r)+1 and let p be a prime GSL number dividing q. Then GSLp cannot be any of GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr, as otherwise p would divide the difference q-(2*3*5*7...*r) = 1, which is impossible. Therefore, GSLp must be another GSL that MVP will win. Q.E.D. Well, there we have it! LOL btw :D thank you so much for this post Can i include this in the OP?
Ha - sure. ^.^
|
On October 21 2012 23:50 EtherealDeath wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2012 23:02 Dayrlan wrote:On October 21 2012 22:52 JustPassingBy wrote:
now: prove that MVP will win infinitely many gsl titles! Corollary. MVP will win an infinite number of GSLs.Proof. Suppose that GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr are all of the GSLs MVP will win. Let q = (2*3*5*7...*r)+1 and let p be a prime GSL number dividing q. Then GSLp cannot be any of GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr, as otherwise p would divide the difference q-(2*3*5*7...*r) = 1, which is impossible. Therefore, GSLp must be another GSL that MVP will win. Q.E.D. That requires an additional assumption.
That there are infinitely many GSL numbers ~_~ i.e. that there are infinitely many GSLs.
So we can "weaken" the corollary as "If SC2 doesn't die, then MVP will win infinitely many GSL titles." ^^
|
On October 21 2012 23:41 Big J wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2012 23:02 Dayrlan wrote:On October 21 2012 22:52 JustPassingBy wrote:
now: prove that MVP will win infinitely many gsl titles! Corollary. MVP will win an infinite number of GSLs.Proof. Suppose that GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr are all of the GSLs MVP will win. Let q = (2*3*5*7...*r)+1 and let p be a prime GSL number dividing q. Then GSLp cannot be any of GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr, as otherwise p would divide the difference q-(2*3*5*7...*r) = 1, which is impossible. Therefore, GSLp must be another GSL that MVP will win. Q.E.D. Well done, Mr. Euklid
No! I've been found out!
|
On October 21 2012 22:01 Biggun69 wrote:
Cool Story Bro
this guy didn't get it at all.
|
|
|
On October 21 2012 23:43 HaXXspetten wrote:
wouldn't surprise me if some superstitious people actually believed this ^^
What? You don't believe? How can you not believe in MVP?!
|
This was absolutely excellent. Good observation!
|
|
|
|
|
Mvp gives no fucks about the second law of thermodynamics
Being subject to the heat death of the universe is for Zergs, Mvp gonna win infinite GSLs
|
|
|
Mvp winning GSL? Never again in this life.
|
On October 22 2012 01:09 monkybone wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2012 23:47 emythrel wrote:
always wondered why people dont consider 1 a prime. It is divisible only by itself and 1 to make a whole number, doesn't that qualify it as a prime? Thing about prime numbers is unique prime factorization. 1 screws this up big time.
Well, it's not a big deal, just exclude 1 from the theorem (many theorems only work with exclusions of finite amount of cases):
every integer greater than 1 is either prime itself or is the product of prime numbers (=/= 1)
Especially, as the OP clearly proves ( ) the theorem: Mvp wins every of his prime numbered GSL attempts and we also know that the sentence Mvp won his first GSL on his first try, we have a good reasons to consider 1 to be prime to unite those two statements into one: Mvp wins a GSL title, if and only if it is a prime numbered effort for him to do so.
|
|
|
lol don't know how this got to 4 pages. Mvp POWER
|
|
|
Katowice25012 Posts
Whoah.
Whoah!
We must not let the secret out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
