That account was created on 2010-11-21 08:16:21 and had 378 posts.
Reason: Stray away from mindless caster-bashing please. If you have nothing to contribute, don't post.
Forum Index > Closed |
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
April 27 2011 17:08 GMT
#13581
That account was created on 2010-11-21 08:16:21 and had 378 posts. Reason: Stray away from mindless caster-bashing please. If you have nothing to contribute, don't post. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
April 27 2011 18:44 GMT
#13582
That account was created on 2010-10-24 07:53:34 and had 1425 posts. Reason: On April 28 2011 03:28 hitman133 wrote: Show nested quote + On April 28 2011 03:00 Joementum wrote: On April 28 2011 01:34 Alejandrisha wrote: Man this warpgate change is absolutely enormous. Really They could have fixed the whole thing by disabling cliff-warping on the outer 2 hexes of a pylon in all directions but no.. they have to change every protoss build ever :/ It will be like playing a different game for a week but I'm sure we'll get used to it o_0 What they really should have done is never introduced Warp Gates, in its current form, at all. I'm not saying Toss is overpowered, but WG really doesn't fit in well with SC2. Zerg is supposed to be the swarming race that can reinforce the quickest, but it's not. That's Protoss with their Warp Gate tech now. The instant reinforcement factor of an already strong army really doesn't help the game at all either. If only they made WGs only usable with Warp Prisms when the game first came out. I wonder how that would have worked out O_o. Don't be bullshit man Toss can max out instantly b/c you suck and let him have 5k in bank with 30 gates. There's no way Protoss can re-max as fast as Zerg cheap shit units. DO you realize that even tier 1 units from protoss are more expensive than roaches, hydras ? Mutal is 100/100 but they are 10x better than phoenix in harassing. Gosh, Zerg players are so ignorant with their point of view. You have been warned and banned countless times for exactly what you're doing here. You're one step away from a permanent ban. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
April 27 2011 18:51 GMT
#13583
That account was created on 2006-07-25 15:31:39 and had 56 posts. Reason: 1) You suck at posting. Example: 666 2) You necro'd a 3 year old thread with this: On April 28 2011 03:43 Orchid wrote: MOTHERSHIPS DONT WORK ANYMORE Really? | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
April 27 2011 20:14 GMT
#13584
That account was created on 2011-01-29 22:42:20 and had 5 posts. Reason: Keep racism and related stereotypes off TL please. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
April 27 2011 21:23 GMT
#13585
That account was created on 2010-11-19 12:31:45 and had 38 posts. Reason: Well if you're done, please let me show you the door --> |¯| <-- God speed spiderman. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
April 27 2011 21:50 GMT
#13586
That account was created on 2010-12-23 11:14:07 and had 1 posts. Reason: 1 post 1 line 1 blog peace. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
April 27 2011 23:10 GMT
#13587
That account was created on 2010-02-01 04:13:44 and had 76 posts. Reason: These forums are not for you to cry about balance. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
April 27 2011 23:51 GMT
#13588
That account was created on 2010-04-19 07:53:35 and had 945 posts. Reason: no trollfaces | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
April 28 2011 01:51 GMT
#13589
That account was created on 2009-05-06 13:05:38 and had 1620 posts. Reason: Your recent posting history is filled with one word and other low/no content posts. Please return with better posting habits. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
April 28 2011 02:03 GMT
#13590
That account was created on 2003-04-27 12:45:48 and had 1061 posts. Reason: If you begin a post with "I'll probably get banned for saying this" then you should rethink whether or not that post should be made at all. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
April 28 2011 02:05 GMT
#13591
That account was created on 2010-07-16 05:22:24 and had 1637 posts. Reason: Martyr | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
April 28 2011 02:24 GMT
#13592
That account was created on 2010-07-20 22:42:11 and had 43 posts. Reason: Enjoy your 2 weeks back at BW! | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
April 28 2011 03:38 GMT
#13593
That account was created on 2011-01-15 10:02:45 and had 33 posts. Reason: still making terrible threads | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
April 28 2011 03:55 GMT
#13594
That account was created on 2004-10-22 10:49:06 and had 860 posts. Reason: I have no idea how you've slipped by our radar for so long. Incredible. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
April 28 2011 04:04 GMT
#13595
That account was created on 2010-05-02 23:05:15 and had 378 posts. Reason: You really haven't learned a thing over the course of two bans have you? Flaming and insults are unacceptable on TL. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
April 28 2011 04:24 GMT
#13596
That account was created on 2010-11-22 18:57:25 and had 477 posts. Reason: You just reached the end of the rope for bad posting. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
April 28 2011 05:56 GMT
#13597
That account was created on 2010-09-25 06:33:54 and had 76 posts. Reason: On April 28 2011 13:22 emecee wrote: Show nested quote + On April 28 2011 11:01 vOdToasT wrote: On April 28 2011 10:34 lolsixtynine wrote: Pro players play too fast to make it enjoyable to follow for pure entertainment value because the screen moves around too much. I, and many others, disagree. Don't make statements like that, 'cause you don't speak for us. I, and many others, disagree. Don't make statements like that, 'cause you don't speak for us. hey, don't spam | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
April 28 2011 06:15 GMT
#13598
That account was created on 2010-04-06 14:03:15 and had 88 posts. Reason: On April 28 2011 13:20 Punic wrote: Show nested quote + On April 28 2011 13:14 motbob wrote: I assume that the reason you aren't posting about this in the LR thread is that everyone else found it hilarious and you would just look like someone who takes things too seriously. But the joke is on you! Even though you made a new thread, you still look like someone who takes things way too seriously. not sure what this means. try again. @megalisk anyone who averages ~77 posts a day cant have anything meaningful to add. just like your post here. hey, don't be such a meanie | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
April 28 2011 07:17 GMT
#13599
That account was created on 2011-04-27 23:49:37 and had 0 posts. Reason: Busted! | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
April 28 2011 07:22 GMT
#13600
That account was created on 2010-09-18 16:22:59 and had 15 posts. Reason: Fourth time you try to reopen the same topic with the same deficiencies. Hardly any information, spam some links, still post like this when you were warned two times not to And I won't even get into the total lack of grammar, spelling, punctuation and capitalisation. Take some time and effort to make a post presentable and clear to the users of this community. | ||
| ||
SC Evo Complete
SEL Fall '24 Group A/B
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney 31387 Dota 2Rain 6163 Horang2 1397 Stork 477 ZerO 346 ggaemo 327 BeSt 238 hero 128 Mind 115 HiyA 93 [ Show more ] Mong 78 Backho 70 [sc1f]eonzerg 58 Killer 52 Barracks 50 sSak 48 SilentControl 36 ToSsGirL 30 Sexy 26 zelot 22 Free 19 IntoTheRainbow 12 Counter-Strike Other Games tarik_tv4689 B2W.Neo2510 gobbtv748 crisheroes588 shoxiejesuss463 DeMusliM279 Mew2King271 sgares259 Fuzer 219 Hui .217 Liquid`VortiX144 RotterdaM121 XaKoH 104 mouzStarbuck78 Trikslyr51 ZerO(Twitch)18 Organizations StarCraft 2 Other Games StarCraft 2 Dota 2 StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • Adnapsc2 24 StarCraft: Brood War• Legendk 10 • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel • sooper7s League of Legends |
Online Event
OlimoLeague
BSL: ProLeague
Dewalt vs XuanXuan
Cross vs Xin
CSO Cup
Acropolis
Acropolis
Sparkling Tuna Cup
SOOP
ByuN vs Rogue
SC Evo Complete
WardiTV Invitational
[ Show More ] PassionCraft
Online Event
BSL: ProLeague
Mihu vs kogeT
Sziky vs JDConan
Acropolis
Acropolis
Wardi Open
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
SC Evo Complete
|
|