EPTShould NASL really be a part of liquibets? - Page 2
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
MrDudeMan
Canada973 Posts
| ||
|
AmericanUmlaut
Germany2594 Posts
I'd rather see MLG or IPL games in Liquibets, since those are real tournaments, and let the NASL finals be in there too. It's just the league games that are too much. | ||
|
Vehemus
United States586 Posts
You hear that Cruncher goes inactive but you don't know if he's still playing his games or if they were played before or what happened. You've got a player that was slumping heavily three weeks ago but has figured things out now... do you bet on him or not? It's basically just a guessing game instead of an actual test of knowledge. The integrity of the Liquibet is in question, too. Who's to say that someone who knows a player in the NASL personally won't get help with his Liquibet? Or users on the website like iNcontroL who have to bet on their own games which have already been played. I'm not accusing iNcontroL of anything and maybe he refrains from placing bets on his own games but that isn't exactly fair to him either. He should have an equal opportunity for points as everyone else on this site. Liquibet isn't serious business at all so it doesn't matter. But I'd honestly prefer to have NASL taken out since the games are not played anywhere close to live, games turn out to be walkovers far too often, and there isn't enough transparency from NASL on what and when is exactly going on in their league when it comes to the games. | ||
|
Roggay
Switzerland6320 Posts
I really don't follow the NASL at all. | ||
|
juked
United States691 Posts
| ||
|
Mordiford
4448 Posts
On November 02 2011 05:30 zhurai wrote: Poll: Do you think NASL should be on liquibets? <-- why not a "don't care" option ? There is, you don't vote. If you're one of the people that doesn't care, or doesn't use liquibets then this doesn't affect you at all. | ||
|
Rasun
United States787 Posts
| ||
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37063 Posts
| ||
|
Special Endrey
Germany1929 Posts
On November 02 2011 05:18 Wesso wrote: I don't think they need to be removed per se, they could also make a system to choose which tournaments to bet on. I stopped liquibetting due to the number of liquibets I had to make (I like to read up on the players so it took too much time) But I'm all for less liquibets. exactly my opionen as well on the topic | ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
Some games will be weeks off. You can tell by patches how old the games are occasionally. Other players have stated the games were played weeks earlier. | ||
|
Hikari
1914 Posts
I agree as well. Used to watch NASL for some of the korean stars, but stopped in season 2. Would like to see more tournament choices such as WCG. | ||
|
sVnteen
Germany2238 Posts
so the majority says that they will rather PAY to see matches of KOREANS at UNWATCHABLE TIMES than the matches of the TOP FOREIGNERS who play in a league with A LOT OF GAMES and FOR A HUGE PRIZEPOOL at PERFECTLY WATCHABLE TIMES and WITH A REBROADCAST thats quite odd | ||
|
MattyClutch
United States711 Posts
I also am unsure why people are saying things like: It's ridiculous to try to guess who's going to win a game that was played a week ago, or two or maybe even three. Has something changed? I thought it was a day or two, not weeks. At least last I heard. | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
| ||
|
marttorn
Norway5211 Posts
for invite events like asus rog, or Dreamhack 8 man invitationals though I feel could be cool to have LB's for, as it's a very small set of matches. Have each match give 2 points in the ro8, and increase it as the invite goes? | ||
|
AimlessAmoeba
Canada704 Posts
| ||
|
Sina92
Sweden1303 Posts
On November 02 2011 05:38 sVnteen wrote: lol @ this poll thats just ridiculous so the majority says that they will rather PAY to see matches of KOREANS at UNWATCHABLE TIMES than the matches of the TOP FOREIGNERS who play in a league with A LOT OF GAMES and FOR A HUGE PRIZEPOOL at PERFECTLY WATCHABLE TIMES and WITH A REBROADCAST thats quite odd You ever heard of VODs? :D And also, that goes to show that the GSL atleast is deserving of being on liquibets. Great production, greater players. | ||
|
DeltruS
Canada2214 Posts
| ||
|
shell
Portugal2722 Posts
If you don't like it don't vote on it.. | ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On November 02 2011 05:38 MattyClutch wrote: I don't see any reason to remove NASL as long as it has a relatively high number of talented players in it. I watch both the GSL and NASL (as much as I can). I also am unsure why people are saying things like: Has something changed? I thought it was a day or two, not weeks. At least last I heard. They are dine weeks in advance this season. That's the biggest problem with nasl and liquidbet. The games are just old so its hard to accurately judge those games. | ||
| ||
