There's something magical about BW compared to SC2. Be it the team atmosphere, the audience, the korean casters, the history of it et cetera.
Why do you still play SCBW - Page 3
Forum Index > Closed |
sinistral
Singapore859 Posts
There's something magical about BW compared to SC2. Be it the team atmosphere, the audience, the korean casters, the history of it et cetera. | ||
Lumire
United States607 Posts
On July 04 2011 17:32 kalany wrote: What the heck? Okay, the reason I ask this is because I have a solution to protect the livelihoods of pro BW players. I think I'll reveal it now because you guys are accusing me of things. I think KESPA should contract a really good mapmaker and get him to recreate SCBW on SCII engine. Hence, the game improves graphically but the gameplay remains the same. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=145316 As close as its gonna get, BW cant be recreated. Smells like troll to me. | ||
Lightwip
United States5497 Posts
On July 04 2011 17:32 kalany wrote: What the heck? Okay, the reason I ask this is because I have a solution to protect the livelihoods of pro BW players. I think I'll reveal it now because you guys are accusing me of things. I think KESPA should contract a really good mapmaker and get him to recreate SCBW on SCII engine. Hence, the game improves graphically but the gameplay remains the same. It's actually been done, but it's simply not going to ever work as well. Besides, the graphics of BW are perfect. That and Red Alert 2 are the only games I know that did graphics as well as they could possibly be done. I personally don't find the graphics of SC2 to be an improvement at all. | ||
Gann1
United States1575 Posts
![]() Did you know that the vast majority of SC2 players don't even make money outside of the prize money they win? Every BW A-teamer gets a decent salary. | ||
Nazza
Australia1654 Posts
On July 04 2011 17:32 kalany wrote: What the heck? Okay, the reason I ask this is because I have a solution to protect the livelihoods of pro BW players. I think I'll reveal it now because you guys are accusing me of things. I think KESPA should contract a really good mapmaker and get him to recreate SCBW on SCII engine. Hence, the game improves graphically but the gameplay remains the same. That wouldn't work because of 2 things: 30 degree ramps Unit movement/dynamics Also 3) Dragoons with good pathing are OP. | ||
OptimusYale
Korea (South)1005 Posts
However playing the game is a total nostalgia trip for me, thats why I play ![]() | ||
DoX.)
Singapore6164 Posts
| ||
kalany
United States149 Posts
I really don't get it. Will recreating SCBW on SCII really destroy the integrity of the game? I've seen TLAttack where Sheth plays the BW maps on SCII and it seems like it has got a lot of potential. Everything from MBS to auto-mine can be disabled. | ||
rift
1819 Posts
That is the conversion mod, broseph. | ||
Pippah
Denmark353 Posts
| ||
moopie
12605 Posts
On July 04 2011 17:25 kalany wrote: Dude....don't try to have this debate with me man. You can't say that SCBW isn't going to dissipate as soon as contracts expire and key star players (Flash, Jaedong, Bisu) enlist in the military. Didn't Hite and some other team get absorbed already? I don't know man....it's not looking good for you guys. At first I gave you the benefit of the doubt. Thanks for reinforcing my opinions on sc2 posters coming into bw general. Get out. | ||
konadora
![]()
Singapore66071 Posts
On July 04 2011 17:37 kalany wrote: I really don't get it. Will recreating SCBW on SCII really destroy the integrity of the game? I've seen TLAttack where Sheth plays the BW maps on SCII and it seems like it has got a lot of potential. Everything from MBS to auto-mine can be disabled. why do you want us to play bw on sc2 when we can play bw on bw? | ||
ShadeR
Australia7535 Posts
| ||
Nazza
Australia1654 Posts
On July 04 2011 17:37 kalany wrote: I really don't get it. Will recreating SCBW on SCII really destroy the integrity of the game? I've seen TLAttack where Sheth plays the BW maps on SCII and it seems like it has got a lot of potential. Everything from MBS to auto-mine can be disabled. Or Blizzard could try harder with HotS. | ||
Black[CAT]
Malaysia2589 Posts
| ||
Jurassic
Hungary79 Posts
On July 04 2011 17:29 kalany wrote: Haha, nah. I actually play SCII in lowest settings because it does get distracting. But as a watcher of pro matches, I like the graphics to be souped up. You can blame that on the 27" Samsung HDTV I purchased before I went to college which probably gives away my age too. At this point, I feel like a Christian trying to convert a Jew ![]() Why would you convert anyone? BW is clearly the more polished game (at least for now), and I say that as a true SC2 fanboy... If you never played it you simply can't understand. This does not mean that SC2 cannot be as fun as BW (I would say that a good macro game is just as fun in both games). | ||
puppykiller
United States3126 Posts
On July 04 2011 17:38 Jurassic wrote: Why would you convert anyone? BW is clearly the more polished game (at least for now), and I say that as a true SC2 fanboy... If you never played it you simply can't understand. This does not mean that SC2 cannot be as fun as BW (I would say that a good macro game is just as fun in both games). Nigga's be high... | ||
ShadeR
Australia7535 Posts
| ||
Rhaegar99
Australia1190 Posts
| ||
Black[CAT]
Malaysia2589 Posts
On July 04 2011 17:39 ShadeR wrote: In all seriousness a more appropriate question would be "Why play SC2?" Maybe i should post that in the sc2 forums ![]() | ||
| ||