• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:18
CEST 11:18
KST 18:18
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall7HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL41Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?12FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event16Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports? Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event HomeStory Cup 27 (June 27-29)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall Help: rep cant save Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread [BSL20] ProLeague LB Final - Saturday 20:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Trading/Investing Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
Game Sound vs. Music: The Im…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 612 users

Weak Thor AA crippling TvP creativity - Page 5

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 Next All
aike
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States1629 Posts
November 18 2010 13:35 GMT
#81
On November 18 2010 22:30 HalfAmazing wrote:
Nadagast you're absolutely correct. The people disagreeing with you don't seem to understand the issue with Thor attack priority. Mixing in a single carrier, or even void ray with your ground army, completely nullifies Thor's normally high DPS. It is far too hard a counter. Fixing this issue would make TvP considerably more interesting as we'd see a lot more late game-oriented play.


This doesn't even make any sense. TARGET FIRE WITH THE THOR! It's really not hard to do at all. You can even repair the thor if you want in the battle and then it's just invincible because the rest of the P army is dead after that, and then the 1 thor can take on like 200000 carriers by itself cuz of SCVs repairing it. Giving T a unit that counters every P ground unit and air unit in the game is just stupid lol. If you don't know how to target fire units you don't deserve to be playing in MLG.
Wahaha
drlame
Profile Joined February 2010
Sweden574 Posts
November 18 2010 13:36 GMT
#82
The way I see it:
Thors can't be effective against everything, simple as that. If you say a stimmed marine has more DPS, then use stimmed marines instead, ezpz.
ace246
Profile Joined October 2010
Australia360 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-18 13:39:42
November 18 2010 13:38 GMT
#83
On November 18 2010 19:33 Nadagast wrote:
Thors have great anti air against light units, but against armored air units, their air attack is beyond terrible. With equal upgrades against Carriers, Thors do 4x4 = 16 damage per volley. That's less DPS than a stimmed Marine.

Thors weakness against armored air targets would be reasonable if they weren't so high up on the attack priority. In a large battle with Carriers on one side and Thors on the other, Thors do basically no DPS, unless you manually target Thors on ground units, they spend the entire fight shooting Interceptors and Carriers.

Now I know what you're saying: Get Vikings to kill Armored air units. But the problem is that Vikings suck on the ground. The problem is that getting armored air units is almost always a win for the Protoss in TvP. This is only masked by the fact that most TvPs are over fairly quickly and don't ever get past 2-3 base for the P, because almost all Terrans use bio. There are three ways getting Vikings to counter Carriers can go:
1. The best case scenario is that you make just enough to kill his Carriers then hope you win the ground battle. Terran maybe comes out slightly ahead in this case. But it's very difficult to hit the exact right amount of Vikings.
2. If you lose the air battle and he has carriers left over you lose the battle. Nothing else you have that shoots up (Marines and Thors) are good vs Carriers with support.
3. If you win the air battle with too many vikings left over, you'll lose the ground fight. Vikings that are 0/0 and on the ground are pretty terrible.

Also they are on an entirely separate upgrade table so you're at 0/0 when they already have some upgrades.

There are a couple of solutions to this problem:
Change Thor anti-air damage to be 12x4, or 24x2 instead of 6+6lightx4.
Change Thors to automatically target ground units over armored air units and Interceptors.

If Thors were changed so that Terrans had a viable counter to armored air other than Viking/Marines, I believe we would see playstyles other than bio open up.


they fixed this in the latest patch: thors now prioritise attacking ground units over air units
PulseSUI
Profile Joined August 2010
Switzerland305 Posts
November 18 2010 13:40 GMT
#84
fun fact:

landed vikings are about equal to Stalkers and the higher the upgrades go, the better for the Viking.

the key point is the shield upgrade, 3/3/0 Stalkers vs 3/3 Vikings is a very very close fight, realy depending who ever shoots first who is going to win the fight.
if terran goes 3/3 mech and the protoss goes 3/3/0 ground, for the level3 shieldupgrade, costing a wooping 900/900, the terran can get 2/2 ship upgrades and have some spare cash, or can up to 3/3 ship for just 150 gas/mins more.

Vikings are not weak on the ground, they are about equal to stalkers, once in a ball, beat out Zealots and are not realy effected by forcefields.
psy storm does also very little because of the size of the vikings.

Angra
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States2652 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-18 13:51:43
November 18 2010 13:46 GMT
#85
On November 18 2010 21:58 JDeathmetal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2010 21:54 Angra wrote:
On November 18 2010 21:52 JDeathmetal wrote:
while were at it, can't we just give thors 3000 HP, make them free to build. Give them anti everything and splash on the ground, and please make them free.

Then all the poor terran troubles in the oooooohhhh so hard PvT match-ups are over.

ow and please give marines and scv' s the ability to morph in to thors for free


To be honest it has nothing to do with the actual Thor itself. It has to do with the fact that there's literally no good response to Protoss air, except for Marines. And that makes for a really stale matchup.


Can I ask you the thousand pro matchups where we see protoss air dominate everything of terran cause there is no anti? The OP wants to see that thors counter all air, which is bs.

Terran has enough anti air, I mean viking being the cheapest and strongest air unit, countering everything that toss can throw at them in the air.

I don't know how you can complain about this.

Indeed the match-up feels stale but thats not because protoss is so dominant in the air.

Only thing I agree at is that thors should not give armored air priority, but then again a little apm from the terran side shouldnt hurt. Something else then T A+Click


I never said that Terran has no anti-air. I said that if Marines weren't made, they would have no anti-air. Most professional games involve bio, which means Marines. Believe me, if Marines didn't exist, we would see a LOT more Protoss air in the PvT matchup.

It's not even that Thors don't automatically target things like Void Rays. It's that Thors are AWFUL against Void Rays in terms of damage output, regardless if you "micro" to shoot at them or not. Considering Vikings, you need almost double the Void Ray count to deal with them if you don't have Marines. Void Rays kill Vikings almost instantly if you slip up once on keeping them out of range. The only reason Vikings have any sort of effectiveness against Void Rays is because they can take pot-shots at them out of range while being protected by Marines in the front. If those Marines didn't exist, pure Viking vs pure Void Ray is a joke.
ltortoise
Profile Joined August 2010
633 Posts
November 18 2010 13:49 GMT
#86
On November 18 2010 22:35 aike wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2010 22:30 HalfAmazing wrote:
Nadagast you're absolutely correct. The people disagreeing with you don't seem to understand the issue with Thor attack priority. Mixing in a single carrier, or even void ray with your ground army, completely nullifies Thor's normally high DPS. It is far too hard a counter. Fixing this issue would make TvP considerably more interesting as we'd see a lot more late game-oriented play.


This doesn't even make any sense. TARGET FIRE WITH THE THOR! It's really not hard to do at all. You can even repair the thor if you want in the battle and then it's just invincible because the rest of the P army is dead after that, and then the 1 thor can take on like 200000 carriers by itself cuz of SCVs repairing it. Giving T a unit that counters every P ground unit and air unit in the game is just stupid lol. If you don't know how to target fire units you don't deserve to be playing in MLG.


Uh, what the hell?

If it didn't make sense, why did Blizzard JUST CHANGE THE THOR so that it doesn't automatically target MEDIVACS over everything else? So that you can use it in late game TvT without the AI glitching out on you continuously.

Why would this be any different for TvP? And you realize target firing isn't even a great solution, right?

What if I have just three Thors in the late game? I can't exactly put them in a single control group and have them focus fire, they would overkill and waste their DPS. I would have to click each one individually, and have each one individually trying to kill ground units continuously, and the second I stop it will go back to firing against air etc etc.

OP brings up a decently valid point that it's pretty silly for a Thor to auto-target air over ground. I'd rather manually focus Mutalisks in TvZ than have to continuously babysit them in every other possible situation.
ensis
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany340 Posts
November 18 2010 13:49 GMT
#87
omg terran is weak!
i want a thor to be effective vs EVERYTHING. i want to kill every unit that protoss somehow can get just by getting thors!

sorry, but just the fact alone, that a thor CAN shoot air is more than strong. imagine collossi could kill mutas!
this is Day[9] Daily #266 where we learn to be a better substractor- - - - - - - - - - - - -even Chuck Norris watches Day[9] Daily - - - - - - - TL ban policy sucks ratsass
Panoptic
Profile Joined September 2009
United Kingdom515 Posts
November 18 2010 13:50 GMT
#88
On November 18 2010 22:38 ace246 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2010 19:33 Nadagast wrote:
Thors have great anti air against light units, but against armored air units, their air attack is beyond terrible. With equal upgrades against Carriers, Thors do 4x4 = 16 damage per volley. That's less DPS than a stimmed Marine.

Thors weakness against armored air targets would be reasonable if they weren't so high up on the attack priority. In a large battle with Carriers on one side and Thors on the other, Thors do basically no DPS, unless you manually target Thors on ground units, they spend the entire fight shooting Interceptors and Carriers.

Now I know what you're saying: Get Vikings to kill Armored air units. But the problem is that Vikings suck on the ground. The problem is that getting armored air units is almost always a win for the Protoss in TvP. This is only masked by the fact that most TvPs are over fairly quickly and don't ever get past 2-3 base for the P, because almost all Terrans use bio. There are three ways getting Vikings to counter Carriers can go:
1. The best case scenario is that you make just enough to kill his Carriers then hope you win the ground battle. Terran maybe comes out slightly ahead in this case. But it's very difficult to hit the exact right amount of Vikings.
2. If you lose the air battle and he has carriers left over you lose the battle. Nothing else you have that shoots up (Marines and Thors) are good vs Carriers with support.
3. If you win the air battle with too many vikings left over, you'll lose the ground fight. Vikings that are 0/0 and on the ground are pretty terrible.

Also they are on an entirely separate upgrade table so you're at 0/0 when they already have some upgrades.

There are a couple of solutions to this problem:
Change Thor anti-air damage to be 12x4, or 24x2 instead of 6+6lightx4.
Change Thors to automatically target ground units over armored air units and Interceptors.

If Thors were changed so that Terrans had a viable counter to armored air other than Viking/Marines, I believe we would see playstyles other than bio open up.


they fixed this in the latest patch: thors now prioritise attacking ground units over air units


Nope. It only lowered medivac priority, not all air.
"Crom laughs at your four winds!"
aike
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States1629 Posts
November 18 2010 13:56 GMT
#89
On November 18 2010 22:49 ltortoise wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2010 22:35 aike wrote:
On November 18 2010 22:30 HalfAmazing wrote:
Nadagast you're absolutely correct. The people disagreeing with you don't seem to understand the issue with Thor attack priority. Mixing in a single carrier, or even void ray with your ground army, completely nullifies Thor's normally high DPS. It is far too hard a counter. Fixing this issue would make TvP considerably more interesting as we'd see a lot more late game-oriented play.


This doesn't even make any sense. TARGET FIRE WITH THE THOR! It's really not hard to do at all. You can even repair the thor if you want in the battle and then it's just invincible because the rest of the P army is dead after that, and then the 1 thor can take on like 200000 carriers by itself cuz of SCVs repairing it. Giving T a unit that counters every P ground unit and air unit in the game is just stupid lol. If you don't know how to target fire units you don't deserve to be playing in MLG.


Uh, what the hell?

If it didn't make sense, why did Blizzard JUST CHANGE THE THOR so that it doesn't automatically target MEDIVACS over everything else? So that you can use it in late game TvT without the AI glitching out on you continuously.

Why would this be any different for TvP? And you realize target firing isn't even a great solution, right?

What if I have just three Thors in the late game? I can't exactly put them in a single control group and have them focus fire, they would overkill and waste their DPS. I would have to click each one individually, and have each one individually trying to kill ground units continuously, and the second I stop it will go back to firing against air etc etc.

OP brings up a decently valid point that it's pretty silly for a Thor to auto-target air over ground. I'd rather manually focus Mutalisks in TvZ than have to continuously babysit them in every other possible situation.


Oh right, i'm sorry, I forgot all the noobs want Blizzard to just easy mode starcraft 2 for them so they don't even have to play. Just 1a your whole army into enemy army and sit back and watch as you win the game. I totally forgot, please forgive me.
Wahaha
Cheerio
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
Ukraine3178 Posts
November 18 2010 14:02 GMT
#90
On November 18 2010 22:40 PulseSUI wrote:
fun fact:

landed vikings are about equal to Stalkers and the higher the upgrades go, the better for the Viking.

the key point is the shield upgrade, 3/3/0 Stalkers vs 3/3 Vikings is a very very close fight, realy depending who ever shoots first who is going to win the fight.
if terran goes 3/3 mech and the protoss goes 3/3/0 ground, for the level3 shieldupgrade, costing a wooping 900/900, the terran can get 2/2 ship upgrades and have some spare cash, or can up to 3/3 ship for just 150 gas/mins more.

Vikings are not weak on the ground, they are about equal to stalkers, once in a ball, beat out Zealots and are not realy effected by forcefields.
psy storm does also very little because of the size of the vikings.


lol. Nice to know. That makes this thread even funnier.
Thezzy
Profile Joined October 2010
Netherlands2117 Posts
November 18 2010 14:08 GMT
#91
Carriers aren't the issue in TvP at all, triple or even just double Reactor Starport can easily deal with Carriers.

The problem in TvP (IMO) is transitioning out of Bio into something else and actually staying alive while doing it. Transitioning into Mech is so vulnerable to a timing attack that sticking with Bio tends to get favored, until HT & Colossi show up and melt everything.
Playing Terran is like flying down a MULE drop in a marine suit, firing a Gauss Rifle
Krejven
Profile Joined August 2010
Sweden105 Posts
November 18 2010 14:11 GMT
#92
I wonder how it would be if Thors 250mm cannon could target air. mmmmm
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
KotaOnCue
Profile Joined September 2010
United States180 Posts
November 18 2010 14:14 GMT
#93
I love people who go, "Vikings have no use once all the air units are gone!" Well, they just made their use right there. You just forced them to go and face your Thor/Bioball army with their inferior ground army. That's a pretty good use right there.

And people don't realize that they are pretty good harassment units as well. 4 Vikings can take down a ton of probes and then fly away once they see the stalkers coming in to get them. If you can't find use for your vikings after they've done their job, you're not thinking hard enough.
"They say ignorance is bliss. Is it true?"
Cibron
Profile Joined March 2010
Sweden253 Posts
November 18 2010 14:26 GMT
#94
On November 18 2010 20:24 X-Codes wrote:
450 Minerals + 250 gas for 1 Carrier = 3 Vikings + 25 Gas leftover. 1 Carrier and 3 Vikings also have equal supply cost. Also, a Reactor'd Starport produces 3 Vikings in roughly the same amount of time it takes to create 1 Carrier from a perfectly Chronoboosted Stargate. With just a little more micro than a moving the Vikings into the Carriers, you should be able to not lose a single viking in this exchange. Yes, not ONE. Why not? Because Carriers are so laughably slow, even slower than Vikings, that they just can't catch a retreating Viking, and they can't escape from an engagement with them. I'm also not taking into account the inevitable Marine support that the first wave of Vikings will have.

Also, if you do any scouting at all then the Protoss player can't go all Suddenly... CARRIERS! on you. If they don't completely neglect their ground army, then they can probably fund 1 Stargate off 1 base and 3 Stargates off 2. So, you have an opportunity to scout their fast expo easily enough. Next is that it takes 1 minute to build the stargates and 1 more to build the Fleet Beacon. Only then do they get the pleasure of spending 2 minutes building 3 Carriers off these two bases. That's a huge window of opportunity to scout the stargates and build Vikings to counter whatever they're doing (and Vikings really do counter WHATEVER they do with Stargates).

Carriers vs. Terran is a trap of Ackbarian proportions.


Comparing Carriers to Vikings cost wise is so stupid idk what to say. Or maybe I do: HARD COUNTER. Carriers are good vs ground units and semi good vs certain air units.

The OP didn't mean to ask what to do about Carriers but why is terran mech so bad vs air in general (unless its muta)?
ZOMGY (¬O_o)¬ || BeastyQQ FTW!! ||
GreEny K
Profile Joined February 2008
Germany7312 Posts
November 18 2010 14:58 GMT
#95
On November 18 2010 20:32 TibblesEvilCat wrote:
right.. show me replays because serriousley this feels like somone wanting thor to be anti all god unit.



That's how I feel as well, I had a game last night where a 2 base terran was just going thor and marine while I had 4 bases up and I lost... I don't blame the loss to thors since I realize I did not do the proper counter but trying to take away any weakness the unit has seems unfair to me.
Why would you ever choose failure, when success is an option.
Jumbled
Profile Joined September 2010
1543 Posts
November 18 2010 14:59 GMT
#96
It's really hard to have much sympathy for people complaining about actually having to micro their Thors in this (rather rare) situation, when Protoss players facing Thors have to individually target each SCV repairing them. Yes, the game's AI targetting could use some changes in a few different situations, but that doesn't justify the OP wanting to turn Thors into some kind of god-unit. Demands for idiotic buffs like that don't really belong anywhere on TL, and certainly not in the strategy section.
Thrombozyt
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Germany1269 Posts
November 18 2010 15:16 GMT
#97
I would love to see any replay/VOD from the 'l2mirco!' crowd, featuring them efficiently preserving the DPS of 3+ thors in an engangement of two 140 food armies, where the toss brings gateway units and their crowd control units (colo or HT) with 3 voids or 1 carrier against their mech army.

The problem being described isn't that the terran gets owned by the air units, but by the thors not contributing to the fight the second they can shoot at armored air targets.

This also counters all the 'but toss can never get 5 carriers all of the sudden!' arguements. They don't have to. When going mech, you rely alot on the single target DPS of thors to augment you splash dmg of tanks and hellions. Protoss being on gateway/colossi just needs to bring in 1 or maybe 2 carriers or - if he needs to attack quickly - 3-4 voids and the same army that would have lost convincingly to the mech army will now just overrun them, because the thors are not participating in the actual fight. With the thor temporarily out of the equation, tanks just get owned by zealots (damaging each other and the thors in the process) and the hellions get roasted by the collosi.

Another problem is the fact, that vikings don't solve this problem. They just shorten the time during which the thors are disabled and usually they are not worth the gas that you need for your mech army unless you see the stargates - and then it's too late.

Also - if toss does a serious switch to carriers, you better have forseen that. Yes, in theory land 1 viking perfectly controlled kills infinity carriers, but in reality you cannot kite forever, because they are doing damage to your ground army or base while chasing your kiting vikings.
TheGreatHegemon
Profile Joined September 2010
61 Posts
November 18 2010 15:19 GMT
#98
The issue with Mech is vulnerability to blink stalkers... Yes, it can't address armored air well, but that's fine in my opinion.

Theoretically, Stalkers should be pretty badly countered by tanks or thors. However, because of the bloody blink, a pure stalker composition will counter thor/siege tank (As a T player, I've experimented with this against a practice partner; it's possible I suck, but it just seems that blink-surrounds decimate the soft tanks or even thors easily for cost. And stalkers are hardly a niche unit for P.
HalfAmazing
Profile Joined May 2008
Netherlands402 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-18 15:32:04
November 18 2010 15:30 GMT
#99
On November 18 2010 22:33 Panoptic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2010 22:26 sandroba wrote:
Wow, I can't believe how stubborn the responses are in this thread. Nadagast has a point. Listen to him before blindly questioning what he's trying to point out. Each thor does insane dmg vs ground so you have to basically manually target every single one of your thors if the protoss has any kind of armored air or you're turning your 500 resource unit into one comparable to a marine in terms of dps (50 resource unit). That requires a insane amount apm to do if you have multiple thors. That's clearly an unintended side effect of thors anti-air priority and I expect it to be patched soon because it only makes the game more one dimensional.


I don't quite understand how it takes such insane apm?

Ctrl+ left click on thor (select all thors)
Shift + A-click on the units you want it to attack
Depending on how many thors you have Shift and left click on portraits to lessen your selection and tell those thors to attack new targes to lessen overkill.

non?


Have you even played the game man? What you're suggesting is absurd. It can't be done. Not by anyone.

Seriously what the fuck is up with all the lunacy straight outta Bronze telling you to manually target stalkers with your Thors? Even if you could do it (which you can't), you'd be giving up a fuckload of DPS.
You can figure out the other half.
aike
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States1629 Posts
November 18 2010 15:55 GMT
#100
On November 19 2010 00:30 HalfAmazing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2010 22:33 Panoptic wrote:
On November 18 2010 22:26 sandroba wrote:
Wow, I can't believe how stubborn the responses are in this thread. Nadagast has a point. Listen to him before blindly questioning what he's trying to point out. Each thor does insane dmg vs ground so you have to basically manually target every single one of your thors if the protoss has any kind of armored air or you're turning your 500 resource unit into one comparable to a marine in terms of dps (50 resource unit). That requires a insane amount apm to do if you have multiple thors. That's clearly an unintended side effect of thors anti-air priority and I expect it to be patched soon because it only makes the game more one dimensional.


I don't quite understand how it takes such insane apm?

Ctrl+ left click on thor (select all thors)
Shift + A-click on the units you want it to attack
Depending on how many thors you have Shift and left click on portraits to lessen your selection and tell those thors to attack new targes to lessen overkill.

non?


Have you even played the game man? What you're suggesting is absurd. It can't be done. Not by anyone.

Seriously what the fuck is up with all the lunacy straight outta Bronze telling you to manually target stalkers with your Thors? Even if you could do it (which you can't), you'd be giving up a fuckload of DPS.


Have you guys ever even heard of control groups? Saying it can't be done is like saying I can't cast 10 storms within 5 seconds in BW on a giant army of hydras under dark swarms. Or I can't dodge lurker shots with marines. I will make you guys a replay and show you how it's done because you all seem so terrible you can't use 50 APM to target a few units manually. I've almost never played Terran and I bet I can do this no problem.
Wahaha
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 42m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 131
ProTech53
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 3267
BeSt 700
ToSsGirL 476
actioN 376
GoRush 358
Killer 321
Mini 175
EffOrt 103
Nal_rA 97
Larva 79
[ Show more ]
JulyZerg 63
Shinee 62
Mong 50
Sacsri 49
Pusan 46
Light 41
Noble 29
JYJ27
Sharp 23
sSak 19
Bale 16
Rush 15
Dota 2
BananaSlamJamma448
XcaliburYe355
League of Legends
JimRising 470
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss948
Stewie2K926
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King232
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor134
Other Games
shahzam1305
ceh9600
Happy308
DeMusliM198
crisheroes150
rGuardiaN73
SortOf45
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick825
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 347
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH382
• LUISG 18
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2103
League of Legends
• Stunt631
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
42m
RSL Revival
42m
ByuN vs Classic
Clem vs Cham
WardiTV European League
6h 42m
ByuN vs NightPhoenix
HeRoMaRinE vs HiGhDrA
Krystianer vs sebesdes
MaxPax vs Babymarine
SKillous vs Mixu
ShoWTimE vs MaNa
Replay Cast
14h 42m
RSL Revival
1d
herO vs SHIN
Reynor vs Cure
WardiTV European League
1d 6h
Scarlett vs Percival
Jumy vs ArT
YoungYakov vs Shameless
uThermal vs Fjant
Nicoract vs goblin
Harstem vs Gerald
FEL
1d 6h
Korean StarCraft League
1d 17h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
[ Show More ]
FEL
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL: ProLeague
3 days
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-28
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.