|
On June 10 2010 03:11 IntoTheWow wrote: I did not use the word pleasure, I said entertainment. I also did not talk about sustaining human life, but eating.
Nice try though!
edit: also, Zoler
| V
hahahha at nice try, he didn't even have a point.
Glad the guy got hurt =) I hope if he's stupid enough to do it again, he gets hurt more =)
|
On June 10 2010 02:57 IntoTheWow wrote: I'm glad this happened.
+1, wish the bull would have done more serious dmg tho
|
On June 10 2010 02:56 Corrupt wrote: Holy cow!
![[image loading]](http://captionsearch.com/pix/2rub7eoeem.jpg)
ಠ_ಠ Though not strictly correct, it's a bull.
User was warned for this post
|
On June 10 2010 03:23 IntoTheWow wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2010 03:16 katull wrote: To those who condemn bullfighting (and thus consider this funny):
I hold this sport for equally brutal and vicious, but I don't condemn this sport. Not all bulls tested and bred for this have to endure this fight, and all of them are held in conditions unequal to any farming/breeding conditions you find in Europe. I don't want to write "happy cows", but this is as close as you can get...
If you eat meat as I do, consider how those animals are kept, and if you find that you don't really care, you shouldn't judge those who kill them for the barbaric enjoyment of the masses while *not* keeping them in small confinements all day long, transport them brutally for hours without water or food just to throw half of the meat away because it's cheap anyway.
I have more to write (and cite) but I'll wait for the first responses ^^ 2 wrongs != 1 right
So you are saying he deserved this? Could you laugh at this? By that logic (considering my prior points) anyone who eats meat deserves the same. Is that your point? Please elaborate I'm not praising the sport, I'm praising the way they keep their cattle. If I would have to chose as a cow, I'd rather live happily and fight unfairly than being tortured all my life...
|
On June 10 2010 03:12 Thrill wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2010 03:08 Liquid`NonY wrote:On June 10 2010 03:05 IntoTheWow wrote:On June 10 2010 03:04 Liquid`NonY wrote: Wait why all the hate on him? None of you guys eat beef or what? =/ Killing to eat != killing for entertainment. Beef isn't needed to sustain human life. Humans eat it for pleasure. Eating beef is killing for pleasure, just the same. That's not even relevant to the argument. Yeah, we eat beef for pleasure but most of us who purchase packed meat assume that the animal has been put down humanly. There's a huge difference to assumed humane killing (i realize this is not always the case, but it is by principle illegal and when a case surfaces that animals have been killed in an inhumane fashion, it always makes headline news at least where i live) and intended suffering for entertainment. Go troll somewhere else.
Whether the animal is put down humanly or not its still being killed when it wants to live. The matadors and the people who enjoy the fights look it with the idea that the bull is going to be killed anyways, at least this way it has a chance of dieing with honor, maybe more painfully but the bull also has a chance to fight back against its killer. I would prefer myself to die with a fight than be put down involuntarily with no chance to do anything.
|
is awesome32278 Posts
On June 10 2010 03:34 katull wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2010 03:23 IntoTheWow wrote:On June 10 2010 03:16 katull wrote: To those who condemn bullfighting (and thus consider this funny):
I hold this sport for equally brutal and vicious, but I don't condemn this sport. Not all bulls tested and bred for this have to endure this fight, and all of them are held in conditions unequal to any farming/breeding conditions you find in Europe. I don't want to write "happy cows", but this is as close as you can get...
If you eat meat as I do, consider how those animals are kept, and if you find that you don't really care, you shouldn't judge those who kill them for the barbaric enjoyment of the masses while *not* keeping them in small confinements all day long, transport them brutally for hours without water or food just to throw half of the meat away because it's cheap anyway.
I have more to write (and cite) but I'll wait for the first responses ^^ 2 wrongs != 1 right So you are saying he deserved this? Could you laugh at this? By that logic (considering my prior points) anyone who eats meat deserves the same. Is that your point? Please elaborate I'm not praising the sport, I'm praising the way they keep their cattle. If I would have to chose as a cow, I'd rather live happily and fight unfairly than being tortured all my life...
Yeah and If I were god I would cure world hunger. But you are not a cow. And cows don't get to choose.
Now back into reality. Please try not to put words I didn't not say into my mouth.
What I said is that even if bulls are treated nicer before being tortured in public, that doesn't take away the fact that they are indeed tortured for entertainment. Better than bad, can still be bad.
Trying to go off the tangent with the way meat is mass produced today doesn't work either. We are not talking about that in this thread, and even if we were, it doesn't make this 'sport' any better.
|
On June 10 2010 03:34 Pengu1n wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2010 03:12 Thrill wrote:On June 10 2010 03:08 Liquid`NonY wrote:On June 10 2010 03:05 IntoTheWow wrote:On June 10 2010 03:04 Liquid`NonY wrote: Wait why all the hate on him? None of you guys eat beef or what? =/ Killing to eat != killing for entertainment. Beef isn't needed to sustain human life. Humans eat it for pleasure. Eating beef is killing for pleasure, just the same. That's not even relevant to the argument. Yeah, we eat beef for pleasure but most of us who purchase packed meat assume that the animal has been put down humanly. There's a huge difference to assumed humane killing (i realize this is not always the case, but it is by principle illegal and when a case surfaces that animals have been killed in an inhumane fashion, it always makes headline news at least where i live) and intended suffering for entertainment. Go troll somewhere else. Whether the animal is put down humanly or not its still being killed when it wants to live. The matadors and the people who enjoy the fights look it with the idea that the bull is going to be killed anyways, at least this way it has a chance of dieing with honor, maybe more painfully but the bull also has a chance to fight back against its killer. I would prefer myself to die with a fight than be put down involuntarily with no chance to do anything.
Yeah being stabbed, and if it fights back and wins, it's still killed.
Lol, you call being put in a cage and stabbed repeatedly "honor" lol, you're a complete joke.
|
is awesome32278 Posts
People, you are not bulls! Stop trying to take decisions as one!
|
8751 Posts
On June 10 2010 03:11 IntoTheWow wrote: I did not use the word pleasure, I said entertainment. I also did not talk about sustaining human life, but eating.
Nice try though!
edit: also, Zoler
| V lol kid you can't point out that I used different words and pretend that means something until you've given a reason why it means something. Pleasure encompasses entertainment, so I'm perfectly fine there. I only brought up sustaining human life as a way of anticipating a possible counterargument that you could make. That is, you could say we need to eat so killing for beef isn't for pleasure, even though we do get pleasure out of it. But of course that's incorrect because killing for beef is almost always for pleasure and hardly ever out of necessity. So, do you have any arguments or logic or just your typical bullshit one liners? =[
|
is awesome32278 Posts
On June 10 2010 03:34 Pengu1n wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2010 03:12 Thrill wrote:On June 10 2010 03:08 Liquid`NonY wrote:On June 10 2010 03:05 IntoTheWow wrote:On June 10 2010 03:04 Liquid`NonY wrote: Wait why all the hate on him? None of you guys eat beef or what? =/ Killing to eat != killing for entertainment. Beef isn't needed to sustain human life. Humans eat it for pleasure. Eating beef is killing for pleasure, just the same. That's not even relevant to the argument. Yeah, we eat beef for pleasure but most of us who purchase packed meat assume that the animal has been put down humanly. There's a huge difference to assumed humane killing (i realize this is not always the case, but it is by principle illegal and when a case surfaces that animals have been killed in an inhumane fashion, it always makes headline news at least where i live) and intended suffering for entertainment. Go troll somewhere else. Whether the animal is put down humanly or not its still being killed when it wants to live. The matadors and the people who enjoy the fights look it with the idea that the bull is going to be killed anyways, at least this way it has a chance of dieing with honor, maybe more painfully but the bull also has a chance to fight back against its killer. I would prefer myself to die with a fight than be put down involuntarily with no chance to do anything.
Yeah nice fair fight. The moment the person is injured a bunch of people get the bull away and take the person to a doctor. The moment the bull is injured people clap and scream!
This photo was not the bull dying with honor, it was just a crack in their torturing system.
|
This happened a few weeks ago! Still friggin' insane.
And people, do not listen to ITW. HE'S ARGENTINIAN. His country is renown for its beef. Dude's hands are literally covered in bovine blood. That savage!
|
On June 10 2010 03:34 Pengu1n wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2010 03:12 Thrill wrote:On June 10 2010 03:08 Liquid`NonY wrote:On June 10 2010 03:05 IntoTheWow wrote:On June 10 2010 03:04 Liquid`NonY wrote: Wait why all the hate on him? None of you guys eat beef or what? =/ Killing to eat != killing for entertainment. Beef isn't needed to sustain human life. Humans eat it for pleasure. Eating beef is killing for pleasure, just the same. That's not even relevant to the argument. Yeah, we eat beef for pleasure but most of us who purchase packed meat assume that the animal has been put down humanly. There's a huge difference to assumed humane killing (i realize this is not always the case, but it is by principle illegal and when a case surfaces that animals have been killed in an inhumane fashion, it always makes headline news at least where i live) and intended suffering for entertainment. Go troll somewhere else. anyways, at least this way it has a chance of dieing with honor
lol what? seriously? stop disnyfiying the bull. It doesn't want to fight. Me too, I'm happy that duche got roughed up.
|
On June 10 2010 03:24 fredd wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2010 03:11 Zoler wrote:On June 10 2010 03:08 Liquid`NonY wrote:On June 10 2010 03:05 IntoTheWow wrote:On June 10 2010 03:04 Liquid`NonY wrote: Wait why all the hate on him? None of you guys eat beef or what? =/ Killing to eat != killing for entertainment. Beef isn't needed to sustain human life. Humans eat it for pleasure. Eating beef is killing for pleasure, just the same. Torturing and killing isn't the same. If you think the mass-produced meat you have readily available to you hasn't been tortured, you must be really naive.
So you mean you can't chose products that says they aren't? As far as I know there are lots of meat that comes from cows that hasn't been tortured and has lived happy lives or w/e. I'm not saying I do this right now because I'm not the one buying dinner for my home (mom does) but when I get own place I sure will!
|
is awesome32278 Posts
On June 10 2010 03:43 Hawk wrote: This happened a few weeks ago! Still friggin' insane.
And people, do not listen to ITW. HE'S ARGENTINIAN. His country is renown for its beef. Dude's hands are literally covered in bovine blood. That savage!
lol so american, ignorant about the rest of the world.
Here we get up early every morning with bows and arrows and go hunt our own food. Animals here die with honor.
|
lol @ everyone saying he deserved this.
"YEAH ITS NOT MY CULTURE WHAT ASSHOLES"
Like Nony said everyone eats beef and those cows die worse than the bulls do. Bull fighting is just a cultural thing and just because you don't understand it doesn't mean someone deserves to get mauled.
|
On June 10 2010 03:39 Liquid`NonY wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2010 03:11 IntoTheWow wrote: I did not use the word pleasure, I said entertainment. I also did not talk about sustaining human life, but eating.
Nice try though!
edit: also, Zoler
| V lol kid you can't point out that I used different words and pretend that means something until you've given a reason why it means something. Pleasure encompasses entertainment, so I'm perfectly fine there. I only brought up sustaining human life as a way of anticipating a possible counterargument that you could make. That is, you could say we need to eat so killing for beef isn't for pleasure, even though we do get pleasure out of it. But of course that's incorrect because killing for beef is almost always for pleasure and hardly ever out of necessity. So, do you have any arguments or logic or just your typical bullshit one liners? =[
There has already been multiple arguments provided in this thread. Basically it boils down to the difference between turning something into a bloodsport where you torture the animal and slaughtering it for meat.
|
On June 10 2010 03:45 Vasoline73 wrote: lol @ everyone saying he deserved this.
"YEAH ITS NOT MY CULTURE WHAT ASSHOLES"
Like Nony said everyone eats beef and those cows die worse than the bulls do. Bull fighting is just a cultural thing and just because you don't understand it doesn't mean someone deserves to get mauled.
He's poking a sword at the bull. I'd very much so think he deserves to get mauled. Shit, he should be PREPARED to get mauled when stepping into the arena with it.
|
On June 10 2010 03:45 Vasoline73 wrote: lol @ everyone saying he deserved this.
"YEAH ITS NOT MY CULTURE WHAT ASSHOLES"
Like Nony said everyone eats beef and those cows die worse than the bulls do. Bull fighting is just a cultural thing and just because you don't understand it doesn't mean someone deserves to get mauled.
So basically, since it's their culture, they shouldn't change.
Oh I guess it was the U.S.'s culture to have slaves along time ago, but we shouldn't change culture right? Because evolving is bad or something?
Fuck em, they stab an animal for sport, then it fucks him up, GOOD.
|
is awesome32278 Posts
On June 10 2010 03:39 Liquid`NonY wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2010 03:11 IntoTheWow wrote: I did not use the word pleasure, I said entertainment. I also did not talk about sustaining human life, but eating.
Nice try though!
edit: also, Zoler
| V lol kid you can't point out that I used different words and pretend that means something until you've given a reason why it means something. Pleasure encompasses entertainment, so I'm perfectly fine there. I only brought up sustaining human life as a way of anticipating a possible counterargument that you could make. That is, you could say we need to eat so killing for beef isn't for pleasure, even though we do get pleasure out of it. But of course that's incorrect because killing for beef is almost always for pleasure and hardly ever out of necessity. So, do you have any arguments or logic or just your typical bullshit one liners? =[
hey "kiddo", try and read the rest of my posts in this thread. Why should I make gigantic posts when my point of view is perfectly understandable the way they are?
You equalized torturing animals with killing them. Come back from that and we can continue talking.
|
On June 10 2010 03:45 Vasoline73 wrote: lol @ everyone saying he deserved this.
"YEAH ITS NOT MY CULTURE WHAT ASSHOLES"
Like Nony said everyone eats beef and those cows die worse than the bulls do. Bull fighting is just a cultural thing and just because you don't understand it doesn't mean someone deserves to get mauled.
This is the worst comment of this thread pretty much lol. I guess if some country had a culture of killing people in an arena that would be exactly the same thing. No? Then what is your point?
|
|
|
|
|
|