• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:01
CEST 16:01
KST 23:01
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!9[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier2Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League42Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.164Rollback Netcode in Brood War144
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? Server Blocker SCII needs to put more weight on strategy and tact Stellar Fest 2 Replay Pack
Tourneys
WORTEX Challenger Series — Open SC2 LAN in Budapes RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 548 Shining Bright The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train
Brood War
General
Mineral gathering rate (boosted) for each patch BW General Discussion Do we even care about balance? Rollback Netcode in Brood War Bot on ladder
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League [ASL22] Grand Finals [Women's StarCraft] Tier 8 CK 2026-10-20 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Chess Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023 Football (Soccer) Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
How Much Genes Contribute to…
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 11436 users

Battle.net's new ToS - Page 2

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
mrdx
Profile Blog Joined October 2004
Vietnam1555 Posts
May 27 2010 22:19 GMT
#21
On May 28 2010 07:00 iloahz wrote:
"any" group competition? Like say we have a little competition with 3 people inside our own house we gotta have Blizzard's written consent?

Read the rest of the sentence -_-
BoxerForever.com - the one and only international Boxer fansite since 2006 :)
Kralic
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Canada2628 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-27 22:25:46
May 27 2010 22:19 GMT
#22
You just need written consent from Blizzard, it is probably there so they can review what is going on so they don't have some company charging people to play Blizzards game.

Edit: Also read the entire TOS instead of highlighting the most disturbing thing on its own. It is there to protect their property. Most likely they will have a "Tournament License" for companies that are going to throw a huge tournament with a big prize. ie: OSL MSL WCG and so on.
Brood War forever!
crate
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States2474 Posts
May 27 2010 22:21 GMT
#23
I remember the staff saying they had to get Blizzard approval for each of the TSLs they ran. No chance of me finding the posts though.

This is nothing new, I think.
We did. You did. Yes we can. No. || http://crawl.akrasiac.org/scoring/players/crate.html || twitch.tv/crate3333
QibingZero
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
2611 Posts
May 27 2010 22:25 GMT
#24
On May 28 2010 07:03 LaSt)ChAnCe wrote:
Great game makers have bills, too.


Every time someone makes a comment like this, regarding some huge corporation making sure they secure any potential profits, it's a slap in the face to everyone out there who actually does have to worry about paying bills. Or, you know, worse.
Oh, my eSports
MadJack
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Peru357 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-27 22:28:03
May 27 2010 22:26 GMT
#25
On May 28 2010 07:17 Keyser wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 07:15 MadJack wrote:
On May 28 2010 07:00 PJA wrote:
How dare blizzard try to profit from their amazing games!


"C. use the Service for any "e-sports" or group competition sponsored, promoted or facilitated by any commercial or non-profit entity without Blizzard's prior written consent."

In other words, sites like teamliquid are in the OBLIGATION to ask for permission to make a tournament even if there is no prize money and stuff.

So care, if Blizzard doesnt wants to, there wont be a next TSL.


I doubt TL could be classified as a non-profit entity unless it is charging for something I am not aware of. It's a legal term that doesn't really mean exactly how it sounds.


I tought non-profit actually ment non-profit, but as you say if its a legal term and I might be/am wrong.
Still, it doesnt make it right that they mention "E-sports" as if that was something they own, its like we had to pay the creator/s (or their heirs) of basketball everytime you play the game.
이제동 화이팅! / http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26jjD3ro-Xk /
Zeke50100
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States2220 Posts
May 27 2010 22:27 GMT
#26
There's really nothing stopping people from just having a large number of games in a row as just "casual" games, then graciously giving "donations" to the person who wins the final game. It's not competetive at all
The6357
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
United States1268 Posts
May 27 2010 22:27 GMT
#27
Blizzard ain't cool anymore in my book...
2010 worldcup!! corea fighting!!!
Vain
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Netherlands1115 Posts
May 27 2010 22:29 GMT
#28
On May 28 2010 07:00 PJA wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 06:54 MadJack wrote:
http://us.blizzard.com/en-us/company/about/termsofuse-new.html

Dont know if this is old i just checked my bnet acc and it was there.

Check this part:

Additional License Limitations.
blah blah blah...You agree that you will not, under any circumstances:

C. use the Service for any "e-sports" or group competition sponsored, promoted or facilitated by any commercial or non-profit entity without Blizzard's prior written consent.

Im really sad that Blizzard is turning into a cashmachine instead of the great game makers that they used to be...

Your toughts, and keep it clean


How dare blizzard try to profit from their amazing games!

The more money blizzard is able to make from SC2 being a successful e-sport the more likely they are to put more effort into designing, balancing, supporting, etc. SC2 and any other RTS they make in the future.


So you are saying starcraft II is at this moment such a good game because of all the money they made with wow?


+ Show Spoiler +
WHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA

Battle.net 2.0 is a waiter and he's a dick
sgeng
Profile Joined April 2010
United States78 Posts
May 27 2010 22:29 GMT
#29
On May 28 2010 07:11 Shizuru~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 06:54 MadJack wrote:
http://us.blizzard.com/en-us/company/about/termsofuse-new.html

Dont know if this is old i just checked my bnet acc and it was there.

Check this part:

Additional License Limitations.
blah blah blah...You agree that you will not, under any circumstances:

C. use the Service for any "e-sports" or group competition sponsored, promoted or facilitated by any commercial or non-profit entity without Blizzard's prior written consent.

Im really sad that Blizzard is turning into a cashmachine instead of the great game makers that they used to be...

Your toughts, and keep it clean


i really do not understand where this mentality of Blizzard is doing this for milking cash off the E-Sport community comes from...



You don't? Let me tell you: unadulterated greed.

They saw how big BW got in the esports scene and figured that they could be making a LOT more by simply retaining the rights to all tournaments/sanctioned events and charging money to high profile events to be held. I doubt they will bother with the small grassroots stuff. But stuff like the MSL and the Starleague I can see them requiring a fraction of the money to go to themselves.

As a business move, it'll probably rake in a lot of money for Blizzard...or it could kill off the fledgling SC2 competitive scene. It remains to be seen. Probably the former though.

I personally do not agree with Blizzard's attempts to control esports. Sure they made the game, but that in no way should allow them to restrict the freedom to hold competitive tournaments or events using this game. No other game has ever done this, it is a limitation on the rights of the game-buyers. It's as if Wizards of the Coast went ahead and said "You can't hold Magic tournaments without our consent." Simply makes no sense. The company makes the game. They sell the game. The game is now in the customer's possession and he/she should be allowed to do whatever he/she wants to (within legal bounds).
Kenpachi
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States9908 Posts
May 27 2010 22:30 GMT
#30
wait so no TL starleagues?
Nada's body is South Korea's greatest weapon.
Pablols
Profile Joined August 2009
Chile519 Posts
May 27 2010 22:35 GMT
#31
FUCK THAT whats wrong with them omg non profit?!?!?
11cc
Profile Joined May 2008
Finland561 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-27 22:45:36
May 27 2010 22:38 GMT
#32
I don't have anything against blizzard making money for the game they made, but a huge part of success will be part of community effort which will attract more people to the scene. And blizzard is going to take advantage of that.

Once the tourneys and the scene gets bigger, blizzard will ask more money, actively punishing community effort for their success. That's what they wanted to do with bw too in Korea too. And there is good arguments for both kespa and blizzard there. But with sc2 blizzard is taking all the power and that's a little too greedy in my opinion.

With bw we have a great game and freedom, and it needed both to be as succesful as it is today. Not gonna get as lucky again it seems.

edit: damn 100post... well better luck at 1000
Spiffeh
Profile Joined May 2010
United States830 Posts
May 27 2010 22:38 GMT
#33
Speculation is good to a degree, but worrying to death about something that hasn't happened yet is unproductive. So far Blizzard has been frugal in giving permission for small tourneys to happen and until that ceases I don't think there's much to worry about. Like other posters said, this is just lawyer jargon meant to prevent loopholes.
Keyser
Profile Joined May 2010
102 Posts
May 27 2010 22:38 GMT
#34
On May 28 2010 07:26 MadJack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 07:17 Keyser wrote:
On May 28 2010 07:15 MadJack wrote:
On May 28 2010 07:00 PJA wrote:
How dare blizzard try to profit from their amazing games!


"C. use the Service for any "e-sports" or group competition sponsored, promoted or facilitated by any commercial or non-profit entity without Blizzard's prior written consent."

In other words, sites like teamliquid are in the OBLIGATION to ask for permission to make a tournament even if there is no prize money and stuff.

So care, if Blizzard doesnt wants to, there wont be a next TSL.


I doubt TL could be classified as a non-profit entity unless it is charging for something I am not aware of. It's a legal term that doesn't really mean exactly how it sounds.


I tought non-profit actually ment non-profit, but as you say if its a legal term and I might be/am wrong.
Still, it doesnt make it right that they mention "E-sports" as if that was something they own, its like we had to pay the creator/s (or their heirs) of basketball everytime you play the game.


If basketball had been created today I am sure you would have to pay to host big tournaments for that too

Basically to be considered a non-profit entity you actually do need to be making money somehow, but there is no money leftover for the owners at the end of the day, it is just used for running the business. Wikimedia, the company running Wikipedia is a good example. They have a lot of money flowing through, but it's used to maintain Wikipedia and whatever else they might be doing, they don't actually profit.

I am not sure if the donations TL probably recieves would qualify for them to be a non-profit organization. I suppose it MIGHT, but it seems unlikely to me that Blizzard would want to block tournaments where there's no money to be had by the organizers.
T.O.P. *
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Hong Kong4685 Posts
May 27 2010 22:41 GMT
#35
On May 28 2010 07:30 Kenpachi wrote:
wait so no TL starleagues?

As long as TL gets written consent from Blizzard, they can run TSL.
Oracle comes in, Scvs go down, never a miscommunication.
NotGood-
Profile Joined March 2010
United States134 Posts
May 27 2010 22:42 GMT
#36
On May 28 2010 07:02 Redmark wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 07:00 iloahz wrote:
"any" group competition? Like say we have a little competition with 3 people inside our own house we gotta have Blizzard's written consent?

Only if you're sponsored, I think. That's what it says.

Does this mean blizz will hunt TL.net's ass down during say TSL 3 if its sponsored by razor or w/e?
Spawkuring
Profile Joined July 2008
United States755 Posts
May 27 2010 22:43 GMT
#37
It's in Blizzard's best interest to keep the amount of bureaucratic red tape as low as possible for minor events. E-sports isn't gonna grow if you can't even host a small tournament w/o jumping through hoops. E-sports not growing = greedy CEOs not getting money, so I don't think we have to worry too much.
crate
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States2474 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-27 22:46:52
May 27 2010 22:46 GMT
#38
Oh, I lied about not being able to find the posts:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=113363#16

TL got a license to run TSL1/TSL2. This is nothing new.
We did. You did. Yes we can. No. || http://crawl.akrasiac.org/scoring/players/crate.html || twitch.tv/crate3333
Tankbusta
Profile Joined May 2010
United States109 Posts
May 27 2010 22:51 GMT
#39
This is for using Battle.net, correct?

If so, your LAN tournament should be fine since you're not using their service
RifleCow
Profile Joined February 2008
Canada637 Posts
May 27 2010 22:52 GMT
#40
I don't think it will be a smart business decision for blizzard to shut down every LAN it hears about that doesn't have its consent. As far as I can see this will be for major tournaments, so blizzard has some control over other organizations associated with it's name. Obviously like a tournament sponsored by the Pedophilia Association of America will not look good for blizzard. Basically, this just gives them the ability to shut something down that they believe will reflect badly upon them and the game.
hohoho
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
IntoTheTV X SOOP
20:00
Premier - Group A
herO vs Solar
Krystianer vs Percival
IntoTheiNu 1016
WardiTV853
Rex129
CranKy Ducklings71
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko407
Rex 129
LamboSC2 103
Classic 63
Codebar 14
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 2583
Horang2 990
EffOrt 669
Mini 548
Soma 529
Stork 405
Larva 320
Light 300
ggaemo 261
Rush 254
[ Show more ]
Hyuk 236
Snow 208
Killer 151
Zeus 108
Barracks 108
Mind 100
Hyun 76
Leta 72
Pusan 66
Sea.KH 65
sorry 60
Bale 59
Shinee 30
Sexy 30
Creator 28
Trap 28
Shine 27
yabsab 23
Terrorterran 20
Sacsri 14
ProTech1
Britney 0
Dota 2
Gorgc4010
XaKoH 382
qojqva0
Counter-Strike
byalli440
gobbtv116
kRYSTAL_25
Heroes of the Storm
crisheroes426
Trikslyr28
Other Games
singsing2403
B2W.Neo853
hiko845
Pyrionflax251
DeMusliM227
Liquid`VortiX127
RotterdaM88
QueenE30
Fuzer 9
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH279
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP3
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• ChaeLyn 4
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2213
• WagamamaTV400
League of Legends
• Nemesis2009
• TFBlade548
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
9h 59m
The PondCast
19h 59m
Kung Fu Cup
20h 59m
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1d 20h
Reynor vs Zoun
Neeb vs Rogue
FEL
3 days
Patches Events
3 days
FEL
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
[ Show More ]
IntoTheTV X SOOP
6 days
ByuN vs Lambo
MaxPax vs Bunny
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 22
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
IPSL Winter 2026-27
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
Acropolis #5 - GSC
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.