|
On August 17 2009 14:19 .risingdragoon wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2009 14:11 SilverskY wrote:On August 17 2009 14:06 .risingdragoon wrote:
a forward rax is suppose to lift off after it finishes or 1 marine and lift off
if you build more than that it's a proxy Correct me if I'm wrong, but the term proxy and the term forward is defined by the location of the barracks in relation to your base and your opponents, not how many marines you make from it nor when you lift it off... maybe in nonmirrors but not in tvt recently very forward rax has becoming common in tvt for early & sustained scouting purposes, and a proxy is still an early attack
You can build a rax with the intention of it being a forward rax then see a vulnerability and build more marines that doesn't make it a proxy.
|
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
On August 17 2009 14:18 Avidkeystamper wrote:Poll: Who did worse?( Vote): Arisol ( Vote): Jwajwa
JwaJa actually got to make an expansion.
|
Korea (South)3086 Posts
On August 17 2009 14:21 tree.hugger wrote:JwaJa actually got to make an expansion.
Jwaja actually lasted longer than single-digit minutes.
|
after that rape, arisol will never play starcraft again.
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
I dunno, I thought him being down 120 to 35 in supply was pretty bad from Jwaja
|
wow the difference in class is amazing... fantasy defended that early aggression with ease...
|
On August 17 2009 14:22 SilverskY wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2009 14:21 tree.hugger wrote:On August 17 2009 14:18 Avidkeystamper wrote:Poll: Who did worse?( Vote): Arisol ( Vote): Jwajwa JwaJa actually got to make an expansion. Jwaja actually lasted longer than single-digit minutes.
On top of that his name is 350% cooler than arisol.
Jwaja fighting
|
On August 17 2009 14:21 d(O.o)a wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2009 14:19 .risingdragoon wrote:On August 17 2009 14:11 SilverskY wrote:On August 17 2009 14:06 .risingdragoon wrote:
a forward rax is suppose to lift off after it finishes or 1 marine and lift off
if you build more than that it's a proxy Correct me if I'm wrong, but the term proxy and the term forward is defined by the location of the barracks in relation to your base and your opponents, not how many marines you make from it nor when you lift it off... maybe in nonmirrors but not in tvt recently very forward rax has becoming common in tvt for early & sustained scouting purposes, and a proxy is still an early attack You can build a rax with the intention of it being a forward rax then see a vulnerability and build more marines that doesn't make it a proxy.
don't think we're calling about the samething???
I'll call it proxy scouting rax then, cus that's what happened. one guy was scouting the other was proxying
|
Jwaja actually did pretty well in the second game. Until he decided to suicide his entire army into Flash's defenses. This guy just got owned hard.
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
On side note, the number of idiots and people who cannot read on Livestream chats is quite disturbing. Plus, the influx of chinese viewers today was pretty annoying, especially since they kept on getting the chat disabled.
|
On August 17 2009 14:24 .risingdragoon wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2009 14:21 d(O.o)a wrote:On August 17 2009 14:19 .risingdragoon wrote:On August 17 2009 14:11 SilverskY wrote:On August 17 2009 14:06 .risingdragoon wrote:
a forward rax is suppose to lift off after it finishes or 1 marine and lift off
if you build more than that it's a proxy Correct me if I'm wrong, but the term proxy and the term forward is defined by the location of the barracks in relation to your base and your opponents, not how many marines you make from it nor when you lift it off... maybe in nonmirrors but not in tvt recently very forward rax has becoming common in tvt for early & sustained scouting purposes, and a proxy is still an early attack You can build a rax with the intention of it being a forward rax then see a vulnerability and build more marines that doesn't make it a proxy. ???
Player A makes forward rax, sees player B going 14cc, obviously player A is gonna make more than 1 marine
|
I was hoping for an epic set between Yarnc and Sea but according the spoiler results the games were very disappointing. Fantasy vs newguy wasn't expected to be a good set.
How exactly are players picked for WCG qualifiers? Do these no name players go through offline qualifiers or picked out of a hat? If there were more qualifying matches I would think these players who have never played a PL game would not qualify.
|
motbob
United States12546 Posts
On August 17 2009 14:55 BlackMagister wrote:
I was hoping for an epic set between Yarnc and Sea but according the spoiler results the games were very disappointing. Fantasy vs newguy wasn't expected to be a good set.
How exactly are players picked for WCG qualifiers? Do these no name players go through offline qualifiers or picked out of a hat? If there were more qualifying matches I would think these players who have never played a PL game would not qualify.
I think it's
- top 4 last qualifier
- whoever is left from the top of Kespa rank
EDIT: that can't be right since Sea was in the qualifiers...
|
So ArisoL was at the top of the kespa ranking with his zero kespa sanctioned game record before his games vs Fantasy? Do they count no games played as a 100% win rate?
|
motbob
United States12546 Posts
On August 17 2009 16:39 BlackMagister wrote:
So ArisoL was at the top of the kespa ranking with his zero kespa sanctioned game record before his games vs Fantasy? Do they count no games played as a 100% win rate?
Oh, they had amateur qualifiers as well for 4 slots.
|
On August 17 2009 14:55 BlackMagister wrote:
I was hoping for an epic set between Yarnc and Sea but according the spoiler results the games were very disappointing. Fantasy vs newguy wasn't expected to be a good set.
How exactly are players picked for WCG qualifiers? Do these no name players go through offline qualifiers or picked out of a hat? If there were more qualifying matches I would think these players who have never played a PL game would not qualify.
KESPA 1-2 (Bisu, Jaedong), Luxury (defending wcg world champion), and Stork(wcg world runner up all get bye weeks
KESPA 3-6 (Flash, Leta, Fantasy, Jangbi) all get to play amatuer qualifiers
KESPA 7-24 have to play other players ranked 7-24.
This results in a ro16 bracket where bo3 series single elimination will decide who gets to move on.
|
Ok, when was Sea's last good game?
Feels like his play has been crap for quite some time.
|
Belgium9947 Posts
Sea 
|
On August 17 2009 14:22 SilverskY wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2009 14:21 tree.hugger wrote:On August 17 2009 14:18 Avidkeystamper wrote:Poll: Who did worse?( Vote): Arisol ( Vote): Jwajwa JwaJa actually got to make an expansion. Jwaja actually lasted longer than single-digit minutes.
god thats so pathetic that arisol failed proxyed 2 games
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
