• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:06
CET 13:06
KST 21:06
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT29Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book19Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
Blizzard Classic Cup - Tastosis announced as captains3Weekly Cups (March 2-8): ByuN overcomes PvT block4GSL CK - New online series15BSL Season 224Vitality ends partnership with ONSYDE20
StarCraft 2
General
GSL CK - New online series Weekly Cups (March 2-8): ByuN overcomes PvT block Blizzard Classic Cup - Tastosis announced as captains Weekly Cups (Feb 23-Mar 1): herO doubles, 2v2 bonanza Vitality ends partnership with ONSYDE
Tourneys
[GSL CK] Team Maru vs. Team herO Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026] Map Editor closed ?
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 516 Specter of Death Mutation # 515 Together Forever Mutation # 514 Ulnar New Year
Brood War
General
ASL21 General Discussion Recent recommended BW games BSL 22 Map Contest — Submissions OPEN to March 10 BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BSL Season 22
Tourneys
IPSL Spring 2026 is here! ASL Season 21 Qualifiers March 7-8 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues BWCL Season 64 Announcement
Strategy
Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Zealot bombing is no longer popular?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread PC Games Sales Thread Path of Exile No Man's Sky (PS4 and PC) Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Mexico's Drug War Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion General nutrition recommendations Cricket [SPORT] TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Laptop capable of using Photoshop Lightroom?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
Gaming-Related Deaths
TrAiDoS
Unintentional protectionism…
Uldridge
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2737 users

[ASL2] Ro16 Day 4 - Page 33

Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments
Post a Reply
Prev 1 31 32 33 All
doubleupgradeobbies!
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Australia1205 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-01-02 17:05:07
January 02 2017 17:00 GMT
#641
On January 03 2017 00:58 Letmelose wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 03 2017 00:12 doubleupgradeobbies! wrote:
On January 02 2017 23:09 Letmelose wrote:
Bisu's contribution to the match-up of PvZ, while enormous, isn't as large as his contributions in terms of the creation of new build orders. I already discussed this particular topic with another poster, so I won't bother repeating myself. Like I said before, I think saying Bisu was the totality of all PvZ meta-game advancements is a fabrication created by the mythical status of his upset against sAviOr.


Just to clarify, I'm not summarising 'the entirety of the PvZ meta' as just the advent of the Bisu build. Obviously that was one big contribution that he pioneered after Daezang, and they've been a staple of PvZ ever since.

But even thereafter, he has been the one pioneering pretty much every minor variation and timing of these. When Bisu was briefly irrelevant to the matchup, the entire collective of other protoss came up with builds like the dragoon bust. While these are innovations, they are not exactly stable platforms from which to play a standard game of PvZ. I don't think it's really that unfair to say that for basically the entirety of his professional career he has been the standard by which the PvZ metagame has been defined. Others may have 'invented' builds/variations/whatever, but it's difficult to pioneer a build if you aren't actually good enough in the PvZ matchup to beat the top zergs with it consistently.

As for the rest of that, I pretty much agree. I'm simply not equating how good someone is in a matchup to being better than everyone else at the matchup.

I completely agree BeSt's understanding of certain parts of the matchup were better. But it's not like Jangbi's were bad (I mean i don't know, I have no information on whether he even optimises his own variations on build orders). But the fact that Jangbi maybe be bested on aspects of PvT by other players, doesn't take away from how good his PvT was.

It is consistent with my very original point. Jangbi's PvT is at times really really good, sometimes the best. But top protosses are much better against terran than they are against zerg. Even being the best, you are going to have more competition in every aspect of PvT. And that he should be BeSted (pun intended :p) in some aspects, doesn't make his PvT less good, it just means other people also have really good PvT.


I don't think I've had such a lasting back and forth of opinions in a while. I think we've established pretty much all our opinions on Bisu and the protoss race in general. However, I'll add one more point of contention.

You can't credit Bisu for being the totality of all meta-game advancements just because he had the most success with it, and became the standard for the success or failure for any evolutions that happened during his career, If that's the case whoever's the best player at the time becomes responsible for any changes in the meta-game as long as he utilizes it to reasonable success.

That's like saying Flash is the totality of the late-game mech meta-game shift despite the fact that FanTaSy created the build by himself during practice, and first implemented it on a televised setting, just because Flash won more games with it, and used it to greater success than any other player. There's value of having success with implementing a certain strategy, and adding fine refinements to it, and another value of creating its idea in the first place. You can't just mix the two, and pretend that the amount of success a player has with a certain innovation gets the right to all the credit of the meta-game change that takes place exactly due to that innovation.


I'm not saying you have to be the most successful with an idea, to get the credit. But you do have to have SOME success with it.

I mean, if you invent a build, go out and never win with it, or win just 1 game out of many attempts, how much credit can you really get? You did invent the build, so some... but if someone sees the build and decides they like it, and then proceeds to actually beat a bunch of high tier players with it. Then yeah, i'm going to give the latter person more credit.

For our example if Fantasy, invented, then proceeded to use his build to good effect taking down a few top players before Flash caught on. Then it wouldn't matter how successful Flash is with it, that's not pioneering a build, that's just using it. Flash could get some credit if he made minor variations on it to great affect, because that is his input, but in this case Fantasy would still get alot of the credit.

For Bisu's input to PvZ, I may have missed alot, but other than a bunch of fairly all-in timing attacks (which were then never built on, as they arn't stable ways to play the matchup), I really can't think of anything much other protosses have done.

It may all these variations on 'Neo Bisu' builds may not be his invention (at least i can't say for a fact that they are), and having not watched every PvZ of that era, I can't say with certainty that other's haven't invented builds that Bisu has then used. But I can't recall any instances of anyone else stringing together a few noteworthy games with new builds/variations in that matchup.

From what I can see, the evolution of the meta has gone from:

Pre-Bisu builds (I'm just going to start from his career, I don't know the pre-Bisu PvZ meta that well)

Bisu build and it's many variations.

Protoss floundering in the Matchup in general, Kal is touted by some as the 'best PvZ player', Movie busts some Zerg simcities with dragoons.

Protoss continue floundering in the matchup. And everyone just sucks at it, they still use older Bisu build variations, but they don't really work.

Neo-Bisu builds

Now.

MSL, 2003-2011, RIP. OSL, 2000-2012, RIP. Proleague, 2003-2012, RIP. And then there was none... Even good things must come to an end.
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
January 02 2017 18:17 GMT
#642
On January 03 2017 02:00 doubleupgradeobbies! wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 03 2017 00:58 Letmelose wrote:
On January 03 2017 00:12 doubleupgradeobbies! wrote:
On January 02 2017 23:09 Letmelose wrote:
Bisu's contribution to the match-up of PvZ, while enormous, isn't as large as his contributions in terms of the creation of new build orders. I already discussed this particular topic with another poster, so I won't bother repeating myself. Like I said before, I think saying Bisu was the totality of all PvZ meta-game advancements is a fabrication created by the mythical status of his upset against sAviOr.


Just to clarify, I'm not summarising 'the entirety of the PvZ meta' as just the advent of the Bisu build. Obviously that was one big contribution that he pioneered after Daezang, and they've been a staple of PvZ ever since.

But even thereafter, he has been the one pioneering pretty much every minor variation and timing of these. When Bisu was briefly irrelevant to the matchup, the entire collective of other protoss came up with builds like the dragoon bust. While these are innovations, they are not exactly stable platforms from which to play a standard game of PvZ. I don't think it's really that unfair to say that for basically the entirety of his professional career he has been the standard by which the PvZ metagame has been defined. Others may have 'invented' builds/variations/whatever, but it's difficult to pioneer a build if you aren't actually good enough in the PvZ matchup to beat the top zergs with it consistently.

As for the rest of that, I pretty much agree. I'm simply not equating how good someone is in a matchup to being better than everyone else at the matchup.

I completely agree BeSt's understanding of certain parts of the matchup were better. But it's not like Jangbi's were bad (I mean i don't know, I have no information on whether he even optimises his own variations on build orders). But the fact that Jangbi maybe be bested on aspects of PvT by other players, doesn't take away from how good his PvT was.

It is consistent with my very original point. Jangbi's PvT is at times really really good, sometimes the best. But top protosses are much better against terran than they are against zerg. Even being the best, you are going to have more competition in every aspect of PvT. And that he should be BeSted (pun intended :p) in some aspects, doesn't make his PvT less good, it just means other people also have really good PvT.


I don't think I've had such a lasting back and forth of opinions in a while. I think we've established pretty much all our opinions on Bisu and the protoss race in general. However, I'll add one more point of contention.

You can't credit Bisu for being the totality of all meta-game advancements just because he had the most success with it, and became the standard for the success or failure for any evolutions that happened during his career, If that's the case whoever's the best player at the time becomes responsible for any changes in the meta-game as long as he utilizes it to reasonable success.

That's like saying Flash is the totality of the late-game mech meta-game shift despite the fact that FanTaSy created the build by himself during practice, and first implemented it on a televised setting, just because Flash won more games with it, and used it to greater success than any other player. There's value of having success with implementing a certain strategy, and adding fine refinements to it, and another value of creating its idea in the first place. You can't just mix the two, and pretend that the amount of success a player has with a certain innovation gets the right to all the credit of the meta-game change that takes place exactly due to that innovation.


I'm not saying you have to be the most successful with an idea, to get the credit. But you do have to have SOME success with it.

I mean, if you invent a build, go out and never win with it, or win just 1 game out of many attempts, how much credit can you really get? You did invent the build, so some... but if someone sees the build and decides they like it, and then proceeds to actually beat a bunch of high tier players with it. Then yeah, i'm going to give the latter person more credit.

For our example if Fantasy, invented, then proceeded to use his build to good effect taking down a few top players before Flash caught on. Then it wouldn't matter how successful Flash is with it, that's not pioneering a build, that's just using it. Flash could get some credit if he made minor variations on it to great affect, because that is his input, but in this case Fantasy would still get alot of the credit.

For Bisu's input to PvZ, I may have missed alot, but other than a bunch of fairly all-in timing attacks (which were then never built on, as they arn't stable ways to play the matchup), I really can't think of anything much other protosses have done.

It may all these variations on 'Neo Bisu' builds may not be his invention (at least i can't say for a fact that they are), and having not watched every PvZ of that era, I can't say with certainty that other's haven't invented builds that Bisu has then used. But I can't recall any instances of anyone else stringing together a few noteworthy games with new builds/variations in that matchup.

From what I can see, the evolution of the meta has gone from:

Pre-Bisu builds (I'm just going to start from his career, I don't know the pre-Bisu PvZ meta that well)

Bisu build and it's many variations.

Protoss floundering in the Matchup in general, Kal is touted by some as the 'best PvZ player', Movie busts some Zerg simcities with dragoons.

Protoss continue floundering in the matchup. And everyone just sucks at it, they still use older Bisu build variations, but they don't really work.

Neo-Bisu builds

Now.



I think the main issue with your characterization of the PvZ metagame is specifically the lack of knowledge of "Pre-Bisu" builds. This categorization is, honestly, much too broad, and it discredits the inventions which led up to the "Bisu build." The "Bisu Build" really was the accumulation of many builds which other protosses created, like the Forge FE + Building placements done by Nal-Ra, Sair/Reaver by Nal-Ra, the Sair/DT done by Daezang, etc. which LetMeLose showed before.

Arguably, the Forge FE which is the standard way to start off PvZ, followed by the Gate FE (which I don't remember who first used this build) are the more everlasting and stable ways to play PvZ. This was created in the Pre-Bisu era by Nal-Ra, so to say all protosses did was come up with "timing attacks" before Bisu just seems too... dismissive.
darkness overpowering
doubleupgradeobbies!
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Australia1205 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-01-02 18:35:05
January 02 2017 18:30 GMT
#643
Well my original statement was that Bisu has basically been the entire PvZ metagame for his whole career. While obviously pre-bisu builds is a very long and important phase, it is also before the period I was discussing. Since the start of Bisu's career and the start of the Bisu build have been virtually the same time.

I wasn't dismissing everyone's contribution before him as all ins, but rather everyone else's, to the best of my knowledge, AFTER his career started.

I have to be honest, I do know somewhat of the very long phase of 1 base builds, and a general outline of how all the components of the Bisu build came about, but I didn't know enough to put it in an ordered timeline, and I didn't want to do research to fill in the gaps because it wasn't relevant to the timeframe in question.
MSL, 2003-2011, RIP. OSL, 2000-2012, RIP. Proleague, 2003-2012, RIP. And then there was none... Even good things must come to an end.
Letmelose
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
Korea (South)3227 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-01-02 18:55:44
January 02 2017 18:38 GMT
#644
On January 03 2017 02:00 doubleupgradeobbies! wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 03 2017 00:58 Letmelose wrote:
On January 03 2017 00:12 doubleupgradeobbies! wrote:
On January 02 2017 23:09 Letmelose wrote:
Bisu's contribution to the match-up of PvZ, while enormous, isn't as large as his contributions in terms of the creation of new build orders. I already discussed this particular topic with another poster, so I won't bother repeating myself. Like I said before, I think saying Bisu was the totality of all PvZ meta-game advancements is a fabrication created by the mythical status of his upset against sAviOr.


Just to clarify, I'm not summarising 'the entirety of the PvZ meta' as just the advent of the Bisu build. Obviously that was one big contribution that he pioneered after Daezang, and they've been a staple of PvZ ever since.

But even thereafter, he has been the one pioneering pretty much every minor variation and timing of these. When Bisu was briefly irrelevant to the matchup, the entire collective of other protoss came up with builds like the dragoon bust. While these are innovations, they are not exactly stable platforms from which to play a standard game of PvZ. I don't think it's really that unfair to say that for basically the entirety of his professional career he has been the standard by which the PvZ metagame has been defined. Others may have 'invented' builds/variations/whatever, but it's difficult to pioneer a build if you aren't actually good enough in the PvZ matchup to beat the top zergs with it consistently.

As for the rest of that, I pretty much agree. I'm simply not equating how good someone is in a matchup to being better than everyone else at the matchup.

I completely agree BeSt's understanding of certain parts of the matchup were better. But it's not like Jangbi's were bad (I mean i don't know, I have no information on whether he even optimises his own variations on build orders). But the fact that Jangbi maybe be bested on aspects of PvT by other players, doesn't take away from how good his PvT was.

It is consistent with my very original point. Jangbi's PvT is at times really really good, sometimes the best. But top protosses are much better against terran than they are against zerg. Even being the best, you are going to have more competition in every aspect of PvT. And that he should be BeSted (pun intended :p) in some aspects, doesn't make his PvT less good, it just means other people also have really good PvT.


I don't think I've had such a lasting back and forth of opinions in a while. I think we've established pretty much all our opinions on Bisu and the protoss race in general. However, I'll add one more point of contention.

You can't credit Bisu for being the totality of all meta-game advancements just because he had the most success with it, and became the standard for the success or failure for any evolutions that happened during his career, If that's the case whoever's the best player at the time becomes responsible for any changes in the meta-game as long as he utilizes it to reasonable success.

That's like saying Flash is the totality of the late-game mech meta-game shift despite the fact that FanTaSy created the build by himself during practice, and first implemented it on a televised setting, just because Flash won more games with it, and used it to greater success than any other player. There's value of having success with implementing a certain strategy, and adding fine refinements to it, and another value of creating its idea in the first place. You can't just mix the two, and pretend that the amount of success a player has with a certain innovation gets the right to all the credit of the meta-game change that takes place exactly due to that innovation.


I'm not saying you have to be the most successful with an idea, to get the credit. But you do have to have SOME success with it.

I mean, if you invent a build, go out and never win with it, or win just 1 game out of many attempts, how much credit can you really get? You did invent the build, so some... but if someone sees the build and decides they like it, and then proceeds to actually beat a bunch of high tier players with it. Then yeah, i'm going to give the latter person more credit.

For our example if Fantasy, invented, then proceeded to use his build to good effect taking down a few top players before Flash caught on. Then it wouldn't matter how successful Flash is with it, that's not pioneering a build, that's just using it. Flash could get some credit if he made minor variations on it to great affect, because that is his input, but in this case Fantasy would still get alot of the credit.

For Bisu's input to PvZ, I may have missed alot, but other than a bunch of fairly all-in timing attacks (which were then never built on, as they arn't stable ways to play the matchup), I really can't think of anything much other protosses have done.

It may all these variations on 'Neo Bisu' builds may not be his invention (at least i can't say for a fact that they are), and having not watched every PvZ of that era, I can't say with certainty that other's haven't invented builds that Bisu has then used. But I can't recall any instances of anyone else stringing together a few noteworthy games with new builds/variations in that matchup.

From what I can see, the evolution of the meta has gone from:

Pre-Bisu builds (I'm just going to start from his career, I don't know the pre-Bisu PvZ meta that well)

Bisu build and it's many variations.

Protoss floundering in the Matchup in general, Kal is touted by some as the 'best PvZ player', Movie busts some Zerg simcities with dragoons.

Protoss continue floundering in the matchup. And everyone just sucks at it, they still use older Bisu build variations, but they don't really work.

Neo-Bisu builds

Now.



So you mention the Bisu build, which is a build first utilized by Daezang. Read this post (you'll see that Bisu himself seems to be affected by Daezang's build, because he was going for Citadel of Adun before the games played by Daezang, and going for Stargate first builds only after Daezang utilizes his build to great success against multiple zergs in the ProLeague, and MBC Survivor Tournament)

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/bw-tournaments/517651-asl-ro16-day-4?page=29#564

The Neo Bisu build, which uses zealots instead of dark templars has indeed been optimized by Bisu, but to say that he was the totality of the entire evolution of the match-up, when TerAtO, PuSan were doing various variations of the "Bisu build" in 2005~2006 before it was truly optimized to great success by Daezang on Blitz, is like saying Jaedong was responsible for the invention of the three hachery lair into five hatchery build because he had by far the most success with it as well as being one of the first to use it.

http://blog.naver.com/chldlfdnd123/100207595478

http://blog.naver.com/oroper/70139896008

Forge expansion was a thing before Bisu came round. Forge expansion into Stargate was a thing before Bisu came round. Daezang optimized the build by being able to pressure the zerg early on with both corsairs and dark templars, which reduced the need for mass cannons, and allowed for a faster explosion of gateways. This is the core concept of the Bisu build. Bisu used the build first shown by Daezang to great success, then added his own flavour to it throughout the years by implementing and optimizing certain details that were shown before years ago (corsairs into speedlot pressure was not a new concept), with the core concept of map control through corsairs, and pressuring the zerg as much as possible being prevalent idea. That core idea was initially first used to great success by Daezang, which is why Bisu's claim of being the totality of the entire modern meta-game taking away Daezang's main (and probably only) claim to fame. It's a robbery.

Sure, Bisu was always on the fore-front of the evolution since he rose to fame, but the initial seeds that revolutionized the match-ups were the fruits of the innovations of numerous protoss players, with Daezang being the most obvious candidate for the title of the creator for the Bisu build.
TL+ Member
doubleupgradeobbies!
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Australia1205 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-01-02 19:06:10
January 02 2017 18:40 GMT
#645
Same reply, I'm not dismissing anything before the Bisu build, he obviously had no affect on the PvZ meta before he started playing professionally. Keywords 'for his whole career'.

Also wanted to add, I think you are trying to attribute to me the equating of bringing about the Bisu build as being the be all and end of of PvZ, modern or otherwise. That's not what I've been saying.

In fact, in my very original post, I said to the effect that Bisu build isn't the solution to PvZ, Bisu is.

It's not 'now that we have the Bisu build, he has solved PvZ forever, horray and rejoice'. Quite the opposite. PvZ has still sucked for the majority of protoss, during and after Bisu's career. Yes the build is standardised now, but it's really just been Bisu going out there winning PvZs, it was still pretty terrible for protoss as a whole, Bisu build or not.

It's been more of a case of 'he's the only guy actually doing well in the matchup, lets just do what he does'
MSL, 2003-2011, RIP. OSL, 2000-2012, RIP. Proleague, 2003-2012, RIP. And then there was none... Even good things must come to an end.
Letmelose
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
Korea (South)3227 Posts
January 03 2017 04:17 GMT
#646
On January 03 2017 03:40 doubleupgradeobbies! wrote:
Same reply, I'm not dismissing anything before the Bisu build, he obviously had no affect on the PvZ meta before he started playing professionally. Keywords 'for his whole career'.

Also wanted to add, I think you are trying to attribute to me the equating of bringing about the Bisu build as being the be all and end of of PvZ, modern or otherwise. That's not what I've been saying.

In fact, in my very original post, I said to the effect that Bisu build isn't the solution to PvZ, Bisu is.

It's not 'now that we have the Bisu build, he has solved PvZ forever, horray and rejoice'. Quite the opposite. PvZ has still sucked for the majority of protoss, during and after Bisu's career. Yes the build is standardised now, but it's really just been Bisu going out there winning PvZs, it was still pretty terrible for protoss as a whole, Bisu build or not.

It's been more of a case of 'he's the only guy actually doing well in the matchup, lets just do what he does'


Totally agreed. I just got confused with some of the wording, it's true, Bisu's innovations, while not necessarily the most ground breaking changes that everybody else could then implement for automatic easy games, had subtle nuances that only he could fully utilize to full potential.

Peak ELO, while an incredibly biased for the modern era due to the massive influx of ProLeague games, and increased implementation of best of five series even in the lower rounds such as the round of eight of the MSL, is not that bad a measure of a player's peak performance during the modern era (where all the players benefited from the inflation of the number of games, starting from the 2008/2009 Season).

Highest PvT peak ELO: JangBi (2260)
2nd highest PvT peak ELO: Stork (2259)

Highest PvP peak ELO: Bisu (2267)
2nd highest PvP peak ELO: BeSt (2252)

Highest PvZ peak ELO: Bisu (2327)
2nd highest PvZ peak ELO (in the modern era only, Nal_rA's era came before the massive inflation of the ProLeague schedule): Stork (2209)

The only other match-up that had such massive difference of peak ELO ratings between players of the modern era was Jaedong's ZvZ (2341) to sAviOr's ZvZ (2219), or EffOrt's ZvZ (2213), if you think sAviOr's peak was too heavily influenced by the numbers from his old records. That was how further ahead of the rest of the field Bisu's PvZ was. Even Flash failed to create such massive chasms of peak ELO ratings confined to a specific match-up, although his numbers are all off the walls as well, the massive difference between Bisu's PvZ and other modern day protoss player's PvZ was almost unparalleled.
TL+ Member
SuGo
Profile Joined March 2013
United States681 Posts
January 05 2017 12:36 GMT
#647
Does anyone have specific insight on map selection process for ASL?
Prev 1 31 32 33 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Team League
12:00
Group A
WardiTV158
TKL 109
Liquipedia
GSL
10:00
GSL CK - Day 1
CranKy Ducklings SOOP103
herO (Afreeca)37
Rex31
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko199
ProTech125
TKL 109
herO (Afreeca) 37
Rex 31
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 18345
Bisu 1640
Jaedong 1390
Shuttle 1064
Mini 362
EffOrt 298
Stork 250
Last 196
Soma 187
Rush 180
[ Show more ]
Leta 160
Light 157
JYJ 120
Snow 112
ZerO 111
hero 110
Mong 107
Pusan 107
ggaemo 86
Hyun 77
firebathero 66
Mind 66
ToSsGirL 60
Sharp 60
Backho 39
sSak 31
Noble 30
soO 28
sorry 20
Nal_rA 19
GoRush 12
SilentControl 8
Dota 2
Gorgc2033
XaKoH 433
canceldota57
Counter-Strike
byalli2191
olofmeister1491
shoxiejesuss854
x6flipin288
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King84
Other Games
singsing1364
B2W.Neo1024
Fuzer 211
Pyrionflax192
crisheroes135
KnowMe95
ToD88
hiko26
ZerO(Twitch)10
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream12371
Other Games
gamesdonequick944
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 13
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH296
• 3DClanTV 10
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2271
• Stunt868
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
21h 54m
WardiTV Team League
23h 54m
Replay Cast
1d 11h
Replay Cast
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
WardiTV Team League
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
BSL
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
WardiTV Team League
3 days
BSL
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
5 days
WardiTV Team League
5 days
GSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Spring Cup 2026
WardiTV Winter 2026
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
BSL Season 22
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

CSL Elite League 2026
ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
CSLAN 4
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
NationLESS Cup
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.