• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:00
CEST 21:00
KST 04:00
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 244ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3
Community News
Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)8Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over2New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!40Weekly Cups (August 17-23): Zerg dominate the week6Weekly Cups (August 10-16): SHIN doubles5
StarCraft 2
General
SC4ALL: II Winner Will Earn a Spot at HSC 30! Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) September World Ranking: herO leads, Serral climbs Weekly Cups (August 10-16): SHIN doubles
Tourneys
IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly SC2 INu's Battles#20 [BO.9] 2026 GSTL Announcement Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August)
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 541 Binary Choice The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 540 Dodge This Mutation # 539 Thunder Dome
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion XUN appreciation thread ASL22 General Discussion Making an Online Broodwar Manager Game
Tourneys
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues BSL LAN Party - Kraków 29-30 August - OPEN SIGNUPS [ASL22] Ro24 Group F
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Game Theory for Starcraft Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Diablo IV EVE Corporation Nintendo Switch Thread [Maplestory Hardcore] Let's Play~!! General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Regacy Esports: The Bh…
regacyesports
Violent Games and Crime Rate…
TrAiDoS
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Cathedral Of CS And NY pizza a…
FuDDx
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6799 users

[ASL2] Ro16 Day 4 - Page 33

Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments
Post a Reply
Prev 1 31 32 33 All
doubleupgradeobbies!
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Australia1353 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-01-02 17:05:07
January 02 2017 17:00 GMT
#641
On January 03 2017 00:58 Letmelose wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 03 2017 00:12 doubleupgradeobbies! wrote:
On January 02 2017 23:09 Letmelose wrote:
Bisu's contribution to the match-up of PvZ, while enormous, isn't as large as his contributions in terms of the creation of new build orders. I already discussed this particular topic with another poster, so I won't bother repeating myself. Like I said before, I think saying Bisu was the totality of all PvZ meta-game advancements is a fabrication created by the mythical status of his upset against sAviOr.


Just to clarify, I'm not summarising 'the entirety of the PvZ meta' as just the advent of the Bisu build. Obviously that was one big contribution that he pioneered after Daezang, and they've been a staple of PvZ ever since.

But even thereafter, he has been the one pioneering pretty much every minor variation and timing of these. When Bisu was briefly irrelevant to the matchup, the entire collective of other protoss came up with builds like the dragoon bust. While these are innovations, they are not exactly stable platforms from which to play a standard game of PvZ. I don't think it's really that unfair to say that for basically the entirety of his professional career he has been the standard by which the PvZ metagame has been defined. Others may have 'invented' builds/variations/whatever, but it's difficult to pioneer a build if you aren't actually good enough in the PvZ matchup to beat the top zergs with it consistently.

As for the rest of that, I pretty much agree. I'm simply not equating how good someone is in a matchup to being better than everyone else at the matchup.

I completely agree BeSt's understanding of certain parts of the matchup were better. But it's not like Jangbi's were bad (I mean i don't know, I have no information on whether he even optimises his own variations on build orders). But the fact that Jangbi maybe be bested on aspects of PvT by other players, doesn't take away from how good his PvT was.

It is consistent with my very original point. Jangbi's PvT is at times really really good, sometimes the best. But top protosses are much better against terran than they are against zerg. Even being the best, you are going to have more competition in every aspect of PvT. And that he should be BeSted (pun intended :p) in some aspects, doesn't make his PvT less good, it just means other people also have really good PvT.


I don't think I've had such a lasting back and forth of opinions in a while. I think we've established pretty much all our opinions on Bisu and the protoss race in general. However, I'll add one more point of contention.

You can't credit Bisu for being the totality of all meta-game advancements just because he had the most success with it, and became the standard for the success or failure for any evolutions that happened during his career, If that's the case whoever's the best player at the time becomes responsible for any changes in the meta-game as long as he utilizes it to reasonable success.

That's like saying Flash is the totality of the late-game mech meta-game shift despite the fact that FanTaSy created the build by himself during practice, and first implemented it on a televised setting, just because Flash won more games with it, and used it to greater success than any other player. There's value of having success with implementing a certain strategy, and adding fine refinements to it, and another value of creating its idea in the first place. You can't just mix the two, and pretend that the amount of success a player has with a certain innovation gets the right to all the credit of the meta-game change that takes place exactly due to that innovation.


I'm not saying you have to be the most successful with an idea, to get the credit. But you do have to have SOME success with it.

I mean, if you invent a build, go out and never win with it, or win just 1 game out of many attempts, how much credit can you really get? You did invent the build, so some... but if someone sees the build and decides they like it, and then proceeds to actually beat a bunch of high tier players with it. Then yeah, i'm going to give the latter person more credit.

For our example if Fantasy, invented, then proceeded to use his build to good effect taking down a few top players before Flash caught on. Then it wouldn't matter how successful Flash is with it, that's not pioneering a build, that's just using it. Flash could get some credit if he made minor variations on it to great affect, because that is his input, but in this case Fantasy would still get alot of the credit.

For Bisu's input to PvZ, I may have missed alot, but other than a bunch of fairly all-in timing attacks (which were then never built on, as they arn't stable ways to play the matchup), I really can't think of anything much other protosses have done.

It may all these variations on 'Neo Bisu' builds may not be his invention (at least i can't say for a fact that they are), and having not watched every PvZ of that era, I can't say with certainty that other's haven't invented builds that Bisu has then used. But I can't recall any instances of anyone else stringing together a few noteworthy games with new builds/variations in that matchup.

From what I can see, the evolution of the meta has gone from:

Pre-Bisu builds (I'm just going to start from his career, I don't know the pre-Bisu PvZ meta that well)

Bisu build and it's many variations.

Protoss floundering in the Matchup in general, Kal is touted by some as the 'best PvZ player', Movie busts some Zerg simcities with dragoons.

Protoss continue floundering in the matchup. And everyone just sucks at it, they still use older Bisu build variations, but they don't really work.

Neo-Bisu builds

Now.

MSL, 2003-2011, RIP. OSL, 2000-2012, RIP. Proleague, 2003-2012, RIP. And then there was none... Even good things must come to an end.
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
January 02 2017 18:17 GMT
#642
On January 03 2017 02:00 doubleupgradeobbies! wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 03 2017 00:58 Letmelose wrote:
On January 03 2017 00:12 doubleupgradeobbies! wrote:
On January 02 2017 23:09 Letmelose wrote:
Bisu's contribution to the match-up of PvZ, while enormous, isn't as large as his contributions in terms of the creation of new build orders. I already discussed this particular topic with another poster, so I won't bother repeating myself. Like I said before, I think saying Bisu was the totality of all PvZ meta-game advancements is a fabrication created by the mythical status of his upset against sAviOr.


Just to clarify, I'm not summarising 'the entirety of the PvZ meta' as just the advent of the Bisu build. Obviously that was one big contribution that he pioneered after Daezang, and they've been a staple of PvZ ever since.

But even thereafter, he has been the one pioneering pretty much every minor variation and timing of these. When Bisu was briefly irrelevant to the matchup, the entire collective of other protoss came up with builds like the dragoon bust. While these are innovations, they are not exactly stable platforms from which to play a standard game of PvZ. I don't think it's really that unfair to say that for basically the entirety of his professional career he has been the standard by which the PvZ metagame has been defined. Others may have 'invented' builds/variations/whatever, but it's difficult to pioneer a build if you aren't actually good enough in the PvZ matchup to beat the top zergs with it consistently.

As for the rest of that, I pretty much agree. I'm simply not equating how good someone is in a matchup to being better than everyone else at the matchup.

I completely agree BeSt's understanding of certain parts of the matchup were better. But it's not like Jangbi's were bad (I mean i don't know, I have no information on whether he even optimises his own variations on build orders). But the fact that Jangbi maybe be bested on aspects of PvT by other players, doesn't take away from how good his PvT was.

It is consistent with my very original point. Jangbi's PvT is at times really really good, sometimes the best. But top protosses are much better against terran than they are against zerg. Even being the best, you are going to have more competition in every aspect of PvT. And that he should be BeSted (pun intended :p) in some aspects, doesn't make his PvT less good, it just means other people also have really good PvT.


I don't think I've had such a lasting back and forth of opinions in a while. I think we've established pretty much all our opinions on Bisu and the protoss race in general. However, I'll add one more point of contention.

You can't credit Bisu for being the totality of all meta-game advancements just because he had the most success with it, and became the standard for the success or failure for any evolutions that happened during his career, If that's the case whoever's the best player at the time becomes responsible for any changes in the meta-game as long as he utilizes it to reasonable success.

That's like saying Flash is the totality of the late-game mech meta-game shift despite the fact that FanTaSy created the build by himself during practice, and first implemented it on a televised setting, just because Flash won more games with it, and used it to greater success than any other player. There's value of having success with implementing a certain strategy, and adding fine refinements to it, and another value of creating its idea in the first place. You can't just mix the two, and pretend that the amount of success a player has with a certain innovation gets the right to all the credit of the meta-game change that takes place exactly due to that innovation.


I'm not saying you have to be the most successful with an idea, to get the credit. But you do have to have SOME success with it.

I mean, if you invent a build, go out and never win with it, or win just 1 game out of many attempts, how much credit can you really get? You did invent the build, so some... but if someone sees the build and decides they like it, and then proceeds to actually beat a bunch of high tier players with it. Then yeah, i'm going to give the latter person more credit.

For our example if Fantasy, invented, then proceeded to use his build to good effect taking down a few top players before Flash caught on. Then it wouldn't matter how successful Flash is with it, that's not pioneering a build, that's just using it. Flash could get some credit if he made minor variations on it to great affect, because that is his input, but in this case Fantasy would still get alot of the credit.

For Bisu's input to PvZ, I may have missed alot, but other than a bunch of fairly all-in timing attacks (which were then never built on, as they arn't stable ways to play the matchup), I really can't think of anything much other protosses have done.

It may all these variations on 'Neo Bisu' builds may not be his invention (at least i can't say for a fact that they are), and having not watched every PvZ of that era, I can't say with certainty that other's haven't invented builds that Bisu has then used. But I can't recall any instances of anyone else stringing together a few noteworthy games with new builds/variations in that matchup.

From what I can see, the evolution of the meta has gone from:

Pre-Bisu builds (I'm just going to start from his career, I don't know the pre-Bisu PvZ meta that well)

Bisu build and it's many variations.

Protoss floundering in the Matchup in general, Kal is touted by some as the 'best PvZ player', Movie busts some Zerg simcities with dragoons.

Protoss continue floundering in the matchup. And everyone just sucks at it, they still use older Bisu build variations, but they don't really work.

Neo-Bisu builds

Now.



I think the main issue with your characterization of the PvZ metagame is specifically the lack of knowledge of "Pre-Bisu" builds. This categorization is, honestly, much too broad, and it discredits the inventions which led up to the "Bisu build." The "Bisu Build" really was the accumulation of many builds which other protosses created, like the Forge FE + Building placements done by Nal-Ra, Sair/Reaver by Nal-Ra, the Sair/DT done by Daezang, etc. which LetMeLose showed before.

Arguably, the Forge FE which is the standard way to start off PvZ, followed by the Gate FE (which I don't remember who first used this build) are the more everlasting and stable ways to play PvZ. This was created in the Pre-Bisu era by Nal-Ra, so to say all protosses did was come up with "timing attacks" before Bisu just seems too... dismissive.
darkness overpowering
doubleupgradeobbies!
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Australia1353 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-01-02 18:35:05
January 02 2017 18:30 GMT
#643
Well my original statement was that Bisu has basically been the entire PvZ metagame for his whole career. While obviously pre-bisu builds is a very long and important phase, it is also before the period I was discussing. Since the start of Bisu's career and the start of the Bisu build have been virtually the same time.

I wasn't dismissing everyone's contribution before him as all ins, but rather everyone else's, to the best of my knowledge, AFTER his career started.

I have to be honest, I do know somewhat of the very long phase of 1 base builds, and a general outline of how all the components of the Bisu build came about, but I didn't know enough to put it in an ordered timeline, and I didn't want to do research to fill in the gaps because it wasn't relevant to the timeframe in question.
MSL, 2003-2011, RIP. OSL, 2000-2012, RIP. Proleague, 2003-2012, RIP. And then there was none... Even good things must come to an end.
Letmelose
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
Korea (South)3227 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-01-02 18:55:44
January 02 2017 18:38 GMT
#644
On January 03 2017 02:00 doubleupgradeobbies! wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 03 2017 00:58 Letmelose wrote:
On January 03 2017 00:12 doubleupgradeobbies! wrote:
On January 02 2017 23:09 Letmelose wrote:
Bisu's contribution to the match-up of PvZ, while enormous, isn't as large as his contributions in terms of the creation of new build orders. I already discussed this particular topic with another poster, so I won't bother repeating myself. Like I said before, I think saying Bisu was the totality of all PvZ meta-game advancements is a fabrication created by the mythical status of his upset against sAviOr.


Just to clarify, I'm not summarising 'the entirety of the PvZ meta' as just the advent of the Bisu build. Obviously that was one big contribution that he pioneered after Daezang, and they've been a staple of PvZ ever since.

But even thereafter, he has been the one pioneering pretty much every minor variation and timing of these. When Bisu was briefly irrelevant to the matchup, the entire collective of other protoss came up with builds like the dragoon bust. While these are innovations, they are not exactly stable platforms from which to play a standard game of PvZ. I don't think it's really that unfair to say that for basically the entirety of his professional career he has been the standard by which the PvZ metagame has been defined. Others may have 'invented' builds/variations/whatever, but it's difficult to pioneer a build if you aren't actually good enough in the PvZ matchup to beat the top zergs with it consistently.

As for the rest of that, I pretty much agree. I'm simply not equating how good someone is in a matchup to being better than everyone else at the matchup.

I completely agree BeSt's understanding of certain parts of the matchup were better. But it's not like Jangbi's were bad (I mean i don't know, I have no information on whether he even optimises his own variations on build orders). But the fact that Jangbi maybe be bested on aspects of PvT by other players, doesn't take away from how good his PvT was.

It is consistent with my very original point. Jangbi's PvT is at times really really good, sometimes the best. But top protosses are much better against terran than they are against zerg. Even being the best, you are going to have more competition in every aspect of PvT. And that he should be BeSted (pun intended :p) in some aspects, doesn't make his PvT less good, it just means other people also have really good PvT.


I don't think I've had such a lasting back and forth of opinions in a while. I think we've established pretty much all our opinions on Bisu and the protoss race in general. However, I'll add one more point of contention.

You can't credit Bisu for being the totality of all meta-game advancements just because he had the most success with it, and became the standard for the success or failure for any evolutions that happened during his career, If that's the case whoever's the best player at the time becomes responsible for any changes in the meta-game as long as he utilizes it to reasonable success.

That's like saying Flash is the totality of the late-game mech meta-game shift despite the fact that FanTaSy created the build by himself during practice, and first implemented it on a televised setting, just because Flash won more games with it, and used it to greater success than any other player. There's value of having success with implementing a certain strategy, and adding fine refinements to it, and another value of creating its idea in the first place. You can't just mix the two, and pretend that the amount of success a player has with a certain innovation gets the right to all the credit of the meta-game change that takes place exactly due to that innovation.


I'm not saying you have to be the most successful with an idea, to get the credit. But you do have to have SOME success with it.

I mean, if you invent a build, go out and never win with it, or win just 1 game out of many attempts, how much credit can you really get? You did invent the build, so some... but if someone sees the build and decides they like it, and then proceeds to actually beat a bunch of high tier players with it. Then yeah, i'm going to give the latter person more credit.

For our example if Fantasy, invented, then proceeded to use his build to good effect taking down a few top players before Flash caught on. Then it wouldn't matter how successful Flash is with it, that's not pioneering a build, that's just using it. Flash could get some credit if he made minor variations on it to great affect, because that is his input, but in this case Fantasy would still get alot of the credit.

For Bisu's input to PvZ, I may have missed alot, but other than a bunch of fairly all-in timing attacks (which were then never built on, as they arn't stable ways to play the matchup), I really can't think of anything much other protosses have done.

It may all these variations on 'Neo Bisu' builds may not be his invention (at least i can't say for a fact that they are), and having not watched every PvZ of that era, I can't say with certainty that other's haven't invented builds that Bisu has then used. But I can't recall any instances of anyone else stringing together a few noteworthy games with new builds/variations in that matchup.

From what I can see, the evolution of the meta has gone from:

Pre-Bisu builds (I'm just going to start from his career, I don't know the pre-Bisu PvZ meta that well)

Bisu build and it's many variations.

Protoss floundering in the Matchup in general, Kal is touted by some as the 'best PvZ player', Movie busts some Zerg simcities with dragoons.

Protoss continue floundering in the matchup. And everyone just sucks at it, they still use older Bisu build variations, but they don't really work.

Neo-Bisu builds

Now.



So you mention the Bisu build, which is a build first utilized by Daezang. Read this post (you'll see that Bisu himself seems to be affected by Daezang's build, because he was going for Citadel of Adun before the games played by Daezang, and going for Stargate first builds only after Daezang utilizes his build to great success against multiple zergs in the ProLeague, and MBC Survivor Tournament)

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/bw-tournaments/517651-asl-ro16-day-4?page=29#564

The Neo Bisu build, which uses zealots instead of dark templars has indeed been optimized by Bisu, but to say that he was the totality of the entire evolution of the match-up, when TerAtO, PuSan were doing various variations of the "Bisu build" in 2005~2006 before it was truly optimized to great success by Daezang on Blitz, is like saying Jaedong was responsible for the invention of the three hachery lair into five hatchery build because he had by far the most success with it as well as being one of the first to use it.

http://blog.naver.com/chldlfdnd123/100207595478

http://blog.naver.com/oroper/70139896008

Forge expansion was a thing before Bisu came round. Forge expansion into Stargate was a thing before Bisu came round. Daezang optimized the build by being able to pressure the zerg early on with both corsairs and dark templars, which reduced the need for mass cannons, and allowed for a faster explosion of gateways. This is the core concept of the Bisu build. Bisu used the build first shown by Daezang to great success, then added his own flavour to it throughout the years by implementing and optimizing certain details that were shown before years ago (corsairs into speedlot pressure was not a new concept), with the core concept of map control through corsairs, and pressuring the zerg as much as possible being prevalent idea. That core idea was initially first used to great success by Daezang, which is why Bisu's claim of being the totality of the entire modern meta-game taking away Daezang's main (and probably only) claim to fame. It's a robbery.

Sure, Bisu was always on the fore-front of the evolution since he rose to fame, but the initial seeds that revolutionized the match-ups were the fruits of the innovations of numerous protoss players, with Daezang being the most obvious candidate for the title of the creator for the Bisu build.
TL+ Member
doubleupgradeobbies!
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Australia1353 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-01-02 19:06:10
January 02 2017 18:40 GMT
#645
Same reply, I'm not dismissing anything before the Bisu build, he obviously had no affect on the PvZ meta before he started playing professionally. Keywords 'for his whole career'.

Also wanted to add, I think you are trying to attribute to me the equating of bringing about the Bisu build as being the be all and end of of PvZ, modern or otherwise. That's not what I've been saying.

In fact, in my very original post, I said to the effect that Bisu build isn't the solution to PvZ, Bisu is.

It's not 'now that we have the Bisu build, he has solved PvZ forever, horray and rejoice'. Quite the opposite. PvZ has still sucked for the majority of protoss, during and after Bisu's career. Yes the build is standardised now, but it's really just been Bisu going out there winning PvZs, it was still pretty terrible for protoss as a whole, Bisu build or not.

It's been more of a case of 'he's the only guy actually doing well in the matchup, lets just do what he does'
MSL, 2003-2011, RIP. OSL, 2000-2012, RIP. Proleague, 2003-2012, RIP. And then there was none... Even good things must come to an end.
Letmelose
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
Korea (South)3227 Posts
January 03 2017 04:17 GMT
#646
On January 03 2017 03:40 doubleupgradeobbies! wrote:
Same reply, I'm not dismissing anything before the Bisu build, he obviously had no affect on the PvZ meta before he started playing professionally. Keywords 'for his whole career'.

Also wanted to add, I think you are trying to attribute to me the equating of bringing about the Bisu build as being the be all and end of of PvZ, modern or otherwise. That's not what I've been saying.

In fact, in my very original post, I said to the effect that Bisu build isn't the solution to PvZ, Bisu is.

It's not 'now that we have the Bisu build, he has solved PvZ forever, horray and rejoice'. Quite the opposite. PvZ has still sucked for the majority of protoss, during and after Bisu's career. Yes the build is standardised now, but it's really just been Bisu going out there winning PvZs, it was still pretty terrible for protoss as a whole, Bisu build or not.

It's been more of a case of 'he's the only guy actually doing well in the matchup, lets just do what he does'


Totally agreed. I just got confused with some of the wording, it's true, Bisu's innovations, while not necessarily the most ground breaking changes that everybody else could then implement for automatic easy games, had subtle nuances that only he could fully utilize to full potential.

Peak ELO, while an incredibly biased for the modern era due to the massive influx of ProLeague games, and increased implementation of best of five series even in the lower rounds such as the round of eight of the MSL, is not that bad a measure of a player's peak performance during the modern era (where all the players benefited from the inflation of the number of games, starting from the 2008/2009 Season).

Highest PvT peak ELO: JangBi (2260)
2nd highest PvT peak ELO: Stork (2259)

Highest PvP peak ELO: Bisu (2267)
2nd highest PvP peak ELO: BeSt (2252)

Highest PvZ peak ELO: Bisu (2327)
2nd highest PvZ peak ELO (in the modern era only, Nal_rA's era came before the massive inflation of the ProLeague schedule): Stork (2209)

The only other match-up that had such massive difference of peak ELO ratings between players of the modern era was Jaedong's ZvZ (2341) to sAviOr's ZvZ (2219), or EffOrt's ZvZ (2213), if you think sAviOr's peak was too heavily influenced by the numbers from his old records. That was how further ahead of the rest of the field Bisu's PvZ was. Even Flash failed to create such massive chasms of peak ELO ratings confined to a specific match-up, although his numbers are all off the walls as well, the massive difference between Bisu's PvZ and other modern day protoss player's PvZ was almost unparalleled.
TL+ Member
SuGo
Profile Joined March 2013
United States681 Posts
January 05 2017 12:36 GMT
#647
Does anyone have specific insight on map selection process for ASL?
Prev 1 31 32 33 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 30m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 514
BRAT_OK 73
MindelVK 26
Trap 26
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 1326
Dewaltoss 155
White-Ra 92
Pusan 49
Sexy 35
Dota 2
Dendi1683
Counter-Strike
fl0m1463
x6flipin210
Other Games
Liquid`RaSZi2118
ceh9607
ArmadaUGS128
RotterdaM94
IndyStarCraft 89
KnowMe78
Mew2King54
QueenE49
ToD39
Chillindude19
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV56
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH133
• Reevou 8
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV333
League of Legends
• TFBlade795
Other Games
• imaqtpie1142
• Shiphtur311
Upcoming Events
OSC
3h 30m
IntoTheTV X SOOP
16h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 15h
Big Brain Bouts
1d 15h
Garitos vs ArT
Lambo vs Percival
TriGGeR vs ByuN
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
OSC
2 days
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
2 days
Mixu vs TBD
Spirit vs TBD
Clem vs TBD
Patches Events
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Soma vs Shuttle
BeSt vs Rush
WardiTV Weekly
3 days
[ Show More ]
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Leta vs ggaemo
Jaedong vs Queen
GSL
4 days
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-02
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Light Tournament 2026

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
RSL Revival: Season 6
Calamity Invitational
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
Esports World Cup 2026: LCQ
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Escore Tournament S3: King of Kings
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.