EPT[SPL] Samsung KHAN vs eSTRO - Page 27
| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
|
SuperArc
Austria7781 Posts
| ||
|
baubo
China3370 Posts
On December 20 2009 18:00 IdrA wrote: relatively early game, early mid game. its obvious what he was talking about, dont quibble over terminology But what he said has nothing to do with Stork vs Flying. And nothing to do with my original post. Which is why I don't get it. That is, unless you're saying that Flying's tech path was in fact not correct and that he should've teched to reavers like Stork. That Stork won his first engagement because reavers > templars. | ||
|
StorkHwaiting
United States3465 Posts
All of these things should be calculated into the HT versus Reaver tech discussion. It's like saying fast hive play versus a lurker/hydra lair play is always hive >>> because if you have defilers then you must have a huge army too. coz nobody gets to defilers without all this other tech/eco etc etc. Do you see how this argument doesn't make much sense? THere are inherent pros/cons in taking specific tech paths. You're adding all kinds of contextual bs into it that are not necessarily guaranteed just because you got a certain tech. Everyone understands that in a late game 200/200 situation HTs are going to be better than reavers. But SC is not a game of black and white, there are plenty of conditional situations and rock-paper-scissors. That guy was pointing out that normal reaver timings can be better than rushing to HT in certain situations. I see nothing wrong with that statement. | ||
|
Xiphos
Canada7507 Posts
| ||
|
foeffa
Belgium2115 Posts
 | ||
|
StorkHwaiting
United States3465 Posts
On December 20 2009 22:43 Xiphos wrote: Well I feel that Reavers 'should' be better in PvZ since it can't really be 'sniped' by Mutalisk and it still does great damage and even splash as well. Plus if Z decided to do Dark Swarm, Reavers can still hit the target. erm nobody is talkinga bout PvZ? lol it was pvp reaver vs ht tech | ||
|
Xiphos
Canada7507 Posts
On December 20 2009 23:28 StorkHwaiting wrote: erm nobody is talkinga bout PvZ? lol it was pvp reaver vs ht tech I know but I just felt like saying it. lol | ||
|
StorkHwaiting
United States3465 Posts
On December 20 2009 23:30 Xiphos wrote: I know but I just felt like saying it. lol haha alright, rock on then :D | ||
|
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
(sorry about the all caps, it was a text message to my friend and I didn't want to rewrite the whole thing so I just copied and pasted) | ||
|
Noxide
United States2870 Posts
| ||
|
SkelA
Macedonia13092 Posts
And Stork raping as always.... Jangbi pls come back  | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
|
Sprite
United States1015 Posts
On December 21 2009 01:51 On_Slaught wrote: How far ha FBH fallen when he is getting cocky after beating Action. your definition of cocky is very weird then. | ||
|
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On December 20 2009 22:43 Xiphos wrote: Well I feel that Reavers 'should' be better in PvZ since it can't really be 'sniped' by Mutalisk and it still does great damage and even splash as well. Plus if Z decided to do Dark Swarm, Reavers can still hit the target. I thought storms could do damage despite Dark Swarm? And reavers can certainly be sniped by Mutalisks. | ||
|
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On December 21 2009 01:51 On_Slaught wrote: How far ha FBH fallen when he is getting cocky after beating Action. I think it was somewhat tongue in cheek. | ||
|
hyst.eric.al
United States2332 Posts
| ||
|
pripple
Finland1714 Posts
| ||
|
dukethegold
Canada5645 Posts
Although it is kinda sad that FBH considers defeating a mediocre player a crowning achievement nowadays. | ||
|
okum
France5779 Posts
| ||
|
Tuke
Finland1666 Posts
| ||
| ||
