|
On December 18 2009 20:16 cz wrote:Show nested quote +On December 18 2009 20:14 Chen wrote:On December 18 2009 20:14 meeple wrote:On December 18 2009 20:13 Mastermind wrote:On December 18 2009 20:09 meeple wrote: God I hope Stork shows us his "revolutionary" strategy today and blows us away. wasnt that joke? I thought he said that when he was mocking a lesser zerg. Well... if it was a joke, a lot of people missed it, me included. I've heard it hyped and repeated so many times since he mentioned it. maybe its like Flash's revolutionary TvP build that was discussed for a while didnt that actually pan out as fast upgrades/gols and in a month make all carrier transitions obsolete? I mean the "new" build that would solve his current TvP problems since his old one has been figured out. STORK SNIPES DRONE NICE
|
On December 18 2009 20:16 FireGuyX wrote: Trying a new strategy in the OSL is usually not a good idea, and how are arbiters suppose to be effective effective against zergs anyway? ggplay would argue
|
I think Stork's revolutionary strat is to rape drones with his scout probe.
|
On December 18 2009 20:12 Chen wrote:Show nested quote +On December 18 2009 20:10 UGC4 wrote:On December 18 2009 20:07 Saracen wrote:On December 18 2009 20:06 UGC4 wrote:On December 18 2009 20:02 sashkata wrote:On December 18 2009 19:59 UGC4 wrote:On December 18 2009 19:57 meeple wrote: What did ZerO do wrong? He had a good economy... lots of hydras and lurkers. He even sniped all the ht? But yet he still wasn't able to break down Movie's army. good economy...hmm, did you miss when movie raped some of those drones with a few zealots? zero lost a lot of mining time moving them around. oh, and did you forget the 5+ drones that died to storms? yeah. not such good economy after all Pls. Zero was in an exellent position. Movie's harras didn't pay off. Zero just fucked up. didnt pay off...wow...ur another one that sees harass in terms of pure numbers. sure, all the money that movie spent to kill say 7 drones was probably way more than 350 minerals (7x50). but those are DRONES ur talking about. ie larvae. ie time. ie late buildings/units. 7 drones is like half the saturation of one zerg base. if u really dont think harassing in PvZ pays off, why do you think the pros OPEN with strategy that aim at harming drones? I really can't tell if you're trolling or not. Would you really trade 7 larvae (generic zerg units, like 7 hydras, for example) for a shuttle, 4 zealots, 2 high templar, and 2 dark templar? LOL YES ANY TIME as long as those 7 drones are earli-er drones like zero's were yes. anyone wouldnt? LOL I'm pretty sure any protoss who only gets 7 drones with 2 HT's, 2 DT's, 4 zlots and a shuttle a fail harass. 1 storm usually=3/4 hydras at least in a battle, thus you would hopefully want to get more than that in # of drones. 6 drones for 2 storms and DT's just isnt worth it anyways off topic, main point is fail in middle played much bigger role
wow...ok ur looking at this trade off in generic numbers...listen up those 4 zealots were part of movie's opening timing attack. those are zealots that any average protoss player would accomplish absolutely nothing with, but movie does. he killed drones, and had them drilling instead of mining, at the cost of 4 zealots. if u think 4 zealots is a lot in FE PvZ, then ur just frugal. also, those HT's were not the most important HTs in that particular game. they were movie's first 2 hts, which probably didnt even have enough energy at the time they boarded the shuttle. in your normal C game at iccup, its nice when u get 10 drones with 2 storms cuz your opponent is no pro to run them or avoid the storm. but this is ZERO ur talking about, arguably the best ZvP in the world right now. to get 7 drones off of him in HBR is huge. i cant believe im still debating this. i'll stop cuz u people dont even wanna understand that killing drones is the best/only way to win PvZ.
and btw there was another dead drone. hero probe remember? yeah, that affects a lot too in case u didnt know
|
Losing early drone = loss in OSL Ro8?
|
On December 18 2009 20:17 Jyvblamo wrote:Show nested quote +On December 18 2009 20:16 FireGuyX wrote: Trying a new strategy in the OSL is usually not a good idea, and how are arbiters suppose to be effective effective against zergs anyway? Talk to Pusan.
Pusan/GoGo were already eliminated The game had no meaning
|
Stork totally mucking with Shine - dronekill, pylon nat block
|
|
|
Some of aiur's strongest warriors have only 40 hp
:D
|
|
Shine attempts a ling runby but totally gets shut down by the 4 probes blocking the way.
|
Stork blocks nat with pylon
|
|
WTF Shine lost a fucking drone to a probe Seriously Zergs?How hard is it to defend vs a probe or pull back
|
meh but then loses 3 probes 2 6 lings t.t
|
On December 18 2009 20:17 samachking wrote:Show nested quote +On December 18 2009 20:17 Jyvblamo wrote:On December 18 2009 20:16 FireGuyX wrote: Trying a new strategy in the OSL is usually not a good idea, and how are arbiters suppose to be effective effective against zergs anyway? Talk to Pusan. Pusan/GoGo were already eliminated The game had no meaning That's not what I was talking about. I was referring to Pusan's usage of Arbiters in PvZ. =P
|
ret getting spammed on skype like crazy
|
On December 18 2009 20:18 meeple wrote: Shine attempts a ling runby but totally gets shut down by the 4 probes blocking the way.
he got 2 probes
|
|
|
|
|