EPT! [G] Definitions - Page 6
| Forum Index > Brood War Strategy |
|
blagoonga123
United States2068 Posts
| ||
|
LegendaryDreams
Canada1350 Posts
| ||
|
InfeSteD
United States4658 Posts
| ||
RaGe
Belgium9953 Posts
On October 24 2007 19:10 RaGe wrote: Lingburn: When toss has 1 more attack grade than zerg has armour grades and therefore kills a zergling in 1 hit less still think you should add this | ||
Chill
Calgary26004 Posts
| ||
|
minus_human
4784 Posts
On October 28 2007 03:08 Hypnosis wrote: also, using Hold position on a lurker group with an ovie doesnt work im pretty sure I tested it. RIGHT this moment. It works. | ||
|
ZerG~LegenD
Sweden1179 Posts
| ||
|
r0ar
Australia24 Posts
| ||
|
Chill
Calgary26004 Posts
posting definitions that are already in the list, especially when my definition is better than yours. | ||
|
Hyperionnn
Turkey4968 Posts
| ||
|
G5
United States2922 Posts
| ||
|
MoNKeYSpanKeR
United States2869 Posts
| ||
|
MoNKeYSpanKeR
United States2869 Posts
However if you wanna alter the build somewhat which i like to do, early game hard hydra ling while whoring up +3 expo's (Normally on longinous where this means 4gas) and just overwhelm opponents early on and keep feild control, then switch to tech as soon as you have your bases set up. The misunderstanding comes from a common state that can occur, during any stlye of play, but noticable in sauron zerg when the zerg gets a more then significant advantage. Where in more tech heavy styles you might have lets say 8-10 hatches, and while playing sauron you will have around 15+ or some rediculous amount. That state is where you can just keep sending and remaxing with an insane hatchery count and economic advantage. Which is more commonly seen in a Sauron style becuase it usually contains way more hatcheries then other tech heavier styles. Hence the confusion. I don't think there is any actual name for the state of being able to max--> attack --> remax --> attack /repeat until win. Maybe that's called being sAviOr. | ||
|
fanatacist
10319 Posts
On November 17 2007 09:40 G5 wrote: bulldog is 2 gateways not 3 I'm relatively certain it's 3. | ||
|
Chill
Calgary26004 Posts
| ||
|
Chill
Calgary26004 Posts
On November 17 2007 09:40 G5 wrote: bulldog is 2 gateways not 3 You sure? I don't know anything about PvT but I thought it was 3. Can someone confirm/deny? | ||
|
xmShake
United States1100 Posts
On November 18 2007 03:04 Chill wrote: You sure? I don't know anything about PvT but I thought it was 3. Can someone confirm/deny? I've always thought it was 3. | ||
|
XeroN
Poland12 Posts
| ||
|
Hyperionnn
Turkey4968 Posts
| ||
|
StRyKeR
United States1756 Posts
On December 29 2007 04:59 Hyperionnn wrote: Harass: To damage your opponent's economy/units/buildings. For example: Muta harass, drops at mineral line, defiler's plague (it's kind of harass), vessels with irridate etc.. Kind of a loose definition -- you can call anything a harass by that definition. It's more like an attack meant to annoy, to divert attention. Often used to damage economy (e.g. muta harass, reaver drop, vulture raids) but can be used to kill specific units (irradiate for defilers), not meant to destroy entire armies. | ||
| ||
