|
On January 13 2024 13:21 G5 wrote:
Watched the video and it everything in it made sense. All I really wanna say is that YOU are a phenomenal caster. I've never seen you cast outside of this tournament and I think you're really good. I hope to see you cast more stuff.
QTF!
Watched his commentary for a long time. Very very good caster and makes great content.
|
On January 13 2024 06:27 JimmyJRaynor wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2024 02:15 Ideas wrote:On January 13 2024 02:02 JimmyJRaynor wrote:On January 13 2024 01:47 Ideas wrote:He's a narcissist with serious sexual harassment allegations and completely ruined the BSL by showing up and trying to mount a comeback without telling the organizers about it. The StarCraft community will be better without him. what are the allegations exactly? when did these alleged acts occur? and to quote the great Bill James: "what is the evidence and what does it mean?" Ok don't watch the video cool i watched it. i always triangulate evidence and proposed facts. i am not going to assume everything presented in a youtube video is true. furthermore, some of the allegations were precise and other allegations were vague and open ended. Also, your remedy is rather vague and open ended. What does "the starcraft community would be better without him" mean exactly? He can't play ladder games? He can't attend live events? Who polices this?
If you watched it, why ask what the allegations are? Seems like the bad faith "I'm just asking questions" tactic being employed. Please share some of the triangulated evidence and proposed facts you gathered lol
|
On January 13 2024 22:39 deathgod6 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2024 06:27 JimmyJRaynor wrote:On January 13 2024 02:15 Ideas wrote:On January 13 2024 02:02 JimmyJRaynor wrote:On January 13 2024 01:47 Ideas wrote:He's a narcissist with serious sexual harassment allegations and completely ruined the BSL by showing up and trying to mount a comeback without telling the organizers about it. The StarCraft community will be better without him. what are the allegations exactly? when did these alleged acts occur? and to quote the great Bill James: "what is the evidence and what does it mean?" Ok don't watch the video cool i watched it. i always triangulate evidence and proposed facts. i am not going to assume everything presented in a youtube video is true. furthermore, some of the allegations were precise and other allegations were vague and open ended. Also, your remedy is rather vague and open ended. What does "the starcraft community would be better without him" mean exactly? He can't play ladder games? He can't attend live events? Who polices this? If you watched it, why ask what the allegations are? Seems like the bad faith "I'm just asking questions" tactic being employed. Please share some of the triangulated evidence and proposed facts you gathered lol
because i am not assuming the video has the allegations correct.
Last week several videos alleged Chris Jericho engaged in sexually misconduct several years ago and they all had slightly different accounts of what the exact allegations were.
People were calling for Chris Jericho to be taken off of a Pay Per View appearance that prolly pays him 6 or 7 figures... and he got boo-ed out of the building. Lots of people on all sides are looking to destroy lives while simultaneously claiming a noble "quest for the truth".
So,
No bad faith here. I think if you continue with your overly confrontational line of replies you'er discussing the issue in bad faith.
|
On January 13 2024 23:18 JimmyJRaynor wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2024 22:39 deathgod6 wrote:On January 13 2024 06:27 JimmyJRaynor wrote:On January 13 2024 02:15 Ideas wrote:On January 13 2024 02:02 JimmyJRaynor wrote:On January 13 2024 01:47 Ideas wrote:He's a narcissist with serious sexual harassment allegations and completely ruined the BSL by showing up and trying to mount a comeback without telling the organizers about it. The StarCraft community will be better without him. what are the allegations exactly? when did these alleged acts occur? and to quote the great Bill James: "what is the evidence and what does it mean?" Ok don't watch the video cool i watched it. i always triangulate evidence and proposed facts. i am not going to assume everything presented in a youtube video is true. furthermore, some of the allegations were precise and other allegations were vague and open ended. Also, your remedy is rather vague and open ended. What does "the starcraft community would be better without him" mean exactly? He can't play ladder games? He can't attend live events? Who polices this? If you watched it, why ask what the allegations are? Seems like the bad faith "I'm just asking questions" tactic being employed. Please share some of the triangulated evidence and proposed facts you gathered lol because i am not assuming the video has the allegations correct. Last week several videos alleged Chris Jericho engaged in sexually misconduct several years ago and they all had slightly different accounts of what the exact allegations were. People were calling for Chris Jericho to be taken off of a Pay Per View appearance that prolly pays him 6 or 7 figures... and he got boo-ed out of the building. Lots of people on all sides are looking to destroy lives while simultaneously claiming a noble "quest for the truth". So, No bad faith here. I think if you continue with your overly confrontational line of replies you'er discussing the issue in bad faith.
Saiyan read the allegations verbatim from the original sources... again I honestly don't think you watched the video. You can also read the original sources yourself. How are the allegations not portrayed correctly? If you don't believe them, just say it instead of dancing around it.
And there it is. You already have a preposition that people are "looking to destroy lives" by... accusing a third rate caster of sexual harassment.
You haven't even challenged anything of substance about the allegations. You said yourself some of them are precise and others are vague. So being precise means they can't be trusted, but also being vague means they can't be trusted? Help me with your big brain logic and triangulate this lmao. And you say you use "proposed facts," so in other words allegations?
|
^ Exactly
end of discussion
|
On January 14 2024 00:26 BlueStar wrote:
^ Exactly
end of discussion
nah, i think the discussion can include in actionable remedy. So I think the discussion can move beyond just the allegations.
On January 13 2024 23:50 deathgod6 wrote:
You haven't even challenged anything of substance about the allegations. You said yourself some of them are precise and others are vague. So being precise means they can't be trusted, but also being vague means they can't be trusted? Help me with your big brain logic and triangulate this lmao.
I need to gather more information to get to that stage. I was seeking your side based upon your vague assertion about the SC community.
The repeated "lol" and "lmao" in each post combined with your inability to expand upon your vague remedy indicates to me you are probably discussing this in bad faith.
If you want examples of triangulating evidence, theories, and proposed facts in the face of a complex situation check out my posts in the health and fitness thread. That's usually how I approach things.
On January 13 2024 23:50 deathgod6 wrote:
Help me with your big brain logic and triangulate this lmao.
ya, this is discussion in bad faith.
|
On January 14 2024 01:05 JimmyJRaynor wrote:nah, i think the discussion can include in actionable remedy. So I think the discussion can move beyond just the allegations. Show nested quote +On January 13 2024 23:50 deathgod6 wrote:
You haven't even challenged anything of substance about the allegations. You said yourself some of them are precise and others are vague. So being precise means they can't be trusted, but also being vague means they can't be trusted? Help me with your big brain logic and triangulate this lmao. I need to gather more information to get to that stage. I was seeking your side based upon your vague assertion about the SC community. The repeated "lol" and "lmao" in each post combined with your inability to expand upon your vague remedy indicates to me you are probably discussing this in bad faith. If you want examples of triangulating evidence, theories, and proposed facts in the face of a complex situation check out my posts in the health and fitness thread. That's usually how I approach things. Show nested quote +On January 13 2024 23:50 deathgod6 wrote:
Help me with your big brain logic and triangulate this lmao.
ya, this is discussion in bad faith.
The actionable remedy is disclosure on his side of the allegations, but yet again Rapid has completely dodged responsibility. Which I truly doubt we will ever receive anything as he again has gone into hiding. Keep defending cowards for all I care.
|
On January 14 2024 01:16 art_of_turtle wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2024 01:05 JimmyJRaynor wrote:On January 14 2024 00:26 BlueStar wrote:
^ Exactly
end of discussion nah, i think the discussion can include in actionable remedy. So I think the discussion can move beyond just the allegations. On January 13 2024 23:50 deathgod6 wrote:
You haven't even challenged anything of substance about the allegations. You said yourself some of them are precise and others are vague. So being precise means they can't be trusted, but also being vague means they can't be trusted? Help me with your big brain logic and triangulate this lmao. I need to gather more information to get to that stage. I was seeking your side based upon your vague assertion about the SC community. The repeated "lol" and "lmao" in each post combined with your inability to expand upon your vague remedy indicates to me you are probably discussing this in bad faith. If you want examples of triangulating evidence, theories, and proposed facts in the face of a complex situation check out my posts in the health and fitness thread. That's usually how I approach things. On January 13 2024 23:50 deathgod6 wrote:
Help me with your big brain logic and triangulate this lmao.
ya, this is discussion in bad faith. The actionable remedy is disclosure on his side of the allegations, but yet again Rapid has completely dodged responsibility. Which I truly doubt we will ever receive anything as he again has gone into hiding. Keep defending cowards for all I care.
There is a decent chance he is laughing his ass off reading this stuff.
Defending him? How? I can't even figure out how old this guy is. Any one know how old he is?
At this point,
I think the best actionable remedy is for live event promoters to make their own independent decisions on who they want at their events. Let the free market prevail.
I think "banning for life" is silly and immature. I think if a live event promoter were to ban him from an event 15 years from now they'd look kinda silly. Again, though, let the free market prevail.
|
The extra sad part is that people who are doing absolutely nothing for the community, is flaming ZZZero and rus_brain for this.
|
Defending him? How? I can't even figure out how old this guy is. Any one know how old he is?
Yes you are defending him, seemingly with very little knowledge of the history of the whole situation despite claiming to of watched the video. Also Sayian says within the first 5 minutes of the video that Rapid was born in 91/92. Clearly you didn’t watch it, Idk what his age has to do with anything. He could have been 22 or 40, it doesn’t change anything. I think you’re either trolling here, which would be super weird and in bad taste or you’re just an idiot. Either way, not a great look.
|
Rapid out there trying to figure out how to get laid and getting hit hard by the reality that you're really not allowed to pursue sex with women so straightforwardly.
I could imagine someone teaching him that it's okay to pursue sex with women quickly and directly, and also him hearing that persistence is key when it comes to getting women... and then discovering the hard way that actually if you want sex in any context other than a romantic relationship, the world is very quick to socially castrate you.
The truth is that only a small number of men get away with banging lots of chicks without being pillaried for it - and they're all rich and successful. As a poor, unsuccessful party boy, Rapid never stood a chance.
In fairness, and I do mean fairness, having such a large sex drive probably makes not having sex frequently pretty uncomfortable - but at this point in history, men's discomforts that arise from not getting to bang aren't respected on anywhere near the same level as womens' discomforts with having to bang - and most people who think they're better than Rapid either have much lower sex drive than him or jerk off to pornography in private so they can be appropriately meek in public. That's probably you reading this comment (by the numbers).
My point is this: If you're shitting on Rapid for going after sex with women, but you jerk off to porn so you can fit into society - you're probably not much better than he is on a moral level - you're just smarter about living in a way that doesn't directly upset the people you interact with.
Rapid isn't an evil man - he's just a complete idiot. Lol
|
|
|
On January 14 2024 05:45 JimmiC wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2024 05:30 ThunderJunk wrote:
Rapid out there trying to figure out how to get laid and getting hit hard by the reality that you're really not allowed to pursue sex with women so straightforwardly.
I could imagine someone teaching him that it's okay to pursue sex with women quickly and directly, and also him hearing that persistence is key when it comes to getting women... and then discovering the hard way that actually if you want sex in any context other than a romantic relationship, the world is very quick to socially castrate you.
The truth is that only a small number of men get away with banging lots of chicks without being pillaried for it - and they're all rich and successful. As a poor, unsuccessful party boy, Rapid never stood a chance.
In fairness, and I do mean fairness, having such a large sex drive probably makes not having sex frequently pretty uncomfortable - but at this point in history, men's discomforts that arise from not getting to bang aren't respected on anywhere near the same level as womens' discomforts with having to bang - and most people who think they're better than Rapid either have much lower sex drive than him or jerk off to pornography in private so they can be appropriately meek in public. That's probably you reading this comment (by the numbers).
My point is this: If you're shitting on Rapid for going after sex with women, but you jerk off to porn so you can fit into society - you're probably not much better than he is on a moral level - you're just smarter about living in a way that doesn't directly upset the people you interact with.
Rapid isn't an evil man - he's just a complete idiot. Lol What are you even talking about, you can be straightforward. You can't send pictures your junk (the same way you can't flash people) without permission and if they are under 18 it makes it far more creepy.
I might not have been specific enough -
"Many women accused Rapid of overt sexual advances that were incredibly inappropriate."
"Mr. Rapid came over and his first words were, 'My dick is 26 cm long'"
It's not a dick pic, but it is a dick-first statement. He seems to use dick-first statements a lot. I interpret it as he mistakenly thinks that talking about having a big dick is a way to maneuver the conversation towards eventually hooking up in as straightforward and efficient a way as possible. So - that's what I'm talking about.
When you say, "You can be straightforward", do you think there's many more straightforward ways of trying to get sexual than immediately talking about your dick? If so you're more straightforward than I know how to be.
Perhaps you could educate me on how to be straightforward with a woman you barely know such that you want to bang her but don't want to be in a romantic relationship with her, and in a way that won't make her uncomfortable or get yourself labeled as hypersexual. I'm open to learning that.
|
On January 14 2024 08:39 ThunderJunk wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2024 05:45 JimmiC wrote:On January 14 2024 05:30 ThunderJunk wrote:
Rapid out there trying to figure out how to get laid and getting hit hard by the reality that you're really not allowed to pursue sex with women so straightforwardly.
I could imagine someone teaching him that it's okay to pursue sex with women quickly and directly, and also him hearing that persistence is key when it comes to getting women... and then discovering the hard way that actually if you want sex in any context other than a romantic relationship, the world is very quick to socially castrate you.
The truth is that only a small number of men get away with banging lots of chicks without being pillaried for it - and they're all rich and successful. As a poor, unsuccessful party boy, Rapid never stood a chance.
In fairness, and I do mean fairness, having such a large sex drive probably makes not having sex frequently pretty uncomfortable - but at this point in history, men's discomforts that arise from not getting to bang aren't respected on anywhere near the same level as womens' discomforts with having to bang - and most people who think they're better than Rapid either have much lower sex drive than him or jerk off to pornography in private so they can be appropriately meek in public. That's probably you reading this comment (by the numbers).
My point is this: If you're shitting on Rapid for going after sex with women, but you jerk off to porn so you can fit into society - you're probably not much better than he is on a moral level - you're just smarter about living in a way that doesn't directly upset the people you interact with.
Rapid isn't an evil man - he's just a complete idiot. Lol What are you even talking about, you can be straightforward. You can't send pictures your junk (the same way you can't flash people) without permission and if they are under 18 it makes it far more creepy. I might not have been specific enough - "Many women accused Rapid of overt sexual advances that were incredibly inappropriate." "Mr. Rapid came over and his first words were, 'My dick is 26 cm long'" It's not a dick pic, but it is a dick-first statement. He seems to use dick-first statements a lot. I interpret it as he mistakenly thinks that talking about having a big dick is a way to maneuver the conversation towards eventually hooking up in as straightforward and efficient a way as possible. So - that's what I'm talking about. When you say, "You can be straightforward", do you think there's many more straightforward ways of trying to get sexual than immediately talking about your dick? If so you're more straightforward than I know how to be. Perhaps you could educate me on how to be straightforward with a woman you barely know such that you want to bang her but don't want to be in a romantic relationship with her, and in a way that won't make her uncomfortable or get yourself labeled as hypersexual. I'm open to learning that.
Here's how: you go to night clubs. All dedicated places for that specific purpose.
|
|
|
On January 14 2024 09:17 JimmiC wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2024 08:39 ThunderJunk wrote:On January 14 2024 05:45 JimmiC wrote:On January 14 2024 05:30 ThunderJunk wrote:
Rapid out there trying to figure out how to get laid and getting hit hard by the reality that you're really not allowed to pursue sex with women so straightforwardly.
I could imagine someone teaching him that it's okay to pursue sex with women quickly and directly, and also him hearing that persistence is key when it comes to getting women... and then discovering the hard way that actually if you want sex in any context other than a romantic relationship, the world is very quick to socially castrate you.
The truth is that only a small number of men get away with banging lots of chicks without being pillaried for it - and they're all rich and successful. As a poor, unsuccessful party boy, Rapid never stood a chance.
In fairness, and I do mean fairness, having such a large sex drive probably makes not having sex frequently pretty uncomfortable - but at this point in history, men's discomforts that arise from not getting to bang aren't respected on anywhere near the same level as womens' discomforts with having to bang - and most people who think they're better than Rapid either have much lower sex drive than him or jerk off to pornography in private so they can be appropriately meek in public. That's probably you reading this comment (by the numbers).
My point is this: If you're shitting on Rapid for going after sex with women, but you jerk off to porn so you can fit into society - you're probably not much better than he is on a moral level - you're just smarter about living in a way that doesn't directly upset the people you interact with.
Rapid isn't an evil man - he's just a complete idiot. Lol What are you even talking about, you can be straightforward. You can't send pictures your junk (the same way you can't flash people) without permission and if they are under 18 it makes it far more creepy. I might not have been specific enough - "Many women accused Rapid of overt sexual advances that were incredibly inappropriate." "Mr. Rapid came over and his first words were, 'My dick is 26 cm long'" It's not a dick pic, but it is a dick-first statement. He seems to use dick-first statements a lot. I interpret it as he mistakenly thinks that talking about having a big dick is a way to maneuver the conversation towards eventually hooking up in as straightforward and efficient a way as possible. So - that's what I'm talking about. When you say, "You can be straightforward", do you think there's many more straightforward ways of trying to get sexual than immediately talking about your dick? If so you're more straightforward than I know how to be. Perhaps you could educate me on how to be straightforward with a woman you barely know such that you want to bang her but don't want to be in a romantic relationship with her, and in a way that won't make her uncomfortable or get yourself labeled as hypersexual. I'm open to learning that. To you no, you are a lost cause.
Just not a lemming.
|
On January 14 2024 08:39 ThunderJunk wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2024 05:45 JimmiC wrote:On January 14 2024 05:30 ThunderJunk wrote:
Rapid out there trying to figure out how to get laid and getting hit hard by the reality that you're really not allowed to pursue sex with women so straightforwardly.
I could imagine someone teaching him that it's okay to pursue sex with women quickly and directly, and also him hearing that persistence is key when it comes to getting women... and then discovering the hard way that actually if you want sex in any context other than a romantic relationship, the world is very quick to socially castrate you.
The truth is that only a small number of men get away with banging lots of chicks without being pillaried for it - and they're all rich and successful. As a poor, unsuccessful party boy, Rapid never stood a chance.
In fairness, and I do mean fairness, having such a large sex drive probably makes not having sex frequently pretty uncomfortable - but at this point in history, men's discomforts that arise from not getting to bang aren't respected on anywhere near the same level as womens' discomforts with having to bang - and most people who think they're better than Rapid either have much lower sex drive than him or jerk off to pornography in private so they can be appropriately meek in public. That's probably you reading this comment (by the numbers).
My point is this: If you're shitting on Rapid for going after sex with women, but you jerk off to porn so you can fit into society - you're probably not much better than he is on a moral level - you're just smarter about living in a way that doesn't directly upset the people you interact with.
Rapid isn't an evil man - he's just a complete idiot. Lol What are you even talking about, you can be straightforward. You can't send pictures your junk (the same way you can't flash people) without permission and if they are under 18 it makes it far more creepy. I might not have been specific enough - "Many women accused Rapid of overt sexual advances that were incredibly inappropriate." "Mr. Rapid came over and his first words were, 'My dick is 26 cm long'" It's not a dick pic, but it is a dick-first statement. He seems to use dick-first statements a lot. I interpret it as he mistakenly thinks that talking about having a big dick is a way to maneuver the conversation towards eventually hooking up in as straightforward and efficient a way as possible. So - that's what I'm talking about. When you say, "You can be straightforward", do you think there's many more straightforward ways of trying to get sexual than immediately talking about your dick? If so you're more straightforward than I know how to be. Perhaps you could educate me on how to be straightforward with a woman you barely know such that you want to bang her but don't want to be in a romantic relationship with her, and in a way that won't make her uncomfortable or get yourself labeled as hypersexual. I'm open to learning that.
Lol it's funny to read a thread asking for sexual advice on a forum of a 25 year old game
|
On January 14 2024 08:51 Magic Powers wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2024 08:39 ThunderJunk wrote:On January 14 2024 05:45 JimmiC wrote:On January 14 2024 05:30 ThunderJunk wrote:
Rapid out there trying to figure out how to get laid and getting hit hard by the reality that you're really not allowed to pursue sex with women so straightforwardly.
I could imagine someone teaching him that it's okay to pursue sex with women quickly and directly, and also him hearing that persistence is key when it comes to getting women... and then discovering the hard way that actually if you want sex in any context other than a romantic relationship, the world is very quick to socially castrate you.
The truth is that only a small number of men get away with banging lots of chicks without being pillaried for it - and they're all rich and successful. As a poor, unsuccessful party boy, Rapid never stood a chance.
In fairness, and I do mean fairness, having such a large sex drive probably makes not having sex frequently pretty uncomfortable - but at this point in history, men's discomforts that arise from not getting to bang aren't respected on anywhere near the same level as womens' discomforts with having to bang - and most people who think they're better than Rapid either have much lower sex drive than him or jerk off to pornography in private so they can be appropriately meek in public. That's probably you reading this comment (by the numbers).
My point is this: If you're shitting on Rapid for going after sex with women, but you jerk off to porn so you can fit into society - you're probably not much better than he is on a moral level - you're just smarter about living in a way that doesn't directly upset the people you interact with.
Rapid isn't an evil man - he's just a complete idiot. Lol What are you even talking about, you can be straightforward. You can't send pictures your junk (the same way you can't flash people) without permission and if they are under 18 it makes it far more creepy. I might not have been specific enough - "Many women accused Rapid of overt sexual advances that were incredibly inappropriate." "Mr. Rapid came over and his first words were, 'My dick is 26 cm long'" It's not a dick pic, but it is a dick-first statement. He seems to use dick-first statements a lot. I interpret it as he mistakenly thinks that talking about having a big dick is a way to maneuver the conversation towards eventually hooking up in as straightforward and efficient a way as possible. So - that's what I'm talking about. When you say, "You can be straightforward", do you think there's many more straightforward ways of trying to get sexual than immediately talking about your dick? If so you're more straightforward than I know how to be. Perhaps you could educate me on how to be straightforward with a woman you barely know such that you want to bang her but don't want to be in a romantic relationship with her, and in a way that won't make her uncomfortable or get yourself labeled as hypersexual. I'm open to learning that. Here's how: you go to night clubs. All dedicated places for that specific purpose.
Yes - that would be smarter than blowing up your professsional space, wouldn't it.
|
|
|
On January 14 2024 08:39 ThunderJunk wrote:
"Mr. Rapid came over and his first words were, 'My dick is 26 cm long'"
It's not a dick pic, but it is a dick-first statement.
Dude, i'm so thankful i got to read this, my depression vanished in a second and i burst out laughing.
My point is this: If you're shitting on Rapid for going after sex with women, but you jerk off to porn so you can fit into society - you're probably not much better than he is on a moral level - you're just smarter about living in a way that doesn't directly upset the people you interact with.
This is a really good point btw. How many of us watched and jerked off to porn? No judgement. What if the girls or women you are watching are forced to do it by some psychopats who mistreat them daily? You can be sure that's the case for some of them, because human trafficking/slavery is real. Don't know why we are still opening more threads about Rapid's junk, but this is good food for thought.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
