|
https://starlog.gg/en/leaderboard
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/StarCraft_Remastered_Ladder
9 Korea chobodari 3402 Zerg 317 172 (Hero)
13 Korea Bisuvvvv 3378 Protoss 198 95 (Bisu)
14 Korea hamburgerzerg 3373 Zerg 150 74 (dream.t)nongmin)
15 Korea wGm.111 3361 Protoss 149 54 (Snow)
18 Korea ggaechobo 3345 Zerg 675 534 (Ggaemo)
19 Korea VoVoVoVoVoVoVoV 3339 Protoss 201 109 (???)
21 Korea vBisuv 3334 Protoss 179 73 (Bisu)
22 Korea wGm.Shine 3321 Zerg 297 188 (Shine)
25 Korea insung.byuk 3310 Zerg 137 49 (Soulkey)
27 Korea ggaemoda 3297 Zerg 147 61 (Ggaemo)
30 Korea GOMSUJANG 3281 Zerg 141 42 (Hero)
33 Korea ReadyCash 3260 Zerg 200 131 (???)
34 Korea InSung.mOvie 3248 Protoss 178 105 (Movie)
45 Korea xuanyi 3201 Zerg 319 215 (Savior?)
46 Korea lllllllllIlI 3199 Protoss 210 113 (Bisu)
47 Korea yseongmin 3198 Protoss 185 108 (???)
|
are u trying to imply something
|
I was talking about this like month ago.
top50 world: 34 terrans
top100 world: 68 terrans
top200 world: 109 terrans
...
|
yes~ i saw that too ~ moneyking and mind are first and second place! and that is for a long time now
|
2T-4Z-2P in ASL4 Ro8.
Really makes me think.
|
On December 16 2017 19:29 ZeroChrome wrote:
2T-4Z-2P in ASL4 Ro8.
Really makes me think.
To be fair the ASL maps were insanely zerg favored tho, especially in ZvT.
|
On December 16 2017 18:33 TT1 wrote:
are u trying to imply something
Te-sa-..... ah, nvm xD
|
|
|
On December 16 2017 19:29 ZeroChrome wrote:
2T-4Z-2P in ASL4 Ro8.
Really makes me think.
each player plays a max of like 10 games vs accounts in the hundreds of games. Maybe you should think longer
|
I have a post that about this topic, it's a vietnamese language but you can view picture to understand my opinion.
HERE
In short: T = P = Z almost cases but If you want to become top 1 on the world, let's think about change your race to Terran.
|
Once flash joins the military the game is going to look stupidly imbalanced in favor of Zerg.
|
Sponbang ELO Top 10
May: 5Z-3P-2T
June: 5Z-3P-2T
July: 4T-3Z-3P
August: 5Z-3P-2T
September: 5Z-3T-2P
October: 4Z-3P-3T
November: 4T-3Z-3P
December: 4T-3Z-3P
Conclusion: 저사기 =D
|
did u take note of double/triple id's ..? remember the days when last was #1,2 and 5th of fish ladder hehe
|
so are the other races, just look #1 to see Bisu 3 times
|
Nostalgia, Arcadia, fs and cb had a significant hand in this I’m sure.
|
On December 17 2017 00:03 Bonyth wrote:
so are the other races, just look #1 to see Bisu 3 times
the terran lineup on afreeca has always been incredible solid and dominant if u payed attention like before the time effort/jaedong/soulkey cameback to bw the lineup was simple more packed and of a higher tier pro gamers so just for anyone else if you wish to draw conclusions from this try to make an in depth analysis not just looking at a few ranks on a ladder
|
On December 16 2017 19:43 TT1 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 16 2017 19:29 ZeroChrome wrote:
2T-4Z-2P in ASL4 Ro8.
Really makes me think. To be fair the ASL maps were insanely zerg favored tho, especially in ZvT.
If you compare the ASL map to other map pools have done worse, how can you tell which is more balanced?
Edit: Honest question, I'm not trying to lead you into a trap. Unless player skills are glaringly disparate, player skill (resp. map balance) can only be evaluated when map balance (resp. player skill) is known, right?
|
On December 16 2017 19:43 TT1 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 16 2017 19:29 ZeroChrome wrote:
2T-4Z-2P in ASL4 Ro8.
Really makes me think. To be fair the ASL maps were insanely zerg favored tho, especially in ZvT.
Which only proves race balance is not inherent and universal but a result of the popular map pool, which currently is still heavily leaning towards FS, which is a Terran-favoured map, and CB, which is not bad for Terran, at the very least.
Would be interesting to see what would happen if Blizzard kicked those two and added the ASL maps instead (and Outlier, Central District and Battle Royale on top, to really get the ball rolling).
Player skill levels and map balance cannot really both be judged at the same time. It's a bit like the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Trying to measure the one will always interfere with the other. However, given a large enough player pool it is probably safer to assume that skill levels are evenly distributed and that map statistics with significant numbers of games can therefore be used to assess map balance.
And in comes the "but more skilled or ambitious players are more likely to play the more challenging race (Terran)"-argument. But I don't think there is actually any evidence to back this up.
|
Yes please! Lets balance BW with the same principle we balance sc2! 30% top ladder distribution for every race and equal tournament performance! Trust Blizzard in balancing this!
|
On December 16 2017 21:11 duke91 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 16 2017 19:29 ZeroChrome wrote:
2T-4Z-2P in ASL4 Ro8.
Really makes me think. each player plays a max of like 10 games vs accounts in the hundreds of games. Maybe you should think longer
and what do you think about the hundreds of sponsored games that result in zerg more often than not having the most top 10 players in ELO?
maybe you are the one who should be thinking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
