EPTI was talking about patch 1.16 for BW.
Kespa teams and ICCUP stayed on 1.15.3 because 1.16 had a lot of lag issues and stuff.
http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=84150 (r1ch explaining why it's a bad patch)
9th Sonic StarLeague info - Page 9
| Forum Index > BW General |
Harem
United States11393 Posts
I was talking about patch 1.16 for BW. Kespa teams and ICCUP stayed on 1.15.3 because 1.16 had a lot of lag issues and stuff. http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=84150 (r1ch explaining why it's a bad patch) | ||
|
Clbull
United Kingdom1439 Posts
What dead game? This is going to be sick. Imagine if Sonic managed to usher in a revival of professional BW in Korea and it were to eclipse SC2. To already host a prize pool almost as big as some of the OSLs/MSLs is a huge thing. I'm quite shocked Sonic isn't charging an admission fee for the offline Ro32 onwards. I feel like even if he charged like... $10 - $15, it would be quite a big boon. | ||
|
vgrezende
Brazil66 Posts
... right? | ||
|
Harem
United States11393 Posts
On December 14 2013 04:22 vgrezende wrote: We got Sayle to do an English Cast, right...? ... right? yes | ||
Rekrul
Korea (South)17174 Posts
| ||
|
Skeggaba
Korea (South)1556 Posts
Glad to have parttaken in SSL7 and that the tournament seems to be ever growing. Sonic hwaiting! | ||
intrigue
Washington, D.C9935 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28832 Posts
| ||
|
deus_073
Romania187 Posts
| ||
|
maybenexttime
Poland5831 Posts
On December 14 2013 05:26 Liquid`Drone wrote: blizzard!!!!! that is awesome. Hold your horses! How about "SONIC that is awesome"? Blizzard has hardly done anything yet, after destroying the game. | ||
|
Stratos
Czech Republic6104 Posts
On December 14 2013 05:59 maybenexttime wrote: Hold your horses! How about "SONIC that is awesome"? Blizzard has hardly done anything yet, after destroying the game. Indeed, Blizzard gave us Starcraft, but Sonic gave us STARCRAFT FRIDE!!! | ||
|
arb
Noobville17922 Posts
On December 14 2013 02:23 Hesmyrr wrote: Oh God no, simple graphics makeover - whose necessity is even debatable - is not enough to compensate for horror that is bnet 2.0... A graphics make over would result in an engine change though, and we might lose some of the better bugs that make bw playable/balanced tho. | ||
|
vOdToasT
Sweden2870 Posts
On December 14 2013 07:09 arb wrote: A graphics make over would result in an engine change though, and we might lose some of the better bugs that make bw playable/balanced tho. You could just change the sprites. Changing the graphics while keeping the gameplay identical is not a programming impossibility. I'm more worried about how it would look, considering Blizzard's art style since WarCraft III. | ||
|
arb
Noobville17922 Posts
On December 14 2013 07:24 vOdToasT wrote: You could just change the sprites. Changing the graphics while keeping the gameplay identical is not a programming impossibility. I'm more worried about how it would look, considering Blizzard's art style since WarCraft III. I dunno its hard for me to get away from the gritty warlike feel of BW. if it looked like war3 id prolly kill myself. dragoons etc didnt translate well into 3rd i noticed. | ||
|
Liquid`Drone
Norway28832 Posts
And besides, any "graphic update" would by popular demand have to come with interface improvements which would force the rebalancing of everything and destroy 14 years of strategical development. | ||
|
Xiphos
Canada7507 Posts
On December 14 2013 08:39 arb wrote: I dunno its hard for me to get away from the gritty warlike feel of BW. if it looked like war3 id prolly kill myself. dragoons etc didnt translate well into 3rd i noticed. You'll go suicidal over a game? Ooookay...that's going overboard. | ||
|
fabiano
Brazil4644 Posts
On December 10 2013 02:19 Harem wrote: Killer is 5-1 vs Jangbi since Jangbi came back. Harem came back from the shadows, the forgotten hero rises once again! | ||
|
Shana
Indonesia1814 Posts
| ||
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
 On December 14 2013 08:59 Liquid`Drone wrote: chess is not a better game with prettier game pieces. as long as stuff is easily distinguishable from other stuff then the graphics are fine; and from my point of view brood war does a better job of this than any other game with equally hectic action. There is no need to freshen up the graphics, brood war streamed at the highest quality looks pretty good. And besides, any "graphic update" would by popular demand have to come with interface improvements which would force the rebalancing of everything and destroy 14 years of strategical development. this. No remake of BW please. Leave the game as is. The bugs like muta stacking are due to the engine and such. Making any changes to it even graphical will have a much more profound effect than is realized. | ||
|
vOdToasT
Sweden2870 Posts
On December 14 2013 10:41 BigFan wrote: Surprised to hear that Blizzard will post about it but as mentioned, maybe it'll be a small post or something. Either way, good news. Interesting sponsor, hopefully it goes really well and we see them return for SSL10 this. No remake of BW please. Leave the game as is. The bugs like muta stacking are due to the engine and such. Making any changes to it even graphical will have a much more profound effect than is realized. Not if you just change the sprites... It is possible to change only how the sprites look, and not how anything behaves. | ||
| ||
