EPTYou can alter and distrube the map as you like as long as you keep this and give credit to the creator of the map (Tempz)
http://sc.nibbits.com/maps/project/77616/world-map-by-tempz
Image of map.
http://sc.nibbits.com/maps/view/137326/preview/
Starcraft World Map (30 hours)
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Tempz
3 Posts
You can alter and distrube the map as you like as long as you keep this and give credit to the creator of the map (Tempz) http://sc.nibbits.com/maps/project/77616/world-map-by-tempz Image of map. http://sc.nibbits.com/maps/view/137326/preview/ | ||
|
legoboomette
England165 Posts
| ||
|
Chef
10810 Posts
| ||
|
neobowman
Canada3324 Posts
| ||
|
3FFA
United States3931 Posts
 Nice job, but as said by Chef, it isn't actually much better. Seems to be just a new map of the globe that is more accurate than the current risk maps on B.net to the true globe. | ||
|
dsousa
United States1363 Posts
I think an 8 player FFA world map with 32 bases would be sweet. Not balanced but, real life's not balanced either. | ||
|
torm3ntin
Brazil2534 Posts
| ||
|
d3_crescentia
United States4054 Posts
| ||
|
empty.bottle
685 Posts
| ||
|
HaFnium
United Kingdom1076 Posts
| ||
|
Tempz
3 Posts
| ||
|
LarJarsE
United States1378 Posts
here is a nice looking map from broodwarmaps.net http://www.panschk.de/mappage/comments.php?mapid=2148 ![[image loading]](http://www.panschk.de/mappage/10.jpg) | ||
FlaShFTW
United States10337 Posts
On May 22 2012 06:38 LarJarsE wrote: tbh its pretty ugly :/ it's really blocky and there are tons of straight lines that look unnatural here is a nice looking map from broodwarmaps.net http://www.panschk.de/mappage/comments.php?mapid=2148 terran imba. ^.^ the map doesnt look too bad, but too many blocky features make it unnatural. | ||
|
Meth
Canada396 Posts
On May 22 2012 06:38 LarJarsE wrote: here is a nice looking map from broodwarmaps.net http://www.panschk.de/mappage/comments.php?mapid=2148 that looks fun to play! | ||
|
3FFA
United States3931 Posts
| ||
|
S2Glow
Singapore1042 Posts
| ||
|
aokces
United States309 Posts
The other map would look better without Antarctica, but I guess removing it now would just be a lot of empty space. Their needs to be broken terrain in Asia like cliffs or something for Tibet/Himalayas and maybe the Urals, as it is it's waay too open. There was another World map made a long time ago. It's not as detailed/accurate as the one you made, but much better for gameplay since it makes the most use of terrain and expansions. And besides, when you play all you see is the minimap, how well the map looks zoomed out doesn't matter. http://www.panschk.de/mappage/comments.php?mapid=4496 ![[image loading]](http://i46.tinypic.com/2ikcg3k.jpg) | ||
|
Tempz
3 Posts
On May 22 2012 12:45 aokces wrote: The original map still needs a lot of work... to be playable. The other map would look better without Antarctica, but I guess removing it now would just be a lot of empty space. Their needs to be broken terrain in Asia like cliffs or something for Tibet/Himalayas and maybe the Urals, as it is it's waay too open. There was another World map made a long time ago. It's not as detailed/accurate as the one you made, but much better for gameplay since it makes the most use of terrain and expansions. And besides, when you play all you see is the minimap, how well the map looks zoomed out doesn't matter. http://www.panschk.de/mappage/comments.php?mapid=4496 Any tips on how to balance the world map? | ||
| ||
