EPTBeta was late 97
Old School players? - Page 3
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
FrEaK[S.sIR]
2373 Posts
Beta was late 97 | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On September 02 2005 18:22 ComicBookArtist wrote: Let us not forget ChanmanX, who had a very impressive record. HAHA chanmanx is a legend! who was the other guy? the one on vanilla starcraft that had thousands and thousands of games was it JimKeeley ? | ||
|
baelrog
Austria705 Posts
| ||
|
Chereoke
Zimbabwe201 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
| ||
|
Spegel
Sweden96 Posts
On September 03 2005 02:38 travis wrote: HAHA chanmanx is a legend! who was the other guy? the one on vanilla starcraft that had thousands and thousands of games was it JimKeeley ? TheWorkHorse and Engival had similar records, those was crazy like 11453-5-0. no way those could be real. | ||
|
Mabus
Uganda41 Posts
| ||
|
LastWish
2015 Posts
All I can find in patches is that it's buildtime was once as zealots'... | ||
|
artofmagic
United States1951 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28789 Posts
chanmanx record was "legit" and by that I mean he played bgh vs newbies while maphacking also frozenarbiter you are wrong zileas won 4-3 vs agent zileas won the first 3 then agent won 3 then zileas won the last  | ||
|
Z3rgasm
Indonesia7 Posts
On September 03 2005 06:36 LastWish wrote: I'm just curious what is the "much better dragoons"? All I can find in patches is that it's buildtime was once as zealots'... I'm pretty sure that BW's goon range upgrade is much stronger than it was in vanilla. And yes the build time were also much faster when bw was first released. Edit : Patch 1.04 (basically, the change that bw introduced) Dragoon: - Decreased cost to 125 minerals, 50 gas. - Decreased build time. - Increased range upgrade (Singularity Charge) by 1. The build time was increased back by 1.08 | ||
|
Luhh
Sweden2974 Posts
50% faster larvae spawn rate. hatchery only cost 50 more spawning pool 150 Hence it actually made a LOT of sense not to slap down the extra hatchery as early as now. you could still pump decently from 1 hatch, and the faster tech really hurt a protoss for instance since archons was extremely sluggish and had low acceleration when moving, and cannons did explosive damage. Only 10 against mutas that is :O. But generally, people built far too few hatcheries, gateways, factories etc. But also remember that factories were like 250/150 or something... | ||
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33719 Posts
On September 03 2005 07:19 Liquid`Drone wrote: engival was one of the first winbotters I think chanmanx record was "legit" and by that I mean he played bgh vs newbies while maphacking also frozenarbiter you are wrong zileas won 4-3 vs agent zileas won the first 3 then agent won 3 then zileas won the last T_T! That was a typo! I even checked the score before writing since I was sure zileas won ;D | ||
|
RiSE
United States3182 Posts
On September 02 2005 17:59 Xeroth wrote: Also, where did Spunky, slayer, and corbalt(He used to be considered very good protoss) go. Corbalt is very active on east ;o | ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
| ||
|
nArAnjO
Peru2571 Posts
| ||
|
NettleS
522 Posts
On September 03 2005 08:34 Luhh wrote: But generally, people built far too few hatcheries, gateways, factories etc. But also remember that factories were like 250/150 or something... i dont remember that | ||
|
Xeroth
United States432 Posts
I remember hearing something abotu someone using a namespoof on testies name or something, which explained why there was no instance of him hacking since 1.07, then all of a sudden 1 game in 1.09 where it shows him hacking, and then no instance of him hacking since. Also "Testie"(dunno if it was him or not) did some cheese bunker shit, and Eri went fast cars, and hten testie just pumped like 5 rax of marines, and made no medics. So it could have been on vanilla SC. Thats all I remember about it. Oh, and OB1 and OB2 were in the game. | ||
|
PuertoRican
United States5709 Posts
On September 03 2005 01:13 FrEaK[S.sIR] wrote: Except it came out in early 98 >.< Beta was late 97 yes, im aware when i started playing, thanks for pointing it out. it helps since it was as late birthday present and my b-day is 8/23/1982 Platform: PC Publisher: Vivendi Universal Games Developer: Blizzard Entertainment Genre: RTS (Real-Time Strategy) Release Date: 1997 guess my video wont work. | ||
|
FrEaK[S.sIR]
2373 Posts
On September 03 2005 11:32 PuertoRican wrote: yes, im aware when i started playing, thanks for pointing it out. it helps since it was as late birthday present and my b-day is 8/23/1982 Platform: PC Publisher: Vivendi Universal Games Developer: Blizzard Entertainment Genre: RTS (Real-Time Strategy) Release Date: 1997 guess my video wont work. Look harder. It wasn't released in 1997, the copyright and release date posted by blizzard has been wrong for years. Not that I expect you to actually look for it. EDIT: Specifically, it was released March 30 1998. How you could have owned the game in 1997 when the beta signups started on January 5th is beyond me.. and it would appear I messed up the beta date. Either way, check up your facts. | ||
| ||
