• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 22:06
CEST 04:06
KST 11:06
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202530RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams2Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Corsair Pursuit Micro?
Tourneys
[CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 545 users

SC2 in Proleague? - Page 55

Forum Index > BW General
1399 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 53 54 55 56 57 70 Next
m4gdelen4
Profile Joined October 2008
United States416 Posts
October 23 2011 02:03 GMT
#1081
On October 23 2011 00:18 Warlord_Master wrote:
I will always consider brood war like chess, a classic game that can never be forgotten.


This is word for word exactly how I feel about BW too! I completely agree.
it does to blue what blue does to you
Torpedo.Vegas
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States1890 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-23 10:12:53
October 23 2011 10:10 GMT
#1082
On October 23 2011 04:32 HaFnium wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 22 2011 10:51 Torpedo.Vegas wrote:
I defer to the BW fans who have been around long enough to see the BW scene grow and change. But assuming BW does innately require more skill, is a better Starcraft game, and is better is most meaningful ways with respect to a competitive RTS, why hasn't is reached/reaching the levels of wide spread interest that SC2 is showing? What should be done differently to get this audience? If it is truly the better game, ultimately is shouldn't be confined to Korea. So giving the skill argument to BW, how does that contribute to making a better competitive game game to broadcast?

My question is not from the SC2 vs. BW game design necessarily, but from the SC2 vs. BW business models. I do think SC2 is partially inflated due to newness and constant spotlight attention, but things like Barcraft or the amount of money willing to be pushed into this game from 3rd party sources tells me SC2 is not just a fad that will go gently into that good night.

At the moment, BW may be superior to compete in, but SC2 is superior to sell and grow. I personally think a better use of a BW fan's time would be to take that BW passion and insight and try to mold SC2 in such a way as to avoid past pitfalls and to polish SC2 into it own BW (not BE BW). But it seems like because SC2 will never be BW, it can't become as successful as BW, which I think is filled with so many assumptions that it can't be anything other that trollbait opinion.



SCBW has been doing exceptionally well.
When SCBW was out there was nothing.
no youtube, no livestreams, no commentaries, hell even no replay pre 1.08 patches.
It wasn't designed with e-sport in mind at all but stll grew substantially. In fact I think its one of the most succesful game in driving e-sports forward. Why would blizzard make SC2 had they not seen the success of BW?

And on the fading bit.
Is classical music better or pop music the better music? Good/bad has nothing to do with popularity.
Unfortunately the mass(refering to ppl like you) mainly like graphics and want new stuff so they tend to avoid old stuff. (consumerist) Due to the handicaps mentioned above it took BW quite long to development and by that time the mass would simply not play it.

SC2 will meet the same fate, newer engines, graphics, gameplay might make it obsolete and we may have to see SC3. BW lasted at least 10 years (still going on of coz) and lets see how many years can SC2 last lol


I think the difference is SC2 has BW to build on and SC2 does have developer, community and tournament support that BW never had, built into the game itself. I think graphics and audio capabilities will certainly need upgrading in the future, but I think it is more likely to use SC2 as a platform to upgrade rather then toss it out for a whole new game since Blizzard will probably already have a stable and profitable business model that can mold over time.

I perhaps it won't be SC2, but I think there will come a time where SC will become a platform that the game is built on rather than an isolated game itself. So it could be updated and upgraded overtime without overturning the player and fan base.

Also, I owned and played BW since 2001-2002. Not competitively, but I am not some graphics noobie that jumped on during SC2. I was playing BW on and off until my rig started messing with it so much that it became nearly unplayable and I really didn't know how to mod it back into shape.


NesQuick
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6 Posts
October 23 2011 15:39 GMT
#1083
On October 22 2011 04:52 villageidiot wrote:

Most owners of the kespa are local korean companies, so integration of foreign scene is a vague thing. However people in US and Europe could start using korean telecommunication service providers...


I think such a partnership is what would ultimately drive the transition. Seeing how well the foreign scene is succeeding a business idiot like my self can see how profitable a partnership for international broadcast rights could be. I could see MLG or some similar company picking up English broadcast rights.
Spawn Larva, spawn Overlords. What's this business with Pylons and Probes!?!?
Torpedo.Vegas
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States1890 Posts
October 24 2011 07:34 GMT
#1084
On October 24 2011 00:39 NesQuick wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 22 2011 04:52 villageidiot wrote:

Most owners of the kespa are local korean companies, so integration of foreign scene is a vague thing. However people in US and Europe could start using korean telecommunication service providers...


I think such a partnership is what would ultimately drive the transition. Seeing how well the foreign scene is succeeding a business idiot like my self can see how profitable a partnership for international broadcast rights could be. I could see MLG or some similar company picking up English broadcast rights.


They would have to take a risk and invest a lot in upgrading presentation and infrastructure if they intend to target not only the current foreign BW fans, but attract newbies too.
Lunareste
Profile Joined July 2011
United States3596 Posts
October 24 2011 08:00 GMT
#1085
So, completely serious question here because I don't understand.

Why does it matter so much if Korea (and KeSPA) take up SC2 at all when SC2 is growing exponentially everywhere else around the world? Why is the acceptance of SC2 in Korea such a big deal?

From an outsider's prospective it seems like SC2 is doing just fine.
KT FlaSh FOREVER
SynapseSC
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States86 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-24 12:32:45
October 24 2011 12:30 GMT
#1086
On October 24 2011 17:00 synergy_sin wrote:
So, completely serious question here because I don't understand.

Why does it matter so much if Korea (and KeSPA) take up SC2 at all when SC2 is growing exponentially everywhere else around the world? Why is the acceptance of SC2 in Korea such a big deal?

From an outsider's prospective it seems like SC2 is doing just fine.


I followed BW decently well and I'm now an avid SC2 fan (though I still try to keep up on BW).. and I agree.

As crazy as it may sound to those who are/were BW fans, if SC2 is able to keep up its growth on an international level I believe it can reach a point where Korea will not need to be the mecca of the game. If prize pools & salaries someday reach a point where it makes more sense for top Korean gamers to move internationally and play instead of top international players moving there for the better training, SC2 in Korea may not be as big of a deal as it would seem to be. Especially considering the lack of funding for Korean teams right now and the seemingly looming arms race between MLG and IPL, this may start to slowly shift sooner rather than later. Some players (PuMa, Rain, etc) have already joined international teams.
tyCe
Profile Joined March 2010
Australia2542 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-24 13:25:43
October 24 2011 13:13 GMT
#1087
Quite frankly, SC2 does not need KeSPA. To the contrary, KeSPA needs SC2. KeSPA alone will not legitimise SC2 in Korea. Look at its pedigree: a number of insular-scale games and BW, which is dying in popularity in both Korea and worldwide (this is not open to debate if you look at: 1. Crowd sizes compared to a few years back; and 2. The popular opinion of BW progaming as a profession and game addiction today compared to a few years back).

On the other hand, Blizzard can fast track some development in Korean SC2 progaming by allowing KeSPA into the picture, though it may risk alienating GOM, which I feel has done a commendable job in the past year. However, it is no secret that the large multinational Korean companies are far more interested in sponsoring SC2 progaming than BW alone because of the wider and greater reach (see recent team sponsorship negotiation issues; also compare sponsors of BW teams with the juggernauts of LG, Pepsi, Coca Cola, etc of SC2). Truth be told, KeSPA must feel like a beggar at the bargaining table and the situation will only worsen with time. The contrast between the recent "international" esports festival showcasing games with no global appeal, and competitions like DreamHack, MLG, IEM etc highlights KeSPA's problem very well: increasing irrelevance.

KeSPA in this current state cannot keep BW alive for long. However, if they do embrace SC2 for better sponsorship deals and global interest, BW will similarly lose a great portion of its rising talent to SC2 due to KeSPA helping SC2's legitimacy in Korea (not needed for SC2 but it will help of course). I really think that the only way to keep BW alive for long is to revamp its graphics. As long as it seems as modern and shiny as SC2, it will be treated as the superior and more skill-demanding version of SC2. However, this requires Blizzard approval and I doubt Blizzard will ever agree.

Edit: actually BW fans should be very nervous due to this piece of news as KeSPA is evidently considering trying to usurp GOM's position as the organiser of SC2 progaming at the most revered location, Korea. This is clearly a selfish move or a move designed to guarantee its own survival. If the day comes where KeSPA is realizing more profits from SC2 than BW (and this day will come soon if they do usurp GOM's position), then I doubt they will do all that much to guarantee BW's survival when it is clear that encouraging players like Flash or Jaedon to SC2 will grant KeSPA more profit. KeSPA is certainly not a savior for BW; they are a naive, greedy and insular organization that was too short sighted to negotiate a compromised deal with Blizzard on SC2 in the first instance and is now regretting its past decisions and ultimately jealous of GOM's mutual success and benefit with Blizzard. The explosion of SC2 popularity worldwide contradicted their belief of self-importance and surprised them with their own insignificance on the world stage. They want their position of influence back and more importantly they want a share of the global pie. Therefore, they are going back on their previous stance of matyring themselves for the sake of Korean culture and the good of BW and other alibis, because theyve finally found out in the off season how much money and prestige they are missing out on.
Betrayed by EG.BuK
Vuk_91
Profile Joined September 2010
Serbia1690 Posts
October 24 2011 13:25 GMT
#1088
On October 24 2011 22:13 tyCe wrote:
Quite frankly, SC2 does not need KeSPA. To the contrary, KeSPA needs SC2. KeSPA alone will not legitimise SC2 in Korea. Look at its pedigree: a number of insular-scale games and BW, which is dying in popularity in both Korea and worldwide (this is not open to debate if you look at: 1. Crowd sizes compared to a few years back; and 2. The popular opinion of BW progaming as a profession and game addiction today compared to a few years back).

On the other hand, Blizzard can fast track some development in Korean SC2 progaming by allowing KeSPA into the picture, though it may risk alienating GOM, which I feel has done a commendable job in the past year. However, it is no secret that the large multinational Korean companies are far more interested in sponsoring SC2 progaming than BW alone because of the wider and greater reach (see recent team sponsorship negotiation issues; also compare sponsors of BW teams with the juggernauts of LG, Pepsi, Coca Cola, etc of SC2). Truth be told, KeSPA must feel like a beggar at the bargaining table and the situation will only worsen with time. The contrast between the recent "international" esports festival showcasing games with no global appeal, and competitions like DreamHack, MLG, IEM etc highlights KeSPA's problem very well: increasing irrelevance.

KeSPA in this current state cannot keep BW alive for long. However, if they do embrace SC2 for better sponsorship deals and global interest, BW will similarly lose a great portion of its rising talent to SC2 due to KeSPA helping SC2's legitimacy in Korea (not needed for SC2 but it will help of course). I really think that the only way to keep BW alive for long is to revamp its graphics. As long as it seems as modern and shiny as SC2, it will be treated as the superior and more skill-demanding version of SC2. However, this requires Blizzard approval and I doubt Blizzard will ever agree.

One thing: Proleague finals were the most viewed e-sport event in Korea,and those numbers in China were frightening!
Ikonn
Profile Joined October 2009
Netherlands1958 Posts
October 24 2011 13:27 GMT
#1089
LG is the only one of those "juggernauts" who expressed some interest in actually sponsoring more than a tournament and Pepsi and Coca Cola could be just riding the hype wave like they did with BW ten years ago. Compare that to Shinhan Bank, Samsung, Korean Air, the two big Korean telecom providers and I don't know what the hell you're trying to say
tyCe
Profile Joined March 2010
Australia2542 Posts
October 24 2011 13:33 GMT
#1090
On October 24 2011 22:25 Vuk_91 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2011 22:13 tyCe wrote:
Quite frankly, SC2 does not need KeSPA. To the contrary, KeSPA needs SC2. KeSPA alone will not legitimise SC2 in Korea. Look at its pedigree: a number of insular-scale games and BW, which is dying in popularity in both Korea and worldwide (this is not open to debate if you look at: 1. Crowd sizes compared to a few years back; and 2. The popular opinion of BW progaming as a profession and game addiction today compared to a few years back).

On the other hand, Blizzard can fast track some development in Korean SC2 progaming by allowing KeSPA into the picture, though it may risk alienating GOM, which I feel has done a commendable job in the past year. However, it is no secret that the large multinational Korean companies are far more interested in sponsoring SC2 progaming than BW alone because of the wider and greater reach (see recent team sponsorship negotiation issues; also compare sponsors of BW teams with the juggernauts of LG, Pepsi, Coca Cola, etc of SC2). Truth be told, KeSPA must feel like a beggar at the bargaining table and the situation will only worsen with time. The contrast between the recent "international" esports festival showcasing games with no global appeal, and competitions like DreamHack, MLG, IEM etc highlights KeSPA's problem very well: increasing irrelevance.

KeSPA in this current state cannot keep BW alive for long. However, if they do embrace SC2 for better sponsorship deals and global interest, BW will similarly lose a great portion of its rising talent to SC2 due to KeSPA helping SC2's legitimacy in Korea (not needed for SC2 but it will help of course). I really think that the only way to keep BW alive for long is to revamp its graphics. As long as it seems as modern and shiny as SC2, it will be treated as the superior and more skill-demanding version of SC2. However, this requires Blizzard approval and I doubt Blizzard will ever agree.

One thing: Proleague finals were the most viewed e-sport event in Korea,and those numbers in China were frightening!

Numbers from China are always frightening. The numbers for DotA and other MOBAs in China will probably make KeSPA cream their pants. In any case it doesn't matter what the numbers in Korea were (and the live audience was smaller than usual no? Combined with poor usual viewing outside the finals and the demise of the MSL... Although, if I'm wrong then I'm sorry), because esports is going GLOBAL and Korea alone is but a drop in the ocean of potential viewership and advertising and sponsorship revenue. Big sponsors really help legitimise an event and if SC2, viewed as a direct rival, is getting bigger sponsors, then it is not only getting more money but more recognition. I really don't think BW will survive much longer then, or it will become increasingly irrelevant.
Betrayed by EG.BuK
konadora *
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Singapore66159 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-24 13:37:59
October 24 2011 13:37 GMT
#1091
On October 24 2011 22:13 tyCe wrote:
...
KeSPA in this current state cannot keep BW alive for long. However, if they do embrace SC2 for better sponsorship deals and global interest, BW will similarly lose a great portion of its rising talent to SC2 due to KeSPA helping SC2's legitimacy in Korea (not needed for SC2 but it will help of course). I really think that the only way to keep BW alive for long is to revamp its graphics. As long as it seems as modern and shiny as SC2, it will be treated as the superior and more skill-demanding version of SC2. However, this requires Blizzard approval and I doubt Blizzard will ever agree.
...

this post was decent until i read this lol

revamped graphics? really?

graphics isn't what separate good games from great games. if you can't see that then you're no different from blind fanatics
POGGERS
Kipsate
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Netherlands45349 Posts
October 24 2011 13:45 GMT
#1092
On October 24 2011 22:37 konadora wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2011 22:13 tyCe wrote:
...
KeSPA in this current state cannot keep BW alive for long. However, if they do embrace SC2 for better sponsorship deals and global interest, BW will similarly lose a great portion of its rising talent to SC2 due to KeSPA helping SC2's legitimacy in Korea (not needed for SC2 but it will help of course). I really think that the only way to keep BW alive for long is to revamp its graphics. As long as it seems as modern and shiny as SC2, it will be treated as the superior and more skill-demanding version of SC2. However, this requires Blizzard approval and I doubt Blizzard will ever agree.
...

this post was decent until i read this lol

revamped graphics? really?

graphics isn't what separate good games from great games. if you can't see that then you're no different from blind fanatics


While you are right about that, fact is that the general populace(read, casuals) would like to see shiny graphics.
WriterXiao8~~
hitthat
Profile Joined January 2010
Poland2267 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-24 13:54:13
October 24 2011 13:51 GMT
#1093
On October 24 2011 22:45 Kipsate wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2011 22:37 konadora wrote:
On October 24 2011 22:13 tyCe wrote:
...
KeSPA in this current state cannot keep BW alive for long. However, if they do embrace SC2 for better sponsorship deals and global interest, BW will similarly lose a great portion of its rising talent to SC2 due to KeSPA helping SC2's legitimacy in Korea (not needed for SC2 but it will help of course). I really think that the only way to keep BW alive for long is to revamp its graphics. As long as it seems as modern and shiny as SC2, it will be treated as the superior and more skill-demanding version of SC2. However, this requires Blizzard approval and I doubt Blizzard will ever agree.
...

this post was decent until i read this lol

revamped graphics? really?

graphics isn't what separate good games from great games. if you can't see that then you're no different from blind fanatics


While you are right about that, fact is that the general populace(read, casuals) would like to see shiny graphics.


Its not even true. Company of Heroes got exeptional multiplayer gameplay (no mirror MU, so not a good tournament game) and better graphics than SC2, yet it's still less popular than the newest "warcraft in space".
Shameless BroodWar separatistic, elitist, fanaticaly devoted puritan fanboy.
Darkong
Profile Joined February 2010
United Kingdom418 Posts
October 24 2011 15:00 GMT
#1094
On October 24 2011 22:45 Kipsate wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2011 22:37 konadora wrote:
On October 24 2011 22:13 tyCe wrote:
...
KeSPA in this current state cannot keep BW alive for long. However, if they do embrace SC2 for better sponsorship deals and global interest, BW will similarly lose a great portion of its rising talent to SC2 due to KeSPA helping SC2's legitimacy in Korea (not needed for SC2 but it will help of course). I really think that the only way to keep BW alive for long is to revamp its graphics. As long as it seems as modern and shiny as SC2, it will be treated as the superior and more skill-demanding version of SC2. However, this requires Blizzard approval and I doubt Blizzard will ever agree.
...

this post was decent until i read this lol

revamped graphics? really?

graphics isn't what separate good games from great games. if you can't see that then you're no different from blind fanatics


While you are right about that, fact is that the general populace(read, casuals) would like to see shiny graphics.


I would disagree with that, the people who are the most obsessed with graphic quality are the more core gamers. The casual gamers (god I hate that term) don't care so much, just look at the rise in popularity of Flash and browser based games, portable games on the iPhone and Android as well as how the Wii and DS have performed, graphics just aren't that relevant to the general gaming population.
Trolling the Battle.Net forums, the most fun you can have with your pants on.
white_horse
Profile Joined July 2010
1019 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-24 15:40:35
October 24 2011 15:37 GMT
#1095
On October 24 2011 22:13 tyCe wrote:
...


First of all you are over-analyzing everything and making many assumptions. How would you know so much about what kespa thinks?

Also, why do you and other people assume that SC2 in proleague is going to make brood war players slowly switch to it? Nearly all of the BW progamers who want to switch already have. For those with a decent stipend, a still relatively stable practice environment, and most importantly: the hundreds of hours of time they have put into BW and the passion they have for the game, what makes you think people are going to start switching over?
Translator
maybenexttime
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Poland5552 Posts
October 24 2011 16:08 GMT
#1096
On October 24 2011 22:33 tyCe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2011 22:25 Vuk_91 wrote:
On October 24 2011 22:13 tyCe wrote:
Quite frankly, SC2 does not need KeSPA. To the contrary, KeSPA needs SC2. KeSPA alone will not legitimise SC2 in Korea. Look at its pedigree: a number of insular-scale games and BW, which is dying in popularity in both Korea and worldwide (this is not open to debate if you look at: 1. Crowd sizes compared to a few years back; and 2. The popular opinion of BW progaming as a profession and game addiction today compared to a few years back).

On the other hand, Blizzard can fast track some development in Korean SC2 progaming by allowing KeSPA into the picture, though it may risk alienating GOM, which I feel has done a commendable job in the past year. However, it is no secret that the large multinational Korean companies are far more interested in sponsoring SC2 progaming than BW alone because of the wider and greater reach (see recent team sponsorship negotiation issues; also compare sponsors of BW teams with the juggernauts of LG, Pepsi, Coca Cola, etc of SC2). Truth be told, KeSPA must feel like a beggar at the bargaining table and the situation will only worsen with time. The contrast between the recent "international" esports festival showcasing games with no global appeal, and competitions like DreamHack, MLG, IEM etc highlights KeSPA's problem very well: increasing irrelevance.

KeSPA in this current state cannot keep BW alive for long. However, if they do embrace SC2 for better sponsorship deals and global interest, BW will similarly lose a great portion of its rising talent to SC2 due to KeSPA helping SC2's legitimacy in Korea (not needed for SC2 but it will help of course). I really think that the only way to keep BW alive for long is to revamp its graphics. As long as it seems as modern and shiny as SC2, it will be treated as the superior and more skill-demanding version of SC2. However, this requires Blizzard approval and I doubt Blizzard will ever agree.

One thing: Proleague finals were the most viewed e-sport event in Korea,and those numbers in China were frightening!

Numbers from China are always frightening. The numbers for DotA and other MOBAs in China will probably make KeSPA cream their pants. In any case it doesn't matter what the numbers in Korea were (and the live audience was smaller than usual no? Combined with poor usual viewing outside the finals and the demise of the MSL... Although, if I'm wrong then I'm sorry), because esports is going GLOBAL and Korea alone is but a drop in the ocean of potential viewership and advertising and sponsorship revenue. Big sponsors really help legitimise an event and if SC2, viewed as a direct rival, is getting bigger sponsors, then it is not only getting more money but more recognition. I really don't think BW will survive much longer then, or it will become increasingly irrelevant.


How on earth is SC2 getting bigger sponsors? Are you seriously comparing the likes of Samsung, SKT, KT, CJ, STX and so on to some chicken joints? Sponsors like Pepsi or Coca Cola are investing pennies into SC2 compared to what the former are investing into BW.

I also don't see how KeSPA needs SC2 at all. Their focus is Korea and China to a degree. SC2 is nearly dead in Korea compared to BW. KeSPA needing SC2 is like saying a swimmer needs to hang on to a drowning person. ;;

And saying KeSPA must feel like a beggar is even more ridiculous. Blizzard backed out of all their stupid demands. KeSPA essentially got what they wanted in terms of BW.

As for large multinational Korean companies prefering SC2 over BW. LG sponsored a single SC2 tournament afaik. Samsung, STX, CJ etc. sponsor BW. What's your point?

SC2's popularity in the west is a fad. Didn't it already lose half of the players or so since release? LoL is stealing viewers away from SC2, soon DotA 2 will and potentially the new CS.
Kiett
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States7639 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-24 16:16:23
October 24 2011 16:12 GMT
#1097
On October 24 2011 22:33 tyCe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2011 22:25 Vuk_91 wrote:
On October 24 2011 22:13 tyCe wrote:
Quite frankly, SC2 does not need KeSPA. To the contrary, KeSPA needs SC2. KeSPA alone will not legitimise SC2 in Korea. Look at its pedigree: a number of insular-scale games and BW, which is dying in popularity in both Korea and worldwide (this is not open to debate if you look at: 1. Crowd sizes compared to a few years back; and 2. The popular opinion of BW progaming as a profession and game addiction today compared to a few years back).

On the other hand, Blizzard can fast track some development in Korean SC2 progaming by allowing KeSPA into the picture, though it may risk alienating GOM, which I feel has done a commendable job in the past year. However, it is no secret that the large multinational Korean companies are far more interested in sponsoring SC2 progaming than BW alone because of the wider and greater reach (see recent team sponsorship negotiation issues; also compare sponsors of BW teams with the juggernauts of LG, Pepsi, Coca Cola, etc of SC2). Truth be told, KeSPA must feel like a beggar at the bargaining table and the situation will only worsen with time. The contrast between the recent "international" esports festival showcasing games with no global appeal, and competitions like DreamHack, MLG, IEM etc highlights KeSPA's problem very well: increasing irrelevance.

KeSPA in this current state cannot keep BW alive for long. However, if they do embrace SC2 for better sponsorship deals and global interest, BW will similarly lose a great portion of its rising talent to SC2 due to KeSPA helping SC2's legitimacy in Korea (not needed for SC2 but it will help of course). I really think that the only way to keep BW alive for long is to revamp its graphics. As long as it seems as modern and shiny as SC2, it will be treated as the superior and more skill-demanding version of SC2. However, this requires Blizzard approval and I doubt Blizzard will ever agree.

One thing: Proleague finals were the most viewed e-sport event in Korea,and those numbers in China were frightening!

Numbers from China are always frightening. The numbers for DotA and other MOBAs in China will probably make KeSPA cream their pants. In any case it doesn't matter what the numbers in Korea were (and the live audience was smaller than usual no? Combined with poor usual viewing outside the finals and the demise of the MSL... Although, if I'm wrong then I'm sorry), because esports is going GLOBAL and Korea alone is but a drop in the ocean of potential viewership and advertising and sponsorship revenue. Big sponsors really help legitimise an event and if SC2, viewed as a direct rival, is getting bigger sponsors, then it is not only getting more money but more recognition. I really don't think BW will survive much longer then, or it will become increasingly irrelevant.



Less people went to the Proleague finals because they were scheduled in a hurry, after the ones in Shanghai were cancelled due to the typhoon. The venue was booked last minute, so it was a smaller place than it normally would be. And it still managed to draw some 7000 people. And people go to watch games they care about/players they like; this applies to any esport, including SC2 too as well. Look at the ABC Mart MSL Ro32 Group D matches, or the Jin Air OSL Ro8 (Jangbi vs. Flash). Neither were finals, but both had completely packed stadiums, with barely even any standing room. If you're going to pick days where there are less popular players/teams, then say "see? nobody goes to watch BW anymore," that's not a very valid point.

I mean, for the most part, I think you're right: BW won't become increasingly relevant, and esports is indeed expanding past Korea, but I wanted to set the record straight on some of the things you were claiming.
Writer:o
Easytouch1500
Profile Joined July 2011
United States66 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-24 17:17:58
October 24 2011 17:12 GMT
#1098
On the qq about the removal of the carrier...
The carrier just doesn't belong in sc2 with the existence of the colossus. It doesn't really synergize well with the protons endgame army. That's why I think they added the tempest, as it does synergize really well with colossus.

"He sees my 8 stalkers and my giant e-penis, and he's gonna make sentries" -Alejandrisha
PlosionCornu
Profile Joined August 2010
Italy814 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-24 17:43:15
October 24 2011 17:42 GMT
#1099
Well, I'd consider pretty reasonable an attempt to expand their business in the anglosphere from kespa, in the same way they are trying with china.

I mean, does that even matter? Where's the problem if they want more audience? It's a sponsors association (read, corporations who want to make dem money), they are always on the lookout for new opportunities in the market. Like every damn business in history.

I'm not surprised at all by their newfound interest in sc2. It pulls some numbers over here, and some heads did indeed turn at some point. In the same matter they found out china is interested in bw, going as far as organizing a final in foreign soil (even if chinese rain didn't like that at all).

I think this 3d has so many posts just because it's "sc2" and not "insert game here".
Really now, they organized a GODDAMN FINAL in china, is it a so outlandish thought of doing something about the potential audience us/eu? (we all know that korea for the moment doesn't care about sc2, so I'm gonna assume that they are thinking about "us" foreigners in some way shape or form).

Yeah maybe kespa corporations wanted to expand their business in china, and used bw as a vessel to do so. That may very well be the case, so invalidating my theory. (since enstabilishing a foothold for some corporations in the anglosphere may prove far far harder).

Honestly I don't think kespa is in dire times either, I just think they are looking for means of earning more dosh. It isn't like they are on the verge of declaring bankruptcy or anything like that.
smekz
Profile Joined April 2010
Portugal503 Posts
October 24 2011 19:14 GMT
#1100
curious to see how this will turn out.
i guess this is the monthly sc2 vs bw thread -_-
Prev 1 53 54 55 56 57 70 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 7h 54m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 237
RuFF_SC2 122
ProTech54
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 2397
NaDa 72
Sharp 29
Icarus 10
Noble 9
Dota 2
monkeys_forever1085
LuMiX1
League of Legends
Cuddl3bear4
Counter-Strike
Coldzera 532
Stewie2K349
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox556
AZ_Axe163
Other Games
tarik_tv8789
Day[9].tv993
shahzam868
C9.Mang0234
ViBE200
Maynarde179
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1719
BasetradeTV41
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 40
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• HeavenSC 64
• rockletztv 44
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki28
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5593
Other Games
• Day9tv993
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
7h 54m
ByuN vs Zoun
SHIN vs TriGGeR
Cyan vs ShoWTimE
Rogue vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs Solar
Reynor vs Maru
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
Esports World Cup
1d 7h
Esports World Cup
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.