|
So I am playing / streaming on iCCup and I stumbled upon an actual bot playing games on iCCup... I won but I think it's still pretty amazing that there is bot's playing games on iccup... he is D- rank :-P
http://www.iccup.com/starcraft/gamingprofile/Skynet_bt.html the bots profile, 8-18 wow he actually wins games lol amazing
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/De4I2.jpg)
as you can see in the picture it's obviously a bot, it's simply impossible to have 431 apm with 0% redundancy :-P... still this is so frickin awesome how far bw has come... AI beating people on iccup with a 30% ratio ^^
EDIT : also you can see in the replay that this is obviously a bot, because a human couldnt type this fast, and it says the DWAIIP or something.
edit 2 : replays
[url blocked]
[url blocked]
[url blocked]
yea i played it 3 times to make sure it was a bot the 2nd time then to see how it played the 3rd time 
|
wow thats so badass, looks like it was even d+ in previous seasons!
|
Interesting that the programmers (that's two m's), chose to go with protoss. What with the insane potential of zerg at unlimited apm. Perfect muta micro anyone?
Also being fielded on multiple maps as opposed to just the one. Interesting. Got the replay saved?
|
this is actually bad for esports. a lot of games are dying because the servers are filled with bots, so its boring for real people and they leave(mostly first person shooters from what i know)
|
On June 16 2011 11:36 xarthaz wrote:
this is actually bad for esports. a lot of games are dying because the servers are filled with bots, so its boring for real people and they leave(mostly first person shooters from what i know)
yeah, it was bad for chess too. not like millions of people paid attention when chess players started playing computers. oh wait.....
|
On June 16 2011 11:39 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2011 11:36 xarthaz wrote:
this is actually bad for esports. a lot of games are dying because the servers are filled with bots, so its boring for real people and they leave(mostly first person shooters from what i know) yeah, it was bad for chess too. not like millions of people paid attention when chess players started playing computers. oh wait.....
the quake series have been plagued by bots for a long time 
|
On June 16 2011 11:36 xarthaz wrote:
this is actually bad for esports. a lot of games are dying because the servers are filled with bots, so its boring for real people and they leave(mostly first person shooters from what i know)
I think you are over exaggerating... For me this looks more like someone's little experiment, rather than an attempt to become top, because c'mon, what kind of a bot would possibly be able to win good players? You would need a computer size of Jupiter to calculate all the possible variables in the game in a small amount of time And the answer is not 42
|
i played vs him 3 games or so last season. all you had to do was do some rush build and it would die. ~_~
|
On June 16 2011 11:40 archonOOid wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2011 11:39 dAPhREAk wrote:On June 16 2011 11:36 xarthaz wrote:
this is actually bad for esports. a lot of games are dying because the servers are filled with bots, so its boring for real people and they leave(mostly first person shooters from what i know) yeah, it was bad for chess too. not like millions of people paid attention when chess players started playing computers. oh wait..... the quake series have been plagued by bots for a long time
dont play quake, so i cant comment. i would love to see a computer actually play competitively in sc: flash or jaedong vs. computer = epic~!
|
I posted the replays in the op
|
Sup Telecom! :D Oh and yeah they have bots that play low level I heard on SC2 as well, crazy how that stuff works at all I guess they just mess with the AI built into the vs computer thing you can do. Reminds me of Deep Blue but it just sucks instead of being a total baller. lol
|
On June 16 2011 11:40 archonOOid wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2011 11:39 dAPhREAk wrote:On June 16 2011 11:36 xarthaz wrote:
this is actually bad for esports. a lot of games are dying because the servers are filled with bots, so its boring for real people and they leave(mostly first person shooters from what i know) yeah, it was bad for chess too. not like millions of people paid attention when chess players started playing computers. oh wait..... the quake series have been plagued by bots for a long time
I'm not sure if this is positive or negative, but bots aren't anywhere near the level to where they can compete with really solid players yet. I don't think there are going to be any issues.
|
On June 16 2011 11:42 DNB wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2011 11:36 xarthaz wrote:
this is actually bad for esports. a lot of games are dying because the servers are filled with bots, so its boring for real people and they leave(mostly first person shooters from what i know) I think you are over exaggerating... For me this looks more like someone's little experiment, rather than an attempt to become top, because c'mon, what kind of a bot would possibly be able to win good players? You would need a computer size of Jupiter to calculate all the possible variables in the game in a small amount of time And the answer is not 42
you dont understand. it is not the competitive performance of bots that is the issue. it is bot filled games crowding the entire game lobby that is.
|
On June 16 2011 11:50 xarthaz wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2011 11:42 DNB wrote:On June 16 2011 11:36 xarthaz wrote:
this is actually bad for esports. a lot of games are dying because the servers are filled with bots, so its boring for real people and they leave(mostly first person shooters from what i know) I think you are over exaggerating... For me this looks more like someone's little experiment, rather than an attempt to become top, because c'mon, what kind of a bot would possibly be able to win good players? You would need a computer size of Jupiter to calculate all the possible variables in the game in a small amount of time And the answer is not 42 you dont understand. it is not the competitive performance of bots that is the issue. it is bot filled games crowding the entire game lobby that is.
that would suck. but it will get you up to A+ faster on iccup. ;-)
|
No surprise that the bot plays Protoss
|
Why is it everytime I see this thread pop up I keep thinking that a terminator is playing on ICCup
|
On June 16 2011 11:36 xarthaz wrote:
this is actually bad for esports. a lot of games are dying because the servers are filled with bots, so its boring for real people and they leave(mostly first person shooters from what i know)
What are you talking about? A bot will never reached C-+ Show Spoiler +Until the year 3000 or more xD
In FPS its pretty much teach the bot to aim perfectly and go to a direction.
|
In two years the OP will be
I won but I think it's still pretty amazing that there is bot's playing games on iccup... he is D- rank B- :-P
|
|
|
I'm totally playing this guy if I find him!
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
