• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:00
CET 14:00
KST 22:00
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival11TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9
Community News
BSL21 Open Qualifiers Week & CONFIRM PARTICIPATION1Crank Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams5Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest3Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou22Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four3
StarCraft 2
General
Could we add "Avoid Matchup" Feature for rankgame Smart servos says it affects liberators as well RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou The New Patch Killed Mech!
Tourneys
Crank Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship $3,500 WardiTV Korean Royale S4 Tenacious Turtle Tussle
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment
Brood War
General
[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival BSL Season 21 BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET ASL20 Pre-season Tier List ranking! ASL Runner-Up Race Stats
Tourneys
[ASL20] Grand Finals BSL21 Open Qualifiers Week & CONFIRM PARTICIPATION ASL final tickets help [ASL20] Semifinal A
Strategy
Current Meta Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Simple Questions, Simple Answers Roaring Currents ASL final
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread The Chess Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently... Movie Discussion!
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Benefits Of Limited Comm…
TrAiDoS
Sabrina was soooo lame on S…
Peanutsc
Our Last Hope in th…
KrillinFromwales
Certified Crazy
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1501 users

[Spoilers] Effort's game today

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
Normal
Carefree
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
United States1571 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-19 15:29:56
July 18 2010 11:01 GMT
#1
[Translation] Effort's Extractor Mistake


During today's ACE match between SKTelecom T1 and CJ Entus, Effort brought a drone along with a large amount of zerglings (about three control groups) to break Fantasy's wall. However, the zerg's extractor does not actually create a gap in the wall.

[image loading]

On the other hand, the terran and protoss walls do create this gap:
[image loading]

[image loading]


Effort's mistake did not only result in the loss of a drone, but falsely led him to create zerglings for the wall break. The loss of such a large number of zerglings and larva set back Effort's economy, leading to Fantasy's win.

It should also be noted that when Fantasy built the refinary on the geyser, the wall opened up for zerglings (as can be seen in the second attack).

Wfbrood Article
DebOnAire - 「 Bisu[Shield] 」
ilbh
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil1606 Posts
July 18 2010 11:05 GMT
#2
I think he made the extractor so less SCVs could repair the supply depot.
Part of the inhumanity of the computer is that, once it is competently programmed and working smoothly, it is completely honest.
SaetZero
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States855 Posts
July 18 2010 11:06 GMT
#3
Umm.... I know your title reads spoiler, but doesn't even seeing the name "Effort's Mistake" kind of spoil it...?
Never Forget. #TheRevolutionist
Shatter
Profile Joined October 2009
United States1401 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-18 11:07:37
July 18 2010 11:06 GMT
#4
Effort should read TL more. Then he would know you couldn't use extractor to make a gap. I just suddenly remembered this.

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=68545&currentpage=102#2031
De4ngus
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States6533 Posts
July 18 2010 11:08 GMT
#5
On July 18 2010 20:05 ilbh wrote:
I think he made the extractor so less SCVs could repair the supply depot.

? how does the extractor change that at all.....
GANDHISAUCE
Carefree
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
United States1571 Posts
July 18 2010 11:10 GMT
#6
On July 18 2010 20:06 SaetZero wrote:
Umm.... I know your title reads spoiler, but doesn't even seeing the name "Effort's Mistake" kind of spoil it...?


Effort had two games today, besides, a mistake doesn't necessarily imply the outcome of the game.
DebOnAire - 「 Bisu[Shield] 」
ilbh
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil1606 Posts
July 18 2010 11:12 GMT
#7
On July 18 2010 20:08 De4ngus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2010 20:05 ilbh wrote:
I think he made the extractor so less SCVs could repair the supply depot.

? how does the extractor change that at all.....


I have to watch the VOD to make sure, but if I recall it, he could only use 2 SCVs and then the supply was destroyed.
Part of the inhumanity of the computer is that, once it is competently programmed and working smoothly, it is completely honest.
Carefree
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
United States1571 Posts
July 18 2010 11:13 GMT
#8
On July 18 2010 20:12 ilbh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2010 20:08 De4ngus wrote:
On July 18 2010 20:05 ilbh wrote:
I think he made the extractor so less SCVs could repair the supply depot.

? how does the extractor change that at all.....


I have to watch the VOD to make sure, but if I recall it, he could only use 2 SCVs and then the supply was destroyed.


Nah, that was during the second assault, where his own marines were blocking access to the center depot, so only one SCV could repair it.
DebOnAire - 「 Bisu[Shield] 」
BlackMesa
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
Kenya338 Posts
July 18 2010 11:14 GMT
#9
On July 18 2010 20:12 ilbh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2010 20:08 De4ngus wrote:
On July 18 2010 20:05 ilbh wrote:
I think he made the extractor so less SCVs could repair the supply depot.

? how does the extractor change that at all.....


I have to watch the VOD to make sure, but if I recall it, he could only use 2 SCVs and then the supply was destroyed.

that was another depot.
Need a Light
PoP
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
France15446 Posts
July 18 2010 11:14 GMT
#10
Renamed the thread just in case.
Administrator
ilbh
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil1606 Posts
July 18 2010 11:30 GMT
#11
On July 18 2010 20:13 Carefree Me wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2010 20:12 ilbh wrote:
On July 18 2010 20:08 De4ngus wrote:
On July 18 2010 20:05 ilbh wrote:
I think he made the extractor so less SCVs could repair the supply depot.

? how does the extractor change that at all.....


I have to watch the VOD to make sure, but if I recall it, he could only use 2 SCVs and then the supply was destroyed.


Nah, that was during the second assault, where his own marines were blocking access to the center depot, so only one SCV could repair it.


oh... so sorry then, lol
I just had the impression when I watched the game.

damn, if he thought he could use it to make a gap he screwed even harder...
Part of the inhumanity of the computer is that, once it is competently programmed and working smoothly, it is completely honest.
infinity2k9
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United Kingdom2397 Posts
July 18 2010 11:32 GMT
#12
It's annoying how weird some of the buildings collision boxes are.
SubtleArt
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
2710 Posts
July 18 2010 11:47 GMT
#13
Ah well Fantasy's gay vulture drop rush --> valk build got figured out. Only a matter of time until this stupid bio -> mech shit does too right? RIIIIIGHT?

Actually I wasn't watching the game too closely, fantasy faked a bio opening then came out with a timing push right? Some1 correct me if I'm being an idiot cause the game was on at 2 AM over here lol
Morrow on ZvP: "I'm not very confident in general vs Protoss because of the imbalance (Yes its imbalanced, get over it)."
supernovamaniac
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States3047 Posts
July 18 2010 12:51 GMT
#14
I know for a fact that gas is completely sealed everywhere UNTIL Assimilator/Refinary/Extractor is built on it. Effort was trying to abuse this fact, and there was a way for lings to get through. Unfortunately, good defense from Fantasy, as he saw what was going on.
ppp
cascades
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Singapore6122 Posts
July 18 2010 13:05 GMT
#15
If you read, it says it doesn't apply for extractors.
HS: cascades#1595 || LoL: stoppin
seRapH
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States9776 Posts
July 18 2010 14:12 GMT
#16
yeah, guess koreans dont know this, since the commentators were shouting GAS GAS GAS before the extractor was built and for pretty much no reason.

but the scv was there to block too, so idk.
boomer hands
Superiorwolf
Profile Blog Joined March 2007
United States5509 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-18 14:13:50
July 18 2010 14:13 GMT
#17
Someone posted this earlier but I don't know if anyone saw it. Someone should go test this out!

[image loading]

Oh wait nvm, this is a different wall... he should have had the depot on the bottom iirc. So I guess it was true that the extractor did NOTHING. Wow, poor effort.
Check out my stream at www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=315053 and follow me on Twitter @EGSuppy! :)
Aesop
Profile Joined October 2007
Hungary11304 Posts
July 18 2010 14:27 GMT
#18
I am more confused about those pictures with the wfbrood logo on them. As far as I know, Yurebis created them:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=95004
ModeratorNon veritas sed auctoritas facit legem. | Liquipedia: Don't ask me, I'm retired.
datscilly
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
United States529 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-18 14:51:45
July 18 2010 14:41 GMT
#19
On July 18 2010 23:27 Aesop wrote:
I am more confused about those pictures with the wfbrood logo on them. As far as I know, Yurebis created them:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=95004


I don't know why the article writer at wfbrood put their logos on the pictures, but if you follow the link at the end of the article, it eventually traces back to Liquidpedia.

That said, this article is interesting, and the gap is between the right side of the extractor and the left side of the supply depot.
C[SCL]
Profile Joined April 2009
Philippines576 Posts
July 18 2010 14:55 GMT
#20
Perhaps fantasy knew that building the rax right at that spot could open up a hole, hence the depot above the gas. My two cents.
BISU FAN FOREVER|Really fan.. really.|Flash, please get all the golds. k thx
Carefree
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
United States1571 Posts
July 18 2010 15:12 GMT
#21
On July 18 2010 23:13 Superiorwolf wrote:
Someone posted this earlier but I don't know if anyone saw it. Someone should go test this out!

[image loading]

Oh wait nvm, this is a different wall... he should have had the depot on the bottom iirc. So I guess it was true that the extractor did NOTHING. Wow, poor effort.


Yeah, it seems that the barracks has a much wider space to its left than the depot does.

On July 18 2010 23:55 C[SCL] wrote:
Perhaps fantasy knew that building the rax right at that spot could open up a hole, hence the depot above the gas. My two cents.


Building the rax there would also trap marines outside the wall. Especially given that the wall would be tight (barring any extractors), the marines would be trapped outside until the barracks was lifted.
DebOnAire - 「 Bisu[Shield] 」
tree.hugger
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
July 18 2010 15:51 GMT
#22
At any rate, fantasy was fooled, and pulled a few scvs specifically to plug that hole. And that was not the reason EffOrt lost that game. Fantasy's vulture micro over EffOrt's lurker thrust was what gave fanta the huge advantage, because EffOrt wasn't able to do enough damage to make up for his dead third.
ModeratorEffOrt, Snow, GuMiho, and Team Liquid
Confuse
Profile Joined October 2009
2238 Posts
July 18 2010 17:14 GMT
#23
This is a good post, at least to me it explained the weirdness of effort's play.
If we fear what we do not understand, then why is ignorance bliss?
Superiorwolf
Profile Blog Joined March 2007
United States5509 Posts
July 18 2010 17:21 GMT
#24
EffOrt should have just played normally
Check out my stream at www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=315053 and follow me on Twitter @EGSuppy! :)
Mobius
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Canada1268 Posts
July 18 2010 17:43 GMT
#25
i dont understand numbers.. higher number=more space for units to pass through, lower number=less space for units to pass through or somethin?
Entusman #51
Aesop
Profile Joined October 2007
Hungary11304 Posts
July 18 2010 17:52 GMT
#26
On July 19 2010 02:43 Mobius wrote:
i dont understand numbers.. higher number=more space for units to pass through, lower number=less space for units to pass through or somethin?

Yes, and you have to take specific unit sizes into account: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/List_of_Unit_and_Building_Sizes

For example, Gateway above Forge gives 7 (Gateway lower space) + 8 (Forge upper space) = 15 passageway between them, which is just enough to block a Zergling which is 16 x 16. That's basically the reason why Protoss forge FE works and why we do not place Forges above Gateways (since that would be a gap of 27).
ModeratorNon veritas sed auctoritas facit legem. | Liquipedia: Don't ask me, I'm retired.
arb
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
Noobville17921 Posts
July 18 2010 18:01 GMT
#27
On July 18 2010 23:13 Superiorwolf wrote:
Someone posted this earlier but I don't know if anyone saw it. Someone should go test this out!

[image loading]

Oh wait nvm, this is a different wall... he should have had the depot on the bottom iirc. So I guess it was true that the extractor did NOTHING. Wow, poor effort.

Depot has to be touching the top of the barracks to make a ling proof wall.

His barracks is like 1 square too far to the right
Artillery spawned from the forges of Hell
TheYango
Profile Joined September 2008
United States47024 Posts
July 18 2010 18:13 GMT
#28
On July 18 2010 23:13 Superiorwolf wrote:
Someone posted this earlier but I don't know if anyone saw it. Someone should go test this out!

[image loading]

Oh wait nvm, this is a different wall... he should have had the depot on the bottom iirc. So I guess it was true that the extractor did NOTHING. Wow, poor effort.

IIRC it was confirmed in the thread this was posted in that the Barracks is too far to the right, and the wall isn't ling-tight regardless of the extractor.
Moderator
Aesop
Profile Joined October 2007
Hungary11304 Posts
July 18 2010 18:17 GMT
#29
On July 19 2010 03:01 arb wrote:
Depot has to be touching the top of the barracksGeyser to make a ling proof wall.

His barracks is like 1 square too far to the right

There
ModeratorNon veritas sed auctoritas facit legem. | Liquipedia: Don't ask me, I'm retired.
arb
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
Noobville17921 Posts
July 18 2010 18:19 GMT
#30
On July 19 2010 03:17 Aesop wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 19 2010 03:01 arb wrote:
Depot has to be touching the top of the barracksGeyser to make a ling proof wall.

His barracks is like 1 square too far to the right

There

the barracks has to be touching the top of the geyser yes, but i always thought depots had to be touching some part of the top of the barracks for a ling proof wall?
Artillery spawned from the forges of Hell
Aesop
Profile Joined October 2007
Hungary11304 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-18 18:34:40
July 18 2010 18:26 GMT
#31
On July 19 2010 03:19 arb wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 19 2010 03:17 Aesop wrote:
On July 19 2010 03:01 arb wrote:
Depot has to be touching the top of the barracksGeyser to make a ling proof wall.

His barracks is like 1 square too far to the right

There

the barracks has to be touching the top of the geyser yes, but i always thought depots had to be touching some part of the top of the barracks for a ling proof wall?

That too. But in this case the problem was the barracks placement. I mutilated your text, of course the barracks would have to be touching the Geyser.

But yeah, Depot above Barracks is safe, Barracks above Depot isn't.

Anyway, back on topic. Surely Effort's play looked bad, but fantasy had clearly practiced a lot for this specific constellation. Fantasy used a weird fake from Bio to mech to Bio and even inviting Effort to try the ling break.
ModeratorNon veritas sed auctoritas facit legem. | Liquipedia: Don't ask me, I'm retired.
Carnivorous Sheep
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Baa?21244 Posts
July 18 2010 19:06 GMT
#32
Lx called Effort's play "amateur" for that mistake haha.

I can't believe Effort didn't actually practice the Extractor trick...?
TranslatorBaa!
Zona
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
40426 Posts
July 18 2010 19:08 GMT
#33
On July 18 2010 20:47 SubtleArt wrote:
Ah well Fantasy's gay vulture drop rush --> valk build got figured out. Only a matter of time until this stupid bio -> mech shit does too right? RIIIIIGHT?

Actually I wasn't watching the game too closely, fantasy faked a bio opening then came out with a timing push right? Some1 correct me if I'm being an idiot cause the game was on at 2 AM over here lol

I really don't think this handful mnm (with stim)->mech has vulnerabilities like the other builds do.

And yeah I was slightly perturbed by wfbrood slapping their logo on a pic from liquipedia.
"If you try responding to those absurd posts every day, you become more damaged. So I pay no attention to them at all." Jung Myung Hoon (aka Fantasy), as translated by Kimoleon
Carnivorous Sheep
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Baa?21244 Posts
July 18 2010 19:11 GMT
#34
On July 18 2010 23:27 Aesop wrote:
I am more confused about those pictures with the wfbrood logo on them. As far as I know, Yurebis created them:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=95004


AFAIK Wfbrood automatically rehosts every single image for their articles, and in the process it just slaps a wfbrood.com logo on them.
TranslatorBaa!
hacklebeast
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States5090 Posts
July 18 2010 19:22 GMT
#35
That may not have been the only reason to build the extractor. I thought, at first that the extracter was there to play the role of an ultralisk, and absorb fire. I know that lings are priority targets for the AI, but if there were a few marines in the back, the would have attacked the extractor rather than run forward to fight lings. The difference between those marines being in combat might have caused the push to be succesful. I just have a hard time believing that a progamer would make such a simple mistake.
Protoss: Best, Paralyze, Jangbi, Nal_Ra || Terran: Oov, Boxer, Fantasy, Hiya|| Zerg: Yellow, Zero
Nal_rAwr
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States2611 Posts
July 18 2010 19:31 GMT
#36
its not really a simple mistake though

progamers make a shit load of mistakes all the time
i.e. protoss players (except for bisu and nony) always fuck up their shuttle/reaver micro
they pointlessly lose shuttles and reavers all the time because they suck.

but this gas trick is a trick not too many people know, and since it varies depending on the extractor or refinery, and how fantasy builds the wall, also position, effort wasn't sure

fantasy even didn't know about it i guess, because he built his refinery, which totally defeated the purpose of effort's extractor not allowing the lings in

Nony is Bonjwa
hacklebeast
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States5090 Posts
July 18 2010 19:46 GMT
#37
On July 19 2010 04:31 Nal_rAwr wrote:
its not really a simple mistake though

progamers make a shit load of mistakes all the time
i.e. protoss players (except for bisu and nony) always fuck up their shuttle/reaver micro
they pointlessly lose shuttles and reavers all the time because they suck.

but this gas trick is a trick not too many people know, and since it varies depending on the extractor or refinery, and how fantasy builds the wall, also position, effort wasn't sure

fantasy even didn't know about it i guess, because he built his refinery, which totally defeated the purpose of effort's extractor not allowing the lings in



There is a difference between the two. While you can "know" how to reaver micro, you also need the skill to make it work. If you click in a wrong place, it can ruin the entier thing. However, the extractor trick only requiers knowledge. It is not as if by clicking on different parts of the gyser it will cause the gap to grow or shrink. Given how much they practice progamer should have all of the knowlege there is in the game of starcraft. And fantasy's refinery may even suport my idea. If fantasy was worried about the extractor drawing fire, by placeing his own he eliminates that threat. Although, it is more likely that he just needed more gas for his mech build.
Protoss: Best, Paralyze, Jangbi, Nal_Ra || Terran: Oov, Boxer, Fantasy, Hiya|| Zerg: Yellow, Zero
ndralcasid
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United States524 Posts
July 18 2010 20:36 GMT
#38
+ Show Spoiler +
I thought this thread was going to be about his offensive Nydus, lol
I aint crying over some daggone danishes
Shinshady
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Canada1237 Posts
July 18 2010 21:54 GMT
#39
On July 19 2010 05:36 ndralcasid wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
I thought this thread was going to be about his offensive Nydus, lol


+ Show Spoiler +
Lol the thread started off as Effort's mistake not Effort's best innovation to ZvZ yet xD....
BeSt[WHITE] Have a great retirement | "SKT is best KT." - Vortok | http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/7190/ep24hitcombo2small.gif
Megalisk
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
United States6095 Posts
July 18 2010 22:11 GMT
#40
On July 19 2010 04:31 Nal_rAwr wrote:
progamers make a shit load of mistakes all the time
i.e. protoss players (except for bisu and nony) always fuck up their shuttle/reaver micro


You haven't seen enough Bisu games .
Tear stained american saints and dirty guitar dreams across a universe of desert and blue sky , gas station coffee love letters and two dollar pistol kisses from thirty five dollar hotel room stationary .
soudo
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
603 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-18 22:12:05
July 18 2010 22:11 GMT
#41
On July 19 2010 04:11 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2010 23:27 Aesop wrote:
I am more confused about those pictures with the wfbrood logo on them. As far as I know, Yurebis created them:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=95004


AFAIK Wfbrood automatically rehosts every single image for their articles, and in the process it just slaps a wfbrood.com logo on them.


Maybe Liquipedia should have something similar as well? The only problem is that those images aren't owned by Liquipedia per se, but a Liquipedia/Teamliquid user.
De4ngus
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States6533 Posts
July 18 2010 22:14 GMT
#42
On July 19 2010 00:51 tree.hugger wrote:
At any rate, fantasy was fooled, and pulled a few scvs specifically to plug that hole. And that was not the reason EffOrt lost that game. Fantasy's vulture micro over EffOrt's lurker thrust was what gave fanta the huge advantage, because EffOrt wasn't able to do enough damage to make up for his dead third.

Oh come on, you can't say that wasn't the reason Effort lost the game. Since when do zergs come back vs terran after failed zergling allins? He also wouldn't have lost his third if he hadn't thrown away multiple control groups of zerglings.

The lurker thing was just free units and Fantasy was like thanks ^^ goliaths > lurkers.
GANDHISAUCE
dukethegold
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada5645 Posts
July 18 2010 22:25 GMT
#43
On July 19 2010 06:54 Shinshady wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 19 2010 05:36 ndralcasid wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
I thought this thread was going to be about his offensive Nydus, lol


+ Show Spoiler +
Lol the thread started off as Effort's mistake not Effort's best innovation to ZvZ yet xD....


Actually, that strategy is not really original per say...

+ Show Spoiler +
Offensive nydus was also used in this very very ancient 2v2 game. So called the "best 2v2 game ever" by Plexa.

http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=78535
Simplistik
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
2092 Posts
July 18 2010 22:37 GMT
#44
On July 19 2010 04:08 Zona wrote:
And yeah I was slightly perturbed by wfbrood slapping their logo on a pic from liquipedia.

China was never known for its great regard of Copyright.
Dear BW Gods, it IS now autumn, so...
emucxg
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Finland4559 Posts
July 18 2010 22:45 GMT
#45
On July 19 2010 04:11 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2010 23:27 Aesop wrote:
I am more confused about those pictures with the wfbrood logo on them. As far as I know, Yurebis created them:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=95004


AFAIK Wfbrood automatically rehosts every single image for their articles, and in the process it just slaps a wfbrood.com logo on them.

Ok, I edited the post so Liquipedia be mentioned in the article.
FlopTurnReaver
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Switzerland1980 Posts
July 18 2010 23:17 GMT
#46
[image loading]

This is the only possible ling proof wall for Terran. A Barracks on top of a Depot isn't Ling proof and as already mentioned the Barracks on that other picture is too far on the right.

Of course with this wall you have the disadvantage with the Comsat in a not so great place.
Check out @MapOfTheMonth on Twitter and under http://bit.ly/motmorg
GHOSTCLAW
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
United States17042 Posts
July 19 2010 03:52 GMT
#47
we mentioned this in liquipedia, with almost exactly the same images
PhotographerLiquipedia. Drop me a pm if you've got questions/need help.
Yurebis
Profile Joined January 2009
United States1452 Posts
July 19 2010 06:08 GMT
#48
On July 18 2010 23:27 Aesop wrote:
I am more confused about those pictures with the wfbrood logo on them. As far as I know, Yurebis created them:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=95004

Indeed I did
but I don't give a damn tbh
Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
endy
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Switzerland8970 Posts
July 19 2010 06:57 GMT
#49
I think the extractor let the zerglings passed, but Fantasy sent SCVs to block and defended well. I watch the vod, and I can swear I saw a few zerglings go through before the SCVs arrive.
ॐ
Shinshady
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Canada1237 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-19 06:59:34
July 19 2010 06:57 GMT
#50
Well now that I watched the replay



It can be seen that fantasy's wall was no where close to ling proof as it was open from 2 spots (where he put his SCV's and where the medic blocked) so I don't think the article is right in stating that Effort falsely created lings to break the wall, instead he just wasted the drone.

Also the 2nd time around he still got through even with the refinery there proving that fantasy's defenses we're ling tight at all...
BeSt[WHITE] Have a great retirement | "SKT is best KT." - Vortok | http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/7190/ep24hitcombo2small.gif
Carefree
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
United States1571 Posts
July 19 2010 07:07 GMT
#51
Starting from about 05:25, none of the lings actually went through between the extractor and the depot (he only attacked the bottommost depot and the SCV repairing it.

I tested the wall yesterday (though without the VOD, I'm not sure if I recreated it perfectly), and the lings only fit between a refinery / depot, but not geyser / depot and extractor / depot.
DebOnAire - 「 Bisu[Shield] 」
So no fek
Profile Blog Joined June 2005
United States3001 Posts
July 19 2010 07:12 GMT
#52
I had thought about it last night, and after watching the replay again, I really think Effort could have won the game if he went about his strategy a bit differently. Had he held back his lings and faked a gas steal, he'd have all of his lings versus two smaller waves that were unable to overwhelm Fantasy.

Of course, Effort didn't know that the Extractor still created a ling tight area (excluding the hole near the Rax), so the point is definitely moot. But if you watch the VOD, one of Fantasy's three SCVs is rushing for the gas while the other two are there to block, and is attacking Effort's mutating drone. Immediately after the drone was removed, he started his gas, which allowed Effort to break through that spot rather easily. My newbie level analysis thinks that if he had held his lings back, faked a gas steal forcing Fantasy to take his gas, and then charged in with his stronger force, he definitely could have overwhelmed Fantasy going through the two holes in the wall with superior numbers.
#1 Shuttle fan - TeamLiquid CJ Entusman #36 BW4lyfe
locodoco
Profile Joined July 2010
Korea (South)1615 Posts
July 19 2010 12:06 GMT
#53
how could a progamer not know that creating a extractor doesn't create a gap?.....it's thier job for crying out loud
i wish riot would give me better ping
Comet702
Profile Joined April 2010
China236 Posts
July 19 2010 12:55 GMT
#54
好吧,数据帝的帖子跑到这来了……actually i wondering why effort and all the korean progamers doesn't know this since they are so profession in sc1
Comet from wfbrood.com
Sephy90
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States1785 Posts
July 19 2010 14:54 GMT
#55
Oh man I never knew about this trick. When I was watching the game I was wondering if he built that extractor because if Fantasy had built his refinery, I was assuming it would create some sort of wall, and turns out I was right! But damn, that was such a huge loss, throwing away so many zerglings I really wanted Effort to win, and I was thinking to myself when Fantasy basically contained him, "how the fuck is he going to break that?"
"So I turned the lights off at night and practiced by myself"
Cambium
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
United States16368 Posts
July 19 2010 15:14 GMT
#56
The funny part is, I don't think ANYONE knew about the specifics of the gaps

1. Effort
Obviously, or else he would not have attempted it. Even though, I don't think it would have succeeded anyway because Fantasy's SCVs would've blocked off the lings.

2. Fantasy
He tried to stop the drone from getting the gas by getting the gas himself (?????). Also, Fantasy tried to block the lings with the SCVs, which was supposedly unnecessary. Basically, what fantasy did made no sense to me. Later, after Effort cancelled his Extractor, Fantasy immediately took the gas, and it could mean three things (much more likely i and/or ii)
i. he thought Refinery would be ling-tight too after seeing how the lings were blocked off
ii. he needed gas
iii. he did it to lure Effort's lings (which means he knows the difference b/w Refinery and Extractor, and he's a genius)

3. The commentators
I don't understand Korean, but from their tone of voice, it seems to me that they thought it was a viable option. Could someone translate that segment?

This really comes as a shock to me because as many people have already stated, being progamers, how could they not know all the relevant facts of the game, or more specifically, the match up? How could you not test out taking the Geyser with a drone with a practice partner before the real game (to both Fantasy and Effort)?
When you want something, all the universe conspires in helping you to achieve it.
Cambium
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
United States16368 Posts
July 19 2010 15:17 GMT
#57
Also, I think wfbrood removed their logo on the images?
When you want something, all the universe conspires in helping you to achieve it.
Carefree
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
United States1571 Posts
July 19 2010 15:30 GMT
#58
On July 20 2010 00:17 Cambium wrote:
Also, I think wfbrood removed their logo on the images?


Yeah, seems like they did. I rehosted the images since we're a high traffic site. They're linking straight from liquipedia now, I'll do the same.
DebOnAire - 「 Bisu[Shield] 」
emucxg
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Finland4559 Posts
July 19 2010 16:44 GMT
#59
On July 19 2010 07:37 Simplistik wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 19 2010 04:08 Zona wrote:
And yeah I was slightly perturbed by wfbrood slapping their logo on a pic from liquipedia.

China was never known for its great regard of Copyright.

are you stupid?
Carefree
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
United States1571 Posts
July 19 2010 18:15 GMT
#60
I'm really curious - what is Yi Mu You? I can't quite figure out what the pinyin is supposed to be. :|
DebOnAire - 「 Bisu[Shield] 」
Ryshi
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
Canada361 Posts
July 19 2010 19:31 GMT
#61
Here's an attempt at analyzing what happened:

Fantasy:
He built his rax rather than the traditional wall for 2 main reasons
1) Easier to rally units out, considering his build with mech. I'm pretty sure a lot of gamers sometimes hate playing with small gaps, but of course you can argue he might as well just destroy a depot later.
2) You cannot send marines in otherwise if you build them with the barracks at bottom.

I really don't think Fantasy knew about the extractor trick attack, so he probably didn't build it that way to prevent it. He pulled scvs to cover the spot is a natural reaction, which is fine.

Him taking gas is probably either
1) prevent gas steal
2) he needed gas
3) a bait for the lings to come in which he can defend easily
But usually #3 is a strategy planned before game, and considering this surprise gas attack from effort, #3 is unlikely.

Effort probably only practiced with a regular walling... or perhaps he did it on impulse. If he had practiced vs this walling I doubt he would fail like this.
The World God Only Knows
Freezard
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
Sweden1012 Posts
July 20 2010 01:44 GMT
#62
lol really? effort only built the gas to make it harder for fantasy to place the SCV:s at the gap/repair the depot... you can see that effort immediately attacks the depot with like 8 lings. SCV:s movement fucks up when you click to attack an extractor, while clicking on pure gas moves them there immediately. Just clicking at depot to repair doesn't move them to it cleanly.

That's my theory, your theory doesn't make much sense tbh, he's a top progamer for God's sake.
Kare
Profile Joined March 2009
Norway786 Posts
July 20 2010 01:52 GMT
#63
S many awesome tricks in Brood War!
In life you can obtain all sorts of material wealth, but the real treasure is the epic feelings you get while doing something you love.
Neo_ly1983
Profile Joined May 2010
United States8 Posts
July 20 2010 03:33 GMT
#64
Thank you so much for the translation, Carefree~

I change the link of the picture to make it less controversial.

Also, as you may already noticed, the specific theory on the building block is here:

http://bbs.wfbrood.com/thread-14612-1-1.html

And I wrote some simple c++ code to get all possible combinations to achieve some certain kinds of block in the attachment of that post~

noob4ever
Profile Joined April 2005
Denmark59 Posts
July 20 2010 04:03 GMT
#65
This might be a good time to point out that there is an error on the zerg picture. Zerg Evolution Chamber has the values 0 4 15 11 , and not 0 4 15 3, as the picture shows. I can verify that evo chamber definitely dosent have size 3 at bottom, as I once made a simcity that failed because of that.
Neo_ly1983
Profile Joined May 2010
United States8 Posts
July 20 2010 05:27 GMT
#66
On July 20 2010 13:03 noob4ever wrote:
This might be a good time to point out that there is an error on the zerg picture. Zerg Evolution Chamber has the values 0 4 15 11 , and not 0 4 15 3, as the picture shows. I can verify that evo chamber definitely dosent have size 3 at bottom, as I once made a simcity that failed because of that.


Thanks man! That makes it perfect~~
tree.hugger
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
July 20 2010 05:49 GMT
#67
This has actually become a really interesting discussion.

Several thoughts:
- This was clearly an improvised strategy from EffOrt. He thought fantasy could be beaten in a specific way, and he tried it. To be honest, I don't think that this set EffOrt back a great deal, but it put him behind, that's for sure. It was hardly an all-in, however.
- EffOrt's intention was not to gas steal, as he didn't have a good read on fantasy's build, and had no real reason to know that fantasy needed gas desperately and thus wanted to delay it. Furthermore, the presence of the massed lings pretty much proves that EffOrt's intention wasn't to steal the gas.
- However, the timing of EffOrt's attack seems almost to be perfectly matched to the timing that fantasy intended to take the gas. I think right after his medic popped, he felt he could be comfortable taking his gas. Similarly, he felt comfortable taking the gas, because he had some reason to believe that the zergling threat was over. But I think he knew that the refinery being placed there would create another hole in the wall. So did EffOrt. He makes beeline for it, the moment fantasy drops the refinery, and he sees it while attacking.
- I think both players were confused about the nuance between the refinery and the extractor. EffOrt intended to kill fantasy with it, and fantasy immediately responded by pulling four scvs to block that area of his wall. While they are both progamers, as locodoco points out, this map hasn't been used for months, and the exact building sizes in that specific situation is not something you would necessarily expect everyone to know.
- EffOrt's refinery steal had an odd consequence though, as Frezard notes, that it seems to have decreased the area in which fantasy's scv's could repair that supply depot. EffOrt very nearly breaks down that depot before a second scv is able to maneuver into a repairing position. Was that his intention? I doubt it, because he didn't seem to instruct all the zerglings to attack the depot initially. He may have broken through if he had. It looks to me like he simply instructed the lings to attack move past the wall, and they couldn't, so he reacted in the moment and tried to kill the depot.

All-in-all, this has been very fascinating to read. BW never ceases to be fun to analyze.
ModeratorEffOrt, Snow, GuMiho, and Team Liquid
hauton
Profile Joined March 2009
Hong Kong743 Posts
July 20 2010 05:58 GMT
#68
Question, why do they call EffOrt "Fire Star"?
keep it up, youll either be famous or homeless one day
Neo_ly1983
Profile Joined May 2010
United States8 Posts
July 20 2010 07:00 GMT
#69
On July 20 2010 14:58 hauton wrote:
Question, why do they call EffOrt "Fire Star"?


Because his face looks so strange that people just make jokes on it: He must come from Mars..
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
CrankTV Team League
13:00
Group Stage: 3 Bo5s
Streamerzone vs Shopify Rebellion
TBD vs Team Vitality
LiquipediaDiscussion
Wardi Open
12:00
#57
WardiTV522
OGKoka 323
Rex97
SteadfastSC35
Liquipedia
Replay Cast
10:00
Crank Gathers S2: Preliminary
Team Vitality vs Team FalconLIVE!
CranKy Ducklings170
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 323
Rex 97
SteadfastSC 35
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 36501
firebathero 9315
Jaedong 5451
Sea 1496
EffOrt 550
Pusan 532
Stork 364
Rush 107
ToSsGirL 74
Liquid`Ret 74
[ Show more ]
Icarus 31
Movie 30
Shine 20
sas.Sziky 16
yabsab 14
Dota 2
Gorgc4425
qojqva1014
Dendi560
XcaliburYe158
420jenkins98
ODPixel88
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1773
shoxiejesuss1206
x6flipin483
oskar149
markeloff64
edward20
Other Games
singsing1804
B2W.Neo615
hiko375
crisheroes325
Pyrionflax241
Sick193
Lowko187
Happy130
Mew2King50
QueenE41
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL9224
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 17
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 43
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV257
Upcoming Events
Monday Night Weeklies
4h
BSL 21
12h
WardiTV Invitational
23h
CrankTV Team League
1d
BASILISK vs TBD
Team Liquid vs Team Falcon
BSL 21
1d 12h
Replay Cast
1d 21h
OSC
1d 23h
CrankTV Team League
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
[ Show More ]
CrankTV Team League
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
CrankTV Team League
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
BSL Team A[vengers]
5 days
Dewalt vs Shine
UltrA vs ZeLoT
BSL 21
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
BSL Team A[vengers]
6 days
Cross vs Motive
Sziky vs HiyA
BSL 21
6 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 20
WardiTV TLMC #15
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
BSL 21 Team A
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
META Madness #9
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.