|
Braavos36401 Posts
On October 14 2009 12:01 Urth wrote:
I have a question. I can understand the player prices, but with teams, why is it so weird? Skt1 still costs the most, while stx dominated last season
On October 14 2009 12:08 lazz wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2009 12:01 Urth wrote:
I have a question. I can understand the player prices, but with teams, why is it so weird? Skt1 still costs the most, while stx dominated last season it's based on how many points they generated. stx won a lot, but they didn't get many 3-0s, which is where the big points are. skt got lots of 3-0s, which is what makes them more expensive.
That's not entirely true.
In addition to their scores last round, the team prices are adjusted up or down depending on playoff performance. If you strictly went by last round, it would look something like this:
STX 8
KTF 6
SKT 6
CJE 4
But since STX performed poorly in playoffs, CJ performed great, and SKT won the whole thing, the prices were adjusted to this:
STX 6
KTF 5
SKT 8
CJE 6
|
United States2186 Posts
How were players calculated then? It seems like a mix of their overall and R5 stats? Or were the playoffs a factor too?
|
Hahaha holy shit how did my all KT gimmick team get 9th place? I don't even have Luxury.
I guess the good anti team helps, regardless of Oz rolling peeps and giving lomo 2 points.
|
On October 14 2009 12:19 Hot_Bid wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2009 12:01 Urth wrote:
I have a question. I can understand the player prices, but with teams, why is it so weird? Skt1 still costs the most, while stx dominated last season Show nested quote +On October 14 2009 12:08 lazz wrote:On October 14 2009 12:01 Urth wrote:
I have a question. I can understand the player prices, but with teams, why is it so weird? Skt1 still costs the most, while stx dominated last season it's based on how many points they generated. stx won a lot, but they didn't get many 3-0s, which is where the big points are. skt got lots of 3-0s, which is what makes them more expensive. That's not entirely true. In addition to their scores last round, the team prices are adjusted up or down depending on playoff performance. If you strictly went by last round, it would look something like this: STX 8 KTF 6 SKT 6 CJE 4 But since STX performed poorly in playoffs, CJ performed great, and SKT won the whole thing, the prices were adjusted to this: STX 6 KTF 5 SKT 7 CJE 6
I did not know this. now I regret picking SKT
oh and week 1 was a disaster for me. my team went 6-4 overall, with two missed line up appearances. such mediocrity.
On October 14 2009 14:59 Hot_Bid wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2009 14:58 lazz wrote:On October 14 2009 12:19 Hot_Bid wrote:On October 14 2009 12:01 Urth wrote:
I have a question. I can understand the player prices, but with teams, why is it so weird? Skt1 still costs the most, while stx dominated last season On October 14 2009 12:08 lazz wrote:On October 14 2009 12:01 Urth wrote:
I have a question. I can understand the player prices, but with teams, why is it so weird? Skt1 still costs the most, while stx dominated last season it's based on how many points they generated. stx won a lot, but they didn't get many 3-0s, which is where the big points are. skt got lots of 3-0s, which is what makes them more expensive. That's not entirely true. In addition to their scores last round, the team prices are adjusted up or down depending on playoff performance. If you strictly went by last round, it would look something like this: STX 8 KTF 6 SKT 6 CJE 4 But since STX performed poorly in playoffs, CJ performed great, and SKT won the whole thing, the prices were adjusted to this: STX 6 KTF 5 SKT 7 CJE 6 I did not know this. now I regret picking SKT You had all the information available to you, including last season's statistics. I mean, you looked, saw SKT @ 7 points, and still thought that was worth a pick, so obviously it was a good adjustment no? 
im sure it was available to me but I just didn't go looking for it. I assumed it was based entirely on previous round performance. my mistake I guess
and SKT was 8 points this round, iirc.
|
Braavos36401 Posts
On October 14 2009 14:58 lazz wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2009 12:19 Hot_Bid wrote:On October 14 2009 12:01 Urth wrote:
I have a question. I can understand the player prices, but with teams, why is it so weird? Skt1 still costs the most, while stx dominated last season On October 14 2009 12:08 lazz wrote:On October 14 2009 12:01 Urth wrote:
I have a question. I can understand the player prices, but with teams, why is it so weird? Skt1 still costs the most, while stx dominated last season it's based on how many points they generated. stx won a lot, but they didn't get many 3-0s, which is where the big points are. skt got lots of 3-0s, which is what makes them more expensive. That's not entirely true. In addition to their scores last round, the team prices are adjusted up or down depending on playoff performance. If you strictly went by last round, it would look something like this: STX 8 KTF 6 SKT 6 CJE 4 But since STX performed poorly in playoffs, CJ performed great, and SKT won the whole thing, the prices were adjusted to this: STX 6 KTF 5 SKT 7 CJE 6 I did not know this. now I regret picking SKT
You had all the information available to you, including last season's statistics. I mean, you looked, saw SKT @ 8 points, and still thought that was worth a pick, so obviously it was a good adjustment no?
|
Holy shit my fantasy team is going way up now.
+ Show Spoiler + EffOrt as captain(<3 EffOrt)  sKyHigh on the team(nice comeback) CJ as my team(just won 3-0!) no one on my anti team even played ;D
|
|
|
Braavos36401 Posts
At Blizzcon, some pros said that Hwaseung coaches boasted that they could make playoffs without using Jaedong for any aces in Round 1. I didn't think it was serious but LOL at what happened tonight hahahaha.
edit: GL JAEDONG OWNERS
|
holy shit i have killer on my fantasy team
[Mod edit: your comment is completely appropriate, so I edited it back in. Congrats! You are one of the 19 proud owners of Killer, the new Oz Ace]
|
On October 14 2009 15:07 Hot_Bid wrote:
At Blizzcon, some pros said that Hwaseung coaches boasted that they could make playoffs without using Jaedong for any aces in Round 1. I didn't think it was serious but LOL at what happened tonight hahahaha.
edit: GL JAEDONG OWNERS
Really, then 794 owners are going to be up in arms!
At least KT is smart enough to use Flash in every Ace.
|
hahaha fuck
no jaedong ace? ;_;
|
Melbourne5338 Posts
On October 14 2009 15:11 Phelix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2009 15:07 Hot_Bid wrote:
At Blizzcon, some pros said that Hwaseung coaches boasted that they could make playoffs without using Jaedong for any aces in Round 1. I didn't think it was serious but LOL at what happened tonight hahahaha.
edit: GL JAEDONG OWNERS Really, then 794 owners are going to be up in arms! At least KT is smart enough to use Flash in every Ace.
So you think...
|
Braavos36401 Posts
On October 14 2009 15:11 Phelix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2009 15:07 Hot_Bid wrote:
At Blizzcon, some pros said that Hwaseung coaches boasted that they could make playoffs without using Jaedong for any aces in Round 1. I didn't think it was serious but LOL at what happened tonight hahahaha.
edit: GL JAEDONG OWNERS Really, then 794 owners are going to be up in arms! At least KT is smart enough to use Flash in every Ace.
I was like 80% sure they would've sent Lux on Outsider for Ace if it went 2-2 last time.
|
On October 14 2009 15:11 Phelix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2009 15:07 Hot_Bid wrote:
At Blizzcon, some pros said that Hwaseung coaches boasted that they could make playoffs without using Jaedong for any aces in Round 1. I didn't think it was serious but LOL at what happened tonight hahahaha.
edit: GL JAEDONG OWNERS Really, then 794 owners are going to be up in arms! At least KT is smart enough to use Flash in every Ace.
... wait, what? Are you serious?
|
On October 14 2009 15:07 Hot_Bid wrote:
At Blizzcon, some pros said that Hwaseung coaches boasted that they could make playoffs without using Jaedong for any aces in Round 1. I didn't think it was serious but LOL at what happened tonight hahahaha.
edit: GL JAEDONG OWNERS
wow
|
Why does it say that iam 1073th with 25 pts 
or you are still updating things
|
Haha @ JD owners. Top 70 and 4th in former top 10 
|
week 1 is always hilarious
|
Braavos36401 Posts
Anyone wanna take a crack at optimal team?
|
Cost - Player - Points
5 - Luxury - 8
2 - HiyA - 7
3 - Modesty - 6
2 - HoeJJa - 5
1 - FrOzean - 5
9 -  Bisu - 7
5 - KT Rolster - 10
27 - Total - 48
There are a few ways to get 48 points, this way is just the most cost-effective. Switching calm with luxury, or hoejja with hwasin, for example, would still be 48 points. Also, if you take violet over bisu, there are other ways to add back 2 points with the 6 remaining points. Interestingly, even if you lose two points to gain 4 costpoints to distribute by taking perfectman over violet, there's no way to make up the loss of points.
edit: see next page for a 30 point team that earns 49, I was wrong.
There are a ton of possible anti-teams, not going to list them all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
