EPTSCV stacking - Page 4
| Blogs > MuffiN |
|
Clow
Brazil880 Posts
| ||
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
| ||
Manifesto7
Osaka27174 Posts
On July 02 2009 12:24 MuffiN wrote: Well, TE is the best imo because the mins are balanced. In normal bb i think 7 and 1 are worse than 5 and 1(especailly). Mani, okay, fine, for the sake of time we'll play 3-4 games, if u win one ill write a poem about the evils of glitching and worker stack. if i win, you have to write a poem on how awesome my user name is. : D Sounds good. Muffins are awesome, so that should be easy. | ||
|
MuffiN
Korea (North)201 Posts
On July 02 2009 12:30 CharlieMurphy wrote: Even though you probably don't deserve it here http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?id=57264 ive already read that guide quite extensively.thanks | ||
Hyde
Australia14568 Posts
On July 02 2009 12:30 CharlieMurphy wrote: Even though you probably don't deserve it here http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?id=57264 Haha after all that, how nice of you. | ||
|
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
battle.net .. -shudder- | ||
|
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
On July 02 2009 12:32 Manifesto7 wrote: Sounds good. Muffins are awesome, so that should be easy. this implies you have the possibility of losing MAN UP | ||
|
Manifesto7
Osaka27174 Posts
On July 02 2009 12:46 HeavOnEarth wrote: this implies you have the possibility of losing MAN UP Oh I'll win, but I might just write the poem anyway. | ||
|
MuffiN
Korea (North)201 Posts
On July 02 2009 12:53 Manifesto7 wrote: Oh I'll win, but I might just write the poem anyway. i think, we should have day[9] commentate. | ||
|
ghostWriter
United States3302 Posts
On July 02 2009 12:24 MuffiN wrote: Well, TE is the best imo because the mins are balanced. In normal bb i think 7 and 1 are worse than 5 and 1(especailly). Mani, okay, fine, for the sake of time we'll play 3-4 games, if u win one ill write a poem about the evils of glitching and worker stack. if i win, you have to write a poem on how awesome my user name is. : D Are you muffin-lzuruha? | ||
|
MuffiN
Korea (North)201 Posts
| ||
|
lac29
United States1485 Posts
On July 02 2009 12:09 CharlieMurphy wrote: yea, we just explained that. It's different because the AI doesn't instant auto attack and they scatter around. The aformentioned scenario is more to delay and injure the units a little instead of the 'one-shot' rape that 7 stacked SCV can dish out on a ling. How is this that much different from muta stack? | ||
|
konadora
Singapore66364 Posts
On July 02 2009 11:19 Manifesto7 wrote: ROFL you were playing against CharlieMurphy, veteran of TL.net and one of the best bloodbath players. Search for his youtube videos on how to defend 4 pools. Epic, epic fail. This thread suddenly became legendary | ||
|
Manifesto7
Osaka27174 Posts
On July 02 2009 13:46 lac29 wrote: How is this that much different from muta stack? No land units normally stack. All air units normally stack. Imagine if you could stack ultras or siege tanks... | ||
|
armed_
Canada443 Posts
On July 02 2009 13:46 lac29 wrote: How is this that much different from muta stack? Permanent worker stacking totally breaks the game's balance, and if allowed, would make the metagame completely uninteresting. Muta stack does not. It really doesn't have anything to do with how severe a glitch it is or anything, what's important is the effect it has on the game. | ||
|
Etherone
United States1898 Posts
| ||
|
PokePill
United States1048 Posts
On July 02 2009 10:56 MuffiN wrote: Is this so bad to use on battle.net? If somebody is fucking 4pooling u on bloodbath, (fucking sad anyways) and u stack scvs cuase theres no other way to defend it is like charliemurhpy says 'fucking the same as multicommand' same as maphack? Please enlighten me. I know this bug is banned, however battle.net =/= iccup/progaming, u play for fun. After the game, he starts crying and whispering while he is (DND) and tells me im a loser and stuff. He has anger issues REP: http://repdepot.net/replay.php?id=15973&key=0cd7aa Am i wrong or is he just a overreacting little kid P.S. Happy canada DAY! You are playing on Battle.net, there are no rules, it is not a league or a tournament or a private ladder, you can do whatever you want within the limits of the game there are no rules to sanction what "bugs" are cheating and which aren't. Saying muta stacking is not cheating and saying worker stacking isn't is just hypocrisy even though Z balance relies entirely on a bug, it's Blizzard's own fault for keeping both bugs in the game. Doing this on iccup knowingly would definitely be cheating though. Obviously posting here is a bad idea, just letting you know are in the right and it doesn't matter at ALL what bugs the community deems acceptable on Battle.net. | ||
|
BanZu
United States3329 Posts
I.. just don't understand it. It's not a big deal. Holy shit, it's not a BIG DEAL. Get over yourselves. The first page makes me face-palm. | ||
|
koreasilver
9109 Posts
On July 02 2009 16:05 BanZu wrote: ROFL, everyone is hating SCV stacking so much. I.. just don't understand it. It's not a big deal. Holy shit, it's not a BIG DEAL. Get over yourselves. The first page makes me face-palm. I can't tell if you're serious or not. If so, you need to read the thread again. Also, LOL at anyone for complaining about 5pool on Blood Bath. That's like one of the most standard builds on the map for god's sake. | ||
|
Vasoline73
United States8076 Posts
| ||
| ||
