SCV stacking

On July 02 2009 11:07 AzureEye wrote:
4 pool is cheese that is part of the game. To be honest, 4 pool is not that deadly if you're a Terran and Zerg rarely has decent cheese that works against Terrans anyway compared to vice versa. Just because he 4 pool's does not make him lame, maybe he wants to practice his ling micro vs workers

How would you like it if everytime you opened up with wraiths, he has hacks that nuke your base?

I think you're the person who is wrong here. I hope rest of TL sees the same

On July 02 2009 11:09 Cloud wrote:
Why is it sad that someone 4 pools you on bloodbath...? And well, kind of the other guys fault for not anticipating a fag that will stack scvs against him on bnet.

On July 02 2009 11:08 MuffiN wrote:



4pool on a python would be easy to defend


4 pool on bloodbath which has a distance of like 3 seconds for lings is fucking lame.

On July 02 2009 11:11 MuffiN wrote:



how am i a fag for stacking scvs. 4 pool on bloodbath is insta win, no effrt needed, my baby brother could do it. The only way to counter was fucking stacking so i did it.

On July 02 2009 11:19 Manifesto7 wrote:
ROFL you were playing against CharlieMurphy, veteran of TL.net and one of the best bloodbath players. Search for his youtube videos on how to defend 4 pools.

Epic, epic fail.

On July 02 2009 11:26 Manifesto7 wrote:
Nice build by the way. On blood bath you went to 10/10, then started a depot, then cancelled, then started a rax, then made a depot, and you were dead.

Then you cheated.

Try learning how to build the first two terran buildings correctly before you cry about someone else.

On July 02 2009 11:19 Manifesto7 wrote:
ROFL you were playing against CharlieMurphy, veteran of TL.net and one of the best bloodbath players. Search for his youtube videos on how to defend 4 pools.

Epic, epic fail.

On July 02 2009 10:56 MuffiN wrote:
Is this so bad to use on battle.net? If somebody is fucking 4pooling u on bloodbath, (fucking sad anyways) and u stack scvs cuase theres no other way to defend it is like charliemurhpy says 'fucking the same as multicommand' same as maphack? Please enlighten me. I know this bug is banned, however battle.net =/= iccup/progaming, u play for fun.

After the game, he starts crying and whispering while he is (DND) and tells me im a loser and stuff.

He has anger issues

REP: http://repdepot.net/replay.php?id=15973&key=0cd7aa


Am i wrong or is he just a overreacting little kid

P.S. Happy canada DAY!

On July 02 2009 11:26 Manifesto7 wrote:
Nice build by the way. On blood bath you went to 10/10, then started a depot, then cancelled, then started a rax, then made a depot, and you were dead.

Then you cheated.

Try learning how to build the first two terran buildings correctly before you cry about someone else.

On July 02 2009 11:16 Dreadwave wrote:

What makes this funny is that you played against the guy who made a load of VODs describing exactly how to deal with 4 pool on bloodbath. You could watch those to stop being a freewin to 4 poolers maybe?

On July 02 2009 11:41 CharlieMurphy wrote:

thank you

PS- I kept flaming OP in hopes that he would create a topic on the subject since he acted so impartial to the idea of worker stacking.

Also, The first game we played I noticed that his build was slow, so the next game i took advantage of his sorry build.

btw, it wasn't a 4pool - you even scouted me man, how did you think it was 4? It was clearly a 5pool.
and you worker stacked not only once but twice, especially after i made it clear after the first time that it was cheating.

On July 02 2009 11:40 Manifesto7 wrote:
You got the reaction because you came on TL complaining about someone being BM. That person is also a TL member. Then, you post a replay where YOU are the one cheating, making the BM totally justified. If CM wasn't a TL member, I wouldn't care, but YOU are the one calling him out.

Don't cheat like a jerk and you won't get flamed. Worker stack bug and hacking are both types of cheating.

On July 02 2009 11:51 MuffiN wrote:
im pretty sure that going on dnd, and crying while i cant respond back is fucking bitching.

On July 02 2009 11:46 MuffiN wrote:



Manifesto7 are u kidding me, i knew spor was charliemurphy, thats why i came here and wrote a topic so he would explain his bm to me and why he kept fucking bitching like a little girl. Worker stacking on battle.net and hacking are two different fucking things that are not even close to being the same. You just said, if CM wasnt a tl member u wouldnt care, so ur answers are so fucking baised. I came here for honest opinion, if i am wrong okay so be it, but u call me a dope a moron, criticize my play. Grow up please.

came here for honest opinion

On July 02 2009 11:56 Manifesto7 wrote:


If you knew it was CM, then you know you are shitting on someone in public. You should expect backlash. How am I biased? Because I care if it is someone I know compared to someone I don't? That is stupid.

Cheating is cheating. Obviously there is nothing official about bnet, but it does say a lot about what kind of person you are.

You are a dope, you are a moron, and you play like shit. You

and I'm giving it to you.

On July 02 2009 12:04 Radical wrote:
A little off topic, but is it still against the rules if you stack your workers on the mineral line? Like if my main is being attacked and I have no units there except for drones, I select all workers, right click on one mineral patch, and then attack when the enemy gets close? I couldn't get this to work on a geyser, so I don't even know how he was doing that. I thought I've seen pros do the mineral thing though, so I'm just wondering. BTW, when I stack on minerals, the workers don't all continue to move around stacked, they just kind of scatter after you tell them to attack, as if you were trying to jump through a min line or a wall.

On July 02 2009 12:04 Radical wrote:
A little off topic, but is it still against the rules if you stack your workers on the mineral line? Like if my main is being attacked and I have no units there except for drones, I select all workers, right click on one mineral patch, and then attack when the enemy gets close? I couldn't get this to work on a geyser, so I don't even know how he was doing that. I thought I've seen pros do the mineral thing though, so I'm just wondering. BTW, when I stack on minerals, the workers don't all continue to move around stacked, they just kind of scatter after you tell them to attack, as if you were trying to jump through a min line or a wall.

On July 02 2009 12:07 Newguy wrote:
sorry for my newbishness, but people stack workers when they maynard, when zvp z goes lings up the ramp and probe harasses don't many pro p players use probe stack then stop over the lings so they fuck up the lings and trap/kill some? is it only stacking like 10 and attacking the lings with them to kill thats cheating?

On July 02 2009 12:05 Manifesto7 wrote:
Want to talk to CharlieMurphy, use the PM function. Want to call someone out, make a blog.

About the glitch, don't fucking lie, you knew it was a shitty thing to do. Anyone who is on TL and plays iccup knows that.

And why the fuck would I want to read some shitty blog about some no name being BM to your cheating ass. Nobody would care. Obviously the only reason anyone cares is because we know the people involved. However, if the roles were reversed and CM was the one stacking workers, I would call him a faggot too. Faggot.

You are right, I don't know you. The only think I know about you is you cheat. Write some fucking poetry and reveal your sensitive side for us.

Finally, 100-0? Lets play a bo 199 on blood bath. I think I have a good idea how to win a game or two.

On July 02 2009 12:07 Newguy wrote:
sorry for my newbishness, but people stack workers when they maynard, when zvp z goes lings up the ramp and probe harasses don't many pro p players use probe stack then stop over the lings so they fuck up the lings and trap/kill some? is it only stacking like 10 and attacking the lings with them to kill thats cheating?

shoot sorry didnt see that other post, i was typing this

On July 02 2009 12:15 Dead9 wrote:
I always thought 4/5pool was a really weak build on blood bath? o_O
Everyone opens 8rax or double gate...

On July 02 2009 12:10 MuffiN wrote:
And i have a good idea that if i had the time to do bo199 (Not on bloodbath, cause ur gonna fucking 4 pool every game) I would rape u 100-0.

On July 02 2009 12:19 Rostam wrote:


??

On July 02 2009 12:18 CharlieMurphy wrote:

yea, it is- and they do. But if the guy is opening 10 rax or something then it rapes obviously.

btw Mufin, BB TE is a worse map. It even looks ugly http://repdepot.net/img/minimap/1024/531.jpg

On July 02 2009 12:24 MuffiN wrote:



Well, TE is the best imo because the mins are balanced. In normal bb i think 7 and 1 are worse than 5 and 1(especailly).

Mani, okay, fine, for the sake of time we'll play 3-4 games, if u win one ill write a poem about the evils of glitching and worker stack. if i win, you have to write a poem on how awesome my user name is. : D

On July 02 2009 12:30 CharlieMurphy wrote:
Even though you probably don't deserve it here http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?id=57264

On July 02 2009 12:30 CharlieMurphy wrote:
Even though you probably don't deserve it here http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?id=57264

On July 02 2009 12:32 Manifesto7 wrote:


Sounds good. Muffins are awesome, so that should be easy.

On July 02 2009 12:46 HeavOnEarth wrote:

this implies you have the possibility of losing
MAN UP

On July 02 2009 12:53 Manifesto7 wrote:


Oh I'll win, but I might just write the poem anyway.

On July 02 2009 12:24 MuffiN wrote:



Well, TE is the best imo because the mins are balanced. In normal bb i think 7 and 1 are worse than 5 and 1(especailly).

Mani, okay, fine, for the sake of time we'll play 3-4 games, if u win one ill write a poem about the evils of glitching and worker stack. if i win, you have to write a poem on how awesome my user name is. : D

On July 02 2009 12:09 CharlieMurphy wrote:

yea, we just explained that. It's different because the AI doesn't instant auto attack and they scatter around. The aformentioned scenario is more to delay and injure the units a little instead of the 'one-shot' rape that 7 stacked SCV can dish out on a ling.

On July 02 2009 11:19 Manifesto7 wrote:
ROFL you were playing against CharlieMurphy, veteran of TL.net and one of the best bloodbath players. Search for his youtube videos on how to defend 4 pools.

Epic, epic fail.

On July 02 2009 13:46 lac29 wrote:



How is this that much different from muta stack?

On July 02 2009 13:46 lac29 wrote:
How is this that much different from muta stack?

On July 02 2009 10:56 MuffiN wrote:
Is this so bad to use on battle.net? If somebody is fucking 4pooling u on bloodbath, (fucking sad anyways) and u stack scvs cuase theres no other way to defend it is like charliemurhpy says 'fucking the same as multicommand' same as maphack? Please enlighten me. I know this bug is banned, however battle.net =/= iccup/progaming, u play for fun.

After the game, he starts crying and whispering while he is (DND) and tells me im a loser and stuff.

He has anger issues

REP: http://repdepot.net/replay.php?id=15973&key=0cd7aa


Am i wrong or is he just a overreacting little kid

P.S. Happy canada DAY!

On July 02 2009 16:05 BanZu wrote:
ROFL, everyone is hating SCV stacking so much.

I.. just don't understand it. It's not a big deal. Holy shit, it's not a BIG DEAL.

Get over yourselves. The first page makes me face-palm.

On July 02 2009 14:49 Manifesto7 wrote:

No land units normally stack. All air units normally stack.

Imagine if you could stack ultras or siege tanks...

On July 03 2009 12:43 CharlieMurphy wrote:
well sairs do splash so its not as useful, that is the main reason. But stacked sairs are still slightly better I think.

and flag, I wouldn't doubt it. But if its true then why the fuck would this idiot 10 rax vs a 5pool?

On July 03 2009 10:11 lac29 wrote:


Why don't we really see stacking of any other air units besides mutas then? Seems kinda silly to let one bug be ok but not something like SCV stack (which prob can easily be taken out by any microing ranged unit).