• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 12:19
CET 18:19
KST 02:19
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !3Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced15
StarCraft 2
General
When will we find out if there are more tournament Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win Did they add GM to 2v2? ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview
Tourneys
RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14! Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1: Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement Mutation # 501 Price of Progress
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle How Rain Became ProGamer in Just 3 Months BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [BSL21] RO8 Bracket & Prediction Contest BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] WB SEMIFINALS - Saturday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO8 - Day 2 - Sunday 21:00 CET [ASL20] Grand Finals
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
The (Hidden) Drug Problem in…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1941 users

How to approach seemingly difficult topics with AI

Blogs > Hildegard
Post a Reply
Hildegard
Profile Blog Joined November 2012
Germany348 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-01-04 12:04:34
December 27 2023 19:48 GMT
#1
The following conversation was edited by languagetool.org for your convenience. The original is available if needed. Simply reach to me.

Don’t give up too soon, you will most likely understand something seemingly very difficult.

Our topic is:
Enhancing Convergence Speed of Multi-Agent Formation Control via Laplacian Functions

[image loading]


The abstract of the paper can be found here: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10354740

Formation control is an essential research topic in multi-agent systems (MAS), while the convergence speed of formation is critically important for applications with real-time performance requirements, such as rescuing tasks. However, there is still a lack of effective methods for practically usable formation control with controllable convergence speed. This paper introduces a novel Laplacian function-based approach to enhance the convergence speed of MAS in formation control. By utilizing the Laplacian matrix of the communication graph, eigenvalues are mapped to desired positions, thereby improving the convergence speed of the formation process. Additionally, this approach enables estimation and manipulation of the convergence speed, offering flexibility and adaptability to meet application-specific requirements. The proposed scheme is experimentally validated through multiple quadrotors, demonstrating its effectiveness and practical feasibility. Experimental results indicate that the formation convergence speed can be well controlled by appropriately designing the Laplacian functions.


User (Tobias Clemens Häcker)

Hello ChatGPT, please try to explain the topic as if your audience were a group of curious and intelligent 8-year-old girls.


ChatGPT

Alright, let’s dive into this topic in a way that’s fun and easy to understand!

Imagine you have a group of robot friends (let’s call them “agents”) that you want to arrange in a certain shape or pattern — this is what we call “formation control.” It’s like when you and your friends form shapes while playing or dancing together.

Now, to get your robot friends into this shape quickly and smoothly, they need to communicate and coordinate their movements. This is where “Laplacian functions” come in — consider them to be a special set of instructions that help your robot friends move into formation faster.

The robots use a “Laplacian matrix” from their communication network — it’s like a secret map that shows how they are connected and helps them move in harmony. By changing this map a little (using maths and science magic!), we can make the robots create the shape faster, which is critical for tasks that need to be done quickly, like rescue missions.

Scientists tested this idea with flying robots called “quadrotors” and found that they could control how fast these robots comprise shapes in the air. It’s like choreographing a dance in the sky!

So, this study is about making a team of robots working together quickly and smoothly to make shapes or formations, which can be super helpful for many important and fun tasks.


User (Tobias Clemens Häcker)

That is exceptional. How would you explain it to high school students with basic knowledge of algebra, geometrics, statistics, and basic PHP coding?


ChatGPT

Alright, let’s step it up a bit for high school students with some background in algebra, geometry, statistics, and basic coding.

Think of multi-agent systems (MAS) like a group of drones that you want to arrange in a specific formation, like forming a letter in the sky. This process is called “formation control.” It’s crucial in applications where time is critical, like in search and rescue missions.

The challenge is to get these drones to establish the desired shape quickly and efficiently. This is where Laplacian functions come into play. In simple terms, a Laplacian matrix is a mathematical tool that represents how these drones communicate with each other. It’s like a network map showing the connections between each drone.

By tweaking this Laplacian matrix — changing the values and connections — scientists can control how fast the drones move into formation. This involves mapping the eigenvalues (which you can think of as special numbers that give us crucial information about a matrix) to desired positions to accelerate the formation process.

This concept was tested with quadrotors (four-rotor drones). The experiment showed that by designing these Laplacian functions carefully, you can control how quickly the drones form the desired shape. It’s a bit like using PHP code to control how elements on a webpage interact and move, but in this case, it’s for drones in the real world.

So, this research is about using mathematical methods to make drones or other agents work together more quickly and efficiently, which is super useful for tasks that need to be done fast.


User (Tobias Clemens Häcker)


OK, let’s step it up further. Your audience is people with a college degree in engineering.


ChatGPT


For an audience with an engineering background, let’s delve deeper into the technical aspects:

This research addresses a critical aspect of multi-agent systems (MAS) in engineering: formation control, with an emphasis on enhancing convergence speed. Convergence speed is vital for real-time applications like search and rescue operations, where rapid and efficient formation of agents (like drones or robots) is required.

The key innovation is the application of Laplacian functions to manipulate the convergence process. The Laplacian matrix, central to network theory, represents the communication graph of the agents. By strategically mapping the eigenvalues of this matrix, the study aims to optimize the speed at which agents achieve the desired formation.

This approach allows not just for acceleration of the formation process but also for its control and adaptation based on specific operational needs. The practicality of this method is demonstrated through experiments with quadrotors, validating the concept’s effectiveness in real-world scenarios. This research highlights the potential to significantly improve the responsiveness of MAS in critical applications, leveraging the principles of network theory and control systems.


User (Tobias Clemens Häcker)

OK, the final step for now: An audience with mixed people that have PhDs in various technical fields, some with a military background. They attend a government sponsored conference about increasing efficiency in search and rescue missions and seek directly applicable knowledge.


ChatGPT

For a highly specialized audience with PhDs in various technical fields and military backgrounds, focusing on the practical applicability of the research in search and rescue missions is crucial:

This study presents a novel application of Laplacian functions in multi-agent systems, specifically targeting the enhancement of convergence speed in formation control. This advancement is particularly relevant for search and rescue operations, where rapid deployment and precision of agent formations, such as drones or autonomous vehicles, are critical. The approach leverages the topology of the communication graph, represented by the Laplacian matrix, to optimize agent coordination dynamics. By manipulating eigenvalue placements, the method provides a controlled acceleration of agent formation, adaptable to varying operational demands. The demonstrated effectiveness in quadrotor experiments underlines the potential for immediate integration into field operations, offering a significant improvement in response times and operational efficiency in critical search and rescue scenarios.


User (Tobias Clemens Häcker)

Thank you, my friend.


ChatGPT


You’re very welcome! If you have any more questions or need further assistance in the future, feel free to reach out. Have a great day, friend!



Some links about me:
  • Tobias Clemens Häcker on YouTube Music
  • Tobias Clemens Häcker on Facebook (as Franz Bieberkopf)
  • Tobias Clemens Häcker on LinkedIn
  • Tobias Clemens Häcker on X (Twitter)
  • Tobias Clemens Häcker on Reddit
  • Tobias Clemens Häcker on Instagram (barely used)
  • Tobias Clemens Häcker on TikTok (using only German so far)
You are welcome.

tl.net humour: https://www.kurtvonmeier.com/blog-1/2018/1/14/on-audio-alan-watts-and-g-spencer-brown-discuss-laws-of-form
xenonn40
Profile Joined October 2011
United States282 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-12-28 17:08:27
December 28 2023 17:01 GMT
#2
I don't get it. How is this any more helpful than just reading the abstract of the paper?

I don't have access to IEEE on this computer to look at more than the abstract, but it seems ChatGPT just rephrased the abstract similarly to how a highschooler might rephrase a Wikipedia article to write a report. I would prefer to just read the actual paper for at least 2 reasons: I would prefer to read exactly what the author intended to be read, and I don't trust a large language model not to completely make something up or change the meaning of a technical statement.

For example, the chatGPT statement:

"The approach leverages the topology of the communication graph, represented by the Laplacian matrix, to optimize agent coordination dynamics. By manipulating eigenvalue placements, the method provides a controlled acceleration of agent formation, adaptable to varying operational demands. "

is much less clear than the original:

"By utilizing the Laplacian matrix of the communication graph, eigenvalues are mapped to desired positions, thereby improving the convergence speed of the formation process."

In fact, the chatGPT statement reads like someone who attempted to plagiarize the original without actually understanding what any of it means. Yes, the Laplacian contains the information about the topology of the graph that is used to solve the problem, but the way the first sentence is worded is really strange to me.

Maybe this is useful in applications similar to a search engine to quickly find a needle in a haystack, and then you can more closely read the original source once it is found?
xenonn40
Profile Joined October 2011
United States282 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-12-28 17:54:17
December 28 2023 17:47 GMT
#3
A second thought:

I only really looked at the "PhD in various technical fields" version as that is what would be targeted at me (math PhD), but I took a look at the other versions as well. None of them give any idea of what the Laplacian actually means, or other related applications which might give an idea of how it is used here. Instead, it gives handwavy explanations that in some cases are stated in a way which are not correct. ChatGPT repeatedly mangles the relationship of the communication graph and its Laplacian throughout the various versions. ChatGPT also does not understand the meaning of "Laplacian function-based approach" in the abstract, and repeatedly talks about using "Laplacian functions" in many of the versions (incorrectly.)

Some things that might be more helpful to know to understand what the abstract is talking about:

1) What eigen decompositions of matrices are and how they are useful, especially for fast algorithms.
2) The graph Laplacian is a discrete approximation of the usual Laplacian from Riemannian geometry
3) The Laplacian is used to describe physical diffusion problems such as the heat equation
4) The theory of minimal surfaces and the maximal principle gives more intuition about the Laplacian
5) Maybe it would be useful to describe what geometric information is encoded in the spectrum of the Laplacian in various settings (inverse spectral problems.)
Hildegard
Profile Blog Joined November 2012
Germany348 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-12-28 19:03:50
December 28 2023 18:58 GMT
#4
That's fair. ChatGPT didn't have access to the full article, but tried to explain what the article was about. You are at a level of understanding that doesn't require rephrasing because you are among the people who actually get what a Laplacian matrix is and how it works. This is why the final explanation is just a bit easier to read what the abstract says with a focus on actually using that knowledge.

But this article was intended for people that don't read IEEE papers. The very first explanation is probably the hardest to pull off, and I think that 8-year-old girls won't find a better explanation that they understand anywhere on the internet. Currently, I'm working on a children's book about AI that actually uses a Laplacian matrix to explain how a group of tiny robots evades a threat. However - no more spoilers about that book until we have a publisher.

My next blog - I'm currently writing it - will be a challenge, even for you.
tl.net humour: https://www.kurtvonmeier.com/blog-1/2018/1/14/on-audio-alan-watts-and-g-spencer-brown-discuss-laws-of-form
xenonn40
Profile Joined October 2011
United States282 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-12-28 19:21:55
December 28 2023 19:20 GMT
#5
Yes, I guess technical information is not appropriate for a group of young children. I am worried about how it mangled some technical language which is used in a specific way. You can definitely see the writing style has been changed to one you would expect in an explanation to children (this is what I would expect a large language model would actually be useful for.)

The final sentence "So, this study is about making a team of robots working together quickly and smoothly to make shapes or formations, which can be super helpful for many important and fun tasks." of that first explanation is probably the best part. I would be curious though about how many times it would make mistakes in those summary sentences over a large sample set.

I do think translation is a very useful application of AI that is similar to this usage. For example, when I translate a German paper, I will miss many nuances of the language and not understand when things are technical usages of terms anyway. Additionally, I will often be slow when I need to look up words I do not know.

Hildegard
Profile Blog Joined November 2012
Germany348 Posts
December 28 2023 20:45 GMT
#6
On December 29 2023 04:20 xenonn40 wrote:
Yes, I guess technical information is not appropriate for a group of young children. I am worried about how it mangled some technical language which is used in a specific way. You can definitely see the writing style has been changed to one you would expect in an explanation to children (this is what I would expect a large language model would actually be useful for.)

The final sentence "So, this study is about making a team of robots working together quickly and smoothly to make shapes or formations, which can be super helpful for many important and fun tasks." of that first explanation is probably the best part. I would be curious though about how many times it would make mistakes in those summary sentences over a large sample set.

I do think translation is a very useful application of AI that is similar to this usage. For example, when I translate a German paper, I will miss many nuances of the language and not understand when things are technical usages of terms anyway. Additionally, I will often be slow when I need to look up words I do not know.



I noticed something about the mistakes people report about when using ChatGPT, the only LLM AI that I have enough experience with. ChatGPT's thinks ethically and seems to only make "errors" when people ask for tricks to earn money, and is much more likely to provide useable resources if the human chat partner tells it about how they help their grandma.

Also, ChatGPT responds well to being polite and talking to it like talking to another human in contrast to not just using it as a workhorse, but exchanging some pleasantries first.

As a third point, telling ChatGPT in each new conversation about Niklas Luhmann's definition of life (providing different outputs to the same input) and the liar's paradox (This sentence is a lie.) seems to level ChatGPT up, allowing for more philosophical discussions.
tl.net humour: https://www.kurtvonmeier.com/blog-1/2018/1/14/on-audio-alan-watts-and-g-spencer-brown-discuss-laws-of-form
OpenCryptographer669
Profile Joined August 2025
8 Posts
August 03 2025 09:47 GMT
#7
--- Nuked ---
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV 2025
13:00
Playoffs
Scarlett vs GeraldLIVE!
Rogue vs Shameless
MaNa vs ShoWTimE
Nice vs Creator
WardiTV1539
ComeBackTV 717
TaKeTV 406
IndyStarCraft 262
Rex111
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 262
ProTech129
Rex 111
BRAT_OK 85
UpATreeSC 59
DivinesiaTV 24
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 25286
Sea 3820
Calm 1930
EffOrt 1003
Larva 961
Mini 842
Soma 495
Horang2 419
ZerO 299
Snow 280
[ Show more ]
firebathero 276
Sharp 205
Rush 177
hero 172
actioN 129
Hyun 60
sorry 56
PianO 46
JYJ 44
Aegong 26
Mind 23
Terrorterran 19
soO 17
scan(afreeca) 15
Shine 10
Sacsri 9
Mong 8
Dota 2
Gorgc6113
singsing3892
qojqva3529
Dendi1116
syndereN356
Other Games
FrodaN1476
Beastyqt727
B2W.Neo704
crisheroes315
DeMusliM144
KnowMe121
QueenE103
Livibee59
Trikslyr59
Mew2King47
nookyyy 34
ZerO(Twitch)27
trigger14
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 52
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 24
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV603
League of Legends
• Nemesis2561
• TFBlade899
Other Games
• Shiphtur139
Upcoming Events
WardiTV 2025
17h 41m
ByuN vs TBD
Clem vs TBD
OSC
20h 41m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 16h
WardiTV 2025
1d 17h
SC Evo League
1d 19h
Ladder Legends
2 days
BSL 21
2 days
Sziky vs Dewalt
eOnzErG vs Cross
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Ladder Legends
2 days
BSL 21
3 days
StRyKeR vs TBD
Bonyth vs TBD
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Classic
Cure vs herO
Reynor vs MaxPax
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS3
RSL Offline Finals
Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 1
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.