• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:23
CEST 16:23
KST 23:23
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17
StarCraft 2
General
Who will win EWC 2025? Magnus Carlsen and Fabi review Clem's chess game. Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments RSL Season 1 - Final Week How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports?
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Corsair Pursuit Micro? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Pro gamer house photos Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread BWCL Season 63 Announcement
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 804 users

Killing Youtube - Page 2

Blogs > ninazerg
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 All
Glider
Profile Blog Joined December 2005
United States1353 Posts
November 18 2018 17:44 GMT
#21
I been on YT since the beginning. I know too much about it to think about it, cuz if I started ranting I might as well write a book. Those top 10 this, w/e that viral videos...any one of them gets more reward from YT than my last 20 videos combined. I get about a can of soup a day maybe, that's after 10 years of making half decent content. (the special combination of no more auto-notification, and algorithm change that focuses mostly just on view time and engagement, screwed me over especially hard. My channel is able to still stay afloat luckily) Fun fact: did you know youtube doesn't differentiate between a thumb up and a thumb down? It's all treated as an engagement activity.

But I keep making content whenever I have free time, for the love of it more than anything else. I would like to make a lot more comprehensive stuff like tutorials, taking requests and such... but that's hard unless I win the lottery. There are a lot of free tutorials out there sure, but people don't seem to get that if you want the good stuff, it naturally has to come from people with a crap tons of experience, and those people are not 18 year olds living with their parents, they have real bills to pay like I do. So I have my patreon page to help me make more contents and streams for the masses. It feels ridiculous cuz it feels like I have to ask them for coffee money, and they are doing me a favor. When it is more like, I can do a lot of commissions for a lot more $, and I give a lot of them up, asking people for pizza tipping money, to give them something that I think is way more valuable.

There are billions and billions of artists who are better than me. Yet you rarely find any of them devote a lot of time doing online videos. I'm slightly better than mediocre and have a decade of commission experience and has had theater released stuff and officials of states as clientele. But I'm a dumb-ass that still spends a lot of time making youtube videos because I love my boo boo (viewers who do enjoy the artwork)
BigFan
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
TLADT24920 Posts
November 19 2018 20:24 GMT
#22
Did they provide any reason for demontizing their content? This feels really bizzare to me. It sounds like they are purposely trying to destroy their own platform which doesn't make any sense!
Former BW EiC"Watch Bakemonogatari or I will kill you." -Toad, April 18th, 2017
ninazerg
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States7291 Posts
November 20 2018 00:15 GMT
#23
On November 20 2018 05:24 BigFan wrote:
Did they provide any reason for demontizing their content? This feels really bizzare to me. It sounds like they are purposely trying to destroy their own platform which doesn't make any sense!


Well, advertisers said they didn't want their brands to be associated with content that they thought would be not well-received by general audiences, aka little kids and grandmas. It had a lot to do with outside influences, and advertisers pressuring the platform to create stricter guidelines. Some of the change may also be due to the internal politics of Youtube, but that's purely speculative, so I'm not gonna go into that.
"If two pregnant women get into a fist fight, it's like a mecha-battle between two unborn babies." - Fyodor Dostoevsky
BigFan
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
TLADT24920 Posts
November 21 2018 03:21 GMT
#24
On November 20 2018 09:15 ninazerg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 20 2018 05:24 BigFan wrote:
Did they provide any reason for demontizing their content? This feels really bizzare to me. It sounds like they are purposely trying to destroy their own platform which doesn't make any sense!


Well, advertisers said they didn't want their brands to be associated with content that they thought would be not well-received by general audiences, aka little kids and grandmas. It had a lot to do with outside influences, and advertisers pressuring the platform to create stricter guidelines. Some of the change may also be due to the internal politics of Youtube, but that's purely speculative, so I'm not gonna go into that.

Fair enough, but I still get ads for a lot of different content so, how is this working exactly?
Former BW EiC"Watch Bakemonogatari or I will kill you." -Toad, April 18th, 2017
ninazerg
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States7291 Posts
November 21 2018 05:16 GMT
#25
On November 21 2018 12:21 BigFan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 20 2018 09:15 ninazerg wrote:
On November 20 2018 05:24 BigFan wrote:
Did they provide any reason for demontizing their content? This feels really bizzare to me. It sounds like they are purposely trying to destroy their own platform which doesn't make any sense!


Well, advertisers said they didn't want their brands to be associated with content that they thought would be not well-received by general audiences, aka little kids and grandmas. It had a lot to do with outside influences, and advertisers pressuring the platform to create stricter guidelines. Some of the change may also be due to the internal politics of Youtube, but that's purely speculative, so I'm not gonna go into that.

Fair enough, but I still get ads for a lot of different content so, how is this working exactly?


I'm not sure what you mean. You'll still watch ads. Youtube hasn't gotten rid of ads.
"If two pregnant women get into a fist fight, it's like a mecha-battle between two unborn babies." - Fyodor Dostoevsky
Chef
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
10810 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-11-21 13:27:44
November 21 2018 13:25 GMT
#26
I read a quarter of your post but stopped because I got tired of agreeing with you. Sorry. Feel free to give up reading mine here.

I do miss the times when ads weren't a thing and I found the videos through links on a forum. YouTube is actually getting unwatchable for me, because mid-sentence the video will be interrupted by some dumb ad, 2-4 times in a 20 minute video. I definitely am watching less now, but that's probably actually good for YouTube because I'm a waste of bandwidth who never buys anything.

I do think I always preferred content by people who weren't making a living on it though, because as you said people are trying to adapt to the YouTube algorithm and it is super boring. Also just generally I think it's more interesting to listen to normal people who haven't created an on-air persona. For the same reason I like people who make elaborate posts on forums and stuff. Entertainment can cost as much as you want it to, and the price starts at $0 for it turns out a hell of a lot of cool stuff. Same with education, it turns out you don't have to pay anything to learn a lot. Other than your electric and internet bill.
LEGEND!! LEGEND!!
ninazerg
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States7291 Posts
November 21 2018 23:21 GMT
#27
On November 21 2018 22:25 Chef wrote:
I read a quarter of your post but stopped because I got tired of agreeing with you.


I'll try to make the next one more objectionable.
"If two pregnant women get into a fist fight, it's like a mecha-battle between two unborn babies." - Fyodor Dostoevsky
BigFan
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
TLADT24920 Posts
November 22 2018 00:20 GMT
#28
On November 21 2018 14:16 ninazerg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 21 2018 12:21 BigFan wrote:
On November 20 2018 09:15 ninazerg wrote:
On November 20 2018 05:24 BigFan wrote:
Did they provide any reason for demontizing their content? This feels really bizzare to me. It sounds like they are purposely trying to destroy their own platform which doesn't make any sense!


Well, advertisers said they didn't want their brands to be associated with content that they thought would be not well-received by general audiences, aka little kids and grandmas. It had a lot to do with outside influences, and advertisers pressuring the platform to create stricter guidelines. Some of the change may also be due to the internal politics of Youtube, but that's purely speculative, so I'm not gonna go into that.

Fair enough, but I still get ads for a lot of different content so, how is this working exactly?


I'm not sure what you mean. You'll still watch ads. Youtube hasn't gotten rid of ads.

That was my point. So, the ads are still there, but youtube is pocketing all the money for user-generated content where as before, they were giving some to the content providers. Is this right or did I miss something? Obviously, they are providing a free service to upload videos, but this change still feels odd somewhat to me seeing as the ads are still being displayed on whatever videos.
Former BW EiC"Watch Bakemonogatari or I will kill you." -Toad, April 18th, 2017
Glider
Profile Blog Joined December 2005
United States1353 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-11-26 19:05:11
November 23 2018 15:50 GMT
#29
On November 22 2018 09:20 BigFan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 21 2018 14:16 ninazerg wrote:
On November 21 2018 12:21 BigFan wrote:
On November 20 2018 09:15 ninazerg wrote:
On November 20 2018 05:24 BigFan wrote:
Did they provide any reason for demontizing their content? This feels really bizzare to me. It sounds like they are purposely trying to destroy their own platform which doesn't make any sense!


Well, advertisers said they didn't want their brands to be associated with content that they thought would be not well-received by general audiences, aka little kids and grandmas. It had a lot to do with outside influences, and advertisers pressuring the platform to create stricter guidelines. Some of the change may also be due to the internal politics of Youtube, but that's purely speculative, so I'm not gonna go into that.

Fair enough, but I still get ads for a lot of different content so, how is this working exactly?


I'm not sure what you mean. You'll still watch ads. Youtube hasn't gotten rid of ads.

That was my point. So, the ads are still there, but youtube is pocketing all the money for user-generated content where as before, they were giving some to the content providers. Is this right or did I miss something? Obviously, they are providing a free service to upload videos, but this change still feels odd somewhat to me seeing as the ads are still being displayed on whatever videos.


1. What youtube considers monetizable content guideline becomes tighter for all the reasons mentioned. Their user agreement uses language especially vague and often down right forward like "and any other content we deem inappropriate etc". You still see ads on a variety of videos due to 1) either the video is actually fine, or 2) it is not yet flagged by the AI.

2. Youtube doesn't pocket all the money. It's always 50% (technically I think 48 or 49% right now). They just don't care as much what rest of the 50% goes. If it's a legit video with fully monetizable content, it will go to the creator. If there are copyright material involved, it will generally go to the copyright holder. If there is MCN (think networks like on TV), then generally they will take a % from the channel creator under their contract, rates vary. All this is for the remaining 50%. Youtube always take their 50% share first.
zerglingling
Profile Joined April 2018
131 Posts
December 03 2018 07:52 GMT
#30
On November 03 2018 16:18 ninazerg wrote:
Boy oh boy, I'm sure I got that off my chest. It was really weighing me down. And hey, if you liked this blog, be sure to slam your face against that subscribe button, rate the blog, leave a comment in the comment box below, make sure to ring that bell, and if you're feeling generous, check out my patreon here!

sent
[image loading]
ninazerg
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States7291 Posts
December 04 2018 05:48 GMT
#31
On December 03 2018 16:52 zerglingling wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 03 2018 16:18 ninazerg wrote:
Boy oh boy, I'm sure I got that off my chest. It was really weighing me down. And hey, if you liked this blog, be sure to slam your face against that subscribe button, rate the blog, leave a comment in the comment box below, make sure to ring that bell, and if you're feeling generous, check out my patreon here!

sent
[image loading]


People who donate will receive the following:

$1: Keep your stupid dollar.
$5: I will ignore you.
$10: I will think "Maybe I should thank them" while in the shower, but will forget to do it later
$25: I will type your name in a cool font.
$50: You get one short poem from me.
$100: I will play a game of your choosing (if I have the game) with you for one hour each month
$250: I will send you an envelope with a piece of paper inside that says "penis" on it
$500: I will send you a t-shirt that says "virgin 4 life" on it to you.
$1000: I will send you a limited-edition hair-doll made from my actual hair
$5000: I will send you a video of myself eating a meatball sub while on the toilet.
"If two pregnant women get into a fist fight, it's like a mecha-battle between two unborn babies." - Fyodor Dostoevsky
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11349 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-12-05 00:47:09
December 05 2018 00:46 GMT
#32
Haha. Reverse rewards. The 'rewards' (unwards?) get progressively worse, the more you donate, I... oh wait. I get it.
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
zerglingling
Profile Joined April 2018
131 Posts
December 06 2018 02:39 GMT
#33
Don't worry, each of these is probably someone's fetish.
BigFan
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
TLADT24920 Posts
December 11 2018 02:57 GMT
#34
On November 24 2018 00:50 Glider wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 22 2018 09:20 BigFan wrote:
On November 21 2018 14:16 ninazerg wrote:
On November 21 2018 12:21 BigFan wrote:
On November 20 2018 09:15 ninazerg wrote:
On November 20 2018 05:24 BigFan wrote:
Did they provide any reason for demontizing their content? This feels really bizzare to me. It sounds like they are purposely trying to destroy their own platform which doesn't make any sense!


Well, advertisers said they didn't want their brands to be associated with content that they thought would be not well-received by general audiences, aka little kids and grandmas. It had a lot to do with outside influences, and advertisers pressuring the platform to create stricter guidelines. Some of the change may also be due to the internal politics of Youtube, but that's purely speculative, so I'm not gonna go into that.

Fair enough, but I still get ads for a lot of different content so, how is this working exactly?


I'm not sure what you mean. You'll still watch ads. Youtube hasn't gotten rid of ads.

That was my point. So, the ads are still there, but youtube is pocketing all the money for user-generated content where as before, they were giving some to the content providers. Is this right or did I miss something? Obviously, they are providing a free service to upload videos, but this change still feels odd somewhat to me seeing as the ads are still being displayed on whatever videos.


1. What youtube considers monetizable content guideline becomes tighter for all the reasons mentioned. Their user agreement uses language especially vague and often down right forward like "and any other content we deem inappropriate etc". You still see ads on a variety of videos due to 1) either the video is actually fine, or 2) it is not yet flagged by the AI.

2. Youtube doesn't pocket all the money. It's always 50% (technically I think 48 or 49% right now). They just don't care as much what rest of the 50% goes. If it's a legit video with fully monetizable content, it will go to the creator. If there are copyright material involved, it will generally go to the copyright holder. If there is MCN (think networks like on TV), then generally they will take a % from the channel creator under their contract, rates vary. All this is for the remaining 50%. Youtube always take their 50% share first.

but wasn't Nina saying that they now demonetizable content? So, that means that youtube takes its share, and does what with the rest then? I'm missing something here, I think. Thanks for the rest of the explanation, was really insightful overall.
Former BW EiC"Watch Bakemonogatari or I will kill you." -Toad, April 18th, 2017
Glider
Profile Blog Joined December 2005
United States1353 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-12-13 12:27:23
December 12 2018 23:57 GMT
#35
On December 11 2018 11:57 BigFan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2018 00:50 Glider wrote:
On November 22 2018 09:20 BigFan wrote:
On November 21 2018 14:16 ninazerg wrote:
On November 21 2018 12:21 BigFan wrote:
On November 20 2018 09:15 ninazerg wrote:
On November 20 2018 05:24 BigFan wrote:
Did they provide any reason for demontizing their content? This feels really bizzare to me. It sounds like they are purposely trying to destroy their own platform which doesn't make any sense!


Well, advertisers said they didn't want their brands to be associated with content that they thought would be not well-received by general audiences, aka little kids and grandmas. It had a lot to do with outside influences, and advertisers pressuring the platform to create stricter guidelines. Some of the change may also be due to the internal politics of Youtube, but that's purely speculative, so I'm not gonna go into that.

Fair enough, but I still get ads for a lot of different content so, how is this working exactly?


I'm not sure what you mean. You'll still watch ads. Youtube hasn't gotten rid of ads.

That was my point. So, the ads are still there, but youtube is pocketing all the money for user-generated content where as before, they were giving some to the content providers. Is this right or did I miss something? Obviously, they are providing a free service to upload videos, but this change still feels odd somewhat to me seeing as the ads are still being displayed on whatever videos.


1. What youtube considers monetizable content guideline becomes tighter for all the reasons mentioned. Their user agreement uses language especially vague and often down right forward like "and any other content we deem inappropriate etc". You still see ads on a variety of videos due to 1) either the video is actually fine, or 2) it is not yet flagged by the AI.

2. Youtube doesn't pocket all the money. It's always 50% (technically I think 48 or 49% right now). They just don't care as much what rest of the 50% goes. If it's a legit video with fully monetizable content, it will go to the creator. If there are copyright material involved, it will generally go to the copyright holder. If there is MCN (think networks like on TV), then generally they will take a % from the channel creator under their contract, rates vary. All this is for the remaining 50%. Youtube always take their 50% share first.

but wasn't Nina saying that they now demonetizable content? So, that means that youtube takes its share, and does what with the rest then? I'm missing something here, I think. Thanks for the rest of the explanation, was really insightful overall.


demonetized content = no advertising on the video = pretty much no money for anyone. So there is no share for YT, no share for the content creator. (I say "pretty much" because i'm not sure if there are on page ads not in the video that counts toward anything. But i'm sure yt keeps all those, insignificant as they are compared to in video ads) The 50/50% rule only come into play when there is some type of ad associated directly with the video.

ps. As to the main point raised in this thread by ninazerg.. The whole view time / click bait shallow content culture / it's just all too true and depressing so i just kinda ignored them. Jrkirby's reply makes sense too.. doesn't make the whole thing less depressing (i'm biased cuz i'm a content creator), but it also raise the point of just think of YT as a game. In which case those large channels like buzzfeed are playing it better than most hehe. Anyway, first world issues.

pss. Hey I'm actually friends with the guy who owns the largest wood working channel on Youtube ! don't knock wood working ^_^
Prev 1 2 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 19h 37m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mcanning 309
StarCraft: Brood War
Flash 3502
Barracks 3469
Jaedong 3066
BeSt 1410
Mini 1298
EffOrt 1004
Soma 686
Larva 529
Stork 454
firebathero 372
[ Show more ]
Snow 341
Free 198
Hyun 141
Rush 137
Backho 85
Mind 80
Pusan 66
ZerO 58
Sharp 57
TY 55
ToSsGirL 54
sas.Sziky 48
sorry 47
soO 45
Movie 35
Shinee 33
zelot 32
scan(afreeca) 22
Bale 17
Terrorterran 15
sSak 14
SilentControl 9
Shine 8
Yoon 8
ivOry 3
Dota 2
syndereN643
XcaliburYe349
420jenkins307
League of Legends
Dendi1203
Counter-Strike
ScreaM1681
markeloff86
Other Games
singsing2970
B2W.Neo1649
hiko1469
crisheroes470
Liquid`VortiX88
ZerO(Twitch)26
Rex20
KnowMe6
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 12
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 7
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV493
League of Legends
• Nemesis6124
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
19h 37m
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
1d 19h
Esports World Cup
2 days
Esports World Cup
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.