• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:50
CEST 07:50
KST 14:50
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0
StarCraft 2
General
DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO8 - Group A Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals RECOVER LOST BTC USDT FUNDS RECLAIMER COMPANY [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET NA Team League 6/8/2025
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Armies of Exigo - YesYes? Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 27903 users

Boardgame Review: Twilight Struggle

Blogs > Big J
Post a Reply
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-11-30 17:51:24
November 30 2015 00:44 GMT
#1
Like many people enjoying the depths of RTS games I'm also an avid boardgame player. I especially love games that battle for area control. Also I'm kind of a history freak, always have been since I was little.
For those who share or want to improve on one of those interests I have only two words: Twilight Struggle. If you are unfamiliar with boardgames, there is a major ranking and review website called boardgamegeek. Amongst containing information and forums for all boardgames imaginable it has a ranking system, and for the last few years (I actually don't know when it started) the game I'm going to review, Twilight Struggle, has occupied the number 1 position nearly uncontested. But why?

Players: 2
Type: Strategy, Boardcontrol, Deckcontrol
Replayability: Massive
Required Time: 2-4 hours, depending on your skill and chill; if you are playing it online with rule enforcement, 1-2 hours.
Online Play (free): http://chantry-games.com/
Recommendations: Read the Rulebook thoroughly; if you can, play it with a friend in real life on a the real board and buy it if you find it. It's worth it! Or find someone to play online with that is patient and can give you tips and reminds you of rules. After a few games you should be ready to jump into all-out online play if you have noone else to play with.


Short description:
Twilight Struggle puts you in the position of the Soviet Union or the United States of America shortly after the Second World War. With all the regional and emperial powers being wiped out or collapsing, those two countries are the only remaining Superpowers, ready to split the world in two halfs that should last until... well, until YOU have won or lost the Cold War for your side!

As with many boardgames the options at first seem overwhelming and the rules complicated. But they actually aren't. If you are playing the game on a board it will sometimes be a bit complicated to keep all the markers updated, but in principle the game is rather easy:
You play on a map of the World containing most of the influential and contested countries of the Cold War Era. These countries are split into regions: Europe, Asia, Middle East, Africa, South America and Central America which you will try to control by holding certain key countries, called battleground states.
Besides the map, the other defining element of the game is the card deck. It contains historic events such as the founding of NATO, the Cuba Crisis or the appearance of Gorbachev. These cards are drawn and can alternatingly be played either for their unique effect or more frequently for their operation value, which lets you place influence around the globe to take control states and regions. And then certain cards grant you victory points, mostly connected to the control of the regions of the map. If you get 20 victory points ahead of your opponent you win. Or if you have more victory points at the end of round 10.
In short, you control the board by using your cards and scoring points to win the game.
[image loading]

So far so good, let's get into the real stuff:
I told you the game is more complicated. The insane depth of the game comes from the amounts of options and the various, thoroughly thought-out elements in the game, that make the game amazingly close to real history while giving you the alternative-history options to unite Korea under Soviet domination or succesfully invade the Bay of Pigs.

[image loading]

Let's start with actually playing cards. There are three types of cards: (S)oviet ones, (N)eutral ones and (U)SA ones. If you play a (S) or (N) card as soviet player you choose between the event or performing operations indicated by a certain value on the card. The same applies to the USA with (U) and (N) cards. If you play a card of the other side - which you will often have to - you can only play it for its operations, but the - for the other side benefitial event - will trigger as well! The game therefore often becomes a game of damage control. As a US player you may have to play Fidel Castro at some point that will give the Soviets control of Cuba, but you may conduct the operations optained from the card to try and throw them out of Cuba again immidiately. The game therefore offers an insanely fun dynamic of players trying to play around actual and possible future events, with the uncertainty of their actual appearance or at least their timing. While a US player might build on the eventual appearance of the Japan-USA defense pact to get control of Japan instead of using operations for it, a clever USSR player may hold such a card for multiple rounds without playing it and eventually getting rid of it while taking control of Asia himself with little resistance. Or he may trigger the card after the US has already invested into taking Japan without any repercussions.
This leads me to another topic, the deck. Multiple times during the game the deck is reshuffled with all the cards not played for their event as well as with further mid-war and late-war cards. Therefore, very often in this game you face the choice to either play a cards strong one-time effect and have it removed from the game, or use it for an often medicre amount of operations but keep its potency in the game and try to shift the probability for cards affiliated with your side into your favor, which might eventually cause your opponent to play your strong events anyways.
For example, while taking Egypt with the Nassr-card early as Soviet might be the more efficient option of the card, keeping it in the game might trigger the US-player to leave Egypt uncontested anyways and have Nassr be the sword of Damocles in the region that makes him overly cautious. Your choice!

Influence, Control, Couping and Nuclear War:
So far I haven't really gone into depths about playing cards for operations. The basic option is rather simple. A card has a value of 1 to 4 operations which you use for placing 1 to 4 influence into countries adjecant to countries in which you already have influence. Every country needs a certain amount of influence that you have to be up on your opponent to be considered under you control, which may range from 1 to 4 influence and describes the countries stability. This is by far the most used option to use operations.
The second alternative is very minor and is called realignment rolls. Without going into depths, they basically allow you to throw out your opponents influence based on rolling dice and controlling countries around the country you want to remove influence from. A rare occurance that requires some experience (and luck) to use efficiently.
Much more interesting is the third alternative: Couping. You choose a country your opponent has influence in, you roll a dice and modify the result a bit and then remove influence of your opponent and possibly add your own influence in that country. This is a great way to turn over countries with lower (1-2) stability and get boardpositions in regions that were formerly out of your grasp. Especially, it allows you to turn over the valueable battleground states necessary for scoring victory points. However, everytime you do this you put the world closer to the Edge of Nuclear War. Eventually the game will reach a status of high alert marked by the Defcon Counter falling to 2. Any further Coup attempt in a battleground state will then lead to a Nuclear War, resulting in the player who caused it to lose the game.
This doesn't sound all too difficult to avoid at first, since you just won't coup any battleground states anymore. But, sometimes playing your opponent's cards will grant them operation points in your turn that they can use to coup and start a nuclear war. In your turn, caused by your card, which falls back on you!
In some circumstances your opponent - especially the USA - may be in a position to force you into playing all of your cards in a turn (usually you can hold one over a turn). And if you are then forced to play the CIA card, only granting your opponent 1 measily operation, but just enough to coup one of your banana republics it will cost you the game even if you are ever so close to winning. Little tip: Get rid of those cards as soon as possible, either by playing them early when Defcon isn't at 2 yet, or somehow discarding them (you can shoot one card into space every turn). Did I say Deckcontrol is important?

There is way, way, way more I want to talk about. But I believe not only is it already overly technical and boring for anyone who hasn't played the game, but also I don't want to rip any potential player of the joy of figuring out all the smaller and bigger nouances of the game himself (or herself).
Let's get to one last topic that everybody who has read one of my posts here on TL should know I love:

Balance, Luck and Design
In general the game is considered fairly balanced. Most players would give the Soviet Side a superslight advantage which is usually offset by giving the USA one (or rarely two) extra influence at the start that they might place in any country they already have influence in. Which they will always place in Iran.
However, though the game is balanced the two sides play very unique. The Soviet Union - who will always play first in each turn - is the tempo faction. Their early war cards are great to get you ahead, they place first and can often score regions before the USA can react. And in particular, they can hold the World in a near Nuclear War state by couping Defcon down from 3 to 2 at the start of each turn (Defcon is raised by one at the end of each turn), allowing them to take control of key states but the USA not being able to coup back since that would actually cost them the game (Defcon falls to one). This makes the Soviet Union the faction that is much more likely to win early in the game and to win through getting 20 VPs up on their opponent.
On the flipside, the USA is the more reactive and control-based faction (seen as a tiny bit more difficult in your first games, since you can easily fall into the trap of actually trying to compete with the Soviets too hard in the early-war turns). Many of their strong or effect-equivalent cards only start appearing in the mid- and latewar stages. The US strenght is that they place last in each turn, which allows them to create tricky situations for the Soviet player that he can often only resovlve by forgoing his critical Defcon 3-->2 coup, allowing the US player to actually coup a critical Soviet State. Or they can simply react accordingly to everything and anything the Soviet player does which might get them tiny advantages here and there and everywhere in the longrun.
The main way to win the game as a US player is to get to the game to turn 10 without falling behind too much and winning by the final scoring of each region that is usually opportune for them. Alternatively, the USA has a bigger chance to create a Defcon-trap that will force the Soviets into escalation and losing the game.
However, in either case it is possible to win the game with any wincondition for each side. Except for taking control of all battlegrounds in Europe (which is a side-wincondition), which I have never seen happen. (though having to protect your last battleground state in Europe might be the turning factor...)

I have now long and broad told you why I love this game and how it works. There are a few points of critique I want to mention, mainly based on luck-elements in the game.
First off, the couping and realigning of countries through dice is just a tiny bit too luckbased for my taste. Sometimes as a Soviet player relying on couping countries will grant you with no success at all, making you waste cards and turns for nothing. And sometimes after a few overly successful coups early the game can become a landslide if the opponent doesn't get some luck-elements going for himself.
The second luck-element is card draw. In general the deck-system works out marvellously, even if you don't really see that at first. You may end up with a hand full of Soviet Cards as US player and curse your bad luck - however, that situation makes it very likely that your opponent has the same problem, sitting there with an all US hand to get rid off! Or vis verca, a strong US hand often also means a strong Soviet hand (unless one side has severely skewed the probability for cards through deckcontrol )
But, there are a few very random elements nevertheless. For one, drawing some strong cards, in particular Neutral ones may give you big advantages when the drawing of Soviet and US cards is rather balanced otherwise.
And then there are some particular cards I kind of despise:
Red Scare/Red Purge: This card reduces your opponent's cards operation value by 1, so in sum up to 7 in a turn. Just numberwise, in a game where the cards rank from value 1 to 4 a card that gives you an up to 7 advantage is very strong. But behold, this neutral card returns to the deck. If one player happens to draw and play this card twice the advantage in operations becomes nearly insurmountable, unless the stars align for the other player.
Wargames: The effect of this card is simple. You give your opponent 6 VPs and the game ends immidiately with the guy winning who has more VPs then. I believe this card destroys a bit of the value of the boardcontrol element. With only a 7 VP advantage necessary to win through a lucky draw of this neutral card in the lategame you often feel robbed. For newer players I would recommend to simply remove that card from the Deck, you will have more fun without it! More experienced players will often be able to play around it and keep the VP difference close, but even then it feels kind of cheap.
Bear Trap/Quagmire: These cards force your opponent to discard a card instead of playing it during his turn. And then based on a roll this effect may reoccur the turn after. And again. And again. And... Though the chance is rather low (only 33%), if you roll badly once or twice your take a massive blow. 3 or 4 times and you lose. The chance is low, but then again, if it happens its just crappy. Really, when playing with a friend I would handle the card so that the roll occurs once but then after the second discard the effect has finished.

*****
Markwerf
Profile Joined March 2010
Netherlands3728 Posts
November 30 2015 15:09 GMT
#2
I'm a huge boardgame fan and follow most stuff on boardgamegeek. I got twilight struggle for my birthday last year and it's a pretty solid game but I don't get it to the table much.
A few comments on the game and review:

The game has a ton of luck elements but is very skillbased. It's a common culprit I see in game reviews that people think few sources of randomness means less luck, it's actually quite the contrary. Twilight struggle has so much dice rolling and randomness from events that the luck evens out much more, just due to the law of large numbers. That makes a game pretty skillful and a bad coup here (like missing out on Iran first turn as Soviets) tends to get compensated later. Long games with just 'few' randomness are those that have annoying luck much more I find. For example Eclipse you tend to have a few fights making the luck part quite huge because those fights tend to be all or nothing and you often only have a few fights in a game. Or Age of Discovery where you discover a few colonies each game where you must fight off natives, you do this 3-4 times a game maybe but failing it once has a huge impact and is practically the only relevant source of randomness in the game.
For me that makes the randomness in twilight struggle quite nice, you don't always get to follow the same plans because of it. Sometimes you dominate the middle east because of a few good dice rolls early, other times you have to adjust and score elsewhere.

Some of the cards you mention are not really an issue either I find. Red scare/purge is good but there are plenty other good cards. Being the one to draw the neutral 4s just always helps. There are some much more important cards. Can't recall all names but there are some events incredibly strong that you are happy them off your opponent and send them to space, hopefully at the 3rd turn so they don't reshuffle quickly while not being forced to play one. Wargames is one of my favorite cards actually as it can finish the game early and the threats of such things plays into the setting nicely, you are constantly aware of the possiblity of something catastrophic happening.

Most veterans consider the game quite a bit more imbalanced I believe, bidding as much as 4 influence to go Soviets but I don't play at a high level so don't really bother much about that. Giving 2 extra influence to US seems fine with me in playing.

The reason I don't play it as much though and I don't consider it that great of a game is that it's too card driven for my liking. If you want to play well you simply need to memorize the deck, knowing of the possible effects is too crucial for playing the game. That brings the problem that it's not fun to play as an experienced player against someone that isn't so experienced which breaks the fun too much. For example you just need to know to never contest Japan because there is an event that just takes that for free. You need to be careful in France because of cards. You need to know Egypt can switch, etc. The strategy of the game is just knowing the cards too much and that is a weakness of the game I find. Sure you have this to some extent in most card games but in twilight struggle it's way too much. Combine this with the fact that it's a very long 2 player game I just never get around to it, it's not the game to play with your significant other for most and it's terrible for boardgame groups as those go with 3+ players usually and if it's 2player it's at most an hour or so. And then when you do play you want someone equally experienced. And when I do have that option I think I'd even prefer other games like Through the ages actually.

So i rate this game a 8 because it has potential and oozes in theme but unless you have the perfect buddy for it you will just stare at the box in your shelves usually.

One remedy would be a good Ipad application of the game, I heard that's in the works but we'll see. But games where being good just comes down to 'knowing the cards' never score super highly for me.
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-11-30 22:18:25
November 30 2015 16:44 GMT
#3
I fully agree on the luckpart, it's very controlled and skillbased. At some times it can swing into one players favor but in general I don't think that spoils the fun.

About the cards I mentioned. I wouldn't say they are a problem on average, but they can be sometimes. As I said, Red Scare is quite a good card if you get it once (and since it is an early war card nearly always someone gets it - though it might not always work out perfectly anyways). But when a player gets to headline it twice against you it can feel very unfair. Other big operations neutral cards (like nuclear test bans) also provide big advantages if you get them multiple times, but RS/RP twice can really just swing the game too much imo. Same goes for Bear Trap/Quagmire which shouldn't trigger 3times anyways on average, but when they do your opponent can consequently plan with double turns to break and take countries/regions easily or just simply get 10operations up on you.
I agree about the Wargames opinion, but when you first play the game it is very frustrating if someone just wins like that and you might not even know that this win condition exists. Also I think 6VPs is just a tiny bit too low imo. The game is somewhat balanced around Soviets running the whole game with a lead and the US winning with the final scoring, it is therefore too much of a Soviet win condition in my opinion and I think one of the reasons why the game is considered in the favor of the USSR.

In general I have heard that opinion about the balance as well, but my personal experience is that +1 for USA is best and I think the most frequent played variant on chantry. +4 is definitely too much, at least if you play the Deluxe Edition including the optional cards. On BGG I even read about people bidding 1-2 influence on US in the Deluxe Edition, but personally I would call that excessive as well.

You obviously have a point about "knowing all the cards", but the game plays very well if both players are new and in general in every good game a veteran will rather easily beat a new player. I too did not think I would like that element, but since you can influence the deck just enough in Twilight Struggle and since you learn the cards very naturally when playing a few games I actually started liking that element. But that might just be me loving the historical references.

The two-player part can actually be an upside as well! For me it is often hard to find 5-6players to play the real competitive games with, since my friends are all co-op lovers and keep on jumping from game to game a lot. So I can play Twilight Struggle with that one or other buddy that actually can give or take a beating
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
November 30 2015 17:39 GMT
#4
Thanks for the review and thoughts guys, might have to check this out.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Mina
Profile Joined April 2013
109 Posts
November 30 2015 20:46 GMT
#5
Another board game geek reporting in!

Thank you for this! I haven't played it and unfortunately probably never will since my playing group is so big. Our biggest problem is finding games for more than 6 players.
That which yields is not always weak.
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 41m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft560
Livibee 134
SteadfastSC 67
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 28425
Leta 305
Nal_rA 280
actioN 166
Shine 160
ToSsGirL 49
Pusan 41
Movie 22
Aegong 21
Icarus 11
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K927
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor121
Other Games
summit1g7380
shahzam1097
WinterStarcraft496
ViBE146
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream4909
Other Games
gamesdonequick833
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 48
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1548
Other Games
• Scarra1164
Upcoming Events
GSL Code S
3h 41m
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
Online Event
18h 11m
Replay Cast
20h 11m
GSL Code S
1d 3h
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
1d 4h
Replay Cast
1d 18h
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
OSC
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
SOOP
3 days
[ Show More ]
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Cheesadelphia
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
GSL Code S
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.