• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:48
CEST 21:48
KST 04:48
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL63Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?13FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event22Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? PiG Sty Festival #5: Playoffs Preview + Groups Recap
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL SC uni coach streams logging into betting site Practice Partners (Official)
Tourneys
The Casual Games of the Week Thread CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 547 users

Of having nice things

Blogs > Nebuchad
Post a Reply
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12155 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-08 04:53:48
July 07 2014 16:47 GMT
#1
So yeah, I watched Black Mirror, and I strongly disliked it.

The show is well done over all. It's a bit over the top, but that's on purpose, in order to make the points go across. I don't have issues with the quality of what I saw, I thought it was pretty good. My problem is the points it's trying to make.

Black Mirror's main character is technology. It it the only recurring character, as the human characters are always different, and the future (or present) they live in is also always different. The characters in Black Mirror are confronted to new technologies in extreme ways (for example, someone who lost her fiance to a car accident buys an app that recreates her fiance's online personality from what he wrote on facebook&co, and then proceeds to "chat" with it), and you're supposed to draw conclusions from it. If I were to summarize the message of the show, it would go something like "We're having a ton of progress, but humans are flawed, so there are issues with it."

Wtf kind of logic is this? That's not how you debate. You're showing anecdotal evidence where things went badly for someone, and this is supposed to make me think twice about the big picture? You're basically raising issues with technology because in some situations mistakes will be made. A more accurate account would be that the problem is on the side of the people making the mistakes.

Let me use that line of thinking for things we have today. Cars. Cars are very bad! People died in car accident, so we should have a discussion about the negative effects of cars... That makes no sense at all. We blame reckless driving, not cars.

Also, I have a general issue with the sentence "This is why we can't have nice things". For a few years, it's been fashion, especially in TV shows, to criticize humankind. We are flawed, we are imperfect, we make mistakes, we are human. We don't want a perfect hero like Ned Stark anymore, because they're too good, we'd rather see grey, imperfect people. That leads to a negative message about humanity, because you know, when you're not good people, you can't have nice things.

But that's actually not true. Yup, humans are flawed, humans are clearly not the perfect little beings that some portrayals would have them be. And that's okay. We can have nice things anyway, and we do. All the time. I wish more shows would realize that.

****
No will to live, no wish to die
Titusmaster6
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States5937 Posts
July 08 2014 01:43 GMT
#2
Well that's the whole Darwin Awards, giving out medals for people that are too dumb to handle technology. Basically it's exactly as you said, there's not much to think about. Yes the person who electrocuted himself would have lived if he existed in a more primitive time, but he's still dumb.

Hang in there, the world is a dangerous place
Shorts down shorts up, BOOM, just like that.
CosmicSpiral
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States15275 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-08 02:09:46
July 08 2014 02:09 GMT
#3
There is no anecdotal evidence to critique. Black Mirror is a work of fiction. The episodes depict satirical alternate realities.

Black Mirror is also not Neo-Luddite. It's a commentary on how people use technology, not on technology itself. When it comes to the moral spectrum technology is neutral.
WriterWovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muß man schweigen.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12155 Posts
July 08 2014 02:53 GMT
#4
“
On July 08 2014 11:09 CosmicSpiral wrote:
It's a commentary on how people use technology, not on technology itself. When it comes to the moral spectrum technology is neutral.


The point that technology is neutral when it comes to the moral spectrum, would be the point I was trying to make. I don't see how you get that from the show, though. When you connect a bunch of negative and pessimistic views to technology through how people live with it, you're not being neutral, you're giving a viewpoint.

If we take season 1 episode 3, and we assume there's no negative comment about technology in it, only about how people use technology, then the message has to become something like "people with obsessive behavior will use technology to feed into their obsession". First of all, that is not a very groundbreaking message, and second, I have the same counter to it. The problem isn't that he is using technology in an obsessive manner, the problem is that he's being obsessive in the first place.
No will to live, no wish to die
CosmicSpiral
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States15275 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-08 03:38:50
July 08 2014 03:15 GMT
#5
On July 08 2014 11:53 Nebuchad wrote:
The point that technology is neutral when it comes to the moral spectrum, would be the point I was trying to make. I don't see how you get that from the show, though. When you connect a bunch of negative and pessimistic views to technology through how people live with it, you're not being neutral, you're giving a viewpoint.


There's a problem with using that as a significant theme in a work of fiction: it is neither insightful nor particularly intelligent. It's like saying "Guns aren't bad by themselves, they're just objects".

A program rooted in dark humor having a negative view on its subject is...normal? Satire doesn't bend both ways when it comes to viewpoint. That would defeat the purpose.

On July 08 2014 11:53 Nebuchad wrote:If we take season 1 episode 3, and we assume there's no negative comment about technology in it, only about how people use technology, then the message has to become something like "people with obsessive behavior will use technology to feed into their obsession". First of all, that is not a very groundbreaking message, and second, I have the same counter to it. The problem isn't that he is using technology in an obsessive manner, the problem is that he's being obsessive in the first place.


We're not assuming there's no negative comment on technology. Brooker is critiquing technology but he is not critiquing technology as it is now; he's critiquing what it could become. Hence why all his invented scenarios are fictional, extreme versions of things that already exist. Brooker assumes that the audience understands technology is value-neutral. If it wasn't, the series would retain its themes but have no practical point.

Your counter assumes that the usage of technology only reflects the habits of the users. This is not true. It shapes them through usage and opportunity.
WriterWovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muß man schweigen.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12155 Posts
July 08 2014 03:38 GMT
#6
On July 08 2014 12:15 CosmicSpiral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 08 2014 11:53 Nebuchad wrote:
The point that technology is neutral when it comes to the moral spectrum, would be the point I was trying to make. I don't see how you get that from the show, though. When you connect a bunch of negative and pessimistic views to technology through how people live with it, you're not being neutral, you're giving a viewpoint.


There's a problem with using that as a significant theme in a work of fiction: it is neither insightful nor particularly intelligent. It's like saying "Guns aren't bad by themselves, they're just objects".

A program rooted in dark humor having a negative view on its subject is...normal? Satire doesn't bend both ways when it comes to viewpoint. That would defeat the purpose.

Show nested quote +
On July 08 2014 11:53 Nebuchad wrote:If we take season 1 episode 3, and we assume there's no negative comment about technology in it, only about how people use technology, then the message has to become something like "people with obsessive behavior will use technology to feed into their obsession". First of all, that is not a very groundbreaking message, and second, I have the same counter to it. The problem isn't that he is using technology in an obsessive manner, the problem is that he's being obsessive in the first place.


We're not assuming there's no negative comment on technology. Brooker is critiquing technology but he is not critiquing technology as it is now; he's critiquing what it could become. Hence why all his invented scenarios are fictional, extreme versions of things that already exist.

Your counter assumes that the usage of technology only reflects the habits of the users. This is not true. It shapes them through usage and opportunity.


Guns are designed to shoot at stuff. Technology isn't designed to create the situations the show displays.

I agree with all the rest, except I don't see how that's not a critique of technology in your eyes. What technology could become is a result of what technology is, there's still a cautionary tale element to it. And the non-passive way to say "the usage of technology shapes the habits of the users" is "technology can act as an enabler".
No will to live, no wish to die
CosmicSpiral
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States15275 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-08 04:00:50
July 08 2014 03:52 GMT
#7
On July 08 2014 12:38 Nebuchad wrote:
Guns are designed to shoot at stuff. Technology isn't designed to create the situations the show displays.


A gun is designed to shoot stuff. It serves much more than that in real life. It has a whole host of connotations and symbolic significance, and its practical usage ranged from self-defense to oppressing entire communities. Oftentimes it doesn't need to be fired at all.

Technology is being created to address these situations everyday. The 'grains' in Episode 3 are the commercialized version of what the U.S. government has been working on over the last decade. The situation in Episode 1 is standard procedure in terrorist philosophy, except combined with how the media treats it as a form of entertainment.

On July 08 2014 12:38 Nebuchad wrote:
I agree with all the rest, except I don't see how that's not a critique of technology in your eyes.


It's a critique of technology. This doesn't mean Brooker rejects the obvious benefits of technology. After all, he couldn't make the series without it. They are merely not his concern.

[B]On July 08 2014 12:38 Nebuchad wrote:[
/B]And the non-passive way to say "the usage of technology shapes the habits of the users" is "technology can act as an enabler".


"Technology can act as an enabler" implies technology is a catalyst that accelerates self-destructive issues already present. That is passive. While technology is value-neutral in the sense that it can be used for good or evil purposes, it is value-laden in its functionality.
WriterWovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muß man schweigen.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12155 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-08 04:45:19
July 08 2014 04:39 GMT
#8
I meant passive in the linguistic sense, active/passive. And I would be one to argue that technology acts as a catalyst to things that are already present, yeah. But whichever the case, the root is still human flaws.

You make a fair point that I should have worded my summary of the show differently, since there's no rejection of the benefits, so I can't just say "progress isn't a good thing" like I did. I've done some editing accordingly. My overall critique remains the same.
No will to live, no wish to die
Daswollvieh
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
5553 Posts
July 08 2014 08:02 GMT
#9
On July 08 2014 01:47 Nebuchad wrote:

Let me use that line of thinking for things we have today. Cars. Cars are very bad! People died in car accident, so we should have a discussion about the negative effects of cars... That makes no sense at all. We blame reckless driving, not cars.


It´s a matter of novelty, isn´t it? The show - which I haven´t seen - seems to be about possible implications of new technologies, which most people haven´t thought of yet. I don´t see anything wrong with imagining negative effects of new technology that hasn´t been exhaustively explored in that regard.
Cars on the other hand are well established and everybody is aware of their dangers. Hence, there would be no point in highlighting this. But it has to become common knowledge first.

Also, I have a general issue with the sentence "This is why we can't have nice things". For a few years, it's been fashion, especially in TV shows, to criticize humankind. We are flawed, we are imperfect, we make mistakes, we are human. We don't want a perfect hero like Ned Stark anymore, because they're too good, we'd rather see grey, imperfect people. That leads to a negative message about humanity, because you know, when you're not good people, you can't have nice things.

But that's actually not true. Yup, humans are flawed, humans are clearly not the perfect little beings that some portrayals would have them be. And that's okay. We can have nice things anyway, and we do. All the time. I wish more shows would realize that.


Maybe I watch too few shows, but I don´t get this vibe at all. Why is it bad to show ambiguous people, selfish motives, etc.? It doesn´t take away from anything, does it?
CosmicSpiral
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States15275 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-09 01:29:49
July 09 2014 01:13 GMT
#10
On July 08 2014 13:39 Nebuchad wrote:
I meant passive in the linguistic sense, active/passive. And I would be one to argue that technology acts as a catalyst to things that are already present, yeah. But whichever the case, the root is still human flaws.


I would argue that technology does both. It enables flaws and encourages them as a way of integrating them into everyday life.

On July 08 2014 13:39 Nebuchad wrote:You make a fair point that I should have worded my summary of the show differently, since there's no rejection of the benefits, so I can't just say "progress isn't a good thing" like I did. I've done some editing accordingly. My overall critique remains the same.


There is nothing wrong with your critique in principle. But it is a meta-critique instead of a direct one, and I would encourage you to critique the show on whether it achieves its intended purpose.

On July 08 2014 17:02 Daswollvieh wrote:
Maybe I watch too few shows, but I don´t get this vibe at all. Why is it bad to show ambiguous people, selfish motives, etc.? It doesn´t take away from anything, does it?


I'd agree with him on that, but for different reasons.
WriterWovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muß man schweigen.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12155 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-09 14:47:06
July 09 2014 14:46 GMT
#11
On July 09 2014 10:13 CosmicSpiral wrote:
There is nothing wrong with your critique in principle. But it is a meta-critique instead of a direct one, and I would encourage you to critique the show on whether it achieves its intended purpose.


It does and doesn't. This is a quality show and that's the first thing I said. It does a good job of portraying human flaws, and how they interact with technology. It doesn't do a good job of convincing me that technology is to be critiqued for it, though.

On July 08 2014 17:02 Daswollvieh wrote:
Cars on the other hand are well established and everybody is aware of their dangers. Hence, there would be no point in highlighting this. But it has to become common knowledge first.


The reason we aren't scared of cars isn't that we know of their dangers. The reason is that we can distinguish between the car and the car accident. Nobody is blaming the concept of cars, and nobody should.

On July 08 2014 17:02 Daswollvieh wrote:
Maybe I watch too few shows, but I don´t get this vibe at all. Why is it bad to show ambiguous people, selfish motives, etc.? It doesn´t take away from anything, does it?


That's not what I said. I just mean that because your characters are flawed and imperfect, doesn't mean you have to get all negative and pessimistic about it. Shameless is a show that doesn't do it, btw, one of the reasons why it was VERY enjoyable to watch.
No will to live, no wish to die
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL: ProLeague
18:00
Grand Finals - bo9
Dewalt vs Bonyth
ZZZero.O464
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
BRAT_OK 150
ProTech49
StarCraft: Brood War
Mini 668
EffOrt 512
ZZZero.O 464
Soma 150
Aegong 44
Terrorterran 18
LuMiX 5
Dota 2
qojqva3155
League of Legends
Grubby4350
Dendi1856
Counter-Strike
fl0m1885
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King142
Westballz50
Chillindude50
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor817
Liquid`Hasu495
Other Games
FrodaN3087
B2W.Neo1085
Mlord580
mouzStarbuck233
Pyrionflax150
elazer85
Sick59
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick44994
EGCTV1713
StarCraft 2
angryscii 49
Other Games
BasetradeTV30
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• HeavenSC 49
• Adnapsc2 32
• maralekos22
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• 3DClanTV 42
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• Ler174
League of Legends
• masondota2677
Other Games
• imaqtpie2201
• Shiphtur551
• WagamamaTV334
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
15h 12m
Monday Night Weeklies
20h 12m
Replay Cast
1d 4h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 14h
WardiTV European League
1d 20h
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
WardiTV European League
2 days
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
FEL
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
FEL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 2v2 Season 3
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.