EPTHope you enjoy the art video!
Check out more videos on my youtube or art website if you're new to them.
Neil D Tyson Portrait
| Blogs > Glider |
|
Glider
United States1353 Posts
Hope you enjoy the art video! Check out more videos on my youtube or art website if you're new to them. | ||
|
Alabasern
United States4005 Posts
| ||
|
Aerisky
United States12129 Posts
| ||
|
a_flayer
Netherlands2826 Posts
We are stardust~ | ||
|
Artax
121 Posts
Still, amazing skill warrants 5/5 | ||
|
MarlieChurphy
United States2063 Posts
| ||
|
3FFA
United States3931 Posts
Is this just a hobby or a job or are you studying/practicing to become a professional at the moment? 5/5, as usual. | ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50531 Posts
| ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
| ||
|
sorrowptoss
Canada1431 Posts
| ||
|
terialk
United States770 Posts
 | ||
|
nohbrows
United States653 Posts
On July 15 2013 12:00 3FFA wrote: How many of these have you done now? Is this just a hobby or a job or are you studying/practicing to become a professional at the moment? 5/5, as usual. iirc he has his own business, where he takes commissions for life-like portraits. Something along those lines. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44915 Posts
Beautiful. | ||
|
MilkDud
Canada73 Posts
Your eyes and hair textures are very nice... you must have spent hours practicing them. I still struggle to get the eyes right and you just draw them individually and they still end up perfectly aligned. | ||
|
Shebuha
Canada1335 Posts
| ||
|
OmniEulogy
Canada6593 Posts
| ||
|
Chairman Ray
United States11903 Posts
| ||
|
YoucriedWolf
Sweden1456 Posts
| ||
|
Denzil
United Kingdom4193 Posts
I'd be interested to see a different style video where you talk about what you're looking for / to add at some points | ||
|
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
| ||
|
InspiredFrog
Finland522 Posts
| ||
|
LRM)TechnicS
Bulgaria1565 Posts
| ||
|
Ero-Sennin
United States756 Posts
| ||
|
SpeaKEaSY
United States1070 Posts
Awesome work though, as always. | ||
|
PassiveAce
United States18076 Posts
| ||
|
CrazyF1r3f0x
United States2120 Posts
| ||
|
Kuni
Austria765 Posts
| ||
520
United States2822 Posts
| ||
|
KING CHARLIE :D
United States447 Posts
On July 15 2013 11:46 Artax wrote: Should have been Sagan or Hawking or something... Still, amazing skill warrants 5/5 I'm sorry, but why SHOULD it have been Carl Sagan or Stephen Hawking as opposed to Neil Tyson? Was the title of the drawing, "The most influential astrophysicist that has ever lived" ? Why is NDT not worthy of being drawn to you? You've manufactured this hierarchy of people who are more deserving to be the centerpiece of Glider's art...what metric are you using to determine who is more deserving? Did you bitch at him when he drew Rihanna, saying that he SHOULD have drawn Britney Spears? Did you bitch at him when he drew Bryan Cranston, saying that he should have drawn Robert DeNiro? I don't understand why you have to run your mouth at all, even if it is qualified by a compliment afterward. This is amazing work, and there was no obligation he had to fulfill with this drawing other than to do something that interests him. So why SHOULD it have been someone else? It's like you study the cosmos and have a high level of knowledge about it, but have an axe to grind with people that only know about Neil Degrasse Tyson. So by pointing out two other extremely mainstream brilliant people that you feel are more deserving of a picture, you somehow discredit NDT and assert yourself as the intellectual alpha male of this random subforum of a computer gaming website. I think it's really cool you pursue knowledge with your free time, but you don't need to shit on others to look better in comparison to them. | ||
|
Artax
121 Posts
| ||
|
bjornkavist
Canada1235 Posts
| ||
|
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
| ||
|
canucks12
Canada812 Posts
I was looking through your older videos, but I couldn't find the one of Bisu. Did you have to remove it for some reason? | ||
|
Inertiaddict
United States126 Posts
| ||
|
radscorpion9
Canada2252 Posts
 . There is variation on how you interpret "should" - it either means "you really should have done something else, i'm disappointed" or "it would have been nicer had it have been something else". Its just a personal opinion, don't get worked up about it! | ||
|
thezanursic
5492 Posts
| ||
|
Bommes
Germany1226 Posts
On July 15 2013 16:30 GhandiEAGLE wrote: I think you got more star-stuff than the rest of us, Glider. Amazing work You mean he's fat? His hand/arm doesn't look fat. | ||
|
Zenatsu
100 Posts
On July 16 2013 02:40 KING CHARLIE :D wrote: I'm sorry, but why SHOULD it have been Carl Sagan or Stephen Hawking as opposed to Neil Tyson? [...] I don't understand why you have to run your mouth at all, even if it is qualified by a compliment afterward.[...] The reason you don't understand why he shared his thoughts of his own personal "hierarchy" of influential minds, is the same reason why you felt you SHOULD have exploded unnecessarily on him. Who Artax feels are the most scientific influential people, and who you feel are the most, are completely subjective and opinionated. Look at it as Artax sharing who he feels are his own hero's, as glider shared his hero. I don't understand why you ran your mouth at all, there was no hostility within those words. | ||
|
LuMiX
China5757 Posts
| ||
|
BisuEver
United States247 Posts
On July 16 2013 02:40 KING CHARLIE :D wrote: I'm sorry, but why SHOULD it have been Carl Sagan or Stephen Hawking as opposed to Neil Tyson? Was the title of the drawing, "The most influential astrophysicist that has ever lived" ? Why is NDT not worthy of being drawn to you? You've manufactured this hierarchy of people who are more deserving to be the centerpiece of Glider's art...what metric are you using to determine who is more deserving? Did you bitch at him when he drew Rihanna, saying that he SHOULD have drawn Britney Spears? Did you bitch at him when he drew Bryan Cranston, saying that he should have drawn Robert DeNiro? I don't understand why you have to run your mouth at all, even if it is qualified by a compliment afterward. This is amazing work, and there was no obligation he had to fulfill with this drawing other than to do something that interests him. So why SHOULD it have been someone else? It's like you study the cosmos and have a high level of knowledge about it, but have an axe to grind with people that only know about Neil Degrasse Tyson. So by pointing out two other extremely mainstream brilliant people that you feel are more deserving of a picture, you somehow discredit NDT and assert yourself as the intellectual alpha male of this random subforum of a computer gaming website. I think it's really cool you pursue knowledge with your free time, but you don't need to shit on others to look better in comparison to them. Thanks man | ||
|
NB
Netherlands12045 Posts
| ||
|
icystorage
Jollibee19350 Posts
| ||
|
jinorazi
Korea (South)4948 Posts
| ||
|
Midori8
Australia126 Posts
| ||
|
Copymizer
Denmark2094 Posts
| ||
|
Xapti
Canada2473 Posts
Nonetheless, obviously great work. The pose he's in looking up is quite fitting and provoking. Was a single/specific photo used in order to create the picture? | ||
|
Mataru
Norway356 Posts
| ||
|
Ry2D2
United States429 Posts
| ||
|
NeThZOR
South Africa7387 Posts
| ||
|
JohnHarr
United States375 Posts
| ||
|
Destro
Netherlands1206 Posts
On July 15 2013 11:46 Artax wrote: Should have been Sagan or Hawking or something... Still, amazing skill warrants 5/5 your personal preference isn't driving his creative process. sorry. many people including myself believe tyson is the sagan of our generation. Glider, amazing work as always. truly inspirational, i sincerely hope you tweet him this, knowing his personality, i bet he would be extremely happy to see this | ||
| ||
