• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:05
CEST 08:05
KST 15:05
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy2Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3
Community News
Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)4BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2) How herO can make history in the Code S S2 finals TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group A [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group B RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 3 [ASL19] Grand Finals
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Who’s Getting the Effortless-Chic Look Just Right?
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 26984 users

Journalism and Relationships - Page 7

Blogs > Liquid`Nazgul
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 Next All
ACrow
Profile Joined October 2011
Germany6583 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-17 19:20:10
January 17 2013 19:16 GMT
#121
A well formulated blog. It's recommendable that you keep a calm and professional attitude in this situation, unlike other team managers!
Get off my lawn, young punks
dvorakftw
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
681 Posts
January 17 2013 19:17 GMT
#122
Nazgul stops one step short. Yes Slasher can hurt his business relationship by leaking information teams want to keep but if you then cut off Slasher you can limit your players' exposure and the public's opinion of the team. 'Cutting your nose off to spite your face' is the common expression.
Takkara
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2503 Posts
January 17 2013 19:22 GMT
#123
On January 18 2013 04:17 dvorakftw wrote:
Nazgul stops one step short. Yes Slasher can hurt his business relationship by leaking information teams want to keep but if you then cut off Slasher you can limit your players' exposure and the public's opinion of the team. 'Cutting your nose off to spite your face' is the common expression.


I think this is what Kennigit has been saying on Reddit the past day or so. Both sides need to make a cost:benefit analysis and decide what level of transparency and cooperation is right for them. There are benefits/costs to reporting leaks and there are benefits/costs to shutting out prominent members of the press.

I like what many have said that attempting to organize a public blackballing of Slasher is probably one step beyond what the public is comfortable with. No one at Liquid has hinted at doing this, but there were specters of it in the ITG conversation, and I think that makes people (at least it makes me) squeamish.
Gee gee gee gee baby baby baby
Bumblebee
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
3237 Posts
January 17 2013 19:51 GMT
#124
It's a lot more than just the people we decide to tell. Let's look at it with the example of Snute. Snute is one of the strongest foreign players out there and inevitably a lot of teams will be in the hunt for him and bidding on him. These teams will be informed that they weren't chosen and who overbid them. I don't believe we, as one of the teams, are in a position to make demands from these people about contracts and stuff. We can -- which we of course do -- ask them nicely to respect our signing and let us have our own announcements. We tell our players the same thing, even when they get the hands on this information.

In a scene as young as this, a lot of the stuff going will and, due to the current state, has to be done out of pure respect for other people's things. I'm not saying what Slasher did is disrespectful. We let him do his job and we try to do ours. That's how it is. There's no reason to blame Slasher.
There is no difference between a knight and any other man aside from what he wears. @robinnymann
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18821 Posts
January 17 2013 19:54 GMT
#125
On January 18 2013 04:51 Bumblebee wrote:
It's a lot more than just the people we decide to tell. Let's look at it with the example of Snute. Snute is one of the strongest foreign players out there and inevitably a lot of teams will be in the hunt for him and bidding on him. These teams will be informed that they weren't chosen and who overbid them. I don't believe we, as one of the teams, are in a position to make demands from these people about contracts and stuff. We can -- which we of course do -- ask them nicely to respect our signing and let us have our own announcements. We tell our players the same thing, even when they get the hands on this information.

In a scene as young as this, a lot of the stuff going will and, due to the current state, has to be done out of pure respect for other people's things. I'm not saying what Slasher did is disrespectful. We let him do his job and we try to do ours. That's how it is. There's no reason to blame Slasher.

Out of curiosity, because I really have no idea, who is doing the informing in the emboldened portion? I guess I'm simply curious as to why player negotiations are as open as they seem to be, and whether or not standards of communication/conduct in regards to player signings could be improved upon.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
Myt
Profile Joined July 2011
Germany318 Posts
January 17 2013 19:57 GMT
#126
On January 18 2013 04:22 Takkara wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2013 04:17 dvorakftw wrote:
Nazgul stops one step short. Yes Slasher can hurt his business relationship by leaking information teams want to keep but if you then cut off Slasher you can limit your players' exposure and the public's opinion of the team. 'Cutting your nose off to spite your face' is the common expression.


I think this is what Kennigit has been saying on Reddit the past day or so. Both sides need to make a cost:benefit analysis and decide what level of transparency and cooperation is right for them. There are benefits/costs to reporting leaks and there are benefits/costs to shutting out prominent members of the press.

I like what many have said that attempting to organize a public blackballing of Slasher is probably one step beyond what the public is comfortable with. No one at Liquid has hinted at doing this, but there were specters of it in the ITG conversation, and I think that makes people (at least it makes me) squeamish.


IMO you are on the right path with this. But there is another solution as blackballing independent media, just include them in your marketing strategies! That is what "real sportorganisations" do allready as they are dependent on coverage from big media outlets.
At the moment especially the big teams may not need independent media to get their message out as the community is relativ small and there are other ways, for example comunity sites like TL or Reddit. But I don't think it would be good for teams to try to shut down independent journalists like Slasher. They may be able to do it in this case but when things really get bigger and therefore more interessting for many more professional mediaoutlets there will be no way to control them.
Brindled
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States508 Posts
January 17 2013 20:02 GMT
#127
I'm starting to see why Slasher just shut his mouth in the face of the latter half of Garfield's accusatory words on ITG.
Nazgul wasn't upset at Slasher at all, despite what Garfield eluded to. I am glad to see cooler heads prevailing.
Ua Mau ke Ea o ka ʻĀina i ka Pono @TL_Brindled11
divito
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Canada1213 Posts
January 17 2013 20:07 GMT
#128
The more people that are privy to information, the more likely it is to leak. A basic tenant in most organizations is the aspect of keeping things on a need-to-know basis, especially if it involves somewhat sensible material/information. If that means not letting players, or certain staff aware of the moves happening behind the scenes, that's one route to take.

If you're going to argue that you want to keep an open and fluid organization, you might have to get NDAs signed with partners (and even your own staff/players), and outside sources in whatever deals, promotions or moves you're making, if you're truly committed to being the ones orchestrating and announcing the information.

For someone as business-savvy as Alex, I'm surprised a lot of this has taken place. I'm sure we can definitely expect some changes in the future.

(And NDAs aren't all that complicated for people suggestion such a notion.)
Skype: divito7
Bumblebee
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
3237 Posts
January 17 2013 20:22 GMT
#129
On January 18 2013 04:54 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2013 04:51 Bumblebee wrote:
It's a lot more than just the people we decide to tell. Let's look at it with the example of Snute. Snute is one of the strongest foreign players out there and inevitably a lot of teams will be in the hunt for him and bidding on him. These teams will be informed that they weren't chosen and who overbid them. I don't believe we, as one of the teams, are in a position to make demands from these people about contracts and stuff. We can -- which we of course do -- ask them nicely to respect our signing and let us have our own announcements. We tell our players the same thing, even when they get the hands on this information.

In a scene as young as this, a lot of the stuff going will and, due to the current state, has to be done out of pure respect for other people's things. I'm not saying what Slasher did is disrespectful. We let him do his job and we try to do ours. That's how it is. There's no reason to blame Slasher.

Out of curiosity, because I really have no idea, who is doing the informing in the emboldened portion? I guess I'm simply curious as to why player negotiations are as open as they seem to be, and whether or not standards of communication/conduct in regards to player signings could be improved upon.

Usually it just comes naturally, I think. I'm not the one who sits with the negotiation itself; that's Nazgul. I don't think player negotations are directly open and overbid is also the wrong word to use since people can choose a lesser offer in money if there are other benefits obviously. It seems pretty natural to me that it's a process that has to be somewhat open between the parts involved. People go back and forth with offers and the player uses an offer to notch up the other offer even more, etc. Also it's only natural for the teams to find out who they're up against.
There is no difference between a knight and any other man aside from what he wears. @robinnymann
Dfgj
Profile Joined May 2008
Singapore5922 Posts
January 17 2013 20:28 GMT
#130
On January 18 2013 02:16 DarkLordOlli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2013 02:11 Dfgj wrote:
On January 18 2013 01:50 Plansix wrote:
On January 18 2013 01:15 AshenCZ wrote:
Then again, as Destiny pointed out, if something leaks, it is the TEAM's fault, not Slasher's for finding out and doing his job...

The team owners are saying the ideal relationship would be if Slasher tried to work for them a little so everyone got exposure.

Why not just pay the guy to follow their marketing goals? Seems simpler to me.


Because that would make Slasher lose his credibility as a journalist. Right now if Slasher releases something, you can be pretty sure it's accurate because he's not affiliated with any team. The second he is, people will start doubting whether or not he's just promoting a team when he releases or purposely doesn't release something.

I know that, and I appreciate that there are independent people in the scene. I meant that if teams/businesses expect co-operation, and get flustered when independent people do their own jobs without regard for said team, why not give them an actual incentive? Hell, I'd rather someone be paid to do what EG wants than do it because EG told them to.
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18821 Posts
January 17 2013 20:31 GMT
#131
On January 18 2013 05:22 Bumblebee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2013 04:54 farvacola wrote:
On January 18 2013 04:51 Bumblebee wrote:
It's a lot more than just the people we decide to tell. Let's look at it with the example of Snute. Snute is one of the strongest foreign players out there and inevitably a lot of teams will be in the hunt for him and bidding on him. These teams will be informed that they weren't chosen and who overbid them. I don't believe we, as one of the teams, are in a position to make demands from these people about contracts and stuff. We can -- which we of course do -- ask them nicely to respect our signing and let us have our own announcements. We tell our players the same thing, even when they get the hands on this information.

In a scene as young as this, a lot of the stuff going will and, due to the current state, has to be done out of pure respect for other people's things. I'm not saying what Slasher did is disrespectful. We let him do his job and we try to do ours. That's how it is. There's no reason to blame Slasher.

Out of curiosity, because I really have no idea, who is doing the informing in the emboldened portion? I guess I'm simply curious as to why player negotiations are as open as they seem to be, and whether or not standards of communication/conduct in regards to player signings could be improved upon.

Usually it just comes naturally, I think. I'm not the one who sits with the negotiation itself; that's Nazgul. I don't think player negotations are directly open and overbid is also the wrong word to use since people can choose a lesser offer in money if there are other benefits obviously. It seems pretty natural to me that it's a process that has to be somewhat open between the parts involved. People go back and forth with offers and the player uses an offer to notch up the other offer even more, etc. Also it's only natural for the teams to find out who they're up against.

Yes, I suppose that makes sense. I guess teams find themselves between a rock and a hard place; on one hand, their solvency basically hinges on monetized exposure, and on the other, attempts at controlling that exposure can negatively impact that very thing. 'Tis a tricky situation to be sure.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
Daigoro
Profile Joined October 2010
Germany251 Posts
January 17 2013 20:37 GMT
#132
I really wanted to comment on the issue, but the dozens of drama-laden pages that have already been written discouraged me. After reading this post I feel as though I have said my piece, just more articulate. Thanks for being awesome Nazgul
NanashiStarCraft
Profile Joined October 2011
Germany48 Posts
January 17 2013 21:04 GMT
#133
On January 17 2013 22:02 skeldark wrote:
You and your website have the power in this area to get away with such a statement, sadly.

You have a total misunderstanding about the role of media.
You think you are the owner of an information.
You think by buying a player you own the information of you buying him.
Thats not the case!

You say: "write what i want or i dont talk to you any more".
I hope that the media in this area gets powerful enough that they can say:
"You dont want to talk to us, then we dont write about your team any-more"

You abuse the power to be the owner of a Team and a Media site. Thats all.

In any real sport or politics this statement would be the end of your career.
At the moment thats not the case in esport and that gives you the chance, to rethink your statement.

If you would not have your own media site/show and no power over slasher,
if he would not need your information at all (Lets say he is a big journalist from a big new company)
Would we have this discussion?
I dont think so...


This!

User was warned for this post
mrtomjones
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada4020 Posts
January 17 2013 21:07 GMT
#134
On January 18 2013 04:57 Myt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2013 04:22 Takkara wrote:
On January 18 2013 04:17 dvorakftw wrote:
Nazgul stops one step short. Yes Slasher can hurt his business relationship by leaking information teams want to keep but if you then cut off Slasher you can limit your players' exposure and the public's opinion of the team. 'Cutting your nose off to spite your face' is the common expression.


I think this is what Kennigit has been saying on Reddit the past day or so. Both sides need to make a cost:benefit analysis and decide what level of transparency and cooperation is right for them. There are benefits/costs to reporting leaks and there are benefits/costs to shutting out prominent members of the press.

I like what many have said that attempting to organize a public blackballing of Slasher is probably one step beyond what the public is comfortable with. No one at Liquid has hinted at doing this, but there were specters of it in the ITG conversation, and I think that makes people (at least it makes me) squeamish.


IMO you are on the right path with this. But there is another solution as blackballing independent media, just include them in your marketing strategies! That is what "real sportorganisations" do allready as they are dependent on coverage from big media outlets.
At the moment especially the big teams may not need independent media to get their message out as the community is relativ small and there are other ways, for example comunity sites like TL or Reddit. But I don't think it would be good for teams to try to shut down independent journalists like Slasher. They may be able to do it in this case but when things really get bigger and therefore more interessting for many more professional mediaoutlets there will be no way to control them.

The thing is ESPN or TSN can hype something and they do it damn well. They get people excited and usually have well written articles and analysis. Slasher does not do it as well as EG or TL can. I think they could use him in some way but the teams in SC2 are better equipped to hype than one person on his own who doesn't seem to want to do analysis of these things.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
January 17 2013 21:42 GMT
#135
On January 18 2013 06:04 nkmaNanashi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 17 2013 22:02 skeldark wrote:
You and your website have the power in this area to get away with such a statement, sadly.

You have a total misunderstanding about the role of media.
You think you are the owner of an information.
You think by buying a player you own the information of you buying him.
Thats not the case!

You say: "write what i want or i dont talk to you any more".
I hope that the media in this area gets powerful enough that they can say:
"You dont want to talk to us, then we dont write about your team any-more"

You abuse the power to be the owner of a Team and a Media site. Thats all.

In any real sport or politics this statement would be the end of your career.
At the moment thats not the case in esport and that gives you the chance, to rethink your statement.

If you would not have your own media site/show and no power over slasher,
if he would not need your information at all (Lets say he is a big journalist from a big new company)
Would we have this discussion?
I dont think so...


This!


Post was garbage and did not understand the point of Naz'Gul's statement at all. If this was a "real sport", like the post said, and a reporter was disrupting a teams media announcments, they would just deny him access and black list that reporter. Its very common, these sorts of open discussions on the subject are not.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Myt
Profile Joined July 2011
Germany318 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-17 22:24:50
January 17 2013 21:54 GMT
#136
On January 18 2013 06:07 mrtomjones wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2013 04:57 Myt wrote:
On January 18 2013 04:22 Takkara wrote:
On January 18 2013 04:17 dvorakftw wrote:
Nazgul stops one step short. Yes Slasher can hurt his business relationship by leaking information teams want to keep but if you then cut off Slasher you can limit your players' exposure and the public's opinion of the team. 'Cutting your nose off to spite your face' is the common expression.


I think this is what Kennigit has been saying on Reddit the past day or so. Both sides need to make a cost:benefit analysis and decide what level of transparency and cooperation is right for them. There are benefits/costs to reporting leaks and there are benefits/costs to shutting out prominent members of the press.

I like what many have said that attempting to organize a public blackballing of Slasher is probably one step beyond what the public is comfortable with. No one at Liquid has hinted at doing this, but there were specters of it in the ITG conversation, and I think that makes people (at least it makes me) squeamish.


IMO you are on the right path with this. But there is another solution as blackballing independent media, just include them in your marketing strategies! That is what "real sportorganisations" do allready as they are dependent on coverage from big media outlets.
At the moment especially the big teams may not need independent media to get their message out as the community is relativ small and there are other ways, for example comunity sites like TL or Reddit. But I don't think it would be good for teams to try to shut down independent journalists like Slasher. They may be able to do it in this case but when things really get bigger and therefore more interessting for many more professional mediaoutlets there will be no way to control them.

The thing is ESPN or TSN can hype something and they do it damn well. They get people excited and usually have well written articles and analysis. Slasher does not do it as well as EG or TL can. I think they could use him in some way but the teams in SC2 are better equipped to hype than one person on his own who doesn't seem to want to do analysis of these things.


You are right as long as we are talking about slasher and player announcements. Slasher may not be great or even interested in analysis but on the other side, it is also about credibility and for that independent journalism is crucial.
And for the hype part - that is not the job for media itself, hype has always to be created by the teams. They need just to find different ways to do so and adapt to a new situation. For that I'm with Nazgul, this will change the relationship from teamofficials to jounalists but I don't think this is nessessary a bad thing for any side as long as both sides know how to deal with another.

This hole theme is btw also a question for the future of TL itself. They have to decide in which direction the site will move, I'm pretty sure in a bigger environment TL will lose significance if they not put up more investigative news which would be sad, because I don't think there would be anybody better equipped to not only report the news but also analyse it and put in in the right perspective.
sLideSC2
Profile Joined July 2012
United States225 Posts
January 17 2013 21:58 GMT
#137
Thank you for writing this, and I agree with everything you said. I'm going to be the outlier here, and agree with Alex Garfield almost completely. There is one main, giant point that separates e-sports from real sports, that I think a lot of people miss. E-sport teams make 99% of their revenue from marketing. Sports teams don't make nearly that percentage. When a journalist breaks an announcement over a new signing, it doesn't hurt the sports team. However, it greatly hurts the E-sport teams in most cases. In the case of Stephano, it created a hype train that for sure helped EG, it was almost a game trying to figure out when EG themselves would release the news. In the case of Snute and especially Jaedong, it hurt and almost killed the hype. It's bad for the players, and it's bad for the teams.

I'm not saying Slasher is a bad guy for doing this, but I think an embargo for certain news would definitely help things. I don't however think that teams should band together and completely ban talking to Slasher, that statement seemed more emotionally driven than anything else.

I don't think another debate should be necessary, all the points have already been laid out I think we just have a disagreement.

I think you're all doing a great job.
https://twitter.com/sLideSC2 | (NA)sLide.635 | coL_Sasqautch ~ coL_QXC ~ coL_TriMaster
StarStruck
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
25339 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-17 22:16:43
January 17 2013 22:11 GMT
#138
Yet another one. Everyone wants to give their two cents. Anyway, I leave you with this: "It's nothing personal; it's just business."

On January 18 2013 06:58 sLideSC2 wrote:
Thank you for writing this, and I agree with everything you said. I'm going to be the outlier here, and agree with Alex Garfield almost completely. There is one main, giant point that separates e-sports from real sports, that I think a lot of people miss. E-sport teams make 99% of their revenue from marketing. Sports teams don't make nearly that percentage. When a journalist breaks an announcement over a new signing, it doesn't hurt the sports team. However, it greatly hurts the E-sport teams in most cases. In the case of Stephano, it created a hype train that for sure helped EG, it was almost a game trying to figure out when EG themselves would release the news. In the case of Snute and especially Jaedong, it hurt and almost killed the hype. It's bad for the players, and it's bad for the teams.

I'm not saying Slasher is a bad guy for doing this, but I think an embargo for certain news would definitely help things. I don't however think that teams should band together and completely ban talking to Slasher, that statement seemed more emotionally driven than anything else.

I don't think another debate should be necessary, all the points have already been laid out I think we just have a disagreement.

I think you're all doing a great job.


Don't throw around numbers. You used a gross exaggeration to try and make a point and there is still lots of marketing/advertising/endorsement potential outside of announcing a freaking player. I said it many times in other threads. You want to beat everyone else to the punch you have those pressers ready to go from the signing. You don't wait. Let the rumor wheel go nuts during the process because that way it's all rumor. No need for tunnel vision.
figq
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
12519 Posts
January 17 2013 22:34 GMT
#139
We need more people with such clear and reasonable thought in politics too.
If you stand next to my head, you can hear the ocean. - Day[9]
snively
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States1159 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-17 23:42:38
January 17 2013 22:37 GMT
#140
On January 17 2013 19:40 iKill wrote:
Thank you for bringing a more level-headed explanation to the table than our dear (and slightly angry) friend, Mr. Garfield.


is this a joke. nazgul's name is victor goossens. (goosens? i dont know how to spell it)
i think ur thinking of the CEO of evil geniuses whose name is alex garfield.

thats kind of embarassing.

edit: ok i did it
My religion is Starcraft
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
00:00
OSC Elite Rising Star #15
TBD vs ArTLIVE!
Liquipedia
Replay Cast
00:00
uThermal 2v2 Circuit: May
Liquipedia
OSC
21:00
Mid Season Playoffs
ArT vs ReBellioN
HonMonO vs Ziomek
Shameless vs LunaSea
MilkiCow vs GgMaChine
Moja vs HiGhDrA
Jumy vs TBD
Demi vs NightPhoenix
Solar vs Cham
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 258
Livibee 112
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 795
Leta 306
JulyZerg 168
TY 72
ToSsGirL 61
Nal_rA 56
Shine 21
Yoon 2
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1398
Other Games
summit1g8035
C9.Mang01447
shahzam1003
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream3598
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 17
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH301
• Light_VIP 104
• practicex 32
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 69
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5187
• Stunt376
• HappyZerGling112
Other Games
• Scarra1554
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
4h 55m
HiGhDrA vs Nicoract
MaNa vs HiGhDrA
HiGhDrA vs Reynor
Nicoract vs Reynor
MaNa vs Nicoract
MaNa vs Reynor
MaxPax vs Spirit
Krystianer vs Spirit
OSC
6h 55m
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
12h 55m
Korean StarCraft League
20h 55m
SOOP
1d 2h
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
1d 3h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 4h
Cheesadelphia
1d 8h
CSO Cup
1d 10h
BSL: ProLeague
1d 11h
Hawk vs UltrA
Sziky vs spx
TerrOr vs JDConan
[ Show More ]
GSL Code S
2 days
Rogue vs herO
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
BSL: ProLeague
2 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
Cross vs Doodle
MadiNho vs Dragon
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
5 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.