• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 04:24
CET 10:24
KST 18:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners9Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting12[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11
Community News
StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!33$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship6[BSL21] RO32 Group Stage4Weekly Cups (Oct 26-Nov 2): Liquid, Clem, Solar win; LAN in Philly2Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win10
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" 5.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8) StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!
Tourneys
Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace
Brood War
General
[ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions BW General Discussion [BSL21] RO32 Group Stage BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Grand Finals [BSL21] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta PvZ map balance How to stay on top of macro? Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread Dating: How's your luck?
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Why we need SC3
Hildegard
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Our Last Hope in th…
KrillinFromwales
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1506 users

The Mothership Core - Problems and Solutions

Blogs > Treehead
Post a Reply
Treehead
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
999 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-28 12:18:08
September 28 2012 05:09 GMT
#1
The Mothership Core is, was and will be undoubtedly my favorite new addition to the protoss arsenal. It was created to be a potent unit for economy, for early-game defense, and for use in recalling slow pushes once they are overextended. Currently, it is doing 2 of 3 jobs pretty adequately. The main problems are surrounding it’s attack, which I would like to talk a little about, and then propose a solution to these problems.

Problem: The Mothership Core is currently being used offensively. This is not what was intended for the unit.

The current version of the Mothership Core can be very useful for attacking early. The main challenge of doing so is getting it across the board into an attacking position safely, but this is sometimes a moot point because there tends to be so much space along the sides of the map.

Its range 10 allows it to avoid difficulty with every early Terran Anti-Air when positioned over open space. They can snipe Turrets before the turret can fight back, and 1-shot 0 armor marines from range 10. This means that when positioned over opened space near an expansion, the MC can effectively stop mining until Vikings. Once Vikings are available, they do quite well in taking it down, though it takes several Vikings to take down a MC without losing anything (and once you’ve lose something, the MC has traded effectively).

Against Zerg, as Day9 has pointed out in one of his dailies, the early game use of the MC along with a 4-gate seems very difficult to stop – at a time when the only response zerg has to the MC is Queens (which it outranges and generally trades quite well against). Spore crawlers get the same treatment as turrets – they get killed out of range to be effective as anti-air.

In PvP, the ability to use a MC effectively does a couple things. First, it makes the ramp much less of an advantage (since you can’t deny vision with a flying unit around). This can be a big issue playing against blink builds (whose only issue in engaging is vision) which were previously spending 225/175 on one observer to provide a much more fragile form of vision (40 health vs. the 250 of the MC). This provides blink/obs builds the ability to ignore the obs and get 175/125 more to spend on units (detection aside, this makes blink pushes without detection much harder to stop, and executing blink rushes against DTs semi-autoloss… because PvP needed to be more about build order wins, right?). And then, of course, I’m sure there will be a 4-gate recall build on that winter map with the incredibly close air distances (maybe that map won’t make it, or something – pure speculation).

As you can see offensive MC usage, if you can get away with it poses problems in all matchups. Maybe given sufficiently astute play by your opponent you can’t, but that remains to be seen.

How did this happen? Pre-beta, the MC was a unit attached to a building. It didn’t move and therefore you couldn’t attack with it unless you proxied a Nexus (which is a bit much). So why is it being used so much and so offensively now? It’s mobility has changed, so that it can participate in fights in which it didn’t used to be able to participate.

Problem: The Mothership Core has issues with defending. Because its attack is available for only a short window of time – and the cost of using it is a recall or an energize (both of which are ridiculously better in terms of having more units with which to defend later).

One energize on a Nexus is generally 90 seconds of build time over the next three minutes. That’s a little more than 5 probes, (or about 150-200 resources per minute – not to mention about 225-300 resources if you’re able to harvest at the 30-40 rate as probes emerge). If you get your MC around 4 minutes, your first 100 energy will come at about 5:30. You don’t get 100 energy again until 8:30. By 10 minutes, if you used your first Energize on probes, you’re both mining optimally (somehow, haven’t tweak build order stuff yet, but just in theory) and you’re both still making probes, you’re a solid 450-600 resources ahead. That’s a lot of money – It’s a full Colossus or almost two Immortals.

Ok, we’ve established that Energize is good. Recall is good, too (at least worth the cost of the units you save with it, isn’t it?).

Hey, wait a minute, wasn’t I talking about Purify? Here’s the point I’m coming to about Purify. If you need Energy for Purify, you’re not getting one of these other effects – and for what? If you’re not way behind in army size, your opponent will turn tail and run once Purify hits the field – and during that time you get a few marines, maybe a couple marauders, a stalker or two (perhaps none if they have blink), perhaps more than one roach. See how bad that is at defense? Because you can’t force your enemy to stay (with a lot of FFs – and no Medivacs or burrow - or bad positioning on your opponent’s part) once he’s begun attacking. You get nice bursts of dps – but you can’t keep them around for it, so it just goes unused. And if it is high enough that you can cream an army hard enough to make using the ability worth it, what happens when you get it to the front lines and it can be used offensively? (Hint: scroll up a little bit.)

The point is that energy for an attacking mode is great for offense – but not that good for defense, especially if its duration is low.

My solution
There is undoubtedly more than one, but here’s what I’ve decided I like best. The reason it’s become so good offensively is because it’s mobile. The reason it’s so poor at defense is because its attack is so temporary. So what happens if we make the attack passive, and make the movement the part that’s tied to energy use. This has several effects.

1. We can provide the MC with bursts of mobility during defense. Short bursts of attack may be horrible for defending, but short bursts of mobility are great for it. Why else does everyone and their mother get blink near the beginning of a game if they suspect mutas or drop play?

2. The MC is always available for defending. Maybe it’s not a 45 damage/10 range super-cannon, but who’s going to be able to use it as that anyway – if everytime you turn it on an enemy can just decide to engage again 20 seconds later without the super-cannon available?

3. We can limit how much the MC is able to use its mobility by limiting the availability of its movement speed (through energy cost), and thereby eliminate the possibility of getting it across the map for a rush. If it takes the MC five minutes to get across the field on a map like Steppes of War – who cares if its good during the attack? On this note, you can make it worse during the attack, since its passive attack can have effectiveness of something like a photon cannon, rather than requiring a more potent attack due to its limited availability. Oh, and also, for all you zergies, they could also make it take long enough to get across the field for you to be able to have more anti-air available than hydras, or give it a short enough range to be susceptible to spores. This makes it much more defendable in a “rush” (if such thing is still allowed to occur).

4. This may have a slight “Energy tax” at the beginning of the game, in order to get it into defensive position once it emerges from the Nexus.

Example of Concept
Mothership Core
Cost: 50 minerals, 50 gas, 0 supply, 30 build time
Defense: 150 health, 100 shields, 1 armor
Sight: 14
Ground/Air Attack: 20
Cooldown: 1
Range: 7
Speed: 0

Abilities: Recall (as before), Energize (Range extended to 20 due to restricted mobility) and...
Psionic Thrust
Cost: 50 Energy
Description: Psionic Energy propels the motor-less core forward, granting it a movement speed of 1.0 for 10 seconds.

***
Treehead
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
999 Posts
September 28 2012 05:14 GMT
#2
If you like my solution, feel free to throw it up on the HotS Beta forums. I don't have a beta account and so cannot post there.
monk
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States8476 Posts
September 28 2012 05:28 GMT
#3
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.
Moderator
Jerubaal
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States7684 Posts
September 28 2012 05:36 GMT
#4
On September 28 2012 14:28 monk. wrote:
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.


It should be the mofo'co'.
I'm not stupid, a marauder just shot my brain.
GenesisX
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Canada4267 Posts
September 28 2012 06:00 GMT
#5
On September 28 2012 14:36 Jerubaal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 14:28 monk. wrote:
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.


It should be the mofo'co'.


MSC at least. MC is really really annoying since we already have a player after those initials
133 221 333 123 111
DRTnOOber
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
New Zealand476 Posts
September 28 2012 07:56 GMT
#6
I hereby declare it the "mcore".
But I'm off creep... and so I slow down, what are hellions doing here? I don't belong here...
RolleMcKnolle
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Germany1054 Posts
September 28 2012 08:35 GMT
#7
On September 28 2012 14:36 Jerubaal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 14:28 monk. wrote:
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.


It should be the mofo'co'.

I second this one. Seems appropriate
Treehead
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
999 Posts
September 28 2012 12:20 GMT
#8
On September 28 2012 14:28 monk. wrote:
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.


I always liked MsC myself, but it seemed like I was the only one calling it that.

I edited into my example that normally the MC (MsC) would not have a movement speed, just to make sure it was clear. Anyone have anything they like/dislike about this idea? And is there any chance someone in the beta is going to reccomend this on the b.net beta forums?
SEA KarMa
Profile Joined October 2010
Australia452 Posts
September 28 2012 12:56 GMT
#9
mcore sounds better i reckon, people who are deficient with decoding antonyms have an easier time
"terrible, terrible damage". terrible, terrible design.
MrCon
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
France29748 Posts
September 28 2012 13:22 GMT
#10
On September 28 2012 14:28 monk. wrote:
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.

At least they didn't give it mind control.
docvoc
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States5491 Posts
September 28 2012 15:55 GMT
#11
so basically, the players have found an amazing use for the new unit, the mofo'co, and because of this new strategy that people should have to figure out, instead of figuring it out, people just want a nerf. That sounds kind of... yeah it just sounds bad. Why not let it stay a bit, it isn't as broken as the warhound, its just strong, and it requires micro, so why hate.
User was warned for too many mimes.
Treehead
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
999 Posts
September 28 2012 16:34 GMT
#12
On September 29 2012 00:55 docvoc wrote:
so basically, the players have found an amazing use for the new unit, the mofo'co, and because of this new strategy that people should have to figure out, instead of figuring it out, people just want a nerf. That sounds kind of... yeah it just sounds bad. Why not let it stay a bit, it isn't as broken as the warhound, its just strong, and it requires micro, so why hate.


The rules in the beta are different than the rules upon release. We don't know how strong it is yet. We only know that it's a unit that is doing something it wasn't designed to do and isn't doing something it is designed to do - hence, since we still have time to change it before it goes live, why not?

Once it's released and requires a patch, once they say it's a finished product, there's a different level of "broken" which actually requires a fix.
neoghaleon55
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7435 Posts
September 28 2012 20:12 GMT
#13
Psionic Thrust

heh....
I'm getting a dirty image...

what?!
my favorite player is known as yadongking
lol
moo...for DRG
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 37m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 204
ProTech124
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 6556
Zeus 781
Larva 521
actioN 512
Killer 377
Soma 178
ToSsGirL 98
NaDa 35
sorry 32
Hm[arnc] 17
[ Show more ]
NotJumperer 17
Sharp 14
Sacsri 12
Bale 11
HiyA 10
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm108
LuMiX1
League of Legends
JimRising 529
Reynor90
Counter-Strike
fl0m2159
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor46
Other Games
summit1g17672
C9.Mang0382
XaKoH 116
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick638
Counter-Strike
PGL140
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 14
• Adnapsc2 13
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2600
• Stunt622
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
37m
IPSL
8h 37m
dxtr13 vs OldBoy
Napoleon vs Doodle
LAN Event
8h 37m
Lambo vs Clem
Scarlett vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs TBD
Zoun vs TBD
BSL 21
10h 37m
Gosudark vs Kyrie
Gypsy vs OyAji
UltrA vs Radley
Dandy vs Ptak
Replay Cast
13h 37m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d 2h
LAN Event
1d 5h
IPSL
1d 8h
JDConan vs WIZARD
WolFix vs Cross
BSL 21
1d 10h
spx vs rasowy
HBO vs KameZerg
Cross vs Razz
dxtr13 vs ZZZero
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
1d 23h
Wardi Open
2 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
Classic vs Solar
herO vs Cure
Reynor vs GuMiho
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Solar vs Zoun
MaxPax vs Bunny
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Classic vs Creator
Cure vs TriGGeR
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 21 Points
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual

Upcoming

SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.